Wealdstone vs Forest Green Rovers: match statistics
Wealdstone vs Forest Green Rovers: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Wealdstone played against Forest Green Rovers in National League (England). The game was played on November 22, 2025. Final score: 1:1.
Recent form
Wealdstone has 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 2.00 points per game. Forest Green Rovers has 4 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss, with 2.40 points per game.
Scoring records
Wealdstone scores 1.53 goals per game and allows 1.42. Forest Green Rovers scores 1.84 and allows 0.95. Games in this league average 2.78 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 63% of Wealdstone's games and 58% of Forest Green Rovers's. The Over 2.5 rates are 53% and 53%, compared with league averages of 54% for BTTS and 52% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Forest Green Rovers has the higher season xG average, 2.06 to 1.56 per game. Wealdstone takes 12.4 shots per game, while Forest Green Rovers takes 16.7.
First-half and second-half trends
Wealdstone leads at halftime in 16% of its games and scores 0.95 goals per game after halftime. Forest Green Rovers leads at halftime in 42% and scores 0.89 after halftime.
When the teams score
Wealdstone's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (7 goals). For Forest Green Rovers, it is minutes 16-30 (7 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
National League games average 2.78 goals. Both teams score in 54% of games, and 52% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
There is not enough head-to-head history for a meaningful comparison.
Stats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Wealdstone | Forest Green Rovers | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 34% | 39% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.36 | 0.28 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Forest Green Rovers is 20% better for: last-5 form.
2 pts / game - Wealdstone · 2.4 pts / game - Forest Green Rovers
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Forest Green Rovers is 20% better for: goals scored per game.
1.53 goals / game - Wealdstone · 1.84 goals / game - Forest Green Rovers
Forest Green Rovers is 49% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.42 goals / game - Wealdstone · 0.95 goals / game - Forest Green Rovers
Wealdstone scores in 84% of games (16 of 19 meczów), while Forest Green Rovers keeps a clean sheet in 37% (7 of 19 meczów).
Forest Green Rovers scores in 84% of games (16 of 19 meczów), while Wealdstone keeps a clean sheet in 26% (5 of 19 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Wealdstone
Over / Under - Forest Green Rovers
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Forest Green Rovers is 63% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1 pts / game - Wealdstone · 1.63 pts / game - Forest Green Rovers
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Wealdstone - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 16% of games and wins 42%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
Forest Green Rovers - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 42% of games and wins 63%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.60 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 1.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.0 | 0.4 |
| Average goals per game | 1.4 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 80% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -3 | +4 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 2.40 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.8 | 1.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 1.4 |
| Average goals per game | 2.4 | 2.4 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 80% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 60% | 60% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 0% |
| No goal | 0% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +6 | -2 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (7 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Wealdstone
Forest Green Rovers
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (National League).
Teams vs league
| Wealdstone | Liga | Forest Green Rovers | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 2.95 | 2.78 | • 2.79 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 63% | 54% | ▲ 58% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | • 53% | 52% | • 53% |
| Clean sheets | • 26% | 26% | ▲ 37% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 74% | 69% | ▲ 79% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 74% | 80% | ▼ 74% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
FAQ
What was the result of Wealdstone vs Forest Green Rovers?
The National League match finished Wealdstone 1:1 Forest Green Rovers. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Wealdstone vs Forest Green Rovers?
Wealdstone score 1.53 goals per game on average and Forest Green Rovers 1.84. The National League average is 2.78 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 52% of games. Both teams score in 63% of Wealdstone's matches and 58% of Forest Green Rovers's.
What form are Wealdstone and Forest Green Rovers in?
Over the last 5 games Wealdstone have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Forest Green Rovers 4-0-1 (2.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Wealdstone vs Forest Green Rovers?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.