Wikki Tourist vs Kano Pillars: match statistics
Wikki Tourist presents solid home form with a 40% win rate and an impressive 60% clean sheet record at their own stadium, constituting a significant advantage. The hosts maintain a positive home goal difference of +4 and favorable xG metrics (1.81 for vs 0.76 against), demonstrating their offensive efficiency at home. Kano Pillars posts very poor away results with just 13% wins and a high 75% loss rate, conceding an average of 1.38 goals per match with a negative goal difference of -6. Although the visitors show better overall form in their last five games (2 PPG), their catastrophic away run (lllllldw) and poor xG figures (1.03 for vs 2.06 against) on the road offer little optimism. Given Wikki Tourist's home dominance and Kano Pillars' away frailty, I predict a home victory, though the hosts' recent overall form (0.4 PPG) implies this may not be an easy fixture.
Wikki Tourist vs Kano Pillars: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Wikki Tourist played against Kano Pillars in NPFL (Nigeria). The game was played on January 25, 2026. Final score: 2:0.
Recent form
Wikki Tourist has 0 wins, 2 draws and 3 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.40 points per game. Kano Pillars has 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss, with 2.00 points per game.
Scoring records
Wikki Tourist scores 0.67 goals per game and allows 0.90. Kano Pillars scores 0.86 and allows 1.00. Games in this league average 1.83 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 29% of Wikki Tourist's games and 38% of Kano Pillars's. The Over 2.5 rates are 19% and 33%, compared with league averages of 36% for BTTS and 27% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Kano Pillars has the higher season xG average, 1.55 to 1.37 per game. Wikki Tourist takes 5.3 shots per game, while Kano Pillars takes 3.6.
First-half and second-half trends
Wikki Tourist leads at halftime in 19% of its games and scores 0.24 goals per game after halftime. Kano Pillars leads at halftime in 33% and scores 0.29 after halftime.
When the teams score
Wikki Tourist's most productive scoring window is minutes 31-45+ (6 goals). For Kano Pillars, it is minutes 31-45+ (6 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
NPFL games average 1.83 goals. Both teams score in 36% of games, and 27% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 1 draw and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Wikki Tourist presents solid home form with a 40% win rate and an impressive 60% clean sheet record at their own stadium, constituting a significant advantage. The hosts maintain a positive home goal difference of +4 and favorable xG metrics (1.81 for vs 0.76 against), demonstrating their offensive efficiency at home. Kano Pillars posts very poor away results with just 13% wins and a high 75% loss rate, conceding an average of 1.38 goals per match with a negative goal difference of -6. Although the visitors show better overall form in their last five games (2 PPG), their catastrophic away run (lllllldw) and poor xG figures (1.03 for vs 2.06 against) on the road offer little optimism. Given Wikki Tourist's home dominance and Kano Pillars' away frailty, I predict a home victory, though the hosts' recent overall form (0.4 PPG) implies this may not be an easy fixture.
View the statistical overviewStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Wikki Tourist | Kano Pillars | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 29% | 19% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.26 | 0.43 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.44 | 1.28 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Kano Pillars is 400% better for: last-5 form.
0.4 pts / game - Wikki Tourist · 2 pts / game - Kano Pillars
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Kano Pillars is 28% better for: goals scored per game.
0.67 goals / game - Wikki Tourist · 0.86 goals / game - Kano Pillars
Wikki Tourist is 11% better for: goals allowed per game.
0.9 goals / game - Wikki Tourist · 1 goals / game - Kano Pillars
Wikki Tourist scores in 52% of games (11 of 21 meczów), while Kano Pillars keeps a clean sheet in 29% (6 of 21 meczów).
Kano Pillars scores in 57% of games (12 of 21 meczów), while Wikki Tourist keeps a clean sheet in 38% (8 of 21 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Wikki Tourist
Over / Under - Kano Pillars
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Kano Pillars is 38% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.1 pts / game - Wikki Tourist · 1.52 pts / game - Kano Pillars
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Wikki Tourist - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 19% of games and wins 24%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
Kano Pillars - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 33% of games and wins 33%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.1 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.20 | 0.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.2 | 0.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.2 | 0.8 |
| Average goals per game | 0.4 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 40% |
| No goal | 80% | 80% |
| Goal difference | 0 | -3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.40 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.2 | 0.2 |
| Average goals per game | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 80% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +1 | +3 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (6 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (6 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Wikki Tourist
Kano Pillars
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (NPFL).
Teams vs league
| Wikki Tourist | Liga | Kano Pillars | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 1.57 | 1.83 | • 1.86 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 29% | 36% | ▲ 38% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 19% | 27% | ▲ 33% |
| Clean sheets | • 38% | 38% | ▼ 29% |
| Goal before half-time | • 62% | 62% | ▼ 57% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 43% | 58% | • 57% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Other recorded players
Away team
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Head-to-head
Record from Wikki Tourist's perspective: 0 wins, 1 draw and 0 losses against Kano Pillars. Games average 2.00 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Wikki Tourist vs Kano Pillars?
The NPFL match finished Wikki Tourist 2:0 Kano Pillars. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Wikki Tourist vs Kano Pillars?
Wikki Tourist score 0.67 goals per game on average and Kano Pillars 0.86. The NPFL average is 1.83 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 27% of games. Both teams score in 29% of Wikki Tourist's matches and 38% of Kano Pillars's.
What form are Wikki Tourist and Kano Pillars in?
Over the last 5 games Wikki Tourist have a 0-2-3 record (0.40 points per game) and Kano Pillars 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Wikki Tourist vs Kano Pillars?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Wikki Tourist vs Kano Pillars: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.