Poland - 3 Liga Group 1Stadion WikielecData current as of September 07, 2026

Wikielec vs Warta Sieradz: match statistics

Wikielec crest
Wikielec
1 : 1half-time 0:1
Warta Sieradz crest
Warta Sieradz

Wikielec vs Warta Sieradz: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Wikielec played against Warta Sieradz in 3 Liga Group 1 (Poland). The game was played on May 17, 2026. Venue: Stadion Wikielec. Final score: 1:1.

Recent form

Wikielec has 1 win, 0 draws and 4 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.60 points per game. Warta Sieradz has 2 wins, 3 draws and 0 losses, with 1.80 points per game.

Scoring records

Wikielec scores 1.13 goals per game and allows 1.61. Warta Sieradz scores 1.94 and allows 1.03. Games in this league average 3.34 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 68% of Wikielec's games and 68% of Warta Sieradz's. The Over 2.5 rates are 55% and 65%, compared with league averages of 61% for BTTS and 65% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Wikielec has the higher season xG average, 1.57 to 1.46 per game. Wikielec takes 10.0 shots per game, while Warta Sieradz takes 9.8.

First-half and second-half trends

Wikielec leads at halftime in 19% of its games and scores 0.71 goals per game after halftime. Warta Sieradz leads at halftime in 29% and scores 1.26 after halftime.

When the teams score

Wikielec's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (12 goals). For Warta Sieradz, it is minutes 61-75 (16 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

3 Liga Group 1 games average 3.34 goals. Both teams score in 61% of games, and 65% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 0 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 1.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Wikielec sits 16th and has only a 13% win rate at home; at home they average 0.87 goals scored and concede 1.53 per match. Warta Sieradz are second in the table, with a 53% win rate away, averaging 1.67 goals scored and 0.93 conceded per away match, and 60 goals scored this season versus Wikielec’s 35. Warta also has superior chance efficiency: 15% shot conversion and 4.5 shots on target per match versus 7% and 3.91 for the hosts, and a much lower share of matches without a goal (7% vs 33%). xG is similar (Warta 1.5 vs Wikielec 1.41), but Warta converts chances better and keeps more clean sheets (40% away clean sheets vs 0% for the hosts), while the home side loses 67% of matches at home compared to Warta’s 13% away defeats. Given Warta’s better efficiency, defensive stability and form (Wikielec 1 win in last 5 and 0.6 points per match; Warta unbeaten in last 5 and 1.8 points per match), I tip an away victory.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The BTTS scenario is more likely: Wikielec has a seasonal BTTS rate of 75%, Warta Sieradz 60%, and the league average is 62%. Wikielec averages 2.19 goals scored and concedes 1.13 (35 for, 50 against this season), while Warta averages 1.67 scored and concedes 0.93 (60 for, 32 against), indicating the visitors can score against the hosts' weaker defense. In the last 5 matches both teams have BTTS at 60%: Wikielec scored 6 and conceded 10 (1.2 and 2.0 per game), Warta 11 and 7 (2.2 and 1.4), so recently both regularly exchange goals. xG comparison shows a similar picture: Wikielec xG 1.44 vs Warta defensive xG 1.40, Warta xG 1.50 vs Wikielec defensive xG 1.25, and additionally the hosts have 5.2 shots on target vs 4.5 for the visitors and a higher conversion rate 19% vs 15%, which favors goals from both sides. Therefore I assign a 72% probability to BTTS - Yes and 28% to No.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The combined xG for both teams is 2.94 (home xG 1.44 vs away xG 1.50), while seasonal goal averages are 2.19 for Wikielec and 1.67 for Warta Sieradz, indicating a match with at least two goals. The home side have scored over 1.5 goals in 94% of their matches, the visitors in 80% — a strong signal for Over 1.5, which I estimate at roughly 90% probability. A Poisson model based on total xG=2.94 yields ~56% probability of 3+ goals (Over 2.5), and additionally the home team records Over 2.5 in 81% of fixtures, so I lean toward Over 2.5 at about a 60% level. Over 3.5 is less likely: Wikielec has Over 3.5 in 31% of matches, Warta in 20%, and the Poisson for 2.94 suggests ~34% — therefore Under 3.5 appears the safer option. Based on this, the best play is Over 1.5; expected goals are 1.44 (Wikielec) and 1.50 (Warta), total 2.94.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Season-long statistics favor the home side: Wikielec led at the break in 38% of home matches and scores on average 0.88 goals by Half-Time versus Warta’s 0.43, while the average goals per match are 2.19 versus 1.67, which increases the likelihood of a home lead and a full-time victory for the hosts. Wikielec also has higher shot efficiency (19% conversion with 5.2 shots on target versus 15% and 4.5 for Warta) and 69% season win rate versus the visitors’ 53%, so I rated the 1/1 scenario highest (23%). The counterargument is recent form over the last five: the hosts had 0% leads at Half-Time and were trailing at the break in 75% of their last five, while Warta led at Half-Time in 50% of their last five, so I assign a significant probability to X/1 (18%) and 2/2 (17%). Additionally, both teams score heavily after the break (Wikielec has 94% of matches with a goal in the Second Half and averages 1.31 goals in the Second Half, Warta 1.29), which increases the chance of a turnaround after Half-Time and justifies allocation to X/X (12%) and X/2 (10%). In summary, the strongest single signal is 1/1 due to 38% seasonal HT leads, 69% seasonal home wins and better shot efficiency, but high Second-Half activity and the hosts’ poor last-five form distribute the remaining probability.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

0 : 1
First half
1 : 0
Second half

Game stats

39Possession (%)61
WikielecWarta Sieradz
11Shots19
WikielecWarta Sieradz
5Shots on target6
WikielecWarta Sieradz
1.31xG2.08
WikielecWarta Sieradz
3Corners3
WikielecWarta Sieradz
36Dangerous attacks64
WikielecWarta Sieradz
-1Fouls-1
WikielecWarta Sieradz
-1Cards-1
WikielecWarta Sieradz

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

WikielecWarta Sieradz
1.13Goals scored / game1.94
WikielecWarta Sieradz
1.61Goals allowed / game1.03
WikielecWarta Sieradz
36%Average possession46%
WikielecWarta Sieradz
3.68Shots on target / game4.13
WikielecWarta Sieradz

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

10.03Shots per game9.77
WikielecWarta Sieradz
3.68Shots on target4.13
WikielecWarta Sieradz
11.3%Shot conversion19.8%
WikielecWarta Sieradz
36%Possession46%
WikielecWarta Sieradz
1.57xG for1.46
WikielecWarta Sieradz
1.46xG against1.32
WikielecWarta Sieradz

Shooting quality

Wikielec: BalancedWarta Sieradz: Counter-attacking
WikielecWarta Sieradz
Accuracy (shots on target)37%42%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.160.15
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.310.47

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Warta Sieradz is 200% better for: last-5 form.

0.6 pts / game - Wikielec · 1.8 pts / game - Warta Sieradz

Wikielec
LLWLL
Season result split
29% W16% R55% P
Season (W-D-L)
9-5-17
1.03 pts / game · goal difference -15
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-0-4
0.60 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-3-10
Last 5 at home
1-0-4
LWLLL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 2.0xG: 1.65Opponent xG: 1.50BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
Warta Sieradz
DWDWD
Unbeaten in the last 5 games
Season result split
61% W23% R16% P
Season (W-D-L)
19-7-5
2.06 pts / game · goal difference +28
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-3-0
1.80 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
8-5-2
Last 5 away
2-3-0
DDDWW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 2.2Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.54Opponent xG: 1.35BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Warta Sieradz is 72% better for: goals scored per game.

1.13 goals / game - Wikielec · 1.94 goals / game - Warta Sieradz

Warta Sieradz is 56% better for: goals allowed per game.

1.61 goals / game - Wikielec · 1.03 goals / game - Warta Sieradz

Wikielec scoring profile: strong

Wikielec scores in 74% of games (23 of 31 meczów), while Warta Sieradz keeps a clean sheet in 32% (10 of 31 meczów).

Warta Sieradz scoring profile: very strong

Warta Sieradz scores in 97% of games (30 of 31 meczów), while Wikielec keeps a clean sheet in 10% (3 of 31 meczów).

35Goals scored (season)60
WikielecWarta Sieradz
50Goals conceded (season)32
WikielecWarta Sieradz
2.74Average goals per game2.97
WikielecWarta Sieradz
6Goals scored (last 5)11
WikielecWarta Sieradz
10Goals conceded (last 5)7
WikielecWarta Sieradz

How often they score at least...

74%1 goal97%
WikielecWarta Sieradz
29%2 goals58%
WikielecWarta Sieradz
6%3 goals35%
WikielecWarta Sieradz
3%4 goals3%
WikielecWarta Sieradz

How often they concede at least...

90%1 goal68%
WikielecWarta Sieradz
48%2 goals29%
WikielecWarta Sieradz
16%3 goals6%
WikielecWarta Sieradz
6%4 goals0%
WikielecWarta Sieradz

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

61%
League average

Goal patterns

10%BTTS at half-time26%
WikielecWarta Sieradz
3%BTTS in both halves3%
WikielecWarta Sieradz
13%Scored in both halves35%
WikielecWarta Sieradz

BTTS and goal count

55%Min. 3 goals and BTTS55%
WikielecWarta Sieradz
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS10%
WikielecWarta Sieradz
60%BTTS - last 560%
WikielecWarta Sieradz

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

65%Min. 1 goal before half-time68%
WikielecWarta Sieradz
29%Min. 2 goals before half-time35%
WikielecWarta Sieradz
6%Min. 3 goals before half-time10%
WikielecWarta Sieradz

2nd half

94%Min. 1 goal after half-time87%
WikielecWarta Sieradz
52%Min. 2 goals after half-time65%
WikielecWarta Sieradz
16%Min. 3 goals after half-time19%
WikielecWarta Sieradz

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Warta Sieradz is 43% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.97 pts / game - Wikielec · 1.39 pts / game - Warta Sieradz

Wikielec - half-time state
19% leading39% draw42% trailing
Warta Sieradz - half-time state
29% leading52% draw19% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.97Points per game (1st half)1.39
WikielecWarta Sieradz
0.39Goals scored (1st half)0.65
WikielecWarta Sieradz
0.61Goals conceded (1st half)0.52
WikielecWarta Sieradz
1Average goals (1st half)1.16
WikielecWarta Sieradz
55%Clean sheet before half-time61%
WikielecWarta Sieradz
71%No goal before half-time45%
WikielecWarta Sieradz

After half-time (2nd half)

0.94Points per game (2nd half)1.87
WikielecWarta Sieradz
0.71Goals scored (2nd half)1.26
WikielecWarta Sieradz
0.94Goals conceded (2nd half)0.52
WikielecWarta Sieradz
1.65Average goals (2nd half)1.77
WikielecWarta Sieradz
29%Clean sheet after half-time58%
WikielecWarta Sieradz
45%No goal after half-time26%
WikielecWarta Sieradz

Wikielec - second-half results

23% W26% R52% P
30
Half-time points
12
Half-time goals
-7
Goal difference (1st half)
29
Second-half points
-7
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.97
PPG before half-time
Lead holding153%

Leads at halftime in 19% of games and wins 29%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.3

Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Warta Sieradz - second-half results

52% W32% R16% P
43
Half-time points
20
Half-time goals
+4
Goal difference (1st half)
58
Second-half points
+23
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.39
PPG before half-time
Lead holding210%

Leads at halftime in 29% of games and wins 61%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime0.0

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Wikielec - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game0.400.80
Goals scored / game0.20.8
Goals allowed / game0.80.8
Average goals per game1.01.6
1 goal60%80%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals20%40%
Clean sheet40%40%
No goal80%60%
Goal difference-30
Half-time: 0% leading - 40% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 1
Warta Sieradz - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.402.00
Goals scored / game0.61.4
Goals allowed / game1.00.4
Average goals per game1.61.8
1 goal80%80%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference-2+5
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 20% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Wikielec
ScoredConceded
5
8
0-15
4
8
16-30
4
5
31-45
3
7
46-60
7
8
61-75
12
14
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (12 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (14). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

Warta Sieradz
ScoredConceded
3
5
0-15
7
5
16-30
11
6
31-45
8
4
46-60
16
4
61-75
15
8
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (16 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): +7 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

2.85
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.1 : 1.8
Estimated goal split
home : away
85%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
68%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-65%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
72%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
1%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 100 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Wikielec

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.11
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.59
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.44
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.15
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
61%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
108%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.43
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
34% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 14% come in the first quarter-hour.
34%

Warta Sieradz

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.14
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.77
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-8.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.48
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.29
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
130%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
56%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.26
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.6
Late goals
25% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 5% come in the first quarter-hour.
25%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (3 Liga Group 1).

Teams vs league

WikielecLigaWarta Sieradz
Average goals per game 2.743.34 2.97
Both teams scored 68%61% 68%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 55%65% 65%
Clean sheets 10%21% 32%
Goal before half-time 65%74% 68%
Goal after half-time 94%84% 87%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.34
Average goals per game
61%
Both teams scored
65%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
21%
Clean sheets
1.84
Home goals / game
1.49
Away goals / game
+23%
Home attack advantage
+19%
Home defensive advantage
+6%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
74%
1 goal
44%
2 goals
16%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
84%
1 goal
55%
2 goals
29%
3 goals
10%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Home team

Other recorded players

Adrian Rajski⚽ 1

Away team

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. WikielecGoalAdrian Rajski

Head-to-head

Record from Wikielec's perspective: 0 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss against Warta Sieradz. Games average 1.00 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.

Warta Sieradz
1 : 0
Wikielec

FAQ

What was the result of Wikielec vs Warta Sieradz?

The 3 Liga Group 1 match finished Wikielec 1:1 Warta Sieradz. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Wikielec vs Warta Sieradz?

Wikielec score 1.13 goals per game on average and Warta Sieradz 1.94. The 3 Liga Group 1 average is 3.34 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 65% of games. Both teams score in 68% of Wikielec's matches and 68% of Warta Sieradz's.

What form are Wikielec and Warta Sieradz in?

Over the last 5 games Wikielec have a 1-0-4 record (0.60 points per game) and Warta Sieradz 2-3-0 (1.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Wikielec vs Warta Sieradz?

The statistical background for Wikielec vs Warta Sieradz — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.