Poland - 3 Liga Group 1Data current as of October 16, 2026

Warta Sieradz vs Swit: match statistics

Warta Sieradz crest
Warta Sieradz
3 : 1half-time 0:1
Swit crest
Swit

Warta Sieradz vs Swit: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Warta Sieradz played against Swit in 3 Liga Group 1 (Poland). The game was played on March 29, 2026. Final score: 3:1.

Recent form

Warta Sieradz has 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 2.00 points per game. Swit has 1 win, 1 draw and 3 losses, with 0.80 points per game.

Scoring records

Warta Sieradz scores 1.91 goals per game and allows 0.91. Swit scores 1.48 and allows 1.74. Games in this league average 3.42 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 65% of Warta Sieradz's games and 57% of Swit's. The Over 2.5 rates are 65% and 65%, compared with league averages of 64% for BTTS and 68% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Warta Sieradz has the higher season xG average, 1.45 to 1.20 per game. Warta Sieradz takes 10.1 shots per game, while Swit takes 6.2.

First-half and second-half trends

Warta Sieradz leads at halftime in 26% of its games and scores 1.26 goals per game after halftime. Swit leads at halftime in 22% and scores 0.83 after halftime.

When the teams score

Warta Sieradz's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (14 goals). For Swit, it is minutes 76-90+ (12 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

3 Liga Group 1 games average 3.42 goals. Both teams score in 64% of games, and 68% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 1 home win, 0 draws and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 1.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Warta Sieradz are clear favorites: 2nd place and at home have 83% wins, 2.25 goals per match and 0% matches without scoring. Swit sit 8th, with only 27% wins away, 1.18 goals per away match and 2.45 goals conceded on the road. In the last five matches the hosts show better form (wwdlw) than the visitors (llwld), and xG and SoT differentials favor the hosts. Given Warta’s offensive stability and Swit’s away defensive vulnerability, the result leans toward a home win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Data signal a moderately-high probability of BTTS: league BTTS 64%, Warta season 58% and Świt 55%. Warta at home have 100% BTTS in last5 with avg scoring 2.2 and conceding 1.4 over those matches, boosting the chance both teams score. Świt have weaker recent scoring (0.6 GŚ last5) but concede heavily across the season (40 GA), which also supports the visitors conceding and hosts scoring. High league over2.5 further supports goal exchanges. Given Warta's home form and Świt's defensive vulnerability, recommendation is BTTS: Yes.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

xG and goal-balance analysis points to elevated scoring: home ~1.45 xG, away ~1.31 xG, total ~2.76 xG. Warta Sieradz shows better efficiency and the away defense has conceded 40 goals, increasing Swit’s risk. Both teams have high BTTS rates (58% and 55%) and the league averages 3.41 goals per match, favoring overs. Last5 form confirms hosts’ offensive potential (11 goals in 5) and higher over 2.5 rates for Warta. Based on this, the strongest signal is Over 1.5.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Based on the provided stats Warta Sieradz shows higher quality (PPG 1.67 vs 1.00, better xG and higher shot efficiency), giving them an edge. HT data indicate the hosts often draw at half-time (drawingAtHT_home 67%, scoredAVGHT_home 1.00 vs away 0.27), while Swit rarely leads at HT (last5_leadingAtHT_overall_away 0%, trailingAtHTPercentage_away 73%). The second half favors Warta — better points and second-half form (ppg_2hg_home 1.75, positive gd_2hg_home), suggesting a turnaround from a HT draw to a home win. Combining the high HT draw rate at home with their strong second-half profile, the most likely and strongest signal is HT/FT draw/home win (X/1).

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

0 : 1
First half
3 : 0
Second half

Game stats

52Possession (%)48
Warta SieradzSwit
23Shots11
Warta SieradzSwit
9Shots on target4
Warta SieradzSwit
2.43xG1.27
Warta SieradzSwit
7Corners2
Warta SieradzSwit
50Dangerous attacks40
Warta SieradzSwit
-1Fouls-1
Warta SieradzSwit
-1Cards-1
Warta SieradzSwit

Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

Warta SieradzSwit
1.91Goals scored / game1.48
Warta SieradzSwit
0.91Goals allowed / game1.74
Warta SieradzSwit
48%Average possession39%
Warta SieradzSwit
4.17Shots on target / game2.3
Warta SieradzSwit

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

10.13Shots per game6.17
Warta SieradzSwit
4.17Shots on target2.3
Warta SieradzSwit
18.9%Shot conversion23.9%
Warta SieradzSwit
48%Possession39%
Warta SieradzSwit
1.45xG for1.2
Warta SieradzSwit
1.34xG against1.55
Warta SieradzSwit

Shooting quality

Warta Sieradz: Efficient finishingSwit: Counter-attacking
Warta SieradzSwit
Accuracy (shots on target)41%37%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.140.19
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.460.64

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Warta Sieradz is 150% better for: last-5 form.

2 pts / game - Warta Sieradz · 0.8 pts / game - Swit

Warta Sieradz
WWDLW
Season result split
70% W13% D17% L
Season (W-D-L)
16-3-4
2.22 pts / game · goal difference +23
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
10-0-2
Last 5 at home
4-0-1
WWWLW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 2.2Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.43Opponent xG: 1.23BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 80%
Swit
LLWLD
Season result split
39% W17% D43% L
Season (W-D-L)
9-4-10
1.35 pts / game · goal difference -6
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
3-2-6
Last 5 away
1-1-3
WLDLL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 0.91Opponent xG: 1.54BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Warta Sieradz is 29% better for: goals scored per game.

1.91 goals / game - Warta Sieradz · 1.48 goals / game - Swit

Warta Sieradz is 91% better for: goals allowed per game.

0.91 goals / game - Warta Sieradz · 1.74 goals / game - Swit

Warta Sieradz scoring profile: very strong

Warta Sieradz scores in 96% of games (22 of 23 games), while Swit keeps a clean sheet in 22% (5 of 23 games).

Swit scoring profile: strong

Swit scores in 78% of games (18 of 23 games), while Warta Sieradz keeps a clean sheet in 35% (8 of 23 games).

44Goals scored (season)34
Warta SieradzSwit
21Goals conceded (season)40
Warta SieradzSwit
2.83Average goals per game3.22
Warta SieradzSwit
11Goals scored (last 5)3
Warta SieradzSwit
7Goals conceded (last 5)9
Warta SieradzSwit

How often they score at least...

96%1 goal78%
Warta SieradzSwit
61%2 goals35%
Warta SieradzSwit
30%3 goals26%
Warta SieradzSwit
4%4 goals9%
Warta SieradzSwit

How often they concede at least...

65%1 goal78%
Warta SieradzSwit
26%2 goals43%
Warta SieradzSwit
0%3 goals26%
Warta SieradzSwit
0%4 goals13%
Warta SieradzSwit

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

26%BTTS at half-time30%
Warta SieradzSwit
4%BTTS in both halves13%
Warta SieradzSwit
39%Scored in both halves30%
Warta SieradzSwit

BTTS and goal count

57%Min. 3 goals and BTTS39%
Warta SieradzSwit
9%Min. 3 goals without BTTS26%
Warta SieradzSwit
100%BTTS - last 540%
Warta SieradzSwit

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

61%Min. 1 goal before half-time83%
Warta SieradzSwit
35%Min. 2 goals before half-time61%
Warta SieradzSwit
4%Min. 3 goals before half-time13%
Warta SieradzSwit

2nd half

91%Min. 1 goal after half-time87%
Warta SieradzSwit
70%Min. 2 goals after half-time39%
Warta SieradzSwit
17%Min. 3 goals after half-time22%
Warta SieradzSwit

Game halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Warta Sieradz is 38% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.43 pts / game - Warta Sieradz · 1.04 pts / game - Swit

Warta Sieradz - half-time state
26% leading65% draw9% trailing
Swit - half-time state
22% leading39% draw39% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.43Points per game (1st half)1.04
Warta SieradzSwit
0.65Goals scored (1st half)0.65
Warta SieradzSwit
0.35Goals conceded (1st half)1
Warta SieradzSwit
1Average goals (1st half)1.65
Warta SieradzSwit
65%Clean sheet before half-time35%
Warta SieradzSwit
48%No goal before half-time52%
Warta SieradzSwit

After half-time (2nd half)

1.91Points per game (2nd half)1.52
Warta SieradzSwit
1.26Goals scored (2nd half)0.83
Warta SieradzSwit
0.57Goals conceded (2nd half)0.74
Warta SieradzSwit
1.83Average goals (2nd half)1.57
Warta SieradzSwit
57%Clean sheet after half-time48%
Warta SieradzSwit
17%No goal after half-time39%
Warta SieradzSwit

Warta Sieradz - second-half results

52% W35% D13% L
33
Half-time points
15
Half-time goals
+7
Goal difference (1st half)
44
Second-half points
+16
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.43
PPG before half-time
Lead holding269%

Leads at halftime in 26% of games and wins 70%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.2

Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Swit - second-half results

43% W22% D35% L
24
Half-time points
15
Half-time goals
-8
Goal difference (1st half)
35
Second-half points
+2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.04
PPG before half-time
Lead holding177%

Leads at halftime in 22% of games and wins 39%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime-0.3

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Warta Sieradz - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.801.20
Goals scored / game1.40.8
Goals allowed / game0.60.8
Average goals per game2.01.6
1 goal100%80%
2 goals80%60%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet40%20%
No goal0%40%
Goal difference+40
Half-time: 40% leading - 60% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 60% - Half-time goals total: 7
Swit - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game0.601.00
Goals scored / game0.20.4
Goals allowed / game0.81.0
Average goals per game1.01.4
1 goal60%80%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet40%40%
No goal80%60%
Goal difference-3-3
Half-time: 0% leading - 60% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Warta Sieradz
ScoredConceded
2
3
0-15
6
2
16-30
7
3
31-45
6
4
46-60
9
3
61-75
14
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (14 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +8 - wins late phases.

Swit
ScoredConceded
4
4
0-15
5
8
16-30
6
11
31-45
4
5
46-60
3
3
61-75
12
9
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (12 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

3.02
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.8 : 1.2
Estimated goal split
home : away
88%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
61%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-67%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
75%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
1%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 100 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Warta Sieradz

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.11
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.89
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-5.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.46
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.43
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
99%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
61%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.22
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.6
Late goals
32% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 5% come in the first quarter-hour.
32%

Swit

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.35
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.09
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+2.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.28
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.19
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
99%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
90%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.55
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
35% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 12% come in the first quarter-hour.
35%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (3 Liga Group 1).

Teams vs league

Warta SieradzLigaSwit
Average goals per game▼ 2.833.42▼ 3.22
Both teams scored• 65%64%▼ 57%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▼ 65%68%▼ 65%
Clean sheets▲ 35%20%▲ 22%
Goal before half-time▼ 61%75%▲ 83%
Goal after half-time▲ 91%87%• 87%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.42
Average goals per game
64%
Both teams scored
68%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
20%
Clean sheets
1.93
Home goals / game
1.50
Away goals / game
+29%
Home attack advantage
+22%
Home defensive advantage
+10%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
75%
1 goal
47%
2 goals
15%
3 goals
5%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
87%
1 goal
57%
2 goals
32%
3 goals
12%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Home team

Other recorded players

—Bartłomiej Kręcichwost⚽ 1

Away team

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Warta SieradzGoalBartłomiej Kręcichwost

Head-to-head

Record from Warta Sieradz's perspective: 1 win, 0 draws and 0 losses against Swit. Games average 1.00 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.

Swit
0 : 1
Warta Sieradz

FAQ

What was the result of Warta Sieradz vs Swit?

The 3 Liga Group 1 match finished Warta Sieradz 3:1 Swit. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Warta Sieradz vs Swit?

Warta Sieradz score 1.91 goals per game on average and Swit 1.48. The 3 Liga Group 1 average is 3.42 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 68% of games. Both teams score in 65% of Warta Sieradz's matches and 57% of Swit's.

What form are Warta Sieradz and Swit in?

Over the last 5 games Warta Sieradz have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Swit 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Warta Sieradz vs Swit?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.