Waldhof Mannheim vs Erzgebirge Aue: match statistics
Waldhof Mannheim demonstrates significantly better home form with a 57% win rate and a positive goal difference of +4 at their home ground. The hosts score an average of 1.86 goals per match at home, while Erzgebirge Aue concedes an average of as many as 2 goals in away matches. The visitors are in disastrous form with five consecutive defeats and zero points in recent matches, with only a 7% away win rate this season. The difference in xG quality (1.62 vs 1.36) and the significantly better shot conversion rate of the hosts (14% vs 9%) further argue in favor of a Waldhof Mannheim victory. Aue's negative away goal difference (-14) against the solid defense of the hosts makes the home team's victory the most likely scenario.
Waldhof Mannheim vs Erzgebirge Aue: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Waldhof Mannheim played against Erzgebirge Aue in 3. Liga (Germany). The game was played on March 21, 2026. Final score: 2:1.
Recent form
Waldhof Mannheim has 2 wins, 0 draws and 3 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.20 points per game. Erzgebirge Aue has 0 wins, 0 draws and 5 losses, with 0.00 points per game.
Scoring records
Waldhof Mannheim scores 1.62 goals per game and allows 1.83. Erzgebirge Aue scores 1.14 and allows 1.79. Games in this league average 3.13 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 66% of Waldhof Mannheim's games and 62% of Erzgebirge Aue's. The Over 2.5 rates are 72% and 66%, compared with league averages of 64% for BTTS and 63% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Waldhof Mannheim has the higher season xG average, 1.56 to 1.50 per game. Waldhof Mannheim takes 12.9 shots per game, while Erzgebirge Aue takes 12.5.
First-half and second-half trends
Waldhof Mannheim leads at halftime in 34% of its games and scores 1.03 goals per game after halftime. Erzgebirge Aue leads at halftime in 21% and scores 0.62 after halftime.
When the teams score
Waldhof Mannheim's most productive scoring window is minutes 46-60 (12 goals). For Erzgebirge Aue, it is minutes 31-45+ (8 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
3. Liga games average 3.13 goals. Both teams score in 64% of games, and 63% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 1 home win, 0 draws and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Waldhof Mannheim demonstrates significantly better home form with a 57% win rate and a positive goal difference of +4 at their home ground. The hosts score an average of 1.86 goals per match at home, while Erzgebirge Aue concedes an average of as many as 2 goals in away matches. The visitors are in disastrous form with five consecutive defeats and zero points in recent matches, with only a 7% away win rate this season. The difference in xG quality (1.62 vs 1.36) and the significantly better shot conversion rate of the hosts (14% vs 9%) further argue in favor of a Waldhof Mannheim victory. Aue's negative away goal difference (-14) against the solid defense of the hosts makes the home team's victory the most likely scenario.
View the statistical overviewStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Waldhof Mannheim | Erzgebirge Aue | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 38% | 35% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.33 | 0.26 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Waldhof Mannheim is 42% better for: goals scored per game.
1.62 goals / game - Waldhof Mannheim · 1.14 goals / game - Erzgebirge Aue
Waldhof Mannheim scores in 76% of games (22 of 29 meczów), while Erzgebirge Aue keeps a clean sheet in 24% (7 of 29 meczów).
Erzgebirge Aue scores in 72% of games (21 of 29 meczów), while Waldhof Mannheim keeps a clean sheet in 10% (3 of 29 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Waldhof Mannheim
Over / Under - Erzgebirge Aue
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Waldhof Mannheim is 24% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.28 pts / game - Waldhof Mannheim · 1.03 pts / game - Erzgebirge Aue
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Waldhof Mannheim - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 34% of games and wins 45%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Erzgebirge Aue - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 21% of games and wins 17%. Usually protects a halftime lead through the final whistle.
Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.20 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.0 | 1.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.2 | 0.8 |
| Average goals per game | 1.2 | 2.2 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 60% |
| No goal | 100% | 20% |
| Goal difference | -6 | +3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.60 | 0.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.8 | 0.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.6 | 1.2 |
| Average goals per game | 2.4 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 100% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 0% | 0% |
| No goal | 20% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -4 | -4 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (12 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (8 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (14). Late-goal balance (76-90): -6 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Waldhof Mannheim
Erzgebirge Aue
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (3. Liga).
Teams vs league
| Waldhof Mannheim | Liga | Erzgebirge Aue | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 3.45 | 3.13 | ▼ 2.93 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 66% | 64% | ▼ 62% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 72% | 63% | ▲ 66% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 10% | 22% | ▲ 24% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 83% | 76% | ▲ 79% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 86% | 83% | ▼ 79% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Record from Waldhof Mannheim's perspective: 1 win, 0 draws and 0 losses against Erzgebirge Aue. Games average 2.00 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Waldhof Mannheim vs Erzgebirge Aue?
The 3. Liga match finished Waldhof Mannheim 2:1 Erzgebirge Aue. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Waldhof Mannheim vs Erzgebirge Aue?
Waldhof Mannheim score 1.62 goals per game on average and Erzgebirge Aue 1.14. The 3. Liga average is 3.13 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 63% of games. Both teams score in 66% of Waldhof Mannheim's matches and 62% of Erzgebirge Aue's.
What form are Waldhof Mannheim and Erzgebirge Aue in?
Over the last 5 games Waldhof Mannheim have a 2-0-3 record (1.20 points per game) and Erzgebirge Aue 0-0-5 (0.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Waldhof Mannheim vs Erzgebirge Aue?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.