Yokohama F. Marinos vs Kyoto Sanga: match statistics
Yokohama F. Marinos vs Kyoto Sanga: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Yokohama F. Marinos played against Kyoto Sanga in J1 League (Japan). The game was played on September 2, 2026. Final score: 1:1.
Recent form
Yokohama F. Marinos has 2 wins, 0 draws and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.50 points per game. Kyoto Sanga has 1 win, 1 draw and 2 losses, with 1.00 points per game.
Scoring records
Yokohama F. Marinos scores 1.75 goals per game and allows 1.75. Kyoto Sanga scores 1.50 and allows 2.00. Games in this league average 3.05 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 50% of Yokohama F. Marinos's games and 100% of Kyoto Sanga's. The Over 2.5 rates are 50% and 100%, compared with league averages of 60% for BTTS and 60% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Kyoto Sanga has the higher season xG average, 1.26 to 1.20 per game. Yokohama F. Marinos takes 10.0 shots per game, while Kyoto Sanga takes 11.5.
First-half and second-half trends
Yokohama F. Marinos leads at halftime in 50% of its games and scores 0.75 goals per game after halftime. Kyoto Sanga leads at halftime in 25% and scores 1.25 after halftime.
When the teams score
Yokohama F. Marinos's most productive scoring window is minutes 0-15 (2 goals). For Kyoto Sanga, it is minutes 46-60 (3 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
J1 League games average 3.05 goals. Both teams score in 60% of games, and 60% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 2 previous meetings were available. The record was 1 home win, 0 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Yokohama F. Marinos are fifth in the table and have won 4 of their last 5 matches, while Kyoto Sanga sit 18th and are still without a win this season. The hosts have scored 9 goals in their last five games, and their tally of 2.4 points per match over this period clearly exceeds Kyoto’s 1.4. At home, Marinos average 2 goals per game with a high 21% conversion rate, while the visitors are yet to keep a clean sheet away from home and concede an average of 2 goals. Kyoto are capable of creating chances, averaging 4.5 shots on target and an xG of 1.29, making a goal for the visitors a realistic possibility, but their defense allows opponents an xG of 1.94. The hosts’ superior current form and greater efficiency in front of goal point towards a home win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The strongest signal in favor of both teams scoring comes from their league results to date: both Yokohama F. Marinos and Kyoto Sanga recorded BTTS in 100% of their matches, and neither team kept a clean sheet. The defenses look particularly vulnerable, with the hosts conceding an average of 3.0 goals and the visitors 2.0 goals per match. Their attacking potential is supported by the xG figures: Yokohama produce 1.60 xG while Kyoto allow 1.94 xG, whereas Kyoto create 1.29 xG against 1.58 xG allowed by their opponents. The hosts’ last five matches reduce confidence in the pick, as BTTS landed in only 20% of them, but Kyoto recorded 60%, while their opponents conceded 1.4 goals per match during this period. With the league BTTS average standing at 63%, the more likely scenario remains that both teams will score at least once.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The strongest selection is Over 1.5 goals, as both teams have cleared this line in 100% of their league matches so far, while neither has kept a clean sheet. Yokohama create chances worth an average of 1.60 xG, while Kyoto’s defense allows opponents 1.94 xG, supporting a projection of around 1.50 goals for the home side. Kyoto average 4.5 shots on target per match and have 1.29 xG in attack, while Yokohama’s defense allows 1.58 xG. In their last five matches, Yokohama scored 9 goals, while Kyoto conceded 7, giving the scenario of at least two goals a clear advantage. The 2.5 line remains more balanced, as Over 2.5 goals occurred in 40% and 60% of their respective last five matches.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The strongest signal points to Yokohama leading at the break and maintaining their advantage until the final whistle: in their last five matches, the hosts have won four times, and they were ahead at half-time in 80% of those games. Before the break, Yokohama averaged 1.0 goals scored and conceded just 0.2, whereas Kyoto failed to score in this period, conceded an average of 1.0 goal, and went into half-time trailing in as many as 60% of their matches. The hosts’ full-match form is also clearly superior: they average 1.8 goals scored and 0.8 conceded, compared with Kyoto’s 1.2 scored and 1.4 conceded. However, the visitors are more dangerous after the interval, averaging 1.2 goals in second halves, so scenarios involving a turnaround account for a significant share of the probability. Nevertheless, 1/1 remains the most likely outcome.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Yokohama F. Marinos | Kyoto Sanga | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 35% | 35% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.50 | 0.38 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Yokohama F. Marinos is 50% better for: last-5 form.
1.5 pts / game - Yokohama F. Marinos · 1 pts / game - Kyoto Sanga
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Yokohama F. Marinos is 17% better for: goals scored per game.
1.75 goals / game - Yokohama F. Marinos · 1.5 goals / game - Kyoto Sanga
Yokohama F. Marinos is 14% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.75 goals / game - Yokohama F. Marinos · 2 goals / game - Kyoto Sanga
Yokohama F. Marinos scores in 100% of games (4 of 4 games), while Kyoto Sanga keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 4 games).
Kyoto Sanga scores in 100% of games (4 of 4 games), while Yokohama F. Marinos keeps a clean sheet in 50% (2 of 4 games).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Yokohama F. Marinos
Over / Under - Kyoto Sanga
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Yokohama F. Marinos is 167% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
2 pts / game - Yokohama F. Marinos · 0.75 pts / game - Kyoto Sanga
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Yokohama F. Marinos - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 50% of games and wins 50%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.8 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Kyoto Sanga - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 25% of games and wins 25%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 2.00 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.0 | 0.8 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.5 | 1.3 |
| Average goals per game | 1.5 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 75% | 75% |
| 2 goals | 50% | 50% |
| 3 goals | 25% | 50% |
| Clean sheet | 50% | 50% |
| No goal | 25% | 25% |
| Goal difference | +2 | -2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.75 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.3 | 1.3 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.3 | 0.8 |
| Average goals per game | 1.5 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 50% | 75% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 25% |
| Clean sheet | 25% | 25% |
| No goal | 75% | 0% |
| Goal difference | -4 | +2 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (2 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (3 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Yokohama F. Marinos
Kyoto Sanga
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (J1 League).
Teams vs league
| Yokohama F. Marinos | Liga | Kyoto Sanga | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 3.50 | 3.05 | ▲ 3.50 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 50% | 60% | ▲ 100% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 50% | 60% | ▲ 100% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 50% | 23% | ▼ 0% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 75% | 78% | ▲ 100% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 75% | 80% | ▲ 100% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from Yokohama F. Marinos's perspective: 1 win, 0 draws and 1 loss against Kyoto Sanga. Games average 3.00 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Yokohama F. Marinos vs Kyoto Sanga?
The J1 League match finished Yokohama F. Marinos 1:1 Kyoto Sanga. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Yokohama F. Marinos and Kyoto Sanga?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches Yokohama F. Marinos won 1, Kyoto Sanga won 1 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Yokohama F. Marinos vs Kyoto Sanga?
Yokohama F. Marinos score 1.75 goals per game on average and Kyoto Sanga 1.50. The J1 League average is 3.05 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 60% of games. Both teams score in 50% of Yokohama F. Marinos's matches and 100% of Kyoto Sanga's.
What form are Yokohama F. Marinos and Kyoto Sanga in?
Over the last 5 games Yokohama F. Marinos have a 2-0-2 record (1.50 points per game) and Kyoto Sanga 1-1-2 (1.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Yokohama F. Marinos vs Kyoto Sanga?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Yokohama F. Marinos vs Kyoto Sanga: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.


