Wadi Degla vs Ceramica Cleopatra: match statistics
Ceramica Cleopatra presents clearly better form and seasonal performance, occupying 3rd place in the table with a record of 11 wins and just 4 losses, while Wadi Degla sits in 6th position with a more balanced 7-6-5 record. The visitors show better offensive efficiency on the road (13% shot conversion rate vs 9% for hosts at home) and impressive defense with 56% clean sheets away and an average of only 0.67 conceded goals. The visitors' positive away goal difference (+4) contrasts with the hosts' zero balance at their own stadium. Wadi Degla struggles with efficiency, failing to score in 33% of home matches, which could be crucial given Ceramica's solid defense. The last five meetings for both teams show an identical points record (1.4 PPG), but the quality of play and table position speak in favor of the guests, who have a real chance of taking three points in this clash.
Wadi Degla vs Ceramica Cleopatra: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Wadi Degla played against Ceramica Cleopatra in Egyptian Premier League (Egypt). The game was played on February 28, 2026. Final score: 1:1.
Recent form
Wadi Degla has 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.40 points per game. Ceramica Cleopatra has 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses, with 1.40 points per game.
Scoring records
Wadi Degla scores 1.22 goals per game and allows 1.06. Ceramica Cleopatra scores 1.44 and allows 0.72. Games in this league average 1.99 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 67% of Wadi Degla's games and 33% of Ceramica Cleopatra's. The Over 2.5 rates are 44% and 28%, compared with league averages of 46% for BTTS and 33% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Wadi Degla has the higher season xG average, 1.32 to 1.27 per game. Wadi Degla takes 11.2 shots per game, while Ceramica Cleopatra takes 10.7.
First-half and second-half trends
Wadi Degla leads at halftime in 17% of its games and scores 0.83 goals per game after halftime. Ceramica Cleopatra leads at halftime in 33% and scores 0.89 after halftime.
When the teams score
Wadi Degla's most productive scoring window is minutes 61-75 (7 goals). For Ceramica Cleopatra, it is minutes 76-90+ (7 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Egyptian Premier League games average 1.99 goals. Both teams score in 46% of games, and 33% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
There is not enough head-to-head history for a meaningful comparison.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Ceramica Cleopatra presents clearly better form and seasonal performance, occupying 3rd place in the table with a record of 11 wins and just 4 losses, while Wadi Degla sits in 6th position with a more balanced 7-6-5 record. The visitors show better offensive efficiency on the road (13% shot conversion rate vs 9% for hosts at home) and impressive defense with 56% clean sheets away and an average of only 0.67 conceded goals. The visitors' positive away goal difference (+4) contrasts with the hosts' zero balance at their own stadium. Wadi Degla struggles with efficiency, failing to score in 33% of home matches, which could be crucial given Ceramica's solid defense. The last five meetings for both teams show an identical points record (1.4 PPG), but the quality of play and table position speak in favor of the guests, who have a real chance of taking three points in this clash.
View the statistical overviewStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Wadi Degla | Ceramica Cleopatra | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 32% | 37% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.34 | 0.36 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Ceramica Cleopatra is 18% better for: goals scored per game.
1.22 goals / game - Wadi Degla · 1.44 goals / game - Ceramica Cleopatra
Ceramica Cleopatra is 47% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.06 goals / game - Wadi Degla · 0.72 goals / game - Ceramica Cleopatra
Wadi Degla scores in 72% of games (13 of 18 meczów), while Ceramica Cleopatra keeps a clean sheet in 50% (9 of 18 meczów).
Ceramica Cleopatra scores in 78% of games (14 of 18 meczów), while Wadi Degla keeps a clean sheet in 17% (3 of 18 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Wadi Degla
Over / Under - Ceramica Cleopatra
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Ceramica Cleopatra is 50% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1 pts / game - Wadi Degla · 1.5 pts / game - Ceramica Cleopatra
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Wadi Degla - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 17% of games and wins 39%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
Ceramica Cleopatra - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 33% of games and wins 61%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.40 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.8 | 0.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.0 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 1.8 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -1 | 0 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 2.00 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.2 | 0.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| Average goals per game | 2.0 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 60% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 20% |
| No goal | 20% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +2 | -1 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (7 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Wadi Degla
Ceramica Cleopatra
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Egyptian Premier League).
Teams vs league
| Wadi Degla | Liga | Ceramica Cleopatra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 2.28 | 1.99 | ▲ 2.17 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 67% | 46% | ▼ 33% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 44% | 33% | ▼ 28% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 17% | 35% | ▲ 50% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 61% | 57% | ▼ 50% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 67% | 69% | ▲ 83% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
FAQ
What was the result of Wadi Degla vs Ceramica Cleopatra?
The Egyptian Premier League match finished Wadi Degla 1:1 Ceramica Cleopatra. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Wadi Degla vs Ceramica Cleopatra?
Wadi Degla score 1.22 goals per game on average and Ceramica Cleopatra 1.44. The Egyptian Premier League average is 1.99 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 33% of games. Both teams score in 67% of Wadi Degla's matches and 33% of Ceramica Cleopatra's.
What form are Wadi Degla and Ceramica Cleopatra in?
Over the last 5 games Wadi Degla have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Ceramica Cleopatra 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Wadi Degla vs Ceramica Cleopatra?
The statistical background for Wadi Degla vs Ceramica Cleopatra — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.