Austria - BundesligaTivoli Stadion TirolData current as of October 15, 2026

Wattens vs Ried: match statistics

Wattens crest
Wattens
1 : 2half-time 1:2
Ried crest
Ried

Wattens vs Ried: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Wattens played against Ried in Bundesliga (Austria). The game was played on October 10, 2026. Venue: Tivoli Stadion Tirol. Final score: 1:2.

Recent form

Wattens has 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.40 points per game. Ried has 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses, with 1.40 points per game.

Scoring records

Wattens scores 1.29 goals per game and allows 1.71. Ried scores 1.57 and allows 1.71. Games in this league average 3.07 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 43% of Wattens's games and 86% of Ried's. The Over 2.5 rates are 71% and 57%, compared with league averages of 55% for BTTS and 64% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Ried has the higher season xG average, 1.77 to 1.23 per game. Wattens takes 11.0 shots per game, while Ried takes 15.6.

First-half and second-half trends

Wattens leads at halftime in 14% of its games and scores 0.86 goals per game after halftime. Ried leads at halftime in 29% and scores 0.57 after halftime.

When the teams score

Wattens's most productive scoring window is minutes 61-75 (3 goals). For Ried, it is minutes 0-15 (4 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Bundesliga games average 3.07 goals. Both teams score in 55% of games, and 64% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, 4 previous meetings were available. The record was 1 home win, 1 draw and 2 away wins. Those games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Wattens have a slight edge thanks to home advantage: they have recorded two draws and one defeat in three home matches, while Ried have drawn once and lost twice away from home. The hosts’ defense concedes an average of 2 goals per match at home, compared with 2.67 for the visitors on the road, boosting Wattens’ chances of breaking through. However, Ried create better chances, with an away xG of 1.76 compared with Wattens’ 1.40 at home, and average 15.33 shots to the hosts’ 12.67. Both teams have won 3 of their last 5 matches, so their recent form gives neither side a clear advantage. Despite the threat posed by Ried’s attack, their poorer away results and higher goals-conceded tally marginally tilt the prediction in Wattens’ favor.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

BTTS has occurred in 75% of Wattens matches and 100% of Ried matches, well above the league average of 55%. Both teams have scored in every match they have played so far, while Ried have yet to keep a clean sheet. The hosts average 1.75 goals at home, while the visitors concede 2.67 goals away; meanwhile, Ried’s xG of 1.76 suggests that the visitors also create chances regularly. Wattens’ recent form calls for caution: BTTS landed in only 20% of their last five matches, compared with 80% for Ried. Despite this, the gap between the teams’ season-long figures and Wattens’ recent run supports a BTTS - Yes pick, albeit with moderate confidence.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The strongest pick is Over 1.5 goals: this line has landed in 75% of Wattens matches and 100% of Ried matches. The hosts score an average of 1.75 goals, while the visitors concede 2.67, giving Wattens a clear chance to score more than once. Ried could also get on the scoresheet, averaging 1.76 xG, while Wattens allow opponents 1.84 xG. In their last five matches, Wattens scored 11 goals and Ried 13, so both teams’ current scoring form supports a multi-goal game. The Over 2.5 line also looks promising, but it has landed in 50% of the hosts’ matches and 67% of the visitors’ matches, making Over 1.5 the stronger signal.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The strongest signal points to Wattens leading at the break: the hosts did so in 2 of their 4 home matches, while Ried were trailing at half-time in 2 of their 3 away fixtures. Wattens conceded an average of just 0.25 goals before the break at home, whereas Ried conceded an average of 2 goals in that phase of away games. The full-time result also favors the hosts: at home, they score an average of 1.75 goals and concede 1.00, while Ried score 1.33 and concede 2.67 away from home. Wattens drew the second half in all 4 of their home matches, supporting the scenario in which they hold on to the lead gained before the break. Ried's form increases the upset risk, as they led at half-time in 3 of their last 5 matches overall; however, their away results still make 1/1 the most likely pick.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

1 : 2
First half
0 : 0
Second half

Game stats

64Possession (%)36
WattensRied
22Shots13
WattensRied
8Shots on target4
WattensRied
2.39xG1.48
WattensRied
7Corners4
WattensRied
61Dangerous attacks52
WattensRied
10Fouls10
WattensRied
1Cards2
WattensRied

Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

1.29Goals scored / game1.57
WattensRied
1.71Goals allowed / game1.71
WattensRied
48%Average possession49%
WattensRied
3.57Shots on target / game5.43
WattensRied

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

11Shots per game15.57
WattensRied
3.57Shots on target5.43
WattensRied
11.7%Shot conversion10.1%
WattensRied
48%Possession49%
WattensRied
1.23xG for1.77
WattensRied
1.51xG against1.74
WattensRied

Shooting quality

Wattens: BalancedRied: Attacking
WattensRied
Accuracy (shots on target)32%35%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.360.29

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Wattens
LWWDL
Season result split
29% W29% D43% L
Season (W-D-L)
2-2-3
1.14 pts / game · goal difference -3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
0-2-1
Last 5 at home
0-2-1
DLD
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.39Opponent xG: 1.46BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 80%
Ried
LWLDW
Season result split
29% W29% D43% L
Season (W-D-L)
2-2-3
1.14 pts / game · goal difference -1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
0-1-2
Last 5 away
0-1-2
DLL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 1.56Opponent xG: 1.89BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 60%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Ried is 22% better for: goals scored per game.

1.29 goals / game - Wattens · 1.57 goals / game - Ried

Wattens scoring profile: very strong

Wattens scores in 71% of games (5 of 7 games), while Ried keeps a clean sheet in 14% (1 of 7 games).

Ried scoring profile: very strong

Ried scores in 100% of games (7 of 7 games), while Wattens keeps a clean sheet in 29% (2 of 7 games).

9Goals scored (season)11
WattensRied
12Goals conceded (season)12
WattensRied
3Average goals per game3.29
WattensRied
7Goals scored (last 5)9
WattensRied
8Goals conceded (last 5)9
WattensRied

How often they score at least...

71%1 goal100%
WattensRied
29%2 goals29%
WattensRied
14%3 goals14%
WattensRied
14%4 goals14%
WattensRied

How often they concede at least...

71%1 goal86%
WattensRied
57%2 goals43%
WattensRied
43%3 goals29%
WattensRied
0%4 goals14%
WattensRied

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

29%BTTS at half-time43%
WattensRied
0%BTTS in both halves14%
WattensRied
14%Scored in both halves29%
WattensRied

BTTS and goal count

29%Min. 3 goals and BTTS57%
WattensRied
43%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
WattensRied
20%BTTS - last 580%
WattensRied

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

86%Min. 1 goal before half-time86%
WattensRied
57%Min. 2 goals before half-time57%
WattensRied
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time43%
WattensRied

2nd half

86%Min. 1 goal after half-time71%
WattensRied
57%Min. 2 goals after half-time57%
WattensRied
14%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
WattensRied

Game halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Ried is 33% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.86 pts / game - Wattens · 1.14 pts / game - Ried

Wattens - half-time state
14% leading43% draw43% trailing
Ried - half-time state
29% leading29% draw43% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.86Points per game (1st half)1.14
WattensRied
0.43Goals scored (1st half)1
WattensRied
1Goals conceded (1st half)1
WattensRied
1.43Average goals (1st half)2
WattensRied
29%Clean sheet before half-time43%
WattensRied
57%No goal before half-time29%
WattensRied

After half-time (2nd half)

1.43Points per game (2nd half)0.86
WattensRied
0.86Goals scored (2nd half)0.57
WattensRied
0.71Goals conceded (2nd half)0.71
WattensRied
1.57Average goals (2nd half)1.29
WattensRied
57%Clean sheet after half-time29%
WattensRied
57%No goal after half-time43%
WattensRied

Wattens - second-half results

43% W14% D43% L
6
Half-time points
3
Half-time goals
-4
Goal difference (1st half)
10
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.86
PPG before half-time
Lead holding207%

Leads at halftime in 14% of games and wins 29%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime-0.3

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Ried - second-half results

0% W86% D14% L
8
Half-time points
7
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
6
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.14
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at halftime in 29% of games and wins 29%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime-0.3

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Wattens - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game0.801.80
Goals scored / game0.21.2
Goals allowed / game1.00.6
Average goals per game1.21.8
1 goal80%100%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal80%40%
Goal difference-4+3
Half-time: 20% leading - 20% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 0% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1
Ried - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.400.80
Goals scored / game1.20.6
Goals allowed / game1.00.8
Average goals per game2.21.4
1 goal80%80%
2 goals60%60%
3 goals60%0%
Clean sheet60%20%
No goal20%40%
Goal difference+1-1
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 80% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 6

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Wattens
ScoredConceded
1
2
0-15
0
3
16-30
2
2
31-45
2
1
46-60
3
2
61-75
1
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (3 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

Ried
ScoredConceded
4
3
0-15
0
3
16-30
3
1
31-45
0
1
46-60
2
1
61-75
2
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (4 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

3.14
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.5 : 1.6
Estimated goal split
home : away
102%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
65%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-36%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
71%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Wattens

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.28
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.14
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.06
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.20
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
69%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
144%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.26
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
11% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 11% come in the first quarter-hour.
11%

Ried

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.03
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.17
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.20
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.03
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
132%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
91%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.26
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.4
Late goals
18% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 36% come in the first quarter-hour.
18%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Bundesliga).

Teams vs league

WattensLigaRied
Average goals per game• 3.003.07▲ 3.29
Both teams scored▼ 43%55%▲ 86%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▲ 71%64%▼ 57%
Clean sheets▲ 29%24%▼ 14%
Goal before half-time▲ 86%76%▲ 86%
Goal after half-time▲ 86%81%▼ 71%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.07
Average goals per game
55%
Both teams scored
64%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
24%
Clean sheets
1.88
Home goals / game
1.19
Away goals / game
+58%
Home attack advantage
+37%
Home defensive advantage
+26%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
76%
1 goal
50%
2 goals
21%
3 goals
5%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
81%
1 goal
52%
2 goals
17%
3 goals
2%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. WattensYellow cardMarco Boras
  2. WattensSubstitutionOn: Moritz WelsOff: Husein Balic
  3. WattensSubstitutionOn: Murat ŞatinOff: Thomas Goiginger
  4. RiedYellow cardAndreas Leitner
  5. RiedSubstitutionOn: Isaac Kiese ThelinOff: Evan Eghosa
  6. RiedSubstitutionOn: Dejan RadonjicOff: Philipp Pomer
  7. WattensSubstitutionOn: David KubattaOff: Marc Striednig

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Record from Wattens's perspective: 1 win, 1 draw and 2 losses against Ried. Games average 2.00 goals, and both teams scored in 50% of them.

FAQ

What was the result of Wattens vs Ried?

The Bundesliga match finished Wattens 1:2 Ried. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Wattens and Ried?

In the last 4 head-to-head matches Wattens won 1, Ried won 2 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Wattens vs Ried?

Wattens score 1.29 goals per game on average and Ried 1.57. The Bundesliga average is 3.07 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 64% of games. Both teams score in 43% of Wattens's matches and 86% of Ried's.

What form are Wattens and Ried in?

Over the last 5 games Wattens have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Ried 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Wattens vs Ried?

The statistical background for Wattens vs Ried — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.