Austria - BundesligaData current as of September 12, 2026

Wolfsberger AC vs Grazer AK: match statistics

Wolfsberger AC crest
Wolfsberger AC
2 : 2half-time 1:1
Grazer AK crest
Grazer AK
155%(1.91)
X25%(3.20)
220%(3.60)

Wolfsberger AC demonstrates significantly better home form with 44% wins and a goal difference of +2 at their own stadium, while Grazer AK has only 13% wins away and a dramatic goal difference of -10. The hosts score an average of 1.33 goals per match at home, while the visitors score only 0.63 goals away and in half of the matches they fail to score at all (FTS% 50%). The difference in possession (55% vs 44%) and shooting accuracy (3.44 vs 2.25 shots on target per match) also favors the hosts. Grazer AK concedes an average of 1.88 goals away, which, given Wolfsberger's offensive capabilities, gives real chances for a home win. The recent form of both teams (0.6 vs 1.2 PPG) slightly evens out the chances, hence the inclusion of the possibility of a draw or an away surprise.

Wolfsberger AC vs Grazer AK: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Wolfsberger AC played against Grazer AK in Bundesliga (Austria). The game was played on February 8, 2026. Final score: 2:2.

Recent form

Wolfsberger AC has 1 win, 0 draws and 4 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.60 points per game. Grazer AK has 2 wins, 0 draws and 3 losses, with 1.20 points per game.

Scoring records

Wolfsberger AC scores 1.47 goals per game and allows 1.24. Grazer AK scores 1.00 and allows 1.71. Games in this league average 2.72 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 65% of Wolfsberger AC's games and 65% of Grazer AK's. The Over 2.5 rates are 65% and 65%, compared with league averages of 56% for BTTS and 55% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Wolfsberger AC has the higher season xG average, 1.23 to 1.02 per game. Wolfsberger AC takes 10.8 shots per game, while Grazer AK takes 9.3.

First-half and second-half trends

Wolfsberger AC leads at halftime in 41% of its games and scores 0.47 goals per game after halftime. Grazer AK leads at halftime in 6% and scores 0.65 after halftime.

When the teams score

Wolfsberger AC's most productive scoring window is minutes 0-15 (7 goals). For Grazer AK, it is minutes 76-90+ (5 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Bundesliga games average 2.72 goals. Both teams score in 56% of games, and 55% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 1 home win, 0 draws and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 4.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Wolfsberger AC demonstrates significantly better home form with 44% wins and a goal difference of +2 at their own stadium, while Grazer AK has only 13% wins away and a dramatic goal difference of -10. The hosts score an average of 1.33 goals per match at home, while the visitors score only 0.63 goals away and in half of the matches they fail to score at all (FTS% 50%). The difference in possession (55% vs 44%) and shooting accuracy (3.44 vs 2.25 shots on target per match) also favors the hosts. Grazer AK concedes an average of 1.88 goals away, which, given Wolfsberger's offensive capabilities, gives real chances for a home win. The recent form of both teams (0.6 vs 1.2 PPG) slightly evens out the chances, hence the inclusion of the possibility of a draw or an away surprise.

View the statistical overview

Stats by half

1 : 1
First half
1 : 1
Second half

Game stats

40Possession (%)60
Wolfsberger ACGrazer AK
8Shots16
Wolfsberger ACGrazer AK
3Shots on target10
Wolfsberger ACGrazer AK
0.99xG2.08
Wolfsberger ACGrazer AK
4Corners6
Wolfsberger ACGrazer AK
38Dangerous attacks51
Wolfsberger ACGrazer AK
5Fouls17
Wolfsberger ACGrazer AK
4Cards2
Wolfsberger ACGrazer AK

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

Wolfsberger ACGrazer AK
1.47Goals scored / game1
Wolfsberger ACGrazer AK
1.24Goals allowed / game1.71
Wolfsberger ACGrazer AK
52%Average possession45%
Wolfsberger ACGrazer AK
3.47Shots on target / game2.71
Wolfsberger ACGrazer AK

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

10.82Shots per game9.29
Wolfsberger ACGrazer AK
3.47Shots on target2.71
Wolfsberger ACGrazer AK
13.6%Shot conversion10.8%
Wolfsberger ACGrazer AK
52%Possession45%
Wolfsberger ACGrazer AK
1.23xG for1.02
Wolfsberger ACGrazer AK
1.38xG against1.43
Wolfsberger ACGrazer AK

Shooting quality

Wolfsberger AC: Efficient finishingGrazer AK: Balanced
Wolfsberger ACGrazer AK
Accuracy (shots on target)32%29%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.420.37

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Grazer AK is 100% better for: last-5 form.

0.6 pts / game - Wolfsberger AC · 1.2 pts / game - Grazer AK

Wolfsberger AC
LLLWL
Season result split
41% W18% D41% L
Season (W-D-L)
7-3-7
1.41 pts / game · goal difference +4
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-0-4
0.60 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
4-1-4
Last 5 at home
2-1-2
WLDLW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 1.31Opponent xG: 1.53BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 80%
Grazer AK
LWWLL
Season result split
18% W35% D47% L
Season (W-D-L)
3-6-8
0.88 pts / game · goal difference -12
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-0-3
1.20 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
1-2-5
Last 5 away
1-1-3
DLLWL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 0.96Opponent xG: 1.63BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 100%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Wolfsberger AC is 47% better for: goals scored per game.

1.47 goals / game - Wolfsberger AC · 1 goals / game - Grazer AK

Wolfsberger AC is 38% better for: goals allowed per game.

1.24 goals / game - Wolfsberger AC · 1.71 goals / game - Grazer AK

Wolfsberger AC scoring profile: very strong

Wolfsberger AC scores in 82% of games (14 of 17 meczów), while Grazer AK keeps a clean sheet in 12% (2 of 17 meczów).

Grazer AK scoring profile: strong

Grazer AK scores in 65% of games (11 of 17 meczów), while Wolfsberger AC keeps a clean sheet in 24% (4 of 17 meczów).

25Goals scored (season)17
Wolfsberger ACGrazer AK
21Goals conceded (season)29
Wolfsberger ACGrazer AK
2.71Average goals per game2.71
Wolfsberger ACGrazer AK
5Goals scored (last 5)8
Wolfsberger ACGrazer AK
9Goals conceded (last 5)8
Wolfsberger ACGrazer AK

How often they score at least...

82%1 goal65%
Wolfsberger ACGrazer AK
41%2 goals24%
Wolfsberger ACGrazer AK
24%3 goals12%
Wolfsberger ACGrazer AK
0%4 goals0%
Wolfsberger ACGrazer AK

How often they concede at least...

76%1 goal88%
Wolfsberger ACGrazer AK
41%2 goals47%
Wolfsberger ACGrazer AK
6%3 goals24%
Wolfsberger ACGrazer AK
0%4 goals6%
Wolfsberger ACGrazer AK

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

56%
League average

Goal patterns

24%BTTS at half-time29%
Wolfsberger ACGrazer AK
0%BTTS in both halves6%
Wolfsberger ACGrazer AK
18%Scored in both halves18%
Wolfsberger ACGrazer AK

BTTS and goal count

59%Min. 3 goals and BTTS47%
Wolfsberger ACGrazer AK
6%Min. 3 goals without BTTS18%
Wolfsberger ACGrazer AK
80%BTTS - last 5100%
Wolfsberger ACGrazer AK

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

76%Min. 1 goal before half-time76%
Wolfsberger ACGrazer AK
59%Min. 2 goals before half-time35%
Wolfsberger ACGrazer AK
12%Min. 3 goals before half-time6%
Wolfsberger ACGrazer AK

2nd half

82%Min. 1 goal after half-time76%
Wolfsberger ACGrazer AK
35%Min. 2 goals after half-time53%
Wolfsberger ACGrazer AK
6%Min. 3 goals after half-time18%
Wolfsberger ACGrazer AK

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Wolfsberger AC is 154% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.65 pts / game - Wolfsberger AC · 0.65 pts / game - Grazer AK

Wolfsberger AC - half-time state
41% leading41% draw18% trailing
Grazer AK - half-time state
6% leading47% draw47% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.65Points per game (1st half)0.65
Wolfsberger ACGrazer AK
1Goals scored (1st half)0.35
Wolfsberger ACGrazer AK
0.47Goals conceded (1st half)0.82
Wolfsberger ACGrazer AK
1.47Average goals (1st half)1.18
Wolfsberger ACGrazer AK
59%Clean sheet before half-time29%
Wolfsberger ACGrazer AK
41%No goal before half-time65%
Wolfsberger ACGrazer AK

After half-time (2nd half)

1Points per game (2nd half)1.29
Wolfsberger ACGrazer AK
0.47Goals scored (2nd half)0.65
Wolfsberger ACGrazer AK
0.76Goals conceded (2nd half)0.88
Wolfsberger ACGrazer AK
1.24Average goals (2nd half)1.53
Wolfsberger ACGrazer AK
41%Clean sheet after half-time41%
Wolfsberger ACGrazer AK
59%No goal after half-time53%
Wolfsberger ACGrazer AK

Wolfsberger AC - second-half results

24% W29% D47% L
28
Half-time points
17
Half-time goals
+9
Goal difference (1st half)
17
Second-half points
-5
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.65
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at halftime in 41% of games and wins 41%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.3

Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Grazer AK - second-half results

29% W41% D29% L
11
Half-time points
6
Half-time goals
-8
Goal difference (1st half)
22
Second-half points
-4
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.65
PPG before half-time
Lead holding300%

Leads at halftime in 6% of games and wins 18%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.1

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Wolfsberger AC - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.000.20
Goals scored / game0.60.4
Goals allowed / game0.61.2
Average goals per game1.21.6
1 goal80%100%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet40%0%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference0-4
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 20% draw - 80% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3
Grazer AK - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game0.801.80
Goals scored / game0.41.2
Goals allowed / game0.80.8
Average goals per game1.22.0
1 goal80%80%
2 goals20%80%
3 goals20%40%
Clean sheet40%20%
No goal60%20%
Goal difference-2+2
Half-time: 20% leading - 20% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 60% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Wolfsberger AC
ScoredConceded
7
3
0-15
6
3
16-30
4
2
31-45
2
2
46-60
2
5
61-75
4
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (7 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

Grazer AK
ScoredConceded
1
3
0-15
3
5
16-30
2
6
31-45
4
2
46-60
2
5
61-75
5
8
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (5 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

2.71
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.6 : 1.1
Estimated goal split
home : away
100%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
65%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+48%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
53%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
6%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 17 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Wolfsberger AC

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.15
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.38
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-5.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.24
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.14
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
107%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
93%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.81
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.5
Late goals
16% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 28% come in the first quarter-hour.
16%

Grazer AK

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.41
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.30
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+2.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.02
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.28
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
75%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
124%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.32
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
29% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 6% come in the first quarter-hour.
29%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Bundesliga).

Teams vs league

Wolfsberger ACLigaGrazer AK
Average goals per game 2.712.72 2.71
Both teams scored 65%56% 65%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 65%55% 65%
Clean sheets 24%24% 12%
Goal before half-time 76%76% 76%
Goal after half-time 82%78% 76%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.72
Average goals per game
56%
Both teams scored
55%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
24%
Clean sheets
1.38
Home goals / game
1.34
Away goals / game
+3%
Home attack advantage
+3%
Home defensive advantage
+0%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
76%
1 goal
43%
2 goals
10%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
78%
1 goal
42%
2 goals
15%
3 goals
4%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Wolfsberger ACRed cardMarco Sulzner
  2. Grazer AKYellow cardRamiz Harakaté
  3. Wolfsberger ACYellow cardNikolas Polster
  4. Wolfsberger ACSubstitutionOn: Emmanuel Ofori AgyemangOff: Donis Xhemë Avdijaj
  5. Grazer AKGoalRamiz Harakaté
  6. Wolfsberger ACGoalDavid AtangaAssist: Boris Matić
  7. Grazer AKSubstitutionOn: Christian LichtenbergerOff: Tobias Koch
  8. Grazer AKSubstitutionOn: Alexander HofleitnerOff: Daniel Maderner
  9. Grazer AKGoalRamiz Harakaté
  10. Wolfsberger ACYellow cardRene Renner
  11. Grazer AKYellow cardDominik Frieser
  12. Wolfsberger ACSubstitutionOn: Jessic NgankamOff: Boris Matić
  13. Grazer AKSubstitutionOn: Thorsten SchrieblOff: Mathias Olesen
  14. Wolfsberger ACGoalErik Kojzek
  15. Grazer AKSubstitutionOn: Yannick OberleitnerOff: Leon Klassen

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Record from Wolfsberger AC's perspective: 1 win, 0 draws and 0 losses against Grazer AK. Games average 4.00 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.

Liebherr Grazer AK
1 : 3
Wolfsberger Athletik Club

FAQ

What was the result of Wolfsberger AC vs Grazer AK?

The Bundesliga match finished Wolfsberger AC 2:2 Grazer AK. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Wolfsberger AC vs Grazer AK?

Wolfsberger AC score 1.47 goals per game on average and Grazer AK 1.00. The Bundesliga average is 2.72 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 55% of games. Both teams score in 65% of Wolfsberger AC's matches and 65% of Grazer AK's.

What form are Wolfsberger AC and Grazer AK in?

Over the last 5 games Wolfsberger AC have a 1-0-4 record (0.60 points per game) and Grazer AK 2-0-3 (1.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Wolfsberger AC vs Grazer AK?

The statistical background for Wolfsberger AC vs Grazer AK — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.