Vihren Sandanski vs Fratria: match statistics
Vihren Sandanski vs Fratria: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Vihren Sandanski played against Fratria in Second League (Bulgaria). The game was played on May 4, 2026. Final score: 2:1.
Recent form
Vihren Sandanski has 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.40 points per game. Fratria has 2 wins, 3 draws and 0 losses, with 1.80 points per game.
Scoring records
Vihren Sandanski scores 1.86 goals per game and allows 1.14. Fratria scores 1.86 and allows 0.89. Games in this league average 2.49 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 48% of Vihren Sandanski's games and 54% of Fratria's. The Over 2.5 rates are 55% and 46%, compared with league averages of 45% for BTTS and 44% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Fratria has the higher season xG average, 1.67 to 1.57 per game. Vihren Sandanski takes 11.1 shots per game, while Fratria takes 12.3.
First-half and second-half trends
Vihren Sandanski leads at halftime in 34% of its games and scores 0.93 goals per game after halftime. Fratria leads at halftime in 50% and scores 0.96 after halftime.
When the teams score
Vihren Sandanski's most productive scoring window is minutes 0-15 (11 goals). For Fratria, it is minutes 61-75 (15 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Second League games average 2.49 goals. Both teams score in 45% of games, and 44% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 0 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Vihren Sandanski holds a clear advantage in home metrics: at home they average 2.21 goals per game, 16.08 shots with 10.38 on target and an xG of 2.04, whereas Fratria away averages 1.43 goals, 11.14 shots and 6.43 shots on target with xG 1.53. In the last 5 matches both sides have scored 10 goals each, but Fratria remains unbeaten (0 losses, 1.8 points per game) compared to Vihren, who have 1.4 points and 2 losses in that period. Defensively the hosts also look better at home: they concede 0.79 goals on average and keep clean sheets in 43% of matches, while the visitors concede 0.86 on the road and have 29% clean sheets. At home Vihren win 64% of matches versus Fratria’s 43% away win rate, and the hosts’ goal difference at the stadium is +20 compared to the visitors’ +8 on the road, which favors the home side. Considering the xG advantage (2.04 vs 1.53), higher number of shots on target (10.38 vs 6.43) and better clean sheet rate, I favor a Vihren win and assign probabilities of 60% for the hosts, 25% for a draw and 15% for an away victory.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
I back BTTS - Yes — both teams display relatively high scoring rates this season: Vihren 50% of matches with both teams scoring, Fratria 57%, averaging ~54% versus the league level of 45%. In the last 5 matches Fratria recorded BTTS in 80% of games, Vihren in 40%, and both teams scored 10 goals and conceded 5 (averaging 2.0 scored and 1.0 conceded per match), indicating form favorable to goals from both sides. xG and shot data confirm offensive potential: Vihren generates 1.83 xG with 7.5 shots on target, Fratria 1.53 xG with 6.43 shots on target, while Fratria concedes 1.60 xG per match versus Vihren's 1.10 xG, so the home side has realistic scoring chances and Fratria also creates opportunities. Although both teams concede below 1 goal on average across the season (0.93 and 0.86) and Vihren has 43% clean sheets, the predominance of attacking signals and Fratria's high BTTS rate (80% in L5) lead me to price BTTS at roughly 62% versus 38% for No Goal.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Data indicate a high goal potential: Vihren averages 2.29 goals per match, Fratria 1.43, giving a combined seasonal average of 3.72 goals. An xG-based model (attacking xG 1.83 for Vihren and 1.53 for Fratria, defensive xG 1.10 for Vihren and 1.60 for Fratria) yields an expectation of 1.72 goals for the home side and 1.32 for the away side, total 3.04. At this total the probability distribution implies roughly 81% chance of Over 1.5, about 59% for Over 2.5 and around 36% for Over 3.5, and in the last 5 matches both teams produced Over 2.5 in 60% of cases. Seasonal Over 2.5 rates are 64% for Vihren versus 29% for Fratria, and seasonal BTTS is 50% and 57%, so the strongest and most reliable signal is Over 1.5.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Vihren holds a clear advantage: the hosts led at the break in 8 matches (57%), score on average 1.00 goal in the first half while conceding only 0.43, and at home they average 2.29 goals and win 71% of fixtures. Fratria away averages 1.43 goals per game and concedes 0.86; its xG is 1.53 versus the hosts’ 1.83, while xG against is 1.60 for Fratria and 1.10 for Vihren, suggesting superior chance creation and a larger defensive gap for the visitors. After the break Vihren improves further — in second halves they average 1.29 goals (vs 0.64 for Fratria) and have 86% of matches with at least one goal after the interval, so they can maintain or extend a lead. Considering the 57% HT leads and 71% home win rate, the most likely scenario is the hosts leading at half-time and winning at full-time (1/1); alternatives include a draw at half-time with a later Vihren win (X/1) and a full-time draw (X/X).
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Vihren Sandanski | Fratria | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 60% | 57% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.14 | 0.14 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.28 | 0.27 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Fratria is 29% better for: last-5 form.
1.4 pts / game - Vihren Sandanski · 1.8 pts / game - Fratria
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Fratria is 28% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.14 goals / game - Vihren Sandanski · 0.89 goals / game - Fratria
Vihren Sandanski scores in 72% of games (21 of 29 games), while Fratria keeps a clean sheet in 36% (10 of 28 games).
Fratria scores in 86% of games (24 of 28 games), while Vihren Sandanski keeps a clean sheet in 34% (10 of 29 games).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Vihren Sandanski
Over / Under - Fratria
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Fratria is 22% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.52 pts / game - Vihren Sandanski · 1.86 pts / game - Fratria
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Vihren Sandanski - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 34% of games and wins 52%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
Fratria - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 50% of games and wins 57%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.60 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 1.4 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 40% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +3 | +2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 2.00 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 0.4 |
| Average goals per game | 1.6 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 20% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +2 | +3 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (11 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (15 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Vihren Sandanski
Fratria
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Second League).
Teams vs league
| Vihren Sandanski | Liga | Fratria | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 3.00 | 2.49 | ▲ 2.75 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 48% | 45% | ▲ 54% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 55% | 44% | ▲ 46% |
| Clean sheets | • 34% | 33% | ▲ 36% |
| Goal before half-time | • 69% | 70% | ▲ 82% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 69% | 72% | ▲ 75% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Other recorded players
Away team
Other recorded players
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
- FratriaGoalMiroslav Kalinov Marinov
- Vihren SandanskiGoalMario Topuzov
- Vihren SandanskiGoalMonir Al Badarin
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from Vihren Sandanski's perspective: 0 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss against Fratria. Games average 2.00 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Vihren Sandanski vs Fratria?
The Second League match finished Vihren Sandanski 2:1 Fratria. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Vihren Sandanski vs Fratria?
Vihren Sandanski score 1.86 goals per game on average and Fratria 1.86. The Second League average is 2.49 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 44% of games. Both teams score in 48% of Vihren Sandanski's matches and 54% of Fratria's.
What form are Vihren Sandanski and Fratria in?
Over the last 5 games Vihren Sandanski have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Fratria 2-3-0 (1.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Vihren Sandanski vs Fratria?
The statistical background for Vihren Sandanski vs Fratria — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


