Austria - BundesligaData current as of September 12, 2026

Wattens vs Grazer AK: match statistics

Wattens crest
Wattens
2 : 0half-time 2:0
Grazer AK crest
Grazer AK
155%(2.36)
X30%(3.10)
215%(3.13)

Wattens hold a clear advantage in this encounter, especially considering their home match statistics. The hosts win 40% of their home matches, scoring an average of 1.6 goals with a solid xG of 1.43, while Grazer AK win only 10% of their away matches and score an average of just 0.7 goals (xG 0.95). Additionally, the visitors fail to score in half of their away matches (FTS% 50%), and their goal difference on the road stands at -11. The form of both teams in the last five matches is balanced (Wattens 1.4 PPG, Grazer 1.0 PPG), however, the hosts' advantage in direct home confrontations is clear. Wattens' higher attacking efficiency and the visitors' weak defense (conceding an average of 1.8 goals away) point towards a home victory, although their own defensive issues (30% clean sheets) may allow the visitors to score a goal and keep the tension high until the end.

Wattens vs Grazer AK: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Wattens played against Grazer AK in Bundesliga (Austria). The game was played on March 8, 2026. Final score: 2:0.

Recent form

Wattens has 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.40 points per game. Grazer AK has 1 win, 2 draws and 2 losses, with 1.00 points per game.

Scoring records

Wattens scores 1.38 goals per game and allows 1.43. Grazer AK scores 1.05 and allows 1.62. Games in this league average 2.66 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 67% of Wattens's games and 67% of Grazer AK's. The Over 2.5 rates are 48% and 62%, compared with league averages of 56% for BTTS and 52% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Wattens has the higher season xG average, 1.31 to 1.07 per game. Wattens takes 12.1 shots per game, while Grazer AK takes 9.6.

First-half and second-half trends

Wattens leads at halftime in 29% of its games and scores 0.76 goals per game after halftime. Grazer AK leads at halftime in 10% and scores 0.57 after halftime.

When the teams score

Wattens's most productive scoring window is minutes 61-75 (7 goals). For Grazer AK, it is minutes 16-30 (6 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Bundesliga games average 2.66 goals. Both teams score in 56% of games, and 52% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 1 draw and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Wattens hold a clear advantage in this encounter, especially considering their home match statistics. The hosts win 40% of their home matches, scoring an average of 1.6 goals with a solid xG of 1.43, while Grazer AK win only 10% of their away matches and score an average of just 0.7 goals (xG 0.95). Additionally, the visitors fail to score in half of their away matches (FTS% 50%), and their goal difference on the road stands at -11. The form of both teams in the last five matches is balanced (Wattens 1.4 PPG, Grazer 1.0 PPG), however, the hosts' advantage in direct home confrontations is clear. Wattens' higher attacking efficiency and the visitors' weak defense (conceding an average of 1.8 goals away) point towards a home victory, although their own defensive issues (30% clean sheets) may allow the visitors to score a goal and keep the tension high until the end.

View the statistical overview

Stats by half

2 : 0
First half
0 : 0
Second half

Game stats

50Possession (%)50
WattensGrazer AK
17Shots6
WattensGrazer AK
3Shots on target3
WattensGrazer AK
1.6xG0.73
WattensGrazer AK
8Corners4
WattensGrazer AK
44Dangerous attacks18
WattensGrazer AK
9Fouls12
WattensGrazer AK
3Cards3
WattensGrazer AK

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

1.38Goals scored / game1.05
WattensGrazer AK
1.43Goals allowed / game1.62
WattensGrazer AK
44%Average possession45%
WattensGrazer AK
3.86Shots on target / game3.1
WattensGrazer AK

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

12.14Shots per game9.62
WattensGrazer AK
3.86Shots on target3.1
WattensGrazer AK
11.4%Shot conversion10.9%
WattensGrazer AK
44%Possession45%
WattensGrazer AK
1.31xG for1.07
WattensGrazer AK
1.28xG against1.41
WattensGrazer AK

Shooting quality

Wattens: BalancedGrazer AK: Balanced
WattensGrazer AK
Accuracy (shots on target)32%32%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.360.34

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Wattens is 40% better for: last-5 form.

1.4 pts / game - Wattens · 1 pts / game - Grazer AK

Wattens
LLWDW
Season result split
33% W33% D33% L
Season (W-D-L)
7-7-7
1.33 pts / game · goal difference -1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
4-3-3
Last 5 at home
2-2-1
WDLWD
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.34Opponent xG: 1.31BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%
Grazer AK
LDDLW
Season result split
19% W38% D43% L
Season (W-D-L)
4-8-9
0.95 pts / game · goal difference -12
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
1-3-6
Last 5 away
1-1-3
LWLDL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.30Opponent xG: 1.42BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Wattens is 31% better for: goals scored per game.

1.38 goals / game - Wattens · 1.05 goals / game - Grazer AK

Wattens is 13% better for: goals allowed per game.

1.43 goals / game - Wattens · 1.62 goals / game - Grazer AK

Wattens scoring profile: very strong

Wattens scores in 76% of games (16 of 21 meczów), while Grazer AK keeps a clean sheet in 10% (2 of 21 meczów).

Grazer AK scoring profile: very strong

Grazer AK scores in 67% of games (14 of 21 meczów), while Wattens keeps a clean sheet in 19% (4 of 21 meczów).

29Goals scored (season)22
WattensGrazer AK
30Goals conceded (season)34
WattensGrazer AK
2.81Average goals per game2.67
WattensGrazer AK
6Goals scored (last 5)6
WattensGrazer AK
6Goals conceded (last 5)7
WattensGrazer AK

How often they score at least...

76%1 goal67%
WattensGrazer AK
33%2 goals29%
WattensGrazer AK
24%3 goals10%
WattensGrazer AK
5%4 goals0%
WattensGrazer AK

How often they concede at least...

81%1 goal90%
WattensGrazer AK
43%2 goals43%
WattensGrazer AK
14%3 goals19%
WattensGrazer AK
5%4 goals5%
WattensGrazer AK

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

56%
League average

Goal patterns

19%BTTS at half-time33%
WattensGrazer AK
5%BTTS in both halves10%
WattensGrazer AK
19%Scored in both halves19%
WattensGrazer AK

BTTS and goal count

43%Min. 3 goals and BTTS48%
WattensGrazer AK
5%Min. 3 goals without BTTS14%
WattensGrazer AK
60%BTTS - last 580%
WattensGrazer AK

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

81%Min. 1 goal before half-time76%
WattensGrazer AK
38%Min. 2 goals before half-time43%
WattensGrazer AK
14%Min. 3 goals before half-time5%
WattensGrazer AK

2nd half

81%Min. 1 goal after half-time76%
WattensGrazer AK
38%Min. 2 goals after half-time48%
WattensGrazer AK
19%Min. 3 goals after half-time14%
WattensGrazer AK

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Wattens is 41% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.14 pts / game - Wattens · 0.81 pts / game - Grazer AK

Wattens - half-time state
29% leading29% draw43% trailing
Grazer AK - half-time state
10% leading52% draw38% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.14Points per game (1st half)0.81
WattensGrazer AK
0.62Goals scored (1st half)0.48
WattensGrazer AK
0.81Goals conceded (1st half)0.76
WattensGrazer AK
1.43Average goals (1st half)1.24
WattensGrazer AK
43%Clean sheet before half-time33%
WattensGrazer AK
57%No goal before half-time57%
WattensGrazer AK

After half-time (2nd half)

1.19Points per game (2nd half)1.14
WattensGrazer AK
0.76Goals scored (2nd half)0.57
WattensGrazer AK
0.62Goals conceded (2nd half)0.86
WattensGrazer AK
1.38Average goals (2nd half)1.43
WattensGrazer AK
48%Clean sheet after half-time38%
WattensGrazer AK
48%No goal after half-time57%
WattensGrazer AK

Wattens - second-half results

29% W33% D38% L
24
Half-time points
13
Half-time goals
-4
Goal difference (1st half)
25
Second-half points
+3
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.14
PPG before half-time
Lead holding114%

Leads at halftime in 29% of games and wins 33%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime-0.2

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Grazer AK - second-half results

24% W43% D33% L
17
Half-time points
10
Half-time goals
-6
Goal difference (1st half)
24
Second-half points
-6
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.81
PPG before half-time
Lead holding190%

Leads at halftime in 10% of games and wins 19%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.1

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Wattens - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.001.40
Goals scored / game0.60.6
Goals allowed / game0.60.6
Average goals per game1.21.2
1 goal60%80%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal80%40%
Goal difference00
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3
Grazer AK - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.200.60
Goals scored / game1.00.2
Goals allowed / game0.80.6
Average goals per game1.80.8
1 goal80%60%
2 goals80%20%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet40%40%
No goal20%80%
Goal difference+1-2
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 60% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 60% - Half-time goals total: 5

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Wattens
ScoredConceded
4
6
0-15
3
5
16-30
6
6
31-45
3
5
46-60
7
5
61-75
6
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (7 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.

Grazer AK
ScoredConceded
2
3
0-15
6
5
16-30
2
8
31-45
4
3
46-60
3
5
61-75
5
10
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (6 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

2.74
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.5 : 1.2
Estimated goal split
home : away
103%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
67%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-27%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
51%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
8%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 13 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Wattens

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.03
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.08
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.07
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.15
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
101%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
111%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.07
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
21% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 14% come in the first quarter-hour.
21%

Grazer AK

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.34
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.23
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.02
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.21
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
81%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
118%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.05
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
23% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 9% come in the first quarter-hour.
23%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Bundesliga).

Teams vs league

WattensLigaGrazer AK
Average goals per game 2.812.66 2.67
Both teams scored 67%56% 67%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 48%52% 62%
Clean sheets 19%25% 10%
Goal before half-time 81%75% 76%
Goal after half-time 81%76% 76%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.66
Average goals per game
56%
Both teams scored
52%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
25%
Clean sheets
1.37
Home goals / game
1.29
Away goals / game
+6%
Home attack advantage
+6%
Home defensive advantage
+6%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
75%
1 goal
41%
2 goals
11%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
76%
1 goal
40%
2 goals
14%
3 goals
3%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. WattensYellow cardAdemola Ola-Adebomi
  2. WattensYellow cardDavid Kubatta
  3. Grazer AKRed cardMartin Kreuzriegler
  4. Grazer AKSubstitutionOn: Mukhran BagrationiOff: Christian Lichtenberger
  5. WattensSubstitutionOn: Lukas HinterseerOff: Ademola Ola-Adebomi
  6. WattensYellow cardThomas Sabitzer
  7. Grazer AKYellow cardMathias Olesen
  8. Grazer AKSubstitutionOn: Dominik FrieserOff: Jacob Italiano
  9. WattensSubstitutionOn: Christian HuetzOff: Nikolai Baden Frederiksen
  10. WattensSubstitutionOn: David FalknerOff: Moritz Wels

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Record from Wattens's perspective: 0 wins, 1 draw and 0 losses against Grazer AK. Games average 2.00 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.

Liebherr Grazer AK
1 : 1
WSG Swarovski Wattens

FAQ

What was the result of Wattens vs Grazer AK?

The Bundesliga match finished Wattens 2:0 Grazer AK. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Wattens vs Grazer AK?

Wattens score 1.38 goals per game on average and Grazer AK 1.05. The Bundesliga average is 2.66 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 52% of games. Both teams score in 67% of Wattens's matches and 67% of Grazer AK's.

What form are Wattens and Grazer AK in?

Over the last 5 games Wattens have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Grazer AK 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Wattens vs Grazer AK?

The statistical background for Wattens vs Grazer AK — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.