Wehen Wiesbaden vs Osnabrück: match statistics
Wehen Wiesbaden vs Osnabrück: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Wehen Wiesbaden played against Osnabrück in 3. Liga (Germany). The game was played on May 3, 2026. Final score: 2:3.
Recent form
Wehen Wiesbaden has 0 wins, 2 draws and 3 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.40 points per game. Osnabrück has 4 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss, with 2.40 points per game.
Scoring records
Wehen Wiesbaden scores 1.40 goals per game and allows 1.34. Osnabrück scores 1.66 and allows 0.80. Games in this league average 3.15 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 54% of Wehen Wiesbaden's games and 37% of Osnabrück's. The Over 2.5 rates are 54% and 43%, compared with league averages of 64% for BTTS and 63% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Osnabrück has the higher season xG average, 1.58 to 1.52 per game. Wehen Wiesbaden takes 12.8 shots per game, while Osnabrück takes 13.1.
First-half and second-half trends
Wehen Wiesbaden leads at halftime in 34% of its games and scores 0.83 goals per game after halftime. Osnabrück leads at halftime in 37% and scores 1.09 after halftime.
When the teams score
Wehen Wiesbaden's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (16 goals). For Osnabrück, it is minutes 76-90+ (15 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
3. Liga games average 3.15 goals. Both teams score in 64% of games, and 63% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 1 home win, 0 draws and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 1.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
I predict an away win (2). Osnabrück holds a clear advantage in form and season metrics: 22 wins and 58 goals scored versus Wehen’s 14 wins and 49 goals. In their last 5 matches the visitors recorded 4 wins, scored 8 and conceded only 2. The hosts have failed to win in their last five (0 wins, 2 draws, 3 losses) and conceded 14 goals in that period. Osnabrück’s away defense looks solid — on average 1.00 goals conceded and 47% clean sheets, versus Wehen’s 1.35 goals conceded at home and 18% clean sheets. Wehen create slightly more chances at home (average xG 1.81 at home vs 1.60 xG for Osnabrück away, 15.35 shots and 5.88 shots on target), but the visitors convert better (shot conversion 13% and 65% win rate in away matches). Considering Osnabrück’s 2.4 PPG in the last 5 matches versus Wehen’s 0.4 PPG and the advantage in wins and defense, I estimate probabilities of 60% for the away team, 20% for a draw and 20% for the home team.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The statistics give a mixed signal: the league has a high BTTS rate of 64%, and Wehen had BTTS in 80% of their last 5 matches, but seasonally Wehen records only 28% BTTS and 61% of matches with a clean sheet, while Osnabrück has 47% BTTS for the season. The key factor against BTTS is Osnabrück's defense — in the last 5 matches they conceded just 2 goals (0.4 per match) and show form 'wlwww', whereas Wehen conceded 14 goals in their last 5 matches (2.8 per match) and have form 'llldd'. Offensively both teams are similar: average goals 1.56 (Wehen) vs 1.76 (Osnabrück), attacking xG 1.56 vs 1.60, and on average 12.72 vs 13.47 shots and 4.72 vs 4.65 shots on target. Additionally, Osnabrück have scored 58 and conceded 28 across the season, which together with recent results suggests defensive stability and a chance of a clean sheet. As a result I assign 40% to BTTS - Yes and 60% to No Goal and recommend 'No Goal' as the strongest signal from the data.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The xG projection is 1.49 for Wehen Wiesbaden (average of own xG_for 1.56 and opponent xG_against 1.41) and 1.38 for Osnabrück (average of xG_for 1.60 and xG_against 1.15), totaling 2.87 xG. Assuming a Poisson distribution with λ=2.87, the probability of at least 2 goals (Over 1.5) is about 78%, at least 3 goals (Over 2.5) about 55%, and Over 3.5 only about 32%. Both teams register a similar number of shots on target (4.72 vs 4.65) and average 1.56 and 1.76 goals per match respectively, while the home side has conceded 14 goals in the last 5 matches (2.8 per match), which increases the risk of a higher-scoring game. Seasonal Over 2.5 rates are 39% for the home team and 47% for the away team (league average 64%), so historically the 2.5 line was not a given, but current xG and recent form favor a goal-rich scenario. Based on this, the strongest signal is Over 1.5 (78% probability), therefore I recommend backing Over 1.5.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
I back X/2 (draw at Half-Time, away win Full-Time). A draw at the break is likely because Wehen drew at Half-Time in 50% of matches and have 78% clean HT halves, additionally conceding only 0.22 goals on average before the break, while Osnabrück scores an average of 0.65 goals by Half-Time. After the break I expect an away turnaround: Osnabrück averages 1.76 goals per game season-to-date with xG 1.60, whereas Wehen concedes on average 0.61 goals and has an xG against of 1.15, indicating greater offensive potential for the visitors. Form corroborates this — Osnabrück have won 80% of their last 5 matches, while Wehen have no wins (0%) in their last 5; therefore the X/2 scenario carries the greatest weight.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Wehen Wiesbaden | Osnabrück | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 37% | 36% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.30 | 0.35 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Osnabrück is 500% better for: last-5 form.
0.4 pts / game - Wehen Wiesbaden · 2.4 pts / game - Osnabrück
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Osnabrück is 19% better for: goals scored per game.
1.4 goals / game - Wehen Wiesbaden · 1.66 goals / game - Osnabrück
Osnabrück is 68% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.34 goals / game - Wehen Wiesbaden · 0.8 goals / game - Osnabrück
Wehen Wiesbaden scores in 74% of games (26 of 35 meczów), while Osnabrück keeps a clean sheet in 54% (19 of 35 meczów).
Osnabrück scores in 80% of games (28 of 35 meczów), while Wehen Wiesbaden keeps a clean sheet in 29% (10 of 35 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Wehen Wiesbaden
Over / Under - Osnabrück
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Osnabrück is 10% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.4 pts / game - Wehen Wiesbaden · 1.54 pts / game - Osnabrück
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Wehen Wiesbaden - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 34% of games and wins 40%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Osnabrück - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 37% of games and wins 63%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.0 | 0.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.4 | 1.4 |
| Average goals per game | 2.4 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 100% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 40% |
| No goal | 40% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -2 | -5 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.00 | 2.60 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 1.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 0.0 |
| Average goals per game | 0.8 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 100% |
| No goal | 80% | 20% |
| Goal difference | 0 | +6 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (16 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (15 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +8 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Wehen Wiesbaden
Osnabrück
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (3. Liga).
Teams vs league
| Wehen Wiesbaden | Liga | Osnabrück | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 2.74 | 3.15 | ▼ 2.46 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 54% | 64% | ▼ 37% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 54% | 63% | ▼ 43% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 29% | 21% | ▲ 54% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 69% | 77% | ▼ 66% |
| Goal after half-time | • 83% | 83% | ▼ 71% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from Wehen Wiesbaden's perspective: 1 win, 0 draws and 0 losses against Osnabrück. Games average 1.00 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Wehen Wiesbaden vs Osnabrück?
The 3. Liga match finished Wehen Wiesbaden 2:3 Osnabrück. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Wehen Wiesbaden vs Osnabrück?
Wehen Wiesbaden score 1.40 goals per game on average and Osnabrück 1.66. The 3. Liga average is 3.15 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 63% of games. Both teams score in 54% of Wehen Wiesbaden's matches and 37% of Osnabrück's.
What form are Wehen Wiesbaden and Osnabrück in?
Over the last 5 games Wehen Wiesbaden have a 0-2-3 record (0.40 points per game) and Osnabrück 4-0-1 (2.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Wehen Wiesbaden vs Osnabrück?
The statistical background for Wehen Wiesbaden vs Osnabrück — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


