Morocco - Botola ProData current as of 23 July 2026

Yacoub El Mansour vs UTS Rabat: match statistics

Yacoub El Mansour crest
Yacoub El Mansour
1 : 2half-time 1:2
UTS Rabat crest
UTS Rabat

Yacoub El Mansour vs UTS Rabat: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Yacoub El Mansour play UTS Rabat in Botola Pro (Morocco). The match date is 23 May 2026 at 18:00. Final score: 1:2.

Current form

Yacoub El Mansour: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match. UTS Rabat: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

Yacoub El Mansour scores 1.13 and concedes 1.47 goals per match. UTS Rabat scores 1.07 and concedes 1.33. League average: 2.17 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Yacoub El Mansour 73%, UTS Rabat 63%. Over 2.5: Yacoub El Mansour 57%, UTS Rabat 33%. League level: BTTS 52%, Over 2.5 38%.

xG, shots and style

xG is very similar for both teams. Yacoub El Mansour: 10.2 shots per match, UTS Rabat: 9.5.

Match halves

Yacoub El Mansour: half-time lead 20%, second-half goals 0.60. UTS Rabat: half-time lead 20%, second-half goals 0.57.

Goals by minute

Yacoub El Mansour: 31-45+ (8 goals). UTS Rabat: 76-90+ (9 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Botola Pro: 2.17 goals per match, BTTS 52%, Over 2.5 38%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 0-1-0. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 100%.

Match description

Yacoub El Mansour shows clearly better form over the last five matches: record of 2 wins and 3 draws and an average of 1.8 points per game, while UTS Rabat have 1 win, 1 draw and 3 losses and 0.8 points per game. In the last 5 fixtures the hosts scored 8 goals (1.6 per game) and conceded 6 (1.2 per game), whereas the visitors scored 6 goals (1.2 per game) and conceded 9 (1.8 per game), indicating superior offensive and defensive performance for the home side. Seasonally the hosts average 1.2 goals per home game and only 10% of matches without scoring, while UTS Rabat on the road average 1.0 goal and have as many as 33% of matches without a goal, which increases the home side’s chances. From a quality-of-chances perspective, home xG at home is 1.41 with xG against 1.19, while the visitors’ away xG is 1.40 with xG against 1.44; although the visitors have more shots on target (4.11 vs 3.5), their defense performs worse. Considering better form (PPG 1.8 vs 0.8), lower share of matches without scoring and more favorable xG against, I forecast a home win; suggested probabilities are 60% home, 25% draw and 15% away.

Half-by-half

1 : 2
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

69Possession (%)31
Yacoub El MansourUTS Rabat
14Shots9
Yacoub El MansourUTS Rabat
4Shots on target5
Yacoub El MansourUTS Rabat
1.78xG1.16
Yacoub El MansourUTS Rabat
5Corners1
Yacoub El MansourUTS Rabat
84Dangerous attacks33
Yacoub El MansourUTS Rabat
8Fouls18
Yacoub El MansourUTS Rabat
3Cards3
Yacoub El MansourUTS Rabat

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Yacoub El MansourUTS Rabat
1.13Goals scored / match1.07
Yacoub El MansourUTS Rabat
1.47Goals conceded / match1.33
Yacoub El MansourUTS Rabat
54%Average possession47%
Yacoub El MansourUTS Rabat
3.53Shots on target / match4.03
Yacoub El MansourUTS Rabat

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

10.23Shots per match9.5
Yacoub El MansourUTS Rabat
3.53Shots on target4.03
Yacoub El MansourUTS Rabat
11.1%Shot conversion11.2%
Yacoub El MansourUTS Rabat
54%Possession47%
Yacoub El MansourUTS Rabat
1.3xG for1.3
Yacoub El MansourUTS Rabat
1.11xG against1.35
Yacoub El MansourUTS Rabat

Shooting quality

Yacoub El Mansour: BalancedUTS Rabat: Balanced
Yacoub El MansourUTS Rabat
Accuracy (shots on target)35%42%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.14
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.320.27

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Yacoub El Mansour is 43% better for: last-5 form.

2 pts / match - Yacoub El Mansour · 1.4 pts / match - UTS Rabat

Yacoub El Mansour
WWLDW
Season result split
23% W30% R47% P
Season (W-D-L)
7-9-14
1.00 pts / match · goal difference -10
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
4-5-6
Last 5 at home
2-2-1
LDWWD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.15Opponent xG: 0.93BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
UTS Rabat
LLDWW
Season result split
20% W43% R37% P
Season (W-D-L)
6-13-11
1.03 pts / match · goal difference -8
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
4-6-5
Last 5 away
2-2-1
WDLDW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.44Opponent xG: 0.97BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Yacoub El Mansour is 6% better for: goals scored per match.

1.13 goals / match - Yacoub El Mansour · 1.07 goals / match - UTS Rabat

UTS Rabat is 11% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.47 goals / match - Yacoub El Mansour · 1.33 goals / match - UTS Rabat

Yacoub El Mansour scoring profile: very strong

Yacoub El Mansour scores in 83% of matches (25 of 30 matches), while UTS Rabat keeps a clean sheet in 13% (4 of 30 matches).

UTS Rabat scoring profile: very strong

UTS Rabat scores in 73% of matches (22 of 30 matches), while Yacoub El Mansour keeps a clean sheet in 13% (4 of 30 matches).

34Goals scored (season)32
Yacoub El MansourUTS Rabat
44Goals conceded (season)40
Yacoub El MansourUTS Rabat
2.6Average goals in match2.4
Yacoub El MansourUTS Rabat
7Goals scored (last 5)6
Yacoub El MansourUTS Rabat
5Goals conceded (last 5)6
Yacoub El MansourUTS Rabat

How often they score at least...

83%1 goal73%
Yacoub El MansourUTS Rabat
27%2 goals27%
Yacoub El MansourUTS Rabat
3%3 goals7%
Yacoub El MansourUTS Rabat
0%4 goals0%
Yacoub El MansourUTS Rabat

How often they concede at least...

87%1 goal87%
Yacoub El MansourUTS Rabat
50%2 goals30%
Yacoub El MansourUTS Rabat
10%3 goals10%
Yacoub El MansourUTS Rabat
0%4 goals7%
Yacoub El MansourUTS Rabat

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

73%
Yacoub El Mansour - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.22 of 30 matches
52%
League average

Goal patterns

30%BTTS at half-time27%
Yacoub El MansourUTS Rabat
0%BTTS in both halves7%
Yacoub El MansourUTS Rabat
13%Scored in both halves13%
Yacoub El MansourUTS Rabat

BTTS and goal count

57%Min. 3 goals and BTTS30%
Yacoub El MansourUTS Rabat
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS3%
Yacoub El MansourUTS Rabat
60%BTTS - last 560%
Yacoub El MansourUTS Rabat

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

77%Min. 1 goal before half-time53%
Yacoub El MansourUTS Rabat
43%Min. 2 goals before half-time30%
Yacoub El MansourUTS Rabat
17%Min. 3 goals before half-time17%
Yacoub El MansourUTS Rabat

2nd half

80%Min. 1 goal after half-time80%
Yacoub El MansourUTS Rabat
30%Min. 2 goals after half-time40%
Yacoub El MansourUTS Rabat
7%Min. 3 goals after half-time10%
Yacoub El MansourUTS Rabat

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

UTS Rabat is 14% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.03 pts / match - Yacoub El Mansour · 1.17 pts / match - UTS Rabat

Yacoub El Mansour - half-time state
20% leading43% draw37% trailing
UTS Rabat - half-time state
20% leading57% draw23% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.03Points per match (1st half)1.17
Yacoub El MansourUTS Rabat
0.53Goals scored (1st half)0.5
Yacoub El MansourUTS Rabat
0.9Goals conceded (1st half)0.57
Yacoub El MansourUTS Rabat
1.43Average goals (1st half)1.07
Yacoub El MansourUTS Rabat
43%Clean sheet before half-time57%
Yacoub El MansourUTS Rabat
50%No goal before half-time63%
Yacoub El MansourUTS Rabat

After half-time (2nd half)

1.33Points per match (2nd half)1.03
Yacoub El MansourUTS Rabat
0.6Goals scored (2nd half)0.57
Yacoub El MansourUTS Rabat
0.57Goals conceded (2nd half)0.77
Yacoub El MansourUTS Rabat
1.17Average goals (2nd half)1.33
Yacoub El MansourUTS Rabat
47%Clean sheet after half-time37%
Yacoub El MansourUTS Rabat
53%No goal after half-time50%
Yacoub El MansourUTS Rabat

Yacoub El Mansour - second-half results

33% W33% R33% P
31
Half-time points
16
Half-time goals
-11
Goal difference (1st half)
40
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.03
PPG before half-time
Lead holding115%

Leads at half-time in 20% of matches and wins 23%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.3

Defence stays stable across the full match.

UTS Rabat - second-half results

20% W43% R37% P
35
Half-time points
15
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
31
Second-half points
-6
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.17
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 20% of matches and wins 20%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Yacoub El Mansour - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.601.80
Goals scored / match1.00.4
Goals conceded / match1.00.0
Average goals in match2.00.4
1 goal100%40%
2 goals60%0%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet40%100%
No goal20%60%
Goal difference0+2
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 60% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 5
UTS Rabat - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.800.80
Goals scored / match0.60.6
Goals conceded / match0.21.0
Average goals in match0.81.6
1 goal40%100%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet80%20%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference+2-2
Half-time: 40% leading - 60% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Yacoub El Mansour
ScoredConceded
3
5
0-15
5
10
16-30
8
12
31-45
6
5
46-60
7
3
61-75
5
9
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (8 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.

UTS Rabat
ScoredConceded
5
1
0-15
5
5
16-30
5
11
31-45
5
3
46-60
3
7
61-75
9
13
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (9 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.50
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.2 : 1.3
Estimated goal split
home : away
115%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
68%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-20%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
61%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
5%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 20 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Yacoub El Mansour

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.19
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.53
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-3.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.17
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.36
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
98%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
144%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+1.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
15% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 9% come in the first quarter-hour.
15%

UTS Rabat

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.05
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.21
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-4.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.23
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.02
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
105%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
116%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.37
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
28% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 16% come in the first quarter-hour.
28%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Botola Pro).

Teams vs league

Yacoub El MansourLigaUTS Rabat
Average goals in match 2.602.17 2.40
Both teams scored 73%52% 63%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 57%38% 33%
Clean sheets 13%30% 13%
Goal before half-time 77%63% 53%
Goal after half-time 80%73% 80%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.17
Average goals per match
52%
Both teams scored
38%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
30%
Clean sheets
1.15
Home goals / match
1.02
Away goals / match
+13%
Home attack advantage
+11%
Home defence advantage
+11%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
63%
1 goal
25%
2 goals
8%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
73%
1 goal
35%
2 goals
10%
3 goals
0%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Yacoub El Mansour 0 - 1 - 0 UTS Rabat. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

UTS Rabat
1 : 1
Yacoub El Mansour

FAQ

What was the result of Yacoub El Mansour vs UTS Rabat?

The Botola Pro match finished Yacoub El Mansour 1:2 UTS Rabat. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Yacoub El Mansour vs UTS Rabat?

Yacoub El Mansour score 1.13 goals per game on average and UTS Rabat 1.07. The Botola Pro average is 2.17 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 38% of games. Both teams score in 73% of Yacoub El Mansour's matches and 63% of UTS Rabat's.

What form are Yacoub El Mansour and UTS Rabat in?

Over the last 5 games Yacoub El Mansour have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and UTS Rabat 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Yacoub El Mansour vs UTS Rabat?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Yacoub El Mansour vs UTS Rabat: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.