Wolverhampton Wanderers vs Chelsea: match statistics
Chelsea are the clear favorite for this match. Wolverhampton are bottom of the table with just one win this season and a disastrous home record (8% wins, 75% losses). The hosts have scored only 10 goals in 12 home matches, conceding 25, resulting in a -15 goal difference. Chelsea, on the other hand, show solid away form with a 42% win rate, averaging 1.83 goals per game and failing to score in only 8% of their matches. The Londoners have won 4 of their last 5 games, scoring 10 goals, while Wolves have managed just 1 victory in the same period. Chelsea's advantage in possession (56% vs 46%), shot accuracy (15% vs 8%), and xG (1.48 vs 1.21) further confirms their dominance. Given the massive gap in quality and form between the two sides, an away win is the most probable outcome.
Wolverhampton Wanderers vs Chelsea: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Wolverhampton Wanderers played against Chelsea in Premier League (England). The game was played on February 7, 2026. Final score: 1:3.
Recent form
Wolverhampton Wanderers has 1 win, 2 draws and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.00 points per game. Chelsea has 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss, with 2.00 points per game.
Scoring records
Wolverhampton Wanderers scores 0.63 goals per game and allows 1.88. Chelsea scores 1.75 and allows 1.13. Games in this league average 2.79 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 42% of Wolverhampton Wanderers's games and 63% of Chelsea's. The Over 2.5 rates are 42% and 63%, compared with league averages of 55% for BTTS and 54% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Chelsea has the higher season xG average, 1.59 to 1.11 per game. Wolverhampton Wanderers takes 9.4 shots per game, while Chelsea takes 13.4.
First-half and second-half trends
Wolverhampton Wanderers leads at halftime in 8% of its games and scores 0.21 goals per game after halftime. Chelsea leads at halftime in 42% and scores 1.08 after halftime.
When the teams score
Wolverhampton Wanderers's most productive scoring window is minutes 31-45+ (6 goals). For Chelsea, it is minutes 46-60 (11 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Premier League games average 2.79 goals. Both teams score in 55% of games, and 54% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 0 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Chelsea are the clear favorite for this match. Wolverhampton are bottom of the table with just one win this season and a disastrous home record (8% wins, 75% losses). The hosts have scored only 10 goals in 12 home matches, conceding 25, resulting in a -15 goal difference. Chelsea, on the other hand, show solid away form with a 42% win rate, averaging 1.83 goals per game and failing to score in only 8% of their matches. The Londoners have won 4 of their last 5 games, scoring 10 goals, while Wolves have managed just 1 victory in the same period. Chelsea's advantage in possession (56% vs 46%), shot accuracy (15% vs 8%), and xG (1.48 vs 1.21) further confirms their dominance. Given the massive gap in quality and form between the two sides, an away win is the most probable outcome.
View the statistical overviewStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Wolverhampton Wanderers | Chelsea | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 34% | 36% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.20 | 0.37 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Chelsea is 100% better for: last-5 form.
1 pts / game - Wolverhampton Wanderers · 2 pts / game - Chelsea
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Chelsea is 178% better for: goals scored per game.
0.63 goals / game - Wolverhampton Wanderers · 1.75 goals / game - Chelsea
Chelsea is 66% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.88 goals / game - Wolverhampton Wanderers · 1.13 goals / game - Chelsea
Wolverhampton Wanderers scores in 46% of games (11 of 24 meczów), while Chelsea keeps a clean sheet in 38% (9 of 24 meczów).
Chelsea scores in 92% of games (22 of 24 meczów), while Wolverhampton Wanderers keeps a clean sheet in 8% (2 of 24 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Wolverhampton Wanderers
Over / Under - Chelsea
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Chelsea is 123% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.71 pts / game - Wolverhampton Wanderers · 1.58 pts / game - Chelsea
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Wolverhampton Wanderers - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 8% of games and wins 4%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.
Allows 0.1 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Chelsea - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 42% of games and wins 46%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.80 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.6 | 0.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.8 | 0.2 |
| Average goals per game | 1.4 | 0.4 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 40% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 80% |
| No goal | 80% | 80% |
| Goal difference | -1 | 0 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.40 | 2.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 1.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 1.0 | 2.2 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 60% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 0% |
| Goal difference | -1 | +5 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (6 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): -7 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (11 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Wolverhampton Wanderers
Chelsea
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Premier League).
Teams vs league
| Wolverhampton Wanderers | Liga | Chelsea | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 2.50 | 2.79 | • 2.88 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 42% | 55% | ▲ 63% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 42% | 54% | ▲ 63% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 8% | 26% | ▲ 38% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 67% | 73% | ▲ 75% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 71% | 81% | ▼ 79% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
- Wolverhampton WanderersSubstitutionOn: Pedro Henrique Cardoso de LimaOff: João Victor Gomes da Silva
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Record from Wolverhampton Wanderers's perspective: 0 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss against Chelsea. Games average 3.00 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Wolverhampton Wanderers vs Chelsea?
The Premier League match finished Wolverhampton Wanderers 1:3 Chelsea. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Wolverhampton Wanderers vs Chelsea?
Wolverhampton Wanderers score 0.63 goals per game on average and Chelsea 1.75. The Premier League average is 2.79 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 54% of games. Both teams score in 42% of Wolverhampton Wanderers's matches and 63% of Chelsea's.
What form are Wolverhampton Wanderers and Chelsea in?
Over the last 5 games Wolverhampton Wanderers have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Chelsea 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Wolverhampton Wanderers vs Chelsea?
The statistical background for Wolverhampton Wanderers vs Chelsea — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.