Wolverhampton Wanderers vs Nottingham Forest: match statistics
Wolverhampton Wanderers vs Nottingham Forest: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Wolverhampton Wanderers play Nottingham Forest in Premier League (England). The match date is 3 December 2025 at 20:30. Final score: 0:1.
Current form
Wolverhampton Wanderers: 0-3-2, 0.60 points/match. Nottingham Forest: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match.
Goal statistics
Wolverhampton Wanderers scores 0.71 and concedes 1.79 goals per match. Nottingham Forest scores 1.26 and concedes 1.34. League average: 2.75 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Wolverhampton Wanderers 45%, Nottingham Forest 47%. Over 2.5: Wolverhampton Wanderers 45%, Nottingham Forest 53%. League level: BTTS 56%, Over 2.5 55%.
xG, shots and style
Nottingham Forest has higher xG: 1.44 vs 1.13. Wolverhampton Wanderers: 9.7 shots per match, Nottingham Forest: 12.5.
Match halves
Wolverhampton Wanderers: half-time lead 8%, second-half goals 0.37. Nottingham Forest: half-time lead 21%, second-half goals 0.76.
Goals by minute
Wolverhampton Wanderers: 31-45+ (7 goals). Nottingham Forest: 76-90+ (13 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Premier League: 2.75 goals per match, BTTS 56%, Over 2.5 55%.
Head-to-head
1 H2H matches: 0-1-0. Average goals 0.00, BTTS 0%.
Half-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Wolverhampton Wanderers | Nottingham Forest | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 33% | 33% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.22 | 0.31 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Nottingham Forest is 167% better for: last-5 form.
0.6 pts / match - Wolverhampton Wanderers · 1.6 pts / match - Nottingham Forest
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Nottingham Forest is 77% better for: goals scored per match.
0.71 goals / match - Wolverhampton Wanderers · 1.26 goals / match - Nottingham Forest
Nottingham Forest is 34% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.79 goals / match - Wolverhampton Wanderers · 1.34 goals / match - Nottingham Forest
Wolverhampton Wanderers scores in 50% of matches (19 of 38 matches), while Nottingham Forest keeps a clean sheet in 24% (9 of 38 matches).
Nottingham Forest scores in 63% of matches (24 of 38 matches), while Wolverhampton Wanderers keeps a clean sheet in 11% (4 of 38 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under — Wolverhampton Wanderers
Over / Under — Nottingham Forest
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Nottingham Forest is 47% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.68 pts / match - Wolverhampton Wanderers · 1 pts / match - Nottingham Forest
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Wolverhampton Wanderers - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 8% of matches and wins 8%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Nottingham Forest - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 21% of matches and wins 29%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.00 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 1.2 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 80% |
| Goal difference | -2 | -2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.00 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.4 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 1.6 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 20% |
| No goal | 40% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +6 | 0 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (7 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (15). Late-goal balance (76-90): -8 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (13 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (15). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Wolverhampton Wanderers
Nottingham Forest
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Premier League).
Teams vs league
| Wolverhampton Wanderers | Liga | Nottingham Forest | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.50 | 2.75 | ▼ 2.61 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 45% | 56% | ▼ 47% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 45% | 55% | ▼ 53% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 11% | 26% | ▼ 24% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 66% | 72% | ▲ 74% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 76% | 79% | ▼ 74% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Wolverhampton Wanderers 0 - 1 - 0 Nottingham Forest. Average goals 0.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Wolverhampton Wanderers vs Nottingham Forest?
The Premier League match finished Wolverhampton Wanderers 0:1 Nottingham Forest. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Wolverhampton Wanderers vs Nottingham Forest?
Wolverhampton Wanderers score 0.71 goals per game on average and Nottingham Forest 1.26. The Premier League average is 2.75 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 55% of games. Both teams score in 45% of Wolverhampton Wanderers's matches and 47% of Nottingham Forest's.
What form are Wolverhampton Wanderers and Nottingham Forest in?
Over the last 5 games Wolverhampton Wanderers have a 0-3-2 record (0.60 points per game) and Nottingham Forest 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Wolverhampton Wanderers vs Nottingham Forest?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Wolverhampton Wanderers vs Nottingham Forest: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.