Videoton vs Vasas: match statistics
Videoton vs Vasas: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Videoton played against Vasas in NB II (Hungary). The game was played on April 26, 2026. Final score: 0:2.
Recent form
Videoton has 2 wins, 3 draws and 0 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.80 points per game. Vasas has 4 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss, with 2.40 points per game.
Scoring records
Videoton scores 1.35 goals per game and allows 0.96. Vasas scores 1.96 and allows 0.77. Games in this league average 2.53 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 46% of Videoton's games and 27% of Vasas's. The Over 2.5 rates are 35% and 46%, compared with league averages of 48% for BTTS and 45% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Vasas has the higher season xG average, 1.77 to 1.37 per game. Videoton takes 9.9 shots per game, while Vasas takes 13.9.
First-half and second-half trends
Videoton leads at halftime in 42% of its games and scores 0.65 goals per game after halftime. Vasas leads at halftime in 42% and scores 1.04 after halftime.
When the teams score
Videoton's most productive scoring window is minutes 46-60 (12 goals). For Vasas, it is minutes 76-90+ (16 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
NB II games average 2.53 goals. Both teams score in 48% of games, and 45% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 0 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Vasas is the favorite for this match: they sit 1st in the table and have a 62% win rate away (17 wins this season), while Videoton have a 46% home win rate and 10 wins overall. Offensively the visitors are more efficient — averaging 1.85 goals per away match versus 1.23 for the hosts at home; in the last 5 matches Vasas scored 13 goals and Videoton 8, with shot conversion 14% vs 8% and average shots 13.23 vs 10.83. Defensively Vasas also perform better: conceding 0.38 goals away versus 0.62 for the hosts at home, lower xG against (0.89 vs 1.08) and higher xG for (1.66 vs 1.33), and a higher clean sheet rate 69% vs 54% favoring the visitors. Last 5 form shows 4 wins and 1 loss for Vasas (wwwwl) with 2.4 points per game, while Videoton are unbeaten in 5 (2 wins, 3 draws) with 1.8 points; this indicates the hosts’ resilience but lower offensive effectiveness. Based on superior productivity (1.85 vs 1.23 goals), better xG and efficiency, and dominance in possession and shots, I predict a victory for the visitors.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Vasas is clearly defensively organized — they keep a clean sheet in 69% of matches and concede only 0.38 goals per game, with a season share of matches with both teams scoring for Vasas at just 15%. Videoton, on the other hand, averages 2.08 goals per game (35 goals this season) and has seen BTTS in 60% of its last 5 matches, but its season BTTS rate is 38% and it concedes 1.15 goals per game. xG analysis shows a moderate attacking edge for Videoton (xG 1.88 vs 1.66 for Vasas), while Vasas is better at limiting opponents (xG conceded 0.89 vs 1.06). League-wide BTTS rate is 48% and clean sheets 57%, so both teams are below the league average for mutual scoring (38% and 15%), which together with Vasas’ 20% BTTS in the last 5 matches strengthens the no-goals-for-both scenario. Therefore I rate this market as 'No' with a 70% probability versus 30% for 'BTTS - Yes'.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The model based on average xG gives 1.39 expected goals for Videoton (xG_for 1.88 vs xG_against Vasas 0.89) and 1.36 for Vasas (xG_for 1.66 vs xG_against Videoton 1.06), totaling 2.75 goals. A Poisson distribution with λ=2.75 yields P(≥2)=76%, P(≥3)=52% and P(≥4)=30%, which directly translates to a high probability for Over 1.5 and a moderate probability for Over 2.5. Seasonal stats support this: Videoton has 77% of matches over 1.5 and 92% of matches with at least one goal, Vasas has 62% Over 1.5 and has scored 13 goals in the last 5 matches (avg 2.6). Additionally, both teams take many shots (14.62 vs 13.23 per match, on target 5.77 vs 5.15) with a conversion rate of 14%, increasing actual goal production. Conclusion: pick Over 1.5 as the strongest signal (76% according to the model and data), while Over 3.5 remains much less likely (~30%).
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
First-half statistics favor the visitors: Vasas led at the break in 8 of 13 matches (62%) and averages 1.00 goals by half-time versus 0.85 for Videoton; additionally Vasas concedes only 0.15 goals on average before the break, while Videoton concedes 0.69. Form and recent figures also favor the visitors — in the last five matches Vasas averages 2.6 goals versus Videoton’s 1.6 and holds a 4 wins in 5 record. On the other hand Videoton is stronger after the break: they score an average of 1.23 goals in second halves and accumulate 2.23 points in the second half, giving them a real chance of a turnaround. Considering Vasas’s first-half advantage and their high scoring in recent matches, I project 2/2 (visitors leading at the break and winning) as the most likely scenario, with a meaningful probability for X/2 and X/X.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Videoton | Vasas | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 34% | 39% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.14 | 0.13 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.41 | 0.36 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Vasas is 33% better for: last-5 form.
1.8 pts / game - Videoton · 2.4 pts / game - Vasas
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Vasas is 45% better for: goals scored per game.
1.35 goals / game - Videoton · 1.96 goals / game - Vasas
Vasas is 25% better for: goals allowed per game.
0.96 goals / game - Videoton · 0.77 goals / game - Vasas
Videoton scores in 77% of games (20 of 26 meczów), while Vasas keeps a clean sheet in 62% (16 of 26 meczów).
Vasas scores in 77% of games (20 of 26 meczów), while Videoton keeps a clean sheet in 38% (10 of 26 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Videoton
Over / Under - Vasas
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Videoton - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 42% of games and wins 38%. Usually protects a halftime lead through the final whistle.
Allows 0.1 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Vasas - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 42% of games and wins 65%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 2.20 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.0 | 0.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.2 | 0.4 |
| Average goals per game | 1.2 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 60% |
| No goal | 20% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +4 | +1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 2.20 | 2.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.8 | 1.8 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.2 | 0.4 |
| Average goals per game | 1.0 | 2.2 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 80% |
| No goal | 20% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +3 | +7 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (12 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -7 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (16 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +12 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Videoton
Vasas
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (NB II).
Teams vs league
| Videoton | Liga | Vasas | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 2.31 | 2.53 | ▲ 2.73 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 46% | 48% | ▼ 27% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 35% | 45% | • 46% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 38% | 29% | ▲ 62% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 73% | 70% | • 69% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 77% | 80% | ▼ 73% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from Videoton's perspective: 0 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss against Vasas. Games average 2.00 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Videoton vs Vasas?
The NB II match finished Videoton 0:2 Vasas. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Videoton vs Vasas?
Videoton score 1.35 goals per game on average and Vasas 1.96. The NB II average is 2.53 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 45% of games. Both teams score in 46% of Videoton's matches and 27% of Vasas's.
What form are Videoton and Vasas in?
Over the last 5 games Videoton have a 2-3-0 record (1.80 points per game) and Vasas 4-0-1 (2.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Videoton vs Vasas?
The statistical background for Videoton vs Vasas — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


