Poland - 3 Liga Group 1Stadion WikielecData current as of 17 July 2026

Wikielec vs Warta Sieradz: match statistics

Wikielec crest
Wikielec
1 : 1half-time 0:1
Warta Sieradz crest
Warta Sieradz

Wikielec vs Warta Sieradz: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Wikielec play Warta Sieradz in 3 Liga Group 1 (Poland). The match date is 17 May 2026 at 17:00. Venue: Stadion Wikielec. Final score: 1:1.

Current form

Wikielec: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match. Warta Sieradz: 3-2-0, 2.20 points/match.

Goal statistics

Wikielec scores 1.18 and concedes 1.59 goals per match. Warta Sieradz scores 1.88 and concedes 1.00. League average: 3.33 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Wikielec 71%, Warta Sieradz 68%. Over 2.5: Wikielec 56%, Warta Sieradz 62%. League level: BTTS 62%, Over 2.5 66%.

xG, shots and style

Wikielec has higher xG: 1.55 vs 1.48. Wikielec: 9.7 shots per match, Warta Sieradz: 10.1.

Match halves

Wikielec: half-time lead 21%, second-half goals 0.71. Warta Sieradz: half-time lead 32%, second-half goals 1.21.

Goals by minute

Wikielec: 76-90+ (14 goals). Warta Sieradz: 61-75 (17 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

3 Liga Group 1: 3.33 goals per match, BTTS 62%, Over 2.5 66%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 0-0-1. Average goals 1.00, BTTS 0%.

Match description

Wikielec sits 16th and has only a 13% win rate at home; at home they average 0.87 goals scored and concede 1.53 per match. Warta Sieradz are second in the table, with a 53% win rate away, averaging 1.67 goals scored and 0.93 conceded per away match, and 60 goals scored this season versus Wikielec’s 35. Warta also has superior chance efficiency: 15% shot conversion and 4.5 shots on target per match versus 7% and 3.91 for the hosts, and a much lower share of matches without a goal (7% vs 33%). xG is similar (Warta 1.5 vs Wikielec 1.41), but Warta converts chances better and keeps more clean sheets (40% away clean sheets vs 0% for the hosts), while the home side loses 67% of matches at home compared to Warta’s 13% away defeats. Given Warta’s better efficiency, defensive stability and form (Wikielec 1 win in last 5 and 0.6 points per match; Warta unbeaten in last 5 and 1.8 points per match), I tip an away victory.

Half-by-half

0 : 1
1st half
1 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

39Possession (%)61
WikielecWarta Sieradz
11Shots19
WikielecWarta Sieradz
5Shots on target6
WikielecWarta Sieradz
1.31xG2.08
WikielecWarta Sieradz
3Corners3
WikielecWarta Sieradz
36Dangerous attacks64
WikielecWarta Sieradz
-1Fouls-1
WikielecWarta Sieradz
-1Cards-1
WikielecWarta Sieradz

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

WikielecWarta Sieradz
1.18Goals scored / match1.88
WikielecWarta Sieradz
1.59Goals conceded / match1
WikielecWarta Sieradz
35%Average possession46%
WikielecWarta Sieradz
3.56Shots on target / match4.29
WikielecWarta Sieradz

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

9.71Shots per match10.12
WikielecWarta Sieradz
3.56Shots on target4.29
WikielecWarta Sieradz
12.1%Shot conversion18.6%
WikielecWarta Sieradz
35%Possession46%
WikielecWarta Sieradz
1.55xG for1.48
WikielecWarta Sieradz
1.52xG against1.32
WikielecWarta Sieradz

Shooting quality

Wikielec: Counter-attackingWarta Sieradz: Counter-attacking
WikielecWarta Sieradz
Accuracy (shots on target)37%42%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.160.15
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.330.44

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Warta Sieradz is 120% better for: last-5 form.

1 pts / match - Wikielec · 2.2 pts / match - Warta Sieradz

Wikielec
LLDDW
Season result split
29% W21% R50% P
Season (W-D-L)
10-7-17
1.09 pts / match · goal difference -14
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
3-4-10
Last 5 at home
1-1-3
LLLDW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.39Opponent xG: 1.92BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%
Warta Sieradz
WDDWW
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
62% W24% R15% P
Season (W-D-L)
21-8-5
2.09 pts / match · goal difference +30
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-2-0
2.20 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
9-6-2
Last 5 away
3-2-0
DWWDW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 0.6xG: 1.50Opponent xG: 1.47BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Warta Sieradz is 59% better for: goals scored per match.

1.18 goals / match - Wikielec · 1.88 goals / match - Warta Sieradz

Warta Sieradz is 59% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.59 goals / match - Wikielec · 1 goals / match - Warta Sieradz

Wikielec scoring profile: strong

Wikielec scores in 76% of matches (26 of 34 matches), while Warta Sieradz keeps a clean sheet in 32% (11 of 34 matches).

Warta Sieradz scoring profile: very strong

Warta Sieradz scores in 97% of matches (33 of 34 matches), while Wikielec keeps a clean sheet in 9% (3 of 34 matches).

40Goals scored (season)64
WikielecWarta Sieradz
54Goals conceded (season)34
WikielecWarta Sieradz
2.76Average goals in match2.88
WikielecWarta Sieradz
5Goals scored (last 5)8
WikielecWarta Sieradz
7Goals conceded (last 5)3
WikielecWarta Sieradz

How often they score at least...

76%1 goal97%
WikielecWarta Sieradz
32%2 goals56%
WikielecWarta Sieradz
6%3 goals32%
WikielecWarta Sieradz
3%4 goals3%
WikielecWarta Sieradz

How often they concede at least...

91%1 goal68%
WikielecWarta Sieradz
47%2 goals26%
WikielecWarta Sieradz
15%3 goals6%
WikielecWarta Sieradz
6%4 goals0%
WikielecWarta Sieradz

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

62%
League average

Goal patterns

15%BTTS at half-time24%
WikielecWarta Sieradz
6%BTTS in both halves3%
WikielecWarta Sieradz
15%Scored in both halves32%
WikielecWarta Sieradz

BTTS and goal count

56%Min. 3 goals and BTTS53%
WikielecWarta Sieradz
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS9%
WikielecWarta Sieradz
60%BTTS - last 560%
WikielecWarta Sieradz

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

68%Min. 1 goal before half-time68%
WikielecWarta Sieradz
32%Min. 2 goals before half-time32%
WikielecWarta Sieradz
9%Min. 3 goals before half-time9%
WikielecWarta Sieradz

2nd half

91%Min. 1 goal after half-time85%
WikielecWarta Sieradz
50%Min. 2 goals after half-time62%
WikielecWarta Sieradz
15%Min. 3 goals after half-time21%
WikielecWarta Sieradz

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Warta Sieradz is 47% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1 pts / match - Wikielec · 1.47 pts / match - Warta Sieradz

Wikielec - half-time state
21% leading38% draw41% trailing
Warta Sieradz - half-time state
32% leading50% draw18% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1Points per match (1st half)1.47
WikielecWarta Sieradz
0.44Goals scored (1st half)0.65
WikielecWarta Sieradz
0.65Goals conceded (1st half)0.47
WikielecWarta Sieradz
1.09Average goals (1st half)1.12
WikielecWarta Sieradz
50%Clean sheet before half-time65%
WikielecWarta Sieradz
68%No goal before half-time44%
WikielecWarta Sieradz

After half-time (2nd half)

1Points per match (2nd half)1.82
WikielecWarta Sieradz
0.71Goals scored (2nd half)1.21
WikielecWarta Sieradz
0.88Goals conceded (2nd half)0.53
WikielecWarta Sieradz
1.59Average goals (2nd half)1.74
WikielecWarta Sieradz
32%Clean sheet after half-time56%
WikielecWarta Sieradz
44%No goal after half-time29%
WikielecWarta Sieradz

Wikielec - second-half results

24% W29% R47% P
34
Half-time points
15
Half-time goals
-7
Goal difference (1st half)
34
Second-half points
-6
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding138%

Leads at half-time in 21% of matches and wins 29%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Warta Sieradz - second-half results

50% W32% R18% P
50
Half-time points
22
Half-time goals
+6
Goal difference (1st half)
62
Second-half points
+23
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.47
PPG before half-time
Lead holding194%

Leads at half-time in 32% of matches and wins 62%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Wikielec - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.00
Goals scored / match0.60.4
Goals conceded / match0.80.6
Average goals in match1.41.0
1 goal80%80%
2 goals40%20%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet20%40%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference-1-1
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 3
Warta Sieradz - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.601.40
Goals scored / match0.80.8
Goals conceded / match0.00.6
Average goals in match0.81.4
1 goal80%80%
2 goals0%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet100%40%
No goal20%60%
Goal difference+4+1
Half-time: 80% leading - 20% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Wikielec
ScoredConceded
5
9
0-15
5
9
16-30
6
6
31-45
3
7
46-60
7
8
61-75
14
15
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (14 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (15). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

Warta Sieradz
ScoredConceded
3
5
0-15
8
5
16-30
12
6
31-45
8
4
46-60
17
5
61-75
16
9
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (17 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): +7 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.82
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.1 : 1.7
Estimated goal split
home : away
85%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
70%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-65%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
74%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
1%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 100 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Wikielec

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.03
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.44
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.37
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.07
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
65%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
105%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.09
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
35% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 13% come in the first quarter-hour.
35%

Warta Sieradz

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.16
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.72
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-8.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.40
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.32
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
125%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
55%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.11
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.6
Late goals
25% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 5% come in the first quarter-hour.
25%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (3 Liga Group 1).

Teams vs league

WikielecLigaWarta Sieradz
Average goals in match 2.763.33 2.88
Both teams scored 71%62% 68%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 56%66% 62%
Clean sheets 9%20% 32%
Goal before half-time 68%74% 68%
Goal after half-time 91%83% 85%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.33
Average goals per match
62%
Both teams scored
66%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
20%
Clean sheets
1.82
Home goals / match
1.51
Away goals / match
+21%
Home attack advantage
+17%
Home defence advantage
+5%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
74%
1 goal
44%
2 goals
16%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
83%
1 goal
54%
2 goals
28%
3 goals
10%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Wikielec 0 - 0 - 1 Warta Sieradz. Average goals 1.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

KS Warta Sieradz
1 : 0
GKS Wikielec

FAQ

What was the result of Wikielec vs Warta Sieradz?

The 3 Liga Group 1 match finished Wikielec 1:1 Warta Sieradz. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Wikielec vs Warta Sieradz?

Wikielec score 1.18 goals per game on average and Warta Sieradz 1.88. The 3 Liga Group 1 average is 3.33 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 66% of games. Both teams score in 71% of Wikielec's matches and 68% of Warta Sieradz's.

What form are Wikielec and Warta Sieradz in?

Over the last 5 games Wikielec have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Warta Sieradz 3-2-0 (2.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Wikielec vs Warta Sieradz?

The statistical background for Wikielec vs Warta Sieradz — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.