Wycombe Wanderers vs Sheffield Wednesday: match statistics
Wycombe Wanderers vs Sheffield Wednesday: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Wycombe Wanderers played against Sheffield Wednesday in EFL League One (England). The game was played on September 1, 2026. Venue: Adams Park. Final score: 1:2.
Recent form
Wycombe Wanderers has 0 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 0.67 points per game. Sheffield Wednesday has 2 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss, with 2.00 points per game.
Scoring records
Wycombe Wanderers scores 1.00 goals per game and allows 2.33. Sheffield Wednesday scores 3.00 and allows 1.33. Games in this league average 3.03 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 100% of Wycombe Wanderers's games and 67% of Sheffield Wednesday's. The Over 2.5 rates are 33% and 67%, compared with league averages of 69% for BTTS and 57% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Sheffield Wednesday has the higher season xG average, 2.04 to 1.29 per game. Wycombe Wanderers takes 10.7 shots per game, while Sheffield Wednesday takes 18.7.
First-half and second-half trends
Wycombe Wanderers leads at halftime in 33% of its games and scores 0.33 goals per game after halftime. Sheffield Wednesday leads at halftime in 33% and scores 1.67 after halftime.
When the teams score
Wycombe Wanderers's most productive scoring window is minutes 0-15 (1 goals). For Sheffield Wednesday, it is minutes 31-45+ (2 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
League One games average 3.03 goals. Both teams score in 69% of games, and 57% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
There is not enough head-to-head history for a meaningful comparison.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Sheffield Wednesday hold a slight advantage thanks to their more effective away performances: they average 2 goals per match on the road, while Wycombe score 1 at home. Both teams create a similar number of chances, averaging 14 shots and 5 on target per game, but the visitors convert 14% of their attempts compared with 7% for the hosts. Sheffield Wednesday’s away defense concedes an average xG of 1.13, lower than Wycombe’s 1.23 at home, although neither team has kept a clean sheet yet. Wycombe have drawn both of their home matches so far, whereas Sheffield Wednesday won their only away fixture, which, combined with the difference in finishing efficiency, points towards the visitors. Neither side has shown consistent form, but Sheffield Wednesday’s 1.2 points per match over their last five appearances exceeds Wycombe’s 0.6.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The stronger signal comes from the teams’ current attacking form: Wycombe have averaged 0.8 goals in their last 5 matches, while Sheffield Wednesday have managed only 0.6. The visitors do have an average xG of 1.36, but their actual tally is just 3 goals in five games, pointing to finishing problems. Wycombe have failed to score in 100% of their home matches so far, while Sheffield Wednesday have conceded in every away fixture, making a scenario in which the hosts once again fail to convert their chances the most realistic outcome. Recent BTTS indicators are divergent—80% for Wycombe and 20% for Sheffield Wednesday—but the low combined scoring rate of 1.4 goals per match for both teams suggests that at least one side will fail to score. Although the league records a BTTS rate of 71%, both teams’ data from their last five matches reduces the likelihood of goals at both ends.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Wycombe’s last five matches produced an average of just 2.0 goals, with the team scoring 0.8 and conceding 1.2, while Sheffield Wednesday averaged 2.0 goals, with 0.6 scored and 1.4 conceded. Only 20% of the hosts’ recent matches and 40% of the visitors’ games went over 2.5 goals, clearly limiting the prospects of a high-scoring game. The chance-quality indicators are slightly higher, as Wycombe have created chances worth 1.35 xG and Sheffield Wednesday 1.36 xG over their last five matches, but this is not currently translating into finishing efficiency for either attack. The projected total of 2.25 goals remains below the league average of 2.63, making Under 3.5 the safest signal; the bet would only lose if there were at least four goals.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The strongest scenario is a draw at half-time followed by a Sheffield Wednesday victory at full-time, as both teams often start cautiously: the first 45 minutes ended level in 60% of Wycombe’s last five matches and in 75% of Sheffield’s games. Across those same five appearances, the hosts averaged 0.4 goals before the break, while the visitors averaged just 0.25, limiting the likelihood of either side establishing a clear early advantage. After the interval, Sheffield have performed considerably better, scoring an average of 0.5 goals and conceding just 0.25, whereas Wycombe score 0.4 goals but allow opponents 0.8. The visitors also have a stronger record in the latter stages of matches, averaging 1.75 points after half-time compared with Wycombe’s 0.8; across their last five league fixtures, they won 40% of matches, while the hosts recorded no victories. Sheffield’s superior second-half efficiency should therefore turn an even contest in their favor.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Wycombe Wanderers | Sheffield Wednesday | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 44% | 39% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.21 | 0.41 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Sheffield Wednesday is 199% better for: last-5 form.
0.67 pts / game - Wycombe Wanderers · 2 pts / game - Sheffield Wednesday
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Sheffield Wednesday is 200% better for: goals scored per game.
1 goals / game - Wycombe Wanderers · 3 goals / game - Sheffield Wednesday
Sheffield Wednesday is 75% better for: goals allowed per game.
2.33 goals / game - Wycombe Wanderers · 1.33 goals / game - Sheffield Wednesday
Wycombe Wanderers scores in 100% of games (3 of 3 games), while Sheffield Wednesday keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 3 games).
Sheffield Wednesday scores in 67% of games (2 of 3 games), while Wycombe Wanderers keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 3 games).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Wycombe Wanderers
Over / Under - Sheffield Wednesday
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Sheffield Wednesday is 67% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1 pts / game - Wycombe Wanderers · 1.67 pts / game - Sheffield Wednesday
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Wycombe Wanderers - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 33% of games and wins 0%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.
Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Sheffield Wednesday - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 33% of games and wins 67%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.7 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.7 | 0.3 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.0 | 1.3 |
| Average goals per game | 1.7 | 1.7 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 33% | 33% |
| 3 goals | 33% | 33% |
| Clean sheet | 33% | 33% |
| No goal | 33% | 67% |
| Goal difference | -1 | -3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.67 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.3 | 1.7 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.3 | 1.0 |
| Average goals per game | 1.7 | 2.7 |
| 1 goal | 67% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 67% | 33% |
| 3 goals | 33% | 33% |
| Clean sheet | 67% | 33% |
| No goal | 33% | 33% |
| Goal difference | +3 | +2 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (1 goal). Concedes most in 16-30 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (2 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Wycombe Wanderers
Sheffield Wednesday
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (League One).
Teams vs league
| Wycombe Wanderers | Liga | Sheffield Wednesday | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 3.33 | 3.03 | ▲ 4.33 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 100% | 69% | ▼ 67% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 33% | 57% | ▲ 67% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 0% | 20% | ▼ 0% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 100% | 60% | ▲ 67% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 100% | 89% | ▲ 100% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
FAQ
What was the result of Wycombe Wanderers vs Sheffield Wednesday?
The EFL League One match finished Wycombe Wanderers 1:2 Sheffield Wednesday. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Wycombe Wanderers vs Sheffield Wednesday?
Wycombe Wanderers score 1.00 goals per game on average and Sheffield Wednesday 3.00. The EFL League One average is 3.03 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 57% of games. Both teams score in 100% of Wycombe Wanderers's matches and 67% of Sheffield Wednesday's.
What form are Wycombe Wanderers and Sheffield Wednesday in?
Over the last 5 games Wycombe Wanderers have a 0-2-1 record (0.67 points per game) and Sheffield Wednesday 2-0-1 (2.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Wycombe Wanderers vs Sheffield Wednesday?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


