Waldhof Mannheim vs Ulm: match statistics
Waldhof Mannheim displays solid home form with 45% victories and an impressive goal difference of 0 in home matches, making them a tough rival at their own stadium. The hosts score an average of 1.73 goals per home match, with a similar number of goals conceded, indicating closely contested games. Ulm, on the other hand, has very poor away form with just 27% wins and a negative goal difference of -9, conceding an average of 2.18 goals per match on the road. Although both teams won their last matches in overall form, Ulm's away statistics (64% losses) and their low efficiency in away matches speak for the hosts. Given Waldhof Mannheim's advantage on home turf and the visitors' defensive and offensive problems in away matches, I expect a home victory, though a draw cannot be ruled out due to the balanced form of both teams' last five encounters.
Waldhof Mannheim vs Ulm: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Waldhof Mannheim played against Ulm in 3. Liga (Germany). The game was played on February 6, 2026. Final score: 2:1.
Recent form
Waldhof Mannheim has 1 win, 1 draw and 3 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.80 points per game. Ulm has 2 wins, 0 draws and 3 losses, with 1.20 points per game.
Scoring records
Waldhof Mannheim scores 1.68 goals per game and allows 1.86. Ulm scores 1.36 and allows 2.05. Games in this league average 3.13 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 59% of Waldhof Mannheim's games and 64% of Ulm's. The Over 2.5 rates are 73% and 73%, compared with league averages of 62% for BTTS and 63% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Waldhof Mannheim has the higher season xG average, 1.56 to 1.36 per game. Waldhof Mannheim takes 12.5 shots per game, while Ulm takes 11.1.
First-half and second-half trends
Waldhof Mannheim leads at halftime in 41% of its games and scores 1.00 goals per game after halftime. Ulm leads at halftime in 18% and scores 0.82 after halftime.
When the teams score
Waldhof Mannheim's most productive scoring window is minutes 46-60 (9 goals). For Ulm, it is minutes 46-60 (8 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
3. Liga games average 3.13 goals. Both teams score in 62% of games, and 63% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 1 home win, 0 draws and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Waldhof Mannheim displays solid home form with 45% victories and an impressive goal difference of 0 in home matches, making them a tough rival at their own stadium. The hosts score an average of 1.73 goals per home match, with a similar number of goals conceded, indicating closely contested games. Ulm, on the other hand, has very poor away form with just 27% wins and a negative goal difference of -9, conceding an average of 2.18 goals per match on the road. Although both teams won their last matches in overall form, Ulm's away statistics (64% losses) and their low efficiency in away matches speak for the hosts. Given Waldhof Mannheim's advantage on home turf and the visitors' defensive and offensive problems in away matches, I expect a home victory, though a draw cannot be ruled out due to the balanced form of both teams' last five encounters.
View the statistical overviewStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Waldhof Mannheim | Ulm | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 41% | 33% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.33 | 0.37 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Ulm is 50% better for: last-5 form.
0.8 pts / game - Waldhof Mannheim · 1.2 pts / game - Ulm
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Waldhof Mannheim is 24% better for: goals scored per game.
1.68 goals / game - Waldhof Mannheim · 1.36 goals / game - Ulm
Waldhof Mannheim is 10% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.86 goals / game - Waldhof Mannheim · 2.05 goals / game - Ulm
Waldhof Mannheim scores in 73% of games (16 of 22 meczów), while Ulm keeps a clean sheet in 18% (4 of 22 meczów).
Ulm scores in 82% of games (18 of 22 meczów), while Waldhof Mannheim keeps a clean sheet in 14% (3 of 22 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Waldhof Mannheim
Over / Under - Ulm
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Waldhof Mannheim is 74% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.5 pts / game - Waldhof Mannheim · 0.86 pts / game - Ulm
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Waldhof Mannheim - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 41% of games and wins 45%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.5 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Ulm - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 18% of games and wins 32%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.60 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.2 | 1.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.4 | 1.6 |
| Average goals per game | 1.6 | 2.8 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 100% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 60% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 0% |
| No goal | 80% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -6 | -2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.6 | 1.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.8 | 1.0 |
| Average goals per game | 1.4 | 2.2 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 40% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -1 | +1 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (9 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (8 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Waldhof Mannheim
Ulm
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (3. Liga).
Teams vs league
| Waldhof Mannheim | Liga | Ulm | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 3.55 | 3.13 | ▲ 3.41 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 59% | 62% | ▲ 64% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 73% | 63% | ▲ 73% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 14% | 22% | ▼ 18% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 82% | 76% | ▲ 82% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 86% | 83% | ▼ 77% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from Waldhof Mannheim's perspective: 1 win, 0 draws and 0 losses against Ulm. Games average 3.00 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Waldhof Mannheim vs Ulm?
The 3. Liga match finished Waldhof Mannheim 2:1 Ulm. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Waldhof Mannheim vs Ulm?
Waldhof Mannheim score 1.68 goals per game on average and Ulm 1.36. The 3. Liga average is 3.13 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 63% of games. Both teams score in 59% of Waldhof Mannheim's matches and 64% of Ulm's.
What form are Waldhof Mannheim and Ulm in?
Over the last 5 games Waldhof Mannheim have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and Ulm 2-0-3 (1.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Waldhof Mannheim vs Ulm?
The statistical background for Waldhof Mannheim vs Ulm — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.