Vihren Sandanski vs Nesebar: match statistics
Vihren Sandanski vs Nesebar: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Vihren Sandanski played against Nesebar in Second League (Bulgaria). The game was played on September 27, 2026. Venue: Stadion Spartak. Final score: 2:0.
Recent form
Vihren Sandanski has 4 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 2.40 points per game. Nesebar has 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss, with 1.60 points per game.
Scoring records
Vihren Sandanski scores 2.30 goals per game and allows 1.10. Nesebar scores 2.00 and allows 1.50. Games in this league average 2.72 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 70% of Vihren Sandanski's games and 60% of Nesebar's. The Over 2.5 rates are 50% and 50%, compared with league averages of 47% for BTTS and 48% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Vihren Sandanski has the higher season xG average, 1.70 to 1.66 per game. Vihren Sandanski takes 13.4 shots per game, while Nesebar takes 10.3.
First-half and second-half trends
Vihren Sandanski leads at halftime in 60% of its games and scores 1.60 goals per game after halftime. Nesebar leads at halftime in 40% and scores 1.10 after halftime.
When the teams score
Vihren Sandanski's most productive scoring window is minutes 46-60 (6 goals). For Nesebar, it is minutes 0-15 (4 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Second League games average 2.72 goals. Both teams score in 47% of games, and 48% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
There is not enough head-to-head history for a meaningful comparison.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Vihren Sandanski lead the table and have won 6 of their 10 matches this season, while Nesebar sit fifth with a record of 5 wins, 2 draws and 3 defeats. The hosts are particularly dangerous at home: they average 2.00 goals per match with an xG of 1.89, registering 16 shots and 6.6 on target, whereas Nesebar score just 0.75 goals away from home. The difference is also evident in conversion rates, with Vihren converting 13% of their attempts compared with 7% for the visitors, who have failed to score in 25% of their away matches. The last five matches overall also favor the leaders: Vihren recorded 4 wins and scored 14 goals, while Nesebar won twice and netted 8 goals. A draw remains a realistic possibility, as the hosts have drawn 60% of their home matches, but Nesebar’s weaker attacking output and 50% away-loss rate point towards a Vihren victory.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Vihren average 2.83 goals at home, while Nesebar have scored 1.60 goals per game across their last five matches, creating a solid foundation for both sides to find the net. The hosts have a 67% BTTS rate this season, whereas the visitors’ figure has risen to 80% over their last five fixtures. Nesebar should create chances against a Vihren defense conceding an average of 1.67 goals, with the hosts’ opponents recording an average xG of 1.37. Vihren are clearly more dangerous in attack, averaging 8.25 shots on target compared to Nesebar’s 4.75 and posting an xG of 1.95, making their goal highly probable. The main risk to this pick is that Vihren have kept a clean sheet in 33% of their matches, but the visitors’ current attacking form points more strongly toward BTTS - Yes.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Vihren have scored an average of 2.8 goals in their last 5 matches, while Nesebar have conceded 1.4 goals per game over the same period, clearly supporting the hosts’ scoring potential. The home side also create chances worth an average of 1.95 xG and register 8.25 shots on target per match, whereas Nesebar’s defense allows an average of 1.28 xG. Nesebar have improved offensively in their last five outings, averaging 1.6 goals per game, while both teams have exceeded 1.5 total goals in 100% and 50% of their matches so far, respectively. The projected total of 2.88 goals provides the strongest edge for Over 1.5 goals, as even with moderate finishing, two goals are a more likely scenario than a 0-1 result.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Vihren Sandanski have a clear first-half advantage: they have led at the break in 4 of their 6 home matches, while Nesebar have never been ahead at half-time in their away fixtures. The hosts average 1.33 goals before the break, compared with just 0.25 for the visitors, with Nesebar drawing at half-time in 75% of their away matches. Vihren’s advantage is also evident over the full match: they win 67% of their home games, score an average of 2.83 goals, and record 8.25 shots on target per match, compared with 4.75 for their opponents. Nesebar lose half of their away matches, score just 0.75 goals per game on the road, and have a shot conversion rate of 7%, compared with 22% for the hosts. The most likely scenario is therefore that Vihren take the lead before half-time and maintain it until the final whistle, making 1/1 the most probable HT/FT outcome.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Vihren Sandanski | Nesebar | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 45% | 49% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.16 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.38 | 0.40 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Vihren Sandanski is 50% better for: last-5 form.
2.4 pts / game - Vihren Sandanski · 1.6 pts / game - Nesebar
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Vihren Sandanski is 15% better for: goals scored per game.
2.3 goals / game - Vihren Sandanski · 2 goals / game - Nesebar
Vihren Sandanski is 36% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.1 goals / game - Vihren Sandanski · 1.5 goals / game - Nesebar
Vihren Sandanski scores in 100% of games (10 of 10 games), while Nesebar keeps a clean sheet in 30% (3 of 10 games).
Nesebar scores in 90% of games (9 of 10 games), while Vihren Sandanski keeps a clean sheet in 30% (3 of 10 games).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Vihren Sandanski
Over / Under - Nesebar
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Vihren Sandanski is 47% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
2.2 pts / game - Vihren Sandanski · 1.5 pts / game - Nesebar
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Vihren Sandanski - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 60% of games and wins 60%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 1.1 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Nesebar - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 40% of games and wins 50%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 2.20 | 2.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.8 | 2.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.0 | 1.0 |
| Average goals per game | 0.8 | 3.0 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 60% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 40% |
| No goal | 40% | 0% |
| Goal difference | +4 | +5 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.40 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 1.0 |
| Average goals per game | 1.0 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +1 | 0 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (6 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (4 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Vihren Sandanski
Nesebar
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Second League).
Teams vs league
| Vihren Sandanski | Liga | Nesebar | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 3.40 | 2.72 | ▲ 3.50 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 70% | 47% | ▲ 60% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 50% | 48% | ▲ 50% |
| Clean sheets | • 30% | 30% | • 30% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 60% | 64% | ▲ 80% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 100% | 76% | ▲ 80% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Other recorded players
Away team
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
- Vihren SandanskiAssistKaloyan Krastev
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
FAQ
What was the result of Vihren Sandanski vs Nesebar?
The Second League match finished Vihren Sandanski 2:0 Nesebar. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Vihren Sandanski vs Nesebar?
Vihren Sandanski score 2.30 goals per game on average and Nesebar 2.00. The Second League average is 2.72 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 48% of games. Both teams score in 70% of Vihren Sandanski's matches and 60% of Nesebar's.
What form are Vihren Sandanski and Nesebar in?
Over the last 5 games Vihren Sandanski have a 4-0-1 record (2.40 points per game) and Nesebar 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Vihren Sandanski vs Nesebar?
The statistical background for Vihren Sandanski vs Nesebar — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


