China - Chinese Super LeagueData current as of 23 July 2026

Wuhan Three Towns vs Chengdu Better City FC: match statistics

Wuhan Three Towns vs Chengdu Better City FC: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Wuhan Three Towns play Chengdu Better City FC in Chinese Super League (China). The match date is 17 April 2026 at 14:00. Final score: 0:1.

Current form

Wuhan Three Towns: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match. Chengdu Better City FC: 2-3-0, 1.80 points/match.

Goal statistics

Wuhan Three Towns scores 1.44 and concedes 1.89 goals per match. Chengdu Better City FC scores 2.05 and concedes 0.95. League average: 3.09 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Wuhan Three Towns 67%, Chengdu Better City FC 58%. Over 2.5: Wuhan Three Towns 56%, Chengdu Better City FC 53%. League level: BTTS 65%, Over 2.5 59%.

xG, shots and style

Chengdu Better City FC has higher xG: 1.72 vs 1.35. Wuhan Three Towns: 12.1 shots per match, Chengdu Better City FC: 14.8.

Match halves

Wuhan Three Towns: half-time lead 28%, second-half goals 0.78. Chengdu Better City FC: half-time lead 42%, second-half goals 1.21.

Goals by minute

Wuhan Three Towns: 31-45+ (7 goals). Chengdu Better City FC: 76-90+ (15 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Chinese Super League: 3.09 goals per match, BTTS 65%, Over 2.5 59%.

Head-to-head

2 H2H matches: 0-1-1. Average goals 2.50, BTTS 50%.

Match description

I back the away win (Chengdu Better City) based on a clear statistical advantage: they sit 1st with 4 wins and 1 draw and a goals record of 16:6, while Wuhan Three Towns have 1 win, 1 draw and 3 losses with a 8:11 record. In the last 5 matches Chengdu scored 16 goals and average 2.6 points per game, whereas Wuhan scored 8 and average 0.8 points per game, indicating a large gap in points efficiency. The visitors create better chances (average xG 1.52 vs hosts’ 1.19, 12 shots per game vs 10 and 5 shots on target vs 4), with comparable shot conversion (21% vs 20%), so the offensive superiority is measurable. Wuhan have been conceding heavily recently (11 goals in the last 5 matches, i.e. 2.2 per game) and have 50% of home matches without scoring, while Chengdu have 0% away matches without a goal, therefore I rate the visitors’ chances higher.

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
0 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

52Possession (%)48
Wuhan Three TownsChengdu Better City FC
15Shots9
Wuhan Three TownsChengdu Better City FC
2Shots on target3
Wuhan Three TownsChengdu Better City FC
1.39xG1.14
Wuhan Three TownsChengdu Better City FC
5Corners4
Wuhan Three TownsChengdu Better City FC
42Dangerous attacks49
Wuhan Three TownsChengdu Better City FC
9Fouls17
Wuhan Three TownsChengdu Better City FC
3Cards2
Wuhan Three TownsChengdu Better City FC

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Wuhan Three TownsChengdu Better City FC
1.44Goals scored / match2.05
Wuhan Three TownsChengdu Better City FC
1.89Goals conceded / match0.95
Wuhan Three TownsChengdu Better City FC
Wuhan Three TownsChengdu Better City FC
46%Average possession57%
Wuhan Three TownsChengdu Better City FC
4.22Shots on target / match5.11
Wuhan Three TownsChengdu Better City FC
Wuhan Three TownsChengdu Better City FC

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

12.06Shots per match14.79
Wuhan Three TownsChengdu Better City FC
4.22Shots on target5.11
Wuhan Three TownsChengdu Better City FC
12%Shot conversion13.9%
Wuhan Three TownsChengdu Better City FC
46%Possession57%
Wuhan Three TownsChengdu Better City FC
1.35xG for1.72
Wuhan Three TownsChengdu Better City FC
1.54xG against1.16
Wuhan Three TownsChengdu Better City FC

Shooting quality

Wuhan Three Towns: Counter-attackingChengdu Better City FC: Dominant
Wuhan Three TownsChengdu Better City FC
Accuracy (shots on target)35%35%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.340.40

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Chengdu Better City FC is 80% better for: last-5 form.

1 pts / match - Wuhan Three Towns · 1.8 pts / match - Chengdu Better City FC

Wuhan Three Towns
DDLLW
Season result split
17% W39% R44% P
Season (W-D-L)
3-7-8
0.89 pts / match · goal difference -8
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
3-2-3
Last 5 at home
2-2-1
WLDDW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.69Opponent xG: 1.67BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%
Chengdu Better City FC
WWDDD
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
68% W21% R11% P
Season (W-D-L)
13-4-2
2.26 pts / match · goal difference +21
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-3-0
1.80 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
6-3-1
Last 5 away
2-2-1
WLWDD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.76Opponent xG: 1.22BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 20%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Chengdu Better City FC is 42% better for: goals scored per match.

1.44 goals / match - Wuhan Three Towns · 2.05 goals / match - Chengdu Better City FC

Chengdu Better City FC is 99% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.89 goals / match - Wuhan Three Towns · 0.95 goals / match - Chengdu Better City FC

Wuhan Three Towns scoring profile: very strong

Wuhan Three Towns scores in 78% of matches (14 of 18 matches), while Chengdu Better City FC keeps a clean sheet in 32% (6 of 19 matches).

Chengdu Better City FC scoring profile: very strong

Chengdu Better City FC scores in 89% of matches (17 of 19 matches), while Wuhan Three Towns keeps a clean sheet in 11% (2 of 18 matches).

26Goals scored (season)39
Wuhan Three TownsChengdu Better City FC
34Goals conceded (season)18
Wuhan Three TownsChengdu Better City FC
3.33Average goals in match3
Wuhan Three TownsChengdu Better City FC
8Goals scored (last 5)7
Wuhan Three TownsChengdu Better City FC
8Goals conceded (last 5)5
Wuhan Three TownsChengdu Better City FC

How often they score at least...

78%1 goal89%
Wuhan Three TownsChengdu Better City FC
50%2 goals53%
Wuhan Three TownsChengdu Better City FC
11%3 goals37%
Wuhan Three TownsChengdu Better City FC
6%4 goals16%
Wuhan Three TownsChengdu Better City FC

How often they concede at least...

89%1 goal68%
Wuhan Three TownsChengdu Better City FC
56%2 goals21%
Wuhan Three TownsChengdu Better City FC
28%3 goals5%
Wuhan Three TownsChengdu Better City FC
11%4 goals0%
Wuhan Three TownsChengdu Better City FC

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

67%
Wuhan Three Towns - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.12 of 18 matches
58%
Chengdu Better City FC - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.11 of 19 matches
65%
League average

Goal patterns

28%BTTS at half-time16%
Wuhan Three TownsChengdu Better City FC
6%BTTS in both halves0%
Wuhan Three TownsChengdu Better City FC
22%Scored in both halves42%
Wuhan Three TownsChengdu Better City FC

BTTS and goal count

50%Min. 3 goals and BTTS42%
Wuhan Three TownsChengdu Better City FC
6%Min. 3 goals without BTTS11%
Wuhan Three TownsChengdu Better City FC
60%BTTS - last 580%
Wuhan Three TownsChengdu Better City FC

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

Full match - team comparison (Over)

Wuhan Three TownsChengdu Better City FC
Wuhan Three TownsChengdu Better City FC
Wuhan Three TownsChengdu Better City FC
Wuhan Three TownsChengdu Better City FC

1st half

72%Min. 1 goal before half-time63%
Wuhan Three TownsChengdu Better City FC
44%Min. 2 goals before half-time32%
Wuhan Three TownsChengdu Better City FC
33%Min. 3 goals before half-time16%
Wuhan Three TownsChengdu Better City FC

2nd half

94%Min. 1 goal after half-time95%
Wuhan Three TownsChengdu Better City FC
50%Min. 2 goals after half-time53%
Wuhan Three TownsChengdu Better City FC
22%Min. 3 goals after half-time21%
Wuhan Three TownsChengdu Better City FC

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Chengdu Better City FC is 44% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.17 pts / match - Wuhan Three Towns · 1.68 pts / match - Chengdu Better City FC

Wuhan Three Towns - half-time state
28% leading33% draw39% trailing
Chengdu Better City FC - half-time state
42% leading42% draw16% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.17Points per match (1st half)1.68
Wuhan Three TownsChengdu Better City FC
0.67Goals scored (1st half)0.84
Wuhan Three TownsChengdu Better City FC
0.89Goals conceded (1st half)0.32
Wuhan Three TownsChengdu Better City FC
1.56Average goals (1st half)1.16
Wuhan Three TownsChengdu Better City FC
39%Clean sheet before half-time74%
Wuhan Three TownsChengdu Better City FC
61%No goal before half-time47%
Wuhan Three TownsChengdu Better City FC

After half-time (2nd half)

1.17Points per match (2nd half)2.05
Wuhan Three TownsChengdu Better City FC
0.78Goals scored (2nd half)1.21
Wuhan Three TownsChengdu Better City FC
1Goals conceded (2nd half)0.63
Wuhan Three TownsChengdu Better City FC
1.78Average goals (2nd half)1.84
Wuhan Three TownsChengdu Better City FC
33%Clean sheet after half-time58%
Wuhan Three TownsChengdu Better City FC
39%No goal after half-time21%
Wuhan Three TownsChengdu Better City FC

Wuhan Three Towns - second-half results

28% W33% R39% P
21
Half-time points
12
Half-time goals
-4
Goal difference (1st half)
21
Second-half points
-4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.17
PPG before half-time
Lead holding61%

Leads at half-time in 28% of matches and wins 17%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Chengdu Better City FC - second-half results

63% W16% R21% P
32
Half-time points
16
Half-time goals
+10
Goal difference (1st half)
39
Second-half points
+11
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.68
PPG before half-time
Lead holding162%

Leads at half-time in 42% of matches and wins 68%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Wuhan Three Towns - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.800.60
Goals scored / match1.20.4
Goals conceded / match0.61.0
Average goals in match1.81.4
1 goal60%80%
2 goals60%60%
3 goals40%0%
Clean sheet60%20%
No goal40%60%
Goal difference+3-3
Half-time: 40% leading - 60% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 60% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 6
Chengdu Better City FC - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.001.20
Goals scored / match0.60.8
Goals conceded / match0.20.8
Average goals in match0.81.6
1 goal80%80%
2 goals0%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet80%40%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference+20
Half-time: 60% leading - 20% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Wuhan Three Towns
ScoredConceded
3
5
0-15
2
3
16-30
7
8
31-45
4
5
46-60
6
7
61-75
4
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (7 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

Chengdu Better City FC
ScoredConceded
3
2
0-15
5
2
16-30
8
2
31-45
4
1
46-60
4
4
61-75
15
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (15 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +8 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.16
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.2 : 2.0
Estimated goal split
home : away
102%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
63%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-21%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
69%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
2%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 50 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Wuhan Three Towns

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.19
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.26
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-3.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.09
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.35
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
80%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
145%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.11
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
15% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 12% come in the first quarter-hour.
15%

Chengdu Better City FC

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.56
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.54
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-4.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.33
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.21
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
158%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
53%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.46
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
38% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 8% come in the first quarter-hour.
38%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Chinese Super League).

Teams vs league

Wuhan Three TownsLigaChengdu Better City FC
Average goals in match 3.333.09 3.00
Both teams scored 67%65% 58%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 56%59% 53%
Clean sheets 11%19% 32%
Goal before half-time 72%70% 63%
Goal after half-time 94%89% 95%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.09
Average goals per match
65%
Both teams scored
59%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
19%
Clean sheets
1.80
Home goals / match
1.30
Away goals / match
+38%
Home attack advantage
+28%
Home defence advantage
+20%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
70%
1 goal
37%
2 goals
15%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
89%
1 goal
56%
2 goals
24%
3 goals
12%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (2): Wuhan Three Towns 0 - 1 - 1 Chengdu Better City FC. Average goals 2.50, both teams scored in 50% matches.

Wuhan Three Towns FC
2 : 2
Chengdu Better City FC
Chengdu Better City FC
1 : 0
Wuhan Three Towns FC

FAQ

What was the result of Wuhan Three Towns vs Chengdu Better City FC?

The Chinese Super League match finished Wuhan Three Towns 0:1 Chengdu Better City FC. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Wuhan Three Towns and Chengdu Better City FC?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches Wuhan Three Towns won 0, Chengdu Better City FC won 1 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 2.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Wuhan Three Towns vs Chengdu Better City FC?

Wuhan Three Towns score 1.44 goals per game on average and Chengdu Better City FC 2.05. The Chinese Super League average is 3.09 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 59% of games. Both teams score in 67% of Wuhan Three Towns's matches and 58% of Chengdu Better City FC's.

What form are Wuhan Three Towns and Chengdu Better City FC in?

Over the last 5 games Wuhan Three Towns have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Chengdu Better City FC 2-3-0 (1.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Wuhan Three Towns vs Chengdu Better City FC?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.