Volos NFC vs Kifisia: match statistics
Volos NFC vs Kifisia: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Volos NFC played against Kifisia in Super League (Greece). The game was played on December 6, 2025. Final score: 1:1.
Recent form
Volos NFC has 3 wins, 0 draws and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.80 points per game. Kifisia has 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses, with 1.40 points per game.
Scoring records
Volos NFC scores 1.25 goals per game and allows 1.25. Kifisia scores 1.67 and allows 1.75. Games in this league average 2.75 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 42% of Volos NFC's games and 75% of Kifisia's. The Over 2.5 rates are 50% and 75%, compared with league averages of 49% for BTTS and 51% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Kifisia has the higher season xG average, 1.49 to 1.19 per game. Volos NFC takes 11.4 shots per game, while Kifisia takes 13.9.
First-half and second-half trends
Volos NFC leads at halftime in 50% of its games and scores 0.50 goals per game after halftime. Kifisia leads at halftime in 33% and scores 0.92 after halftime.
When the teams score
Volos NFC's most productive scoring window is minutes 16-30 (5 goals). For Kifisia, it is minutes 76-90+ (6 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Super League games average 2.75 goals. Both teams score in 49% of games, and 51% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
There is not enough head-to-head history for a meaningful comparison.
Stats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Volos NFC | Kifisia | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 37% | 36% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.10 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.29 | 0.33 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Volos NFC is 29% better for: last-5 form.
1.8 pts / game - Volos NFC · 1.4 pts / game - Kifisia
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Kifisia is 34% better for: goals scored per game.
1.25 goals / game - Volos NFC · 1.67 goals / game - Kifisia
Volos NFC is 40% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.25 goals / game - Volos NFC · 1.75 goals / game - Kifisia
Volos NFC scores in 67% of games (8 of 12 meczów), while Kifisia keeps a clean sheet in 8% (1 of 12 meczów).
Kifisia scores in 83% of games (10 of 12 meczów), while Volos NFC keeps a clean sheet in 25% (3 of 12 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Volos NFC
Over / Under - Kifisia
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Volos NFC is 33% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
2 pts / game - Volos NFC · 1.5 pts / game - Kifisia
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Volos NFC - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 50% of games and wins 58%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.8 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Kifisia - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 33% of games and wins 33%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.6 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.80 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.6 | 0.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.2 | 0.8 |
| Average goals per game | 0.8 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 60% |
| No goal | 40% | 80% |
| Goal difference | +2 | -3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.00 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 1.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| Average goals per game | 1.0 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -1 | 0 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (5 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (6 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Volos NFC
Kifisia
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Super League).
Teams vs league
| Volos NFC | Liga | Kifisia | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 2.50 | 2.75 | ▲ 3.42 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 42% | 49% | ▲ 75% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | • 50% | 51% | ▲ 75% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 25% | 27% | ▼ 8% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 58% | 69% | ▲ 75% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 75% | 86% | ▲ 92% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
FAQ
What was the result of Volos NFC vs Kifisia?
The Super League match finished Volos NFC 1:1 Kifisia. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Volos NFC vs Kifisia?
Volos NFC score 1.25 goals per game on average and Kifisia 1.67. The Super League average is 2.75 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 51% of games. Both teams score in 42% of Volos NFC's matches and 75% of Kifisia's.
What form are Volos NFC and Kifisia in?
Over the last 5 games Volos NFC have a 3-0-2 record (1.80 points per game) and Kifisia 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Volos NFC vs Kifisia?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.