England - ChampionshipThe HawthornsData current as of October 23, 2026

West Bromwich Albion vs Queens Park Rangers: match statistics

West Bromwich Albion vs Queens Park Rangers: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

West Bromwich Albion played against Queens Park Rangers in Championship (England). The game was played on September 12, 2026. Venue: The Hawthorns. Final score: 1:1.

Recent form

West Bromwich Albion has 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 2.00 points per game. Queens Park Rangers has 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss, with 1.60 points per game.

Scoring records

West Bromwich Albion scores 1.50 goals per game and allows 1.00. Queens Park Rangers scores 1.17 and allows 0.67. Games in this league average 2.87 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 67% of West Bromwich Albion's games and 50% of Queens Park Rangers's. The Over 2.5 rates are 50% and 50%, compared with league averages of 67% for BTTS and 64% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Queens Park Rangers has the higher season xG average, 1.84 to 1.20 per game. West Bromwich Albion takes 10.0 shots per game, while Queens Park Rangers takes 16.8.

First-half and second-half trends

West Bromwich Albion leads at halftime in 33% of its games and scores 1.00 goals per game after halftime. Queens Park Rangers leads at halftime in 33% and scores 0.50 after halftime.

When the teams score

West Bromwich Albion's most productive scoring window is minutes 61-75 (3 goals). For Queens Park Rangers, it is minutes 31-45+ (4 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Championship games average 2.87 goals. Both teams score in 67% of games, and 64% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, 2 previous meetings were available. The record was 1 home win, 0 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 3.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Queens Park Rangers go into the match with the better record over their last five games: they have collected 10 points, winning 3 times, while West Bromwich Albion have amassed 7 points and suffered 2 defeats. The visitors are flawless away from home, having won both matches while averaging 2.50 goals per game, whereas the hosts are averaging 1.67 goals per home fixture. QPR are also creating significantly more chances, averaging 16 shots and 6 on target compared with West Brom’s 11.67 and 4.67, while their average xG stands at 1.70 against the hosts’ 1.44. West Brom have the more solid home defense, conceding just 0.67 goals per match with 0.95 xG against, but QPR have not failed to score in any away game and are converting their shots at a 16% rate. The visitors’ advantage in recent results and chance creation points to a narrow win, although the hosts’ defensive quality increases the likelihood of a tightly contested match.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The BTTS signal is particularly strong on the QPR side, as they have scored in every match so far, while both teams have scored in 100% of their games. West Bromwich Albion’s season BTTS rate is only 33%, but their recent run indicates a change: in 4 of their last 5 matches, both teams found the net, with an average of 1.6 goals scored and 1.6 conceded. QPR recorded BTTS in 60% of their last five appearances, scoring an average of 1.4 goals, while their xG stood at a solid 1.88. The hosts create even more, with a season xG of 2.00 and 18 shots per match, whereas QPR allow opponents an xG of 1.65. West Brom’s defense has kept a clean sheet in only 33% of matches, so the consistently scoring visitors should create a genuine chance to find the net, making the most likely scenario BTTS - Yes.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The signal for at least two goals is supported by the quality-of-chances data: the hosts average 2.00 xG at home, while the visitors produce 1.70 xG away from home. West Bromwich average 18 shots and 6.33 shots on target at home, but score only 0.67 goals, reflecting a very low 4% conversion rate and suggesting clear potential for improved finishing. QPR score 2.50 goals per away match, while in the last five games, both teams exceeded the 2.5-goal line in 60% of cases. Additionally, the hosts conceded an average of 1.60 goals in their last five matches, while QPR scored 1.40, making the Over 1.5 line clearly the strongest-supported option.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

QPR have a clearly superior season record: they have won 100% of their matches and average 2.50 goals per game, while West Brom win 33% of their matches and score just 0.67 goals per game. The visitors regularly start strongly, leading at the break in 50% of their matches, although a level score after 45 minutes occurs just as often; West Brom were drawing at half-time in 80% of their last five matches. During this run, the hosts scored an average of 0.60 goals before the break, while QPR averaged 0.80, with both teams conceding an identical average of 0.40 goals, reinforcing the likelihood of an even first half. After the interval, the hosts conceded an average of 1.20 goals in their last five matches, compared with just 0.40 for QPR, while the visitors remained unbeaten in second halves. Although West Brom create more chances according to xG, 2.00 compared with 1.70, they convert just 4% of their shots, compared with QPR’s 16%; therefore, the most likely outcome is a half-time draw followed by a late QPR victory.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

1 : 1
First half
0 : 0
Second half

Game stats

64Possession (%)36
West Bromwich AlbionQueens Park Rangers
12Shots4
West Bromwich AlbionQueens Park Rangers
5Shots on target3
West Bromwich AlbionQueens Park Rangers
1.6xG0.67
West Bromwich AlbionQueens Park Rangers
5Corners3
West Bromwich AlbionQueens Park Rangers
69Dangerous attacks29
West Bromwich AlbionQueens Park Rangers
11Fouls14
West Bromwich AlbionQueens Park Rangers
1Cards4
West Bromwich AlbionQueens Park Rangers

Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

West Bromwich AlbionQueens Park Rangers
1.5Goals scored / game1.17
West Bromwich AlbionQueens Park Rangers
1Goals allowed / game0.67
West Bromwich AlbionQueens Park Rangers
West Bromwich AlbionQueens Park Rangers
51%Average possession51%
West Bromwich AlbionQueens Park Rangers
3.83Shots on target / game5.5
West Bromwich AlbionQueens Park Rangers
West Bromwich AlbionQueens Park Rangers

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

10Shots per game16.83
West Bromwich AlbionQueens Park Rangers
3.83Shots on target5.5
West Bromwich AlbionQueens Park Rangers
15%Shot conversion6.9%
West Bromwich AlbionQueens Park Rangers
51%Possession51%
West Bromwich AlbionQueens Park Rangers
1.2xG for1.84
West Bromwich AlbionQueens Park Rangers
1.43xG against1.23
West Bromwich AlbionQueens Park Rangers

Shooting quality

West Bromwich Albion: Efficient finishingQueens Park Rangers: Attacking
West Bromwich AlbionQueens Park Rangers
Accuracy (shots on target)38%33%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.390.21

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

West Bromwich Albion is 25% better for: last-5 form.

2 pts / game - West Bromwich Albion · 1.6 pts / game - Queens Park Rangers

West Bromwich Albion
WLDWW
Season result split
67% W17% D17% L
Season (W-D-L)
4-1-1
2.17 pts / game · goal difference +3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-1-0
Last 5 at home
2-1-0
WDW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.24Opponent xG: 1.28BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%
Queens Park Rangers
DWWLD
Season result split
50% W33% D17% L
Season (W-D-L)
3-2-1
1.83 pts / game · goal difference +3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
2-1-0
Last 5 away
2-1-0
WWD
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 0.6xG: 1.90Opponent xG: 1.08BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

West Bromwich Albion is 28% better for: goals scored per game.

1.5 goals / game - West Bromwich Albion · 1.17 goals / game - Queens Park Rangers

Queens Park Rangers is 49% better for: goals allowed per game.

1 goals / game - West Bromwich Albion · 0.67 goals / game - Queens Park Rangers

West Bromwich Albion scoring profile: very strong

West Bromwich Albion scores in 100% of games (6 of 6 games), while Queens Park Rangers keeps a clean sheet in 33% (2 of 6 games).

Queens Park Rangers scoring profile: mixed

Queens Park Rangers scores in 50% of games (3 of 6 games), while West Bromwich Albion keeps a clean sheet in 33% (2 of 6 games).

9Goals scored (season)7
West Bromwich AlbionQueens Park Rangers
6Goals conceded (season)4
West Bromwich AlbionQueens Park Rangers
2.5Average goals per game1.83
West Bromwich AlbionQueens Park Rangers
7Goals scored (last 5)4
West Bromwich AlbionQueens Park Rangers
5Goals conceded (last 5)3
West Bromwich AlbionQueens Park Rangers

How often they score at least...

100%1 goal50%
West Bromwich AlbionQueens Park Rangers
33%2 goals50%
West Bromwich AlbionQueens Park Rangers
17%3 goals17%
West Bromwich AlbionQueens Park Rangers
0%4 goals0%
West Bromwich AlbionQueens Park Rangers

How often they concede at least...

67%1 goal67%
West Bromwich AlbionQueens Park Rangers
17%2 goals0%
West Bromwich AlbionQueens Park Rangers
17%3 goals0%
West Bromwich AlbionQueens Park Rangers
0%4 goals0%
West Bromwich AlbionQueens Park Rangers

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

67%
West Bromwich Albion - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.4 of 6 games
67%
League average

Goal patterns

17%BTTS at half-time17%
West Bromwich AlbionQueens Park Rangers
0%BTTS in both halves0%
West Bromwich AlbionQueens Park Rangers
17%Scored in both halves17%
West Bromwich AlbionQueens Park Rangers

BTTS and goal count

50%Min. 3 goals and BTTS50%
West Bromwich AlbionQueens Park Rangers
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
West Bromwich AlbionQueens Park Rangers
60%BTTS - last 540%
West Bromwich AlbionQueens Park Rangers

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

Full game - team comparison (Over)

West Bromwich AlbionQueens Park Rangers
West Bromwich AlbionQueens Park Rangers
West Bromwich AlbionQueens Park Rangers

1st half

50%Min. 1 goal before half-time50%
West Bromwich AlbionQueens Park Rangers
17%Min. 2 goals before half-time17%
West Bromwich AlbionQueens Park Rangers
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time17%
West Bromwich AlbionQueens Park Rangers

2nd half

67%Min. 1 goal after half-time33%
West Bromwich AlbionQueens Park Rangers
67%Min. 2 goals after half-time33%
West Bromwich AlbionQueens Park Rangers
33%Min. 3 goals after half-time17%
West Bromwich AlbionQueens Park Rangers

Game halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

West Bromwich Albion is 11% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.67 pts / game - West Bromwich Albion · 1.5 pts / game - Queens Park Rangers

West Bromwich Albion - half-time state
33% leading67% draw0% trailing
Queens Park Rangers - half-time state
33% leading50% draw17% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.67Points per game (1st half)1.5
West Bromwich AlbionQueens Park Rangers
0.5Goals scored (1st half)0.67
West Bromwich AlbionQueens Park Rangers
0.17Goals conceded (1st half)0.33
West Bromwich AlbionQueens Park Rangers
0.67Average goals (1st half)1
West Bromwich AlbionQueens Park Rangers
83%Clean sheet before half-time67%
West Bromwich AlbionQueens Park Rangers
50%No goal before half-time67%
West Bromwich AlbionQueens Park Rangers

After half-time (2nd half)

1.5Points per game (2nd half)1.33
West Bromwich AlbionQueens Park Rangers
1Goals scored (2nd half)0.5
West Bromwich AlbionQueens Park Rangers
0.83Goals conceded (2nd half)0.33
West Bromwich AlbionQueens Park Rangers
1.83Average goals (2nd half)0.83
West Bromwich AlbionQueens Park Rangers
50%Clean sheet after half-time67%
West Bromwich AlbionQueens Park Rangers
33%No goal after half-time67%
West Bromwich AlbionQueens Park Rangers

West Bromwich Albion - second-half results

33% W50% D17% L
10
Half-time points
3
Half-time goals
+2
Goal difference (1st half)
9
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.67
PPG before half-time
Lead holding203%

Leads at halftime in 33% of games and wins 67%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.7

Allows 0.7 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Queens Park Rangers - second-half results

17% W83% D0% L
9
Half-time points
4
Half-time goals
+2
Goal difference (1st half)
8
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.50
PPG before half-time
Lead holding152%

Leads at halftime in 33% of games and wins 50%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime0.0

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

West Bromwich Albion - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.801.20
Goals scored / game0.60.8
Goals allowed / game0.20.8
Average goals per game0.81.6
1 goal60%60%
2 goals20%60%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet80%60%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference+20
Half-time: 40% leading - 60% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3
Queens Park Rangers - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.201.40
Goals scored / game0.20.6
Goals allowed / game0.20.4
Average goals per game0.41.0
1 goal40%40%
2 goals0%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet80%60%
No goal80%60%
Goal difference0+1
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 80% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

West Bromwich Albion
ScoredConceded
0
1
0-15
2
0
16-30
1
0
31-45
2
1
46-60
3
2
61-75
1
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (3 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

Queens Park Rangers
ScoredConceded
0
1
0-15
0
1
16-30
4
0
31-45
2
1
46-60
1
1
61-75
0
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (4 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

2.17
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.1 : 1.1
Estimated goal split
home : away
76%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
59%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+62%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
50%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

West Bromwich Albion

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.23
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.73
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.30
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.43
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
92%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
81%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.17
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.5
Late goals
11% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
11%

Queens Park Rangers

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.61
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.11
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.67
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.56
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
94%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
41%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.23
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.2
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Championship).

Teams vs league

West Bromwich AlbionLigaQueens Park Rangers
Average goals per game▼ 2.502.87▼ 1.83
Both teams scored• 67%67%▼ 50%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▼ 50%64%▼ 50%
Clean sheets▲ 33%21%▲ 33%
Goal before half-time▼ 50%81%▼ 50%
Goal after half-time▼ 67%74%▼ 33%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.87
Average goals per game
67%
Both teams scored
64%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
21%
Clean sheets
1.63
Home goals / game
1.24
Away goals / game
+31%
Home attack advantage
+24%
Home defensive advantage
+12%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
81%
1 goal
41%
2 goals
19%
3 goals
9%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
74%
1 goal
43%
2 goals
17%
3 goals
3%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Queens Park RangersSubstitutionOn: Leon ScarlettOff: Paul Patrick Smyth
  2. West Bromwich AlbionGoalChristopher James Mepham
  3. West Bromwich AlbionGoalCallum StylesAssist: Felix Horn Myhre
  4. Queens Park RangersSubstitutionOn: Glen KamaraOff: Nicolas Martin Hautorp Madsen
  5. Queens Park RangersYellow cardGlen Kamara
  6. Queens Park RangersYellow cardJake Clarke-Salter
  7. Queens Park RangersYellow cardJonathan Varane
  8. West Bromwich AlbionSubstitutionOn: Kareem Tunde RuizOff: Toby Collier
  9. Queens Park RangersSubstitutionOn: Kealey AdamsonOff: Dennis Cirkin
  10. West Bromwich AlbionSubstitutionOn: Ousmane DiakiteOff: Rabby Nzingoula
  11. Queens Park RangersYellow cardRumarn Burrell
  12. Queens Park RangersSubstitutionOn: Koki SaitoOff: Kwame Poku
  13. Queens Park RangersSubstitutionOn: Alfie LloydOff: Leon Scarlett
  14. West Bromwich AlbionSubstitutionOn: George CampbellOff: Nathaniel Harry Phillips
  15. West Bromwich AlbionYellow cardOusmane Diakite

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Record from West Bromwich Albion's perspective: 1 win, 0 draws and 1 loss against Queens Park Rangers. Games average 3.50 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.

FAQ

What was the result of West Bromwich Albion vs Queens Park Rangers?

The Championship match finished West Bromwich Albion 1:1 Queens Park Rangers. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between West Bromwich Albion and Queens Park Rangers?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches West Bromwich Albion won 1, Queens Park Rangers won 1 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 3.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before West Bromwich Albion vs Queens Park Rangers?

West Bromwich Albion score 1.50 goals per game on average and Queens Park Rangers 1.17. The Championship average is 2.87 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 64% of games. Both teams score in 67% of West Bromwich Albion's matches and 50% of Queens Park Rangers's.

What form are West Bromwich Albion and Queens Park Rangers in?

Over the last 5 games West Bromwich Albion have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Queens Park Rangers 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for West Bromwich Albion vs Queens Park Rangers?

The statistical background for West Bromwich Albion vs Queens Park Rangers — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.