Wikki Tourist vs Nasarawa United: match statistics
Wikki Tourist display solid home form with a 45% win rate at home and an impressive goal difference of +6 at their own stadium. The hosts keep clean sheets in 64% of home matches, indicating a stable defense. Despite their high league position (2nd place), Nasarawa United struggle away from home – only 27% wins, a negative goal difference (-4), and as many as 64% of matches without scoring away. xG statistics show the hosts' advantage (1.81 xG For vs 1.01 xG For the visitors), confirming their greater offensive effectiveness in home matches. The form over the last five matches overall is comparable (1.0 PPG vs 1.8 PPG), but Wikki Tourist's clear dominance at home and Nasarawa's weakness away point to a home win. A draw remains a realistic option due to both teams' defensive solidity and Wikki Tourist's history of many draws (45% of home matches).
Wikki Tourist vs Nasarawa United: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Wikki Tourist played against Nasarawa United in NPFL (Nigeria). The game was played on February 1, 2026. Final score: 1:1.
Recent form
Wikki Tourist has 1 win, 2 draws and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.00 points per game. Nasarawa United has 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses, with 1.40 points per game.
Scoring records
Wikki Tourist scores 0.74 goals per game and allows 0.87. Nasarawa United scores 0.96 and allows 0.74. Games in this league average 1.83 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 30% of Wikki Tourist's games and 35% of Nasarawa United's. The Over 2.5 rates are 17% and 30%, compared with league averages of 36% for BTTS and 26% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Nasarawa United has the higher season xG average, 1.71 to 1.32 per game. Wikki Tourist takes 5.1 shots per game, while Nasarawa United takes 9.3.
First-half and second-half trends
Wikki Tourist leads at halftime in 22% of its games and scores 0.30 goals per game after halftime. Nasarawa United leads at halftime in 26% and scores 0.48 after halftime.
When the teams score
Wikki Tourist's most productive scoring window is minutes 31-45+ (7 goals). For Nasarawa United, it is minutes 31-45+ (6 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
NPFL games average 1.83 goals. Both teams score in 36% of games, and 26% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 0 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 1.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Wikki Tourist display solid home form with a 45% win rate at home and an impressive goal difference of +6 at their own stadium. The hosts keep clean sheets in 64% of home matches, indicating a stable defense. Despite their high league position (2nd place), Nasarawa United struggle away from home – only 27% wins, a negative goal difference (-4), and as many as 64% of matches without scoring away. xG statistics show the hosts' advantage (1.81 xG For vs 1.01 xG For the visitors), confirming their greater offensive effectiveness in home matches. The form over the last five matches overall is comparable (1.0 PPG vs 1.8 PPG), but Wikki Tourist's clear dominance at home and Nasarawa's weakness away point to a home win. A draw remains a realistic option due to both teams' defensive solidity and Wikki Tourist's history of many draws (45% of home matches).
View the statistical overviewStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Wikki Tourist | Nasarawa United | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 27% | 36% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.26 | 0.18 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.53 | 0.28 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Nasarawa United is 40% better for: last-5 form.
1 pts / game - Wikki Tourist · 1.4 pts / game - Nasarawa United
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Nasarawa United is 30% better for: goals scored per game.
0.74 goals / game - Wikki Tourist · 0.96 goals / game - Nasarawa United
Nasarawa United is 18% better for: goals allowed per game.
0.87 goals / game - Wikki Tourist · 0.74 goals / game - Nasarawa United
Wikki Tourist scores in 57% of games (13 of 23 meczów), while Nasarawa United keeps a clean sheet in 39% (9 of 23 meczów).
Nasarawa United scores in 61% of games (14 of 23 meczów), while Wikki Tourist keeps a clean sheet in 39% (9 of 23 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Wikki Tourist
Over / Under - Nasarawa United
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Nasarawa United is 8% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.17 pts / game - Wikki Tourist · 1.26 pts / game - Nasarawa United
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Wikki Tourist - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 22% of games and wins 26%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
Nasarawa United - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 26% of games and wins 48%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.80 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.0 | 1.0 |
| Average goals per game | 0.4 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 20% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +2 | -2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.00 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 1.0 |
| Average goals per game | 0.8 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 20% |
| No goal | 80% | 60% |
| Goal difference | 0 | -2 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (7 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (6 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Wikki Tourist
Nasarawa United
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (NPFL).
Teams vs league
| Wikki Tourist | Liga | Nasarawa United | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 1.61 | 1.83 | ▼ 1.70 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 30% | 36% | • 35% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 17% | 26% | ▲ 30% |
| Clean sheets | • 39% | 38% | • 39% |
| Goal before half-time | • 61% | 60% | ▲ 70% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 48% | 59% | ▲ 61% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Head-to-head
Record from Wikki Tourist's perspective: 0 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss against Nasarawa United. Games average 1.00 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Wikki Tourist vs Nasarawa United?
The NPFL match finished Wikki Tourist 1:1 Nasarawa United. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Wikki Tourist vs Nasarawa United?
Wikki Tourist score 0.74 goals per game on average and Nasarawa United 0.96. The NPFL average is 1.83 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 26% of games. Both teams score in 30% of Wikki Tourist's matches and 35% of Nasarawa United's.
What form are Wikki Tourist and Nasarawa United in?
Over the last 5 games Wikki Tourist have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Nasarawa United 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Wikki Tourist vs Nasarawa United?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Wikki Tourist vs Nasarawa United: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.