Yacoub El Mansour vs Ittihad Tanger: match statistics
Statistical analysis indicates a balanced competition favoring a draw scenario. Yacoub El Mansour displays solid home form with a +1 goal difference and 33% clean sheets at home, though their recent overall form is weak (0.8 PPG). Ittihad Tanger has not won a single away match this season, yet a significant 67% of their away games have ended in a draw, confirming a tendency to split points. The hosts hold an advantage in possession (55% vs 47%) and better xG in their matches (1.43 vs 1.30 for the guests), however, the defense of both teams raises concerns—conceding an average of 0.67 and 1.67 goals respectively. Given the weak offense of both squads (averaging 1 goal per match) and the visitors' tendency for away draws, a sharing of points is the most probable result, although the hosts have a chance to leverage home advantage.
Yacoub El Mansour vs Ittihad Tanger: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Yacoub El Mansour played against Ittihad Tanger in Botola Pro (Morocco). The game was played on January 24, 2026. Final score: 1:2.
Recent form
Yacoub El Mansour has 1 win, 1 draw and 3 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.80 points per game. Ittihad Tanger has 1 win, 2 draws and 2 losses, with 1.00 points per game.
Scoring records
Yacoub El Mansour scores 1.00 goals per game and allows 1.38. Ittihad Tanger scores 0.88 and allows 1.38. Games in this league average 2.19 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 50% of Yacoub El Mansour's games and 63% of Ittihad Tanger's. The Over 2.5 rates are 25% and 25%, compared with league averages of 44% for BTTS and 38% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Yacoub El Mansour has the higher season xG average, 1.39 to 1.24 per game. Yacoub El Mansour takes 11.4 shots per game, while Ittihad Tanger takes 10.1.
First-half and second-half trends
Yacoub El Mansour leads at halftime in 25% of its games and scores 0.63 goals per game after halftime. Ittihad Tanger leads at halftime in 13% and scores 0.63 after halftime.
When the teams score
Yacoub El Mansour's most productive scoring window is minutes 61-75 (3 goals). For Ittihad Tanger, it is minutes 61-75 (2 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Botola Pro games average 2.19 goals. Both teams score in 44% of games, and 38% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
There is not enough head-to-head history for a meaningful comparison.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Statistical analysis indicates a balanced competition favoring a draw scenario. Yacoub El Mansour displays solid home form with a +1 goal difference and 33% clean sheets at home, though their recent overall form is weak (0.8 PPG). Ittihad Tanger has not won a single away match this season, yet a significant 67% of their away games have ended in a draw, confirming a tendency to split points. The hosts hold an advantage in possession (55% vs 47%) and better xG in their matches (1.43 vs 1.30 for the guests), however, the defense of both teams raises concerns—conceding an average of 0.67 and 1.67 goals respectively. Given the weak offense of both squads (averaging 1 goal per match) and the visitors' tendency for away draws, a sharing of points is the most probable result, although the hosts have a chance to leverage home advantage.
View the statistical overviewStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Yacoub El Mansour | Ittihad Tanger | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 35% | 28% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.25 | 0.31 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Ittihad Tanger is 25% better for: last-5 form.
0.8 pts / game - Yacoub El Mansour · 1 pts / game - Ittihad Tanger
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Yacoub El Mansour is 14% better for: goals scored per game.
1 goals / game - Yacoub El Mansour · 0.88 goals / game - Ittihad Tanger
Yacoub El Mansour scores in 63% of games (5 of 8 meczów), while Ittihad Tanger keeps a clean sheet in 13% (1 of 8 meczów).
Ittihad Tanger scores in 75% of games (6 of 8 meczów), while Yacoub El Mansour keeps a clean sheet in 13% (1 of 8 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Yacoub El Mansour
Over / Under - Ittihad Tanger
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Yacoub El Mansour is 42% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.25 pts / game - Yacoub El Mansour · 0.88 pts / game - Ittihad Tanger
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Yacoub El Mansour - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 25% of games and wins 13%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.
Allows 0.1 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Ittihad Tanger - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 13% of games and wins 13%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.1 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.20 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 0.6 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 40% |
| No goal | 80% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -1 | 0 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.40 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.0 | 0.8 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| Average goals per game | 0.8 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 40% |
| No goal | 100% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -4 | 0 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (3 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (2 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Yacoub El Mansour
Ittihad Tanger
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Botola Pro).
Teams vs league
| Yacoub El Mansour | Liga | Ittihad Tanger | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 2.38 | 2.19 | • 2.25 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 50% | 44% | ▲ 63% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 25% | 38% | ▼ 25% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 13% | 33% | ▼ 13% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 50% | 67% | ▼ 63% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 100% | 73% | ▲ 75% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
FAQ
What was the result of Yacoub El Mansour vs Ittihad Tanger?
The Botola Pro match finished Yacoub El Mansour 1:2 Ittihad Tanger. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Yacoub El Mansour vs Ittihad Tanger?
Yacoub El Mansour score 1.00 goals per game on average and Ittihad Tanger 0.88. The Botola Pro average is 2.19 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 38% of games. Both teams score in 50% of Yacoub El Mansour's matches and 63% of Ittihad Tanger's.
What form are Yacoub El Mansour and Ittihad Tanger in?
Over the last 5 games Yacoub El Mansour have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and Ittihad Tanger 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Yacoub El Mansour vs Ittihad Tanger?
The statistical background for Yacoub El Mansour vs Ittihad Tanger — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.