Nigeria - NPFLData current as of 23 July 2026

Wikki Tourist vs Bendel Insurance: match statistics

Wikki Tourist vs Bendel Insurance: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Wikki Tourist play Bendel Insurance in NPFL (Nigeria). The match date is 19 April 2026 at 14:00. Final score: 1:2.

Current form

Wikki Tourist: 1-0-4, 0.60 points/match. Bendel Insurance: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Wikki Tourist scores 0.86 and concedes 1.19 goals per match. Bendel Insurance scores 1.16 and concedes 1.00. League average: 2.02 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Wikki Tourist 43%, Bendel Insurance 45%. Over 2.5: Wikki Tourist 32%, Bendel Insurance 34%. League level: BTTS 38%, Over 2.5 34%.

xG, shots and style

Bendel Insurance has higher xG: 1.50 vs 1.34. Wikki Tourist: 5.1 shots per match, Bendel Insurance: 6.9.

Match halves

Wikki Tourist: half-time lead 19%, second-half goals 0.35. Bendel Insurance: half-time lead 24%, second-half goals 0.50.

Goals by minute

Wikki Tourist: 31-45+ (11 goals). Bendel Insurance: 0-15 (9 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

NPFL: 2.02 goals per match, BTTS 38%, Over 2.5 34%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 0-0-1. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 0%.

Match description

I predict a home win. Wikki Tourist have a strong home defence: they concede on average 0.63 goals per match at home and keep a clean sheet in 50% of games, while Bendel score only 0.71 goals per away match on average and fail to score in 53% of their away fixtures. The hosts also create more high-quality chances — their average xG is 1.67 versus Bendel’s away xG of 1.29, and they register more shots on target (4.8 vs 4.0), which should give them an advantage in front of goal. On the other hand, Bendel have scored more goals overall this season (39 vs 27 for Wikki) and have better recent points form (1.6 points per match in the last 5 vs 1.0 for Wikki), so the visitors still have a realistic chance of a positive result. Overall, the statistical edge and Wikki’s home defence incline me towards them winning, but the high draw rate for the hosts means a draw remains a significant scenario.

Half-by-half

1 : 1
1st half
0 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

54Possession (%)46
Wikki TouristBendel Insurance
15Shots4
Wikki TouristBendel Insurance
4Shots on target1
Wikki TouristBendel Insurance
1.92xG0.67
Wikki TouristBendel Insurance
8Corners1
Wikki TouristBendel Insurance
96Dangerous attacks46
Wikki TouristBendel Insurance
-1Fouls-1
Wikki TouristBendel Insurance
-1Cards-1
Wikki TouristBendel Insurance

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Wikki TouristBendel Insurance
0.86Goals scored / match1.16
Wikki TouristBendel Insurance
1.19Goals conceded / match1
Wikki TouristBendel Insurance
27%Average possession33%
Wikki TouristBendel Insurance
1.59Shots on target / match2.39
Wikki TouristBendel Insurance

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

5.14Shots per match6.89
Wikki TouristBendel Insurance
1.59Shots on target2.39
Wikki TouristBendel Insurance
16.8%Shot conversion16.8%
Wikki TouristBendel Insurance
27%Possession33%
Wikki TouristBendel Insurance
1.34xG for1.5
Wikki TouristBendel Insurance
1.17xG against1.32
Wikki TouristBendel Insurance

Shooting quality

Wikki Tourist: Counter-attackingBendel Insurance: Counter-attacking
Wikki TouristBendel Insurance
Accuracy (shots on target)31%35%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.260.22
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.540.49

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Bendel Insurance is 233% better for: last-5 form.

0.6 pts / match - Wikki Tourist · 2 pts / match - Bendel Insurance

Wikki Tourist
WLLLL
Season result split
24% W32% R43% P
Season (W-D-L)
9-12-16
1.05 pts / match · goal difference -12
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-0-4
0.60 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
7-8-3
Last 5 at home
1-2-2
WDDLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 2.2xG: 1.44Opponent xG: 1.24BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 80%
Bendel Insurance
WWWLD
Season result split
37% W37% R26% P
Season (W-D-L)
14-14-10
1.47 pts / match · goal difference +6
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
4-6-9
Last 5 away
1-1-3
LDLWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 0.70Opponent xG: 1.65BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Bendel Insurance is 35% better for: goals scored per match.

0.86 goals / match - Wikki Tourist · 1.16 goals / match - Bendel Insurance

Bendel Insurance is 19% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.19 goals / match - Wikki Tourist · 1 goals / match - Bendel Insurance

Wikki Tourist scoring profile: strong

Wikki Tourist scores in 62% of matches (23 of 37 matches), while Bendel Insurance keeps a clean sheet in 37% (14 of 38 matches).

Bendel Insurance scoring profile: strong

Bendel Insurance scores in 68% of matches (26 of 38 matches), while Wikki Tourist keeps a clean sheet in 30% (11 of 37 matches).

32Goals scored (season)44
Wikki TouristBendel Insurance
44Goals conceded (season)38
Wikki TouristBendel Insurance
2.05Average goals in match2.16
Wikki TouristBendel Insurance
6Goals scored (last 5)6
Wikki TouristBendel Insurance
11Goals conceded (last 5)4
Wikki TouristBendel Insurance

How often they score at least...

62%1 goal68%
Wikki TouristBendel Insurance
24%2 goals32%
Wikki TouristBendel Insurance
0%3 goals13%
Wikki TouristBendel Insurance
0%4 goals3%
Wikki TouristBendel Insurance

How often they concede at least...

70%1 goal63%
Wikki TouristBendel Insurance
35%2 goals26%
Wikki TouristBendel Insurance
14%3 goals8%
Wikki TouristBendel Insurance
0%4 goals3%
Wikki TouristBendel Insurance

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

45%
Bendel Insurance - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.17 of 38 matches
38%
League average

Goal patterns

27%BTTS at half-time26%
Wikki TouristBendel Insurance
8%BTTS in both halves8%
Wikki TouristBendel Insurance
19%Scored in both halves21%
Wikki TouristBendel Insurance

BTTS and goal count

30%Min. 3 goals and BTTS26%
Wikki TouristBendel Insurance
3%Min. 3 goals without BTTS8%
Wikki TouristBendel Insurance
80%BTTS - last 560%
Wikki TouristBendel Insurance

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

68%Min. 1 goal before half-time58%
Wikki TouristBendel Insurance
38%Min. 2 goals before half-time39%
Wikki TouristBendel Insurance
8%Min. 3 goals before half-time8%
Wikki TouristBendel Insurance

2nd half

57%Min. 1 goal after half-time68%
Wikki TouristBendel Insurance
27%Min. 2 goals after half-time29%
Wikki TouristBendel Insurance
8%Min. 3 goals after half-time8%
Wikki TouristBendel Insurance

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Bendel Insurance is 21% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.11 pts / match - Wikki Tourist · 1.34 pts / match - Bendel Insurance

Wikki Tourist - half-time state
19% leading54% draw27% trailing
Bendel Insurance - half-time state
24% leading63% draw13% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.11Points per match (1st half)1.34
Wikki TouristBendel Insurance
0.51Goals scored (1st half)0.66
Wikki TouristBendel Insurance
0.62Goals conceded (1st half)0.42
Wikki TouristBendel Insurance
1.14Average goals (1st half)1.08
Wikki TouristBendel Insurance
51%Clean sheet before half-time63%
Wikki TouristBendel Insurance
54%No goal before half-time53%
Wikki TouristBendel Insurance

After half-time (2nd half)

1.08Points per match (2nd half)1.26
Wikki TouristBendel Insurance
0.35Goals scored (2nd half)0.5
Wikki TouristBendel Insurance
0.57Goals conceded (2nd half)0.58
Wikki TouristBendel Insurance
0.92Average goals (2nd half)1.08
Wikki TouristBendel Insurance
62%Clean sheet after half-time58%
Wikki TouristBendel Insurance
65%No goal after half-time58%
Wikki TouristBendel Insurance

Wikki Tourist - second-half results

19% W51% R30% P
41
Half-time points
19
Half-time goals
-4
Goal difference (1st half)
40
Second-half points
-8
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.11
PPG before half-time
Lead holding126%

Leads at half-time in 19% of matches and wins 24%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Bendel Insurance - second-half results

29% W39% R32% P
51
Half-time points
25
Half-time goals
+9
Goal difference (1st half)
48
Second-half points
-3
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.34
PPG before half-time
Lead holding154%

Leads at half-time in 24% of matches and wins 37%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Wikki Tourist - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.801.20
Goals scored / match0.60.6
Goals conceded / match1.21.0
Average goals in match1.81.6
1 goal80%100%
2 goals80%40%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet20%40%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference-3-2
Half-time: 0% leading - 80% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 0% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 60% - Half-time goals total: 3
Bendel Insurance - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.802.40
Goals scored / match0.40.8
Goals conceded / match0.60.2
Average goals in match1.01.0
1 goal60%100%
2 goals40%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet40%80%
No goal60%20%
Goal difference-1+3
Half-time: 0% leading - 80% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 80% won - 0% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Wikki Tourist
ScoredConceded
4
6
0-15
4
8
16-30
11
9
31-45
5
10
46-60
4
1
61-75
4
10
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (11 goli). Concedes most in 46-60 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): -6 - late phases are a weakness.

Bendel Insurance
ScoredConceded
9
3
0-15
9
3
16-30
7
10
31-45
8
6
46-60
3
7
61-75
8
9
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (9 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.10
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
0.9 : 1.2
Estimated goal split
home : away
104%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
44%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+43%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
42%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
12%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 8 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Wikki Tourist

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.17
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.50
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.48
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.02
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
60%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
205%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.45
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.2
Late goals
13% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 13% come in the first quarter-hour.
13%

Bendel Insurance

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.18
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.02
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-9.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.34
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.32
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
200%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
69%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.53
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.2
Late goals
18% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 20% come in the first quarter-hour.
18%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (NPFL).

Teams vs league

Wikki TouristLigaBendel Insurance
Average goals in match 2.052.02 2.16
Both teams scored 43%38% 45%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 32%34% 34%
Clean sheets 30%37% 37%
Goal before half-time 68%61% 58%
Goal after half-time 57%64% 68%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.02
Average goals per match
38%
Both teams scored
34%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
37%
Clean sheets
1.44
Home goals / match
0.58
Away goals / match
+148%
Home attack advantage
+60%
Home defence advantage
+52%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
61%
1 goal
27%
2 goals
7%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
64%
1 goal
29%
2 goals
8%
3 goals
2%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Wikki Tourist 0 - 0 - 1 Bendel Insurance. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of Wikki Tourist vs Bendel Insurance?

The NPFL match finished Wikki Tourist 1:2 Bendel Insurance. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Wikki Tourist vs Bendel Insurance?

Wikki Tourist score 0.86 goals per game on average and Bendel Insurance 1.16. The NPFL average is 2.02 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 34% of games. Both teams score in 43% of Wikki Tourist's matches and 45% of Bendel Insurance's.

What form are Wikki Tourist and Bendel Insurance in?

Over the last 5 games Wikki Tourist have a 1-0-4 record (0.60 points per game) and Bendel Insurance 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Wikki Tourist vs Bendel Insurance?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Wikki Tourist vs Bendel Insurance: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.