Uganda - Uganda Premier LeagueSt. Mary's StadiumData current as of October 17, 2026

Vipers vs Maroons: match statistics

Vipers crest
Vipers
1 : 1half-time 0:1
Maroons crest
Maroons

Vipers vs Maroons: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Vipers played against Maroons in Uganda Premier League (Uganda). The game was played on October 11, 2026. Venue: St. Mary's Stadium. Final score: 1:1.

Recent form

Vipers has 2 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 2.00 points per game. Maroons has 2 wins, 0 draws and 3 losses, with 1.20 points per game.

Scoring records

Vipers scores 2.33 goals per game and allows 0.33. Maroons scores 1.60 and allows 1.20. Games in this league average 2.05 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 0% of Vipers's games and 60% of Maroons's. The Over 2.5 rates are 67% and 80%, compared with league averages of 36% for BTTS and 40% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Vipers has the higher season xG average, 1.49 to 1.34 per game. Vipers takes 9.7 shots per game, while Maroons takes 8.2.

First-half and second-half trends

Vipers leads at halftime in 67% of its games and scores 1.00 goals per game after halftime. Maroons leads at halftime in 60% and scores 0.80 after halftime.

When the teams score

Vipers's most productive scoring window is minutes 16-30 (2 goals). For Maroons, it is minutes 31-45+ (3 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Uganda Premier League games average 2.05 goals. Both teams score in 36% of games, and 40% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, 2 previous meetings were available. The record was 2 home wins, 0 draws and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Vipers hold a slight home advantage: they concede an average of 0.5 goals per match, while Maroons concede 1 goal away from home and have yet to keep a clean sheet. The hosts also create slightly better scoring chances, with an xG of 1.61 compared with the visitors’ 1.45, while Maroons’ defense allows an average xG of 1.78, versus 1.20 for Vipers. Both teams average 1.5 goals in these conditions, although the visitors hit the target more often — 4 times per match compared with 2.5 for the hosts. The last five matches offer no clear favorite: Vipers have won 1, drawn 2 and lost 2, while Maroons have recorded 2 wins and suffered 3 defeats. With so few matches played, the home advantage remains modest, but the hosts’ more solid defense supports a home-win pick (1).

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

It is slightly more likely that both teams will score: Vipers and Maroons average 1.33 and 1.45 xG, respectively, while their opponents allow chances worth 1.78 and 1.32 xG. Over their last 5 matches, the hosts have averaged 1.0 goals scored and 0.8 conceded, while the visitors have averaged 1.2 scored and 1.2 conceded. BTTS has landed in 40% of Vipers' last 5 matches and 60% of Maroons' matches, which supports a BTTS - Yes pick, but does not provide a strong signal. Caution is warranted because Maroons have failed to score in 50% of their matches, and the league BTTS rate is just 38%. Even so, the edge in chances created by both sides points to a slight lean towards the scenario in which each team finds the net.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The strongest pick is Under 3.5 goals: the forecast stands at 2.45 goals in total, while the league average is 2.03 goals per match. In their last 5 matches, Vipers averaged 1.0 goals scored and 0.8 conceded, while Maroons averaged 1.2 scored and 1.2 conceded—figures that do not point to regular games with at least 4 goals. On the other hand, the teams’ average xG is 1.33 and 1.45, respectively, so a completely tight match should not be assumed either. All of the home team’s matches to date have finished Under 3.5 goals, compared with just 50% for the away team, making this line a clear preference, but not an unconditional one.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The strongest signal comes from Vipers’ two matches at home so far: they led at the break in both, but went on to lose both. After half-time, the hosts scored no goals in either match and conceded an average of two, pointing to a clear risk of surrendering an early lead. Maroons average 1.5 goals away from home, compared with Vipers’ one goal per home match, giving them a case for a turnaround. The 1/2 pick nevertheless remains risky, given the sample of just two home matches for the hosts and two away matches for the visitors; in their last five matches overall, Maroons led at half-time three times, while Vipers did so only once.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

0 : 1
First half
1 : 0
Second half

Game stats

74Possession (%)26
VipersMaroons
7Shots3
VipersMaroons
3Shots on target1
VipersMaroons
1.44xG0.72
VipersMaroons
4Corners1
VipersMaroons
108Dangerous attacks62
VipersMaroons
8Fouls13
VipersMaroons
0Cards0
VipersMaroons

Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

2.33Goals scored / game1.6
VipersMaroons
0.33Goals allowed / game1.2
VipersMaroons
62%Average possession46%
VipersMaroons
3.67Shots on target / game3.4
VipersMaroons

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

9.67Shots per game8.2
VipersMaroons
3.67Shots on target3.4
VipersMaroons
24.1%Shot conversion19.5%
VipersMaroons
62%Possession46%
VipersMaroons
1.49xG for1.34
VipersMaroons
1.38xG against1.39
VipersMaroons

Shooting quality

Vipers: Efficient finishingMaroons: Counter-attacking
VipersMaroons
Accuracy (shots on target)38%41%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.150.16
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.630.47

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Vipers is 67% better for: last-5 form.

2 pts / game - Vipers · 1.2 pts / game - Maroons

Vipers
LWW
Season result split
67% W0% D33% L
Season (W-D-L)
2-0-1
2.00 pts / game · goal difference +6
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-0-1
2.00 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
1-0-1
Last 5 at home
1-0-1
LW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 2.3Goals conceded: 0.3xG: 1.49Opponent xG: 1.38BTTS: 0%Over 2.5: 67%
Maroons
LWLLW
Season result split
40% W0% D60% L
Season (W-D-L)
2-0-3
1.20 pts / game · goal difference +2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-0-3
1.20 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
1-0-1
Last 5 away
1-0-1
WL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.34Opponent xG: 1.39BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 80%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Vipers is 46% better for: goals scored per game.

2.33 goals / game - Vipers · 1.6 goals / game - Maroons

Vipers is 264% better for: goals allowed per game.

0.33 goals / game - Vipers · 1.2 goals / game - Maroons

Vipers scoring profile: very strong

Vipers scores in 67% of games (2 of 3 games), while Maroons keeps a clean sheet in 20% (1 of 5 games).

Maroons scoring profile: mixed

Maroons scores in 80% of games (4 of 5 games), while Vipers keeps a clean sheet in 67% (2 of 3 games).

7Goals scored (season)8
VipersMaroons
1Goals conceded (season)6
VipersMaroons
2.67Average goals per game2.8
VipersMaroons
7Goals scored (last 5)8
VipersMaroons
1Goals conceded (last 5)6
VipersMaroons

How often they score at least...

67%1 goal80%
VipersMaroons
67%2 goals40%
VipersMaroons
67%3 goals40%
VipersMaroons
33%4 goals0%
VipersMaroons

How often they concede at least...

33%1 goal80%
VipersMaroons
0%2 goals40%
VipersMaroons
0%3 goals0%
VipersMaroons
0%4 goals0%
VipersMaroons

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

0%BTTS at half-time0%
VipersMaroons
0%BTTS in both halves0%
VipersMaroons
67%Scored in both halves20%
VipersMaroons

BTTS and goal count

0%Min. 3 goals and BTTS60%
VipersMaroons
67%Min. 3 goals without BTTS20%
VipersMaroons
0%BTTS - last 560%
VipersMaroons

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

100%Min. 1 goal before half-time80%
VipersMaroons
33%Min. 2 goals before half-time20%
VipersMaroons
33%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
VipersMaroons

2nd half

67%Min. 1 goal after half-time80%
VipersMaroons
33%Min. 2 goals after half-time80%
VipersMaroons
0%Min. 3 goals after half-time20%
VipersMaroons

Game halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Vipers - half-time state
67% leading0% draw33% trailing
Maroons - half-time state
60% leading20% draw20% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

2Points per game (1st half)2
VipersMaroons
1.33Goals scored (1st half)0.8
VipersMaroons
0.33Goals conceded (1st half)0.2
VipersMaroons
1.67Average goals (1st half)1
VipersMaroons
67%Clean sheet before half-time80%
VipersMaroons
33%No goal before half-time40%
VipersMaroons

After half-time (2nd half)

2.33Points per game (2nd half)1
VipersMaroons
1Goals scored (2nd half)0.8
VipersMaroons
0Goals conceded (2nd half)1
VipersMaroons
1Average goals (2nd half)1.8
VipersMaroons
100%Clean sheet after half-time40%
VipersMaroons
33%No goal after half-time60%
VipersMaroons

Vipers - second-half results

67% W33% D0% L
6
Half-time points
4
Half-time goals
+3
Goal difference (1st half)
7
Second-half points
+3
Goal difference (2nd half)
2.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at halftime in 67% of games and wins 67%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime-0.3

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Maroons - second-half results

20% W40% D40% L
10
Half-time points
4
Half-time goals
+3
Goal difference (1st half)
5
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
2.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding67%

Leads at halftime in 60% of games and wins 40%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.

Defense after halftime+0.8

Allows 0.8 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Vipers - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game2.002.33
Goals scored / game1.31.0
Goals allowed / game0.30.0
Average goals per game1.71.0
1 goal100%67%
2 goals33%33%
3 goals33%0%
Clean sheet67%100%
No goal33%33%
Goal difference+3+3
Half-time: 67% leading - 0% draw - 33% trailing
2nd half: 67% won - 33% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 4
Maroons - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game2.001.00
Goals scored / game0.80.8
Goals allowed / game0.21.0
Average goals per game1.01.8
1 goal80%80%
2 goals20%80%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet80%40%
No goal40%60%
Goal difference+3-1
Half-time: 60% leading - 20% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Vipers
ScoredConceded
1
0
0-15
2
0
16-30
1
1
31-45
0
0
46-60
2
0
61-75
1
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (2 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

Maroons
ScoredConceded
0
0
0-15
1
0
16-30
3
1
31-45
2
2
46-60
1
1
61-75
1
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (3 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

2.73
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.8 : 1.0
Estimated goal split
home : away
133%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
30%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+10%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
54%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
7%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 14 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Vipers

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.11
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+1.89
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.84
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+1.05
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
193%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
40%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.3
Late goals
14% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 14% come in the first quarter-hour.
14%

Maroons

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.05
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.45
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-3.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.26
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.19
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
193%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
99%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
13% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
13%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Uganda Premier League).

Teams vs league

VipersLigaMaroons
Average goals per game▲ 2.672.05▲ 2.80
Both teams scored▼ 0%36%▲ 60%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▲ 67%40%▲ 80%
Clean sheets▲ 67%39%▼ 20%
Goal before half-time▲ 100%55%▲ 80%
Goal after half-time• 67%67%▲ 80%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.05
Average goals per game
36%
Both teams scored
40%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
39%
Clean sheets
1.21
Home goals / game
0.83
Away goals / game
+46%
Home attack advantage
+31%
Home defensive advantage
+21%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
55%
1 goal
26%
2 goals
10%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
67%
1 goal
31%
2 goals
10%
3 goals
2%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Record from Vipers's perspective: 2 wins, 0 draws and 0 losses against Maroons. Games average 3.00 goals, and both teams scored in 50% of them.

FAQ

What was the result of Vipers vs Maroons?

The Uganda Premier League match finished Vipers 1:1 Maroons. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Vipers and Maroons?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches Vipers won 2, Maroons won 0 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Vipers vs Maroons?

Vipers score 2.33 goals per game on average and Maroons 1.60. The Uganda Premier League average is 2.05 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 40% of games. Both teams score in 0% of Vipers's matches and 60% of Maroons's.

What form are Vipers and Maroons in?

Over the last 5 games Vipers have a 2-0-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Maroons 2-0-3 (1.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Vipers vs Maroons?

The statistical background for Vipers vs Maroons — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.