Wuhan Three Towns vs Chengdu Better City FC: match statistics
Wuhan Three Towns vs Chengdu Better City FC: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Wuhan Three Towns played against Chengdu Better City FC in Chinese Super League (China). The game was played on April 17, 2026. Final score: 0:1.
Recent form
Wuhan Three Towns has 1 win, 1 draw and 3 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.80 points per game. Chengdu Better City FC has 4 wins, 1 draw and 0 losses, with 2.60 points per game.
Scoring records
Wuhan Three Towns scores 1.60 goals per game and allows 2.20. Chengdu Better City FC scores 3.20 and allows 1.20. Games in this league average 2.98 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 80% of Wuhan Three Towns's games and 80% of Chengdu Better City FC's. The Over 2.5 rates are 60% and 80%, compared with league averages of 58% for BTTS and 53% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Chengdu Better City FC has the higher season xG average, 1.99 to 1.10 per game. Wuhan Three Towns takes 9.2 shots per game, while Chengdu Better City FC takes 16.6.
First-half and second-half trends
Wuhan Three Towns leads at halftime in 20% of its games and scores 1.20 goals per game after halftime. Chengdu Better City FC leads at halftime in 60% and scores 1.80 after halftime.
When the teams score
Wuhan Three Towns's most productive scoring window is minutes 61-75 (4 goals). For Chengdu Better City FC, it is minutes 76-90+ (8 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Chinese Super League games average 2.98 goals. Both teams score in 58% of games, and 53% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 2 previous meetings were available. The record was 0 home wins, 1 draw and 1 away win. Those games averaged 2.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
I back the away win (Chengdu Better City) based on a clear statistical advantage: they sit 1st with 4 wins and 1 draw and a goals record of 16:6, while Wuhan Three Towns have 1 win, 1 draw and 3 losses with a 8:11 record. In the last 5 matches Chengdu scored 16 goals and average 2.6 points per game, whereas Wuhan scored 8 and average 0.8 points per game, indicating a large gap in points efficiency. The visitors create better chances (average xG 1.52 vs hosts’ 1.19, 12 shots per game vs 10 and 5 shots on target vs 4), with comparable shot conversion (21% vs 20%), so the offensive superiority is measurable. Wuhan have been conceding heavily recently (11 goals in the last 5 matches, i.e. 2.2 per game) and have 50% of home matches without scoring, while Chengdu have 0% away matches without a goal, therefore I rate the visitors’ chances higher.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Seasonally BTTS occurs for the home team in 67% of matches and for the away team in 100%; in the last 5 matches both teams have BTTS at 80%, which is a strong signal that both sides typically score. The away team has 0% clean sheets this season, the home team only 33% clean sheets; additionally the home side conceded an average of 2.2 goals in the last 5 matches while the away team scored an average of 3.2 goals, indicating weaker home defense and away offensive form. In terms of xG the away team has xG 1.99 in the last 5 matches while the home team has xG against 1.7 in that period; season xG is 2.3 for the home side versus 1.52 for the away side, which confirms both teams have realistic scoring chances. Considering the above figures (67%/100% seasonal BTTS, 80% in the last 5, 0% CS for away), I pick BTTS - Yes with an estimated probability of about 82% versus 18% for No Goal.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
I estimate Wuhan to score 1.69 goals and Chengdu 1.22 goals (total 2.91), calculated from home offensive xG 2.30 and away defensive xG 1.07, and away offensive xG 1.52 and home defensive xG 0.91. Wuhan averages 19.67 shots and 8.0 on target per match, Chengdu 12.0 shots and 5.0 on target; with conversion rates of 19% and 21% the home side creates more chances, increasing goal probability. Both teams have a high share of matches over 2.5 goals: Wuhan 67% and Chengdu 100%, and BTTS at 67% and 100% respectively; the league average is 3.1 goals, which further supports the Over 2.5 goals market. Although seasonally Wuhan has 67% of matches over 3.5 and Chengdu 50%, Wuhan’s last 5 home matches yield only 1.6 goals scored per game and the projected total xG 2.91 is below the 3.5 threshold, so Over 3.5 is less certain (Over 3.5 = 44%). Therefore the strongest signal from the data is Over on the 2.5 line (Over 2.5 = 78%).
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
I select the 1/1 scenario (Wuhan leading at Half-Time and winning Full-Time) because the home side have a 100% home win rate, score an average of 3.67 goals per match and 1.67 goals by Half-Time (6 first-half goals this season), and led at the break in 67% of home games. Wuhan’s higher xG (2.30 vs 1.52), greater number of shots (19.67 vs 12.0) and shots on target (8.0 vs 5.0) support their superiority in chance creation. Chengdu are in good overall form (80% wins in the last 5 matches), but their average first-half goals is only 1.00 and they have lower xG and fewer shots on target, so they are less likely to take control from the outset. Therefore I assign the 1/1 scenario a 50% probability, give outcomes such as Half-Time draw / Full-Time draw (X/X) ~10%, and a full away victory from start to finish (2/2) about 3%, reflecting the home advantage in first-half stats (1.67 vs 1.00) and full-match xG (2.30 vs 1.52).
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Wuhan Three Towns | Chengdu Better City FC | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 33% | 41% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.53 | 0.47 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Chengdu Better City FC is 225% better for: last-5 form.
0.8 pts / game - Wuhan Three Towns · 2.6 pts / game - Chengdu Better City FC
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Chengdu Better City FC is 100% better for: goals scored per game.
1.6 goals / game - Wuhan Three Towns · 3.2 goals / game - Chengdu Better City FC
Chengdu Better City FC is 83% better for: goals allowed per game.
2.2 goals / game - Wuhan Three Towns · 1.2 goals / game - Chengdu Better City FC
Wuhan Three Towns scores in 80% of games (4 of 5 meczów), while Chengdu Better City FC keeps a clean sheet in 20% (1 of 5 meczów).
Chengdu Better City FC scores in 100% of games (5 of 5 meczów), while Wuhan Three Towns keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 5 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Wuhan Three Towns
Over / Under - Chengdu Better City FC
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Chengdu Better City FC is 175% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.8 pts / game - Wuhan Three Towns · 2.2 pts / game - Chengdu Better City FC
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Wuhan Three Towns - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 20% of games and wins 20%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
Chengdu Better City FC - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 60% of games and wins 80%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.8 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.80 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 1.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.4 | 0.8 |
| Average goals per game | 1.8 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 40% |
| No goal | 80% | 20% |
| Goal difference | -5 | +2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 2.20 | 2.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.4 | 1.8 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.2 | 1.0 |
| Average goals per game | 1.6 | 2.8 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 60% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 40% |
| No goal | 40% | 0% |
| Goal difference | +6 | +4 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (4 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Wuhan Three Towns
Chengdu Better City FC
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Chinese Super League).
Teams vs league
| Wuhan Three Towns | Liga | Chengdu Better City FC | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 3.80 | 2.98 | ▲ 4.40 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 80% | 58% | ▲ 80% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 60% | 53% | ▲ 80% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 0% | 23% | ▼ 20% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 80% | 63% | ▼ 60% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 100% | 88% | ▲ 100% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from Wuhan Three Towns's perspective: 0 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss against Chengdu Better City FC. Games average 2.50 goals, and both teams scored in 50% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Wuhan Three Towns vs Chengdu Better City FC?
The Chinese Super League match finished Wuhan Three Towns 0:1 Chengdu Better City FC. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Wuhan Three Towns and Chengdu Better City FC?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches Wuhan Three Towns won 0, Chengdu Better City FC won 1 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 2.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Wuhan Three Towns vs Chengdu Better City FC?
Wuhan Three Towns score 1.60 goals per game on average and Chengdu Better City FC 3.20. The Chinese Super League average is 2.98 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 53% of games. Both teams score in 80% of Wuhan Three Towns's matches and 80% of Chengdu Better City FC's.
What form are Wuhan Three Towns and Chengdu Better City FC in?
Over the last 5 games Wuhan Three Towns have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and Chengdu Better City FC 4-1-0 (2.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Wuhan Three Towns vs Chengdu Better City FC?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.