Volos NFC vs OFI: match statistics
Volos NFC vs OFI: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Volos NFC play OFI in Super League (Greece). The match date is 5 April 2026 at 16:00. Final score: 1:1.
Current form
Volos NFC: 0-0-5, 0.00 points/match. OFI: 2-0-3, 1.20 points/match.
Goal statistics
Volos NFC scores 1.03 and concedes 1.72 goals per match. OFI scores 1.34 and concedes 1.72. League average: 2.57 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Volos NFC 56%, OFI 47%. Over 2.5: Volos NFC 53%, OFI 69%. League level: BTTS 49%, Over 2.5 50%.
xG, shots and style
Volos NFC has higher xG: 1.22 vs 1.04. Volos NFC: 11.2 shots per match, OFI: 9.5.
Match halves
Volos NFC: half-time lead 22%, second-half goals 0.53. OFI: half-time lead 41%, second-half goals 0.56.
Goals by minute
Volos NFC: 76-90+ (7 goals). OFI: 0-15 (12 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Super League: 2.57 goals per match, BTTS 49%, Over 2.5 50%.
Head-to-head
3 H2H matches: 1-1-1. Average goals 2.33, BTTS 67%.
Match description
I predict a home win ('1'), because Volos creates significantly more chances at home than OFI do away. Volos averages 12.62 shots and 3.85 on target per home match versus OFI's 7.77 shots and 3.15 on target away, and the home side's average xG is 1.26 versus 0.91 for the away team. Additionally, Volos concedes an average of 1.31 goals at home, while OFI concedes 2.15 away; together with a higher xG against for the visitors (2.10 vs 1.56) this points to a notable defensive weakness from OFI on the road. In the last 5 matches Volos scored 6 goals and have 1.0 points per game, whereas OFI scored 7 goals and have 1.4 points per game, however OFI suffer 54% losses away compared to Volos' 31% home loss rate. Considering the advantage in quantity and quality of chances (12.62 vs 7.77 shots, xG 1.26 vs 0.91) and the visitors' poorer defense (2.15 conceded away), I favor a Volos victory.
Half-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Volos NFC | OFI | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 33% | 35% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.28 | 0.40 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
OFI is 30% better for: goals scored per match.
1.03 goals / match - Volos NFC · 1.34 goals / match - OFI
Volos NFC scores in 69% of matches (22 of 32 matches), while OFI keeps a clean sheet in 25% (8 of 32 matches).
OFI scores in 72% of matches (23 of 32 matches), while Volos NFC keeps a clean sheet in 13% (4 of 32 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under — Volos NFC
Over / Under — OFI
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
OFI is 39% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.06 pts / match - Volos NFC · 1.47 pts / match - OFI
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Volos NFC - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 22% of matches and wins 28%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
OFI - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 41% of matches and wins 38%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.
Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.60 | 0.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.4 | 1.8 |
| Average goals in match | 2.0 | 2.4 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 0% | 0% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -4 | -6 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.80 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.0 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 1.8 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 40% |
| No goal | 40% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +1 | -2 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goli). Concedes most in 61-75 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (12 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (16). Late-goal balance (76-90): -13 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Volos NFC
OFI
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Super League).
Teams vs league
| Volos NFC | Liga | OFI | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 2.75 | 2.57 | ▲ 3.06 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 56% | 49% | ▼ 47% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 53% | 50% | ▲ 69% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 13% | 30% | ▼ 25% |
| Goal before half-time | • 72% | 71% | ▲ 81% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 78% | 75% | ▲ 88% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (3): Volos NFC 1 - 1 - 1 OFI. Average goals 2.33, both teams scored in 67% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Volos NFC vs OFI?
The Super League match finished Volos NFC 1:1 OFI. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Volos NFC and OFI?
In the last 3 head-to-head matches Volos NFC won 1, OFI won 1 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 2.33 goals, with both teams scoring in 67% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Volos NFC vs OFI?
Volos NFC score 1.03 goals per game on average and OFI 1.34. The Super League average is 2.57 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 50% of games. Both teams score in 56% of Volos NFC's matches and 47% of OFI's.
What form are Volos NFC and OFI in?
Over the last 5 games Volos NFC have a 0-0-5 record (0.00 points per game) and OFI 2-0-3 (1.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Volos NFC vs OFI?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Volos NFC vs OFI: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.