Ireland - Premier DivisionWaterford Regional Sports CentreData current as of September 06, 2026

Waterford vs Sligo Rovers: match statistics

Waterford crest
Waterford
4 : 0half-time 1:0
Sligo Rovers crest
Sligo Rovers

Waterford vs Sligo Rovers: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Waterford played against Sligo Rovers in Premier Division (Ireland). The game was played on June 12, 2026. Venue: Waterford Regional Sports Centre. Final score: 4:0.

Recent form

Waterford has 1 win, 2 draws and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.00 points per game. Sligo Rovers has 1 win, 2 draws and 2 losses, with 1.00 points per game.

Scoring records

Waterford scores 1.11 goals per game and allows 2.11. Sligo Rovers scores 0.79 and allows 1.42. Games in this league average 2.71 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 63% of Waterford's games and 42% of Sligo Rovers's. The Over 2.5 rates are 47% and 42%, compared with league averages of 60% for BTTS and 50% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Waterford has the higher season xG average, 1.29 to 1.13 per game. Waterford takes 11.9 shots per game, while Sligo Rovers takes 10.1.

First-half and second-half trends

Waterford leads at halftime in 16% of its games and scores 0.58 goals per game after halftime. Sligo Rovers leads at halftime in 21% and scores 0.37 after halftime.

When the teams score

Waterford's most productive scoring window is minutes 31-45+ (6 goals). For Sligo Rovers, it is minutes 46-60 (5 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Premier Division games average 2.71 goals. Both teams score in 60% of games, and 50% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, 6 previous meetings were available. The record was 1 home win, 1 draw and 4 away wins. Those games averaged 2.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 33% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

The draw (X) is the most likely outcome because Waterford draws 67% of home matches, while Sligo lose 56% of away games, which favors a split of points. The hosts have an edge in chance creation: on average 1.11 goals per game with xG 1.26, 11.22 shots and 3.67 on target, whereas Sligo away produce 0.67 goals with xG 0.99, 8.67 shots and 2.44 on target and fail to score in 56% of away fixtures. Both defenses are vulnerable — Waterford concede 1.33 goals at home with xG against 1.98, and Sligo concede 1.22 away with xG against 2.11, suggesting the possibility of goal-scoring opportunities for both sides. In the last 5 matches Waterford scored 9 goals (1.8 per game) versus Sligo’s 5 goals (1.0), but both teams average 1 point per game over this period, indicating inconsistent results. In summary, I expect a draw with a slight advantage to the hosts in chance creation, hence the X pick with a moderate probability of a Waterford win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

I back BTTS - Yes because in the last 5 matches Waterford has BTTS 100% (5/5) and Sligo 80% (4/5), which is a strong signal of form for both sides. Season-long BTTS is 40% for Waterford and 44% for Sligo, but the league average BTTS is 60%, so the competition environment favors both teams scoring. Both sides concede relatively frequently: Waterford concedes 1.6 goals seasonally and 2.4 in the last 5, while Sligo concedes 1.22 seasonally and 1.8 in the last 5, which increases the likelihood of goals from both teams. xG and shot data confirm an open game — Waterford has xG_for 1.25 and xG_against 1.7, Sligo has xG_for 0.99 and xG_against 2.11, with average shots 11.3 vs 8.67 and shots on target 2.9 vs 2.44, suggesting offensive situations from both sides. Considering the 100% and 80% in the last 5 matches and the high xG against both teams, I assess BTTS at about 75% versus 25% for No Goal.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

I estimate total expected goals at 2.85: Waterford about 1.60 (based on xG_for 1.25 and a high xG_against vs Sligo 2.11), and Sligo about 1.25 (xG_for 0.99 and xG_against vs Waterford 1.70). In the last 5 games Waterford fixtures averaged 4.2 goals (9 scored and 12 conceded), and Sligo’s games averaged 2.8 goals (5+9), while the league average is 2.71 goals per match. Historically Waterford at home records 80% of matches Over 1.5 and 40% Over 2.5, Sligo has 44% and 44% respectively; however in the last 5 matches Over 2.5 occurred for Waterford in 100% and for Sligo in 60%, and BTTS in the last 5 is 100% (Waterford) and 80% (Sligo). Additionally Waterford averages 11.3 shots per match, Sligo 8.67, which combined with Sligo’s vulnerable defense (xG_against 2.11) increases the likelihood of goals. Based on this, the strongest signal from the data is Over 1.5 (I recommend backing the line 1.5).

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The most likely scenario is Waterford leading at the break and ultimately the hosts winning (1/1). Waterford led at half-time in 30% of matches, while Sligo did so in only 11%; in the last 5 games the hosts led at the break in 20% and averaged 1.0 goals by half-time versus Sligo’s 0.4. The chance metrics also favor Waterford: the hosts average 11.3 shots and 1.25 xG per game compared to the visitors’ 8.67 shots and 0.99 xG, while Sligo concedes as much as 2.11 xG per match. Although Waterford concedes on average 1.6 goals per game and 0.9 goals after the break, and Sligo concedes only 0.56 goals in second halves, the hosts score more goals by half-time (0.5 vs 0.33) and have accumulated 12 points won in halves versus 7 for the visitors, which increases the probability of maintaining the lead.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

1 : 0
First half
3 : 0
Second half

Game stats

38Possession (%)62
WaterfordSligo Rovers
21Shots9
WaterfordSligo Rovers
7Shots on target2
WaterfordSligo Rovers
2.16xG1.02
WaterfordSligo Rovers
4Corners5
WaterfordSligo Rovers
47Dangerous attacks40
WaterfordSligo Rovers
11Fouls9
WaterfordSligo Rovers
2Cards3
WaterfordSligo Rovers

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

WaterfordSligo Rovers
1.11Goals scored / game0.79
WaterfordSligo Rovers
2.11Goals allowed / game1.42
WaterfordSligo Rovers
40%Average possession47%
WaterfordSligo Rovers
3.42Shots on target / game2.68
WaterfordSligo Rovers

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

11.89Shots per game10.05
WaterfordSligo Rovers
3.42Shots on target2.68
WaterfordSligo Rovers
9.3%Shot conversion7.9%
WaterfordSligo Rovers
40%Possession47%
WaterfordSligo Rovers
1.29xG for1.13
WaterfordSligo Rovers
2.08xG against1.89
WaterfordSligo Rovers

Shooting quality

Waterford: BalancedSligo Rovers: Balanced
WaterfordSligo Rovers
Accuracy (shots on target)29%27%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.320.29

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Waterford
LDWLD
Season result split
5% W42% R53% P
Season (W-D-L)
1-8-10
0.58 pts / game · goal difference -19
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
1-6-2
Last 5 at home
1-4-0
DDDDW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 2.4xG: 1.43Opponent xG: 1.77BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 100%
Sligo Rovers
DDLWL
Season result split
26% W21% R53% P
Season (W-D-L)
5-4-10
1.00 pts / game · goal difference -12
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
2-2-5
Last 5 away
2-1-2
LWLDW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 1.03Opponent xG: 2.15BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Waterford is 41% better for: goals scored per game.

1.11 goals / game - Waterford · 0.79 goals / game - Sligo Rovers

Sligo Rovers is 49% better for: goals allowed per game.

2.11 goals / game - Waterford · 1.42 goals / game - Sligo Rovers

Waterford scoring profile: strong

Waterford scores in 63% of games (12 of 19 meczów), while Sligo Rovers keeps a clean sheet in 26% (5 of 19 meczów).

Sligo Rovers scoring profile: very strong

Sligo Rovers scores in 53% of games (10 of 19 meczów), while Waterford keeps a clean sheet in 5% (1 of 19 meczów).

21Goals scored (season)15
WaterfordSligo Rovers
40Goals conceded (season)27
WaterfordSligo Rovers
3.21Average goals per game2.21
WaterfordSligo Rovers
9Goals scored (last 5)5
WaterfordSligo Rovers
12Goals conceded (last 5)9
WaterfordSligo Rovers

How often they score at least...

63%1 goal53%
WaterfordSligo Rovers
32%2 goals26%
WaterfordSligo Rovers
16%3 goals0%
WaterfordSligo Rovers
0%4 goals0%
WaterfordSligo Rovers

How often they concede at least...

95%1 goal74%
WaterfordSligo Rovers
58%2 goals32%
WaterfordSligo Rovers
32%3 goals21%
WaterfordSligo Rovers
21%4 goals16%
WaterfordSligo Rovers

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

60%
League average

Goal patterns

32%BTTS at half-time21%
WaterfordSligo Rovers
16%BTTS in both halves0%
WaterfordSligo Rovers
26%Scored in both halves21%
WaterfordSligo Rovers

BTTS and goal count

42%Min. 3 goals and BTTS37%
WaterfordSligo Rovers
5%Min. 3 goals without BTTS5%
WaterfordSligo Rovers
100%BTTS - last 580%
WaterfordSligo Rovers

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

89%Min. 1 goal before half-time74%
WaterfordSligo Rovers
42%Min. 2 goals before half-time26%
WaterfordSligo Rovers
16%Min. 3 goals before half-time11%
WaterfordSligo Rovers

2nd half

79%Min. 1 goal after half-time63%
WaterfordSligo Rovers
42%Min. 2 goals after half-time37%
WaterfordSligo Rovers
37%Min. 3 goals after half-time11%
WaterfordSligo Rovers

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Sligo Rovers is 27% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.79 pts / game - Waterford · 1 pts / game - Sligo Rovers

Waterford - half-time state
16% leading32% draw53% trailing
Sligo Rovers - half-time state
21% leading37% draw42% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.79Points per game (1st half)1
WaterfordSligo Rovers
0.53Goals scored (1st half)0.42
WaterfordSligo Rovers
1Goals conceded (1st half)0.68
WaterfordSligo Rovers
1.53Average goals (1st half)1.11
WaterfordSligo Rovers
21%Clean sheet before half-time47%
WaterfordSligo Rovers
58%No goal before half-time58%
WaterfordSligo Rovers

After half-time (2nd half)

1.05Points per game (2nd half)1.05
WaterfordSligo Rovers
0.58Goals scored (2nd half)0.37
WaterfordSligo Rovers
1.11Goals conceded (2nd half)0.74
WaterfordSligo Rovers
1.68Average goals (2nd half)1.11
WaterfordSligo Rovers
37%Clean sheet after half-time58%
WaterfordSligo Rovers
53%No goal after half-time68%
WaterfordSligo Rovers

Waterford - second-half results

26% W26% R47% P
15
Half-time points
10
Half-time goals
-9
Goal difference (1st half)
20
Second-half points
-10
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.79
PPG before half-time
Lead holding31%

Leads at halftime in 16% of games and wins 5%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.

Defense after halftime+0.1

Allows 0.1 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Sligo Rovers - second-half results

21% W42% R37% P
19
Half-time points
8
Half-time goals
-5
Goal difference (1st half)
20
Second-half points
-7
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding124%

Leads at halftime in 21% of games and wins 26%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.1

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Waterford - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.201.20
Goals scored / game1.00.8
Goals allowed / game1.01.4
Average goals per game2.02.2
1 goal100%100%
2 goals80%60%
3 goals20%60%
Clean sheet0%20%
No goal20%40%
Goal difference0-3
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 0% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 80% - Half-time goals total: 5
Sligo Rovers - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game0.401.00
Goals scored / game0.40.6
Goals allowed / game1.00.8
Average goals per game1.41.4
1 goal80%60%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet20%60%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference-3-1
Half-time: 0% leading - 40% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Waterford
ScoredConceded
2
6
0-15
2
7
16-30
6
6
31-45
4
5
46-60
1
5
61-75
6
11
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (6 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.

Sligo Rovers
ScoredConceded
2
7
0-15
3
3
16-30
3
3
31-45
5
3
46-60
1
6
61-75
1
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (5 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

2.71
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.3 : 1.4
Estimated goal split
home : away
100%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
53%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-8%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
33%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
17%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 6 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Waterford

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.79
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.21
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.18
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.03
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
76%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
170%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.42
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.0
Late goals
29% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 10% come in the first quarter-hour.
29%

Sligo Rovers

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.76
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.13
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+5.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.34
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.47
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
64%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
97%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.0
Late goals
7% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 13% come in the first quarter-hour.
7%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Premier Division).

Teams vs league

WaterfordLigaSligo Rovers
Average goals per game 3.212.71 2.21
Both teams scored 63%60% 42%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 47%50% 42%
Clean sheets 5%25% 26%
Goal before half-time 89%71% 74%
Goal after half-time 79%76% 63%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.71
Average goals per game
60%
Both teams scored
50%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
25%
Clean sheets
1.47
Home goals / game
1.24
Away goals / game
+19%
Home attack advantage
+16%
Home defensive advantage
+12%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
71%
1 goal
30%
2 goals
13%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
76%
1 goal
46%
2 goals
24%
3 goals
6%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. WaterfordGoalPádraig AmondAssist: Dean McMenamy
  2. WaterfordYellow cardJohn Mahon
  3. Sligo RoversYellow cardAlex Nolan
  4. Sligo RoversYellow cardOliver Denham
  5. WaterfordSubstitutionOn: Jörgen VoilasOff: Tom Lonergan
  6. WaterfordGoalJörgen VoilasAssist: John Mahon
  7. Sligo RoversYellow cardOliver Denham
  8. WaterfordGoalPádraig AmondAssist: Conan Noonan
  9. WaterfordGoalPádraig AmondAssist: Jörgen Voilas
  10. WaterfordYellow cardKevin Long
  11. WaterfordSubstitutionOn: Cian BarrettOff: John Mahon

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Record from Waterford's perspective: 1 win, 1 draw and 4 losses against Sligo Rovers. Games average 2.50 goals, and both teams scored in 33% of them.

Sligo Rovers
2 : 0
Waterford
Waterford
0 : 0
Sligo Rovers
Waterford FC
1 : 2
Sligo Rovers FC
Sligo Rovers FC
1 : 0
Waterford FC
Waterford FC
0 : 4
Sligo Rovers FC
Sligo Rovers FC
2 : 3
Waterford FC

FAQ

What was the result of Waterford vs Sligo Rovers?

The Premier Division match finished Waterford 4:0 Sligo Rovers. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Waterford and Sligo Rovers?

In the last 6 head-to-head matches Waterford won 1, Sligo Rovers won 4 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 2.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 33% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Waterford vs Sligo Rovers?

Waterford score 1.11 goals per game on average and Sligo Rovers 0.79. The Premier Division average is 2.71 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 50% of games. Both teams score in 63% of Waterford's matches and 42% of Sligo Rovers's.

What form are Waterford and Sligo Rovers in?

Over the last 5 games Waterford have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Sligo Rovers 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Waterford vs Sligo Rovers?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.