Yokohama vs Kyoto Sanga: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Yokohama play Kyoto Sanga in J1 League (Japan). The match date is 30 November 2025 at 06:00. Final score: 0:1.

Current form

Yokohama: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match. Kyoto Sanga: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match.

Goal statistics

Yokohama scores 0.71 and concedes 1.18 goals per match. Kyoto Sanga scores 1.63 and concedes 1.05. League average: 2.40 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Yokohama 34%, Kyoto Sanga 61%. Over 2.5: Yokohama 32%, Kyoto Sanga 50%. League level: BTTS 47%, Over 2.5 45%.

xG, shots and style

Kyoto Sanga has higher xG: 1.39 vs 1.08. Yokohama: 9.4 shots per match, Kyoto Sanga: 11.8.

Match halves

Yokohama: half-time lead 18%, second-half goals 0.39. Kyoto Sanga: half-time lead 37%, second-half goals 0.97.

Goals by minute

Yokohama: 76-90+ (7 goals). Kyoto Sanga: 76-90+ (17 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

J1 League: 2.40 goals per match, BTTS 47%, Over 2.5 45%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 0-0-1. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 100%.

Half-by-half

0 : 1
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

49Possession (%)51
YokohamaKyoto Sanga
15Shots7
YokohamaKyoto Sanga
1Shots on target1
YokohamaKyoto Sanga
1.41xG0.73
YokohamaKyoto Sanga
2Corners4
YokohamaKyoto Sanga
56Dangerous attacks29
YokohamaKyoto Sanga
15Fouls13
YokohamaKyoto Sanga
1Cards1
YokohamaKyoto Sanga

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

YokohamaKyoto Sanga
0.71Goals scored / match1.63
YokohamaKyoto Sanga
1.18Goals conceded / match1.05
YokohamaKyoto Sanga
41%Average possession48%
YokohamaKyoto Sanga
2.47Shots on target / match4.53
YokohamaKyoto Sanga

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

9.37Shots per match11.82
YokohamaKyoto Sanga
2.47Shots on target4.53
YokohamaKyoto Sanga
7.6%Shot conversion13.8%
YokohamaKyoto Sanga
41%Possession48%
YokohamaKyoto Sanga
1.08xG for1.39
YokohamaKyoto Sanga
1.35xG against1.44
YokohamaKyoto Sanga

Shooting quality

Yokohama: BalancedKyoto Sanga: Efficient finishing
YokohamaKyoto Sanga
Accuracy (shots on target)26%38%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.290.36

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Kyoto Sanga is 100% better for: last-5 form.

0.8 pts / match - Yokohama · 1.6 pts / match - Kyoto Sanga

Yokohama
DLLLW
Season result split
24% W21% R55% P
Season (W-D-L)
9-8-21
0.92 pts / match · goal difference -18
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
6-4-9
Last 5 at home
2-2-1
DWWDL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.05Opponent xG: 1.62BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
Kyoto Sanga
DDLWW
Season result split
50% W29% R21% P
Season (W-D-L)
19-11-8
1.79 pts / match · goal difference +22
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
10-5-4
Last 5 away
3-2-0
WDWDW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.52Opponent xG: 1.33BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 20%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Kyoto Sanga is 130% better for: goals scored per match.

0.71 goals / match - Yokohama · 1.63 goals / match - Kyoto Sanga

Kyoto Sanga is 12% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.18 goals / match - Yokohama · 1.05 goals / match - Kyoto Sanga

Yokohama scoring profile: strong

Yokohama scores in 55% of matches (21 of 38 matches), while Kyoto Sanga keeps a clean sheet in 26% (10 of 38 matches).

Kyoto Sanga scoring profile: very strong

Kyoto Sanga scores in 87% of matches (33 of 38 matches), while Yokohama keeps a clean sheet in 32% (12 of 38 matches).

27Goals scored (season)62
YokohamaKyoto Sanga
45Goals conceded (season)40
YokohamaKyoto Sanga
1.89Average goals in match2.68
YokohamaKyoto Sanga
6Goals scored (last 5)5
YokohamaKyoto Sanga
8Goals conceded (last 5)5
YokohamaKyoto Sanga

How often they score at least...

55%1 goal87%
YokohamaKyoto Sanga
13%2 goals47%
YokohamaKyoto Sanga
3%3 goals18%
YokohamaKyoto Sanga
0%4 goals8%
YokohamaKyoto Sanga

How often they concede at least...

68%1 goal74%
YokohamaKyoto Sanga
39%2 goals21%
YokohamaKyoto Sanga
8%3 goals11%
YokohamaKyoto Sanga
3%4 goals0%
YokohamaKyoto Sanga

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

47%
League average

Goal patterns

13%BTTS at half-time13%
YokohamaKyoto Sanga
3%BTTS in both halves3%
YokohamaKyoto Sanga
11%Scored in both halves29%
YokohamaKyoto Sanga

BTTS and goal count

26%Min. 3 goals and BTTS37%
YokohamaKyoto Sanga
5%Min. 3 goals without BTTS13%
YokohamaKyoto Sanga
60%BTTS - last 540%
YokohamaKyoto Sanga

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

45%Min. 1 goal before half-time71%
YokohamaKyoto Sanga
16%Min. 2 goals before half-time26%
YokohamaKyoto Sanga
5%Min. 3 goals before half-time16%
YokohamaKyoto Sanga

2nd half

76%Min. 1 goal after half-time87%
YokohamaKyoto Sanga
37%Min. 2 goals after half-time47%
YokohamaKyoto Sanga
11%Min. 3 goals after half-time11%
YokohamaKyoto Sanga

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Kyoto Sanga is 20% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.21 pts / match - Yokohama · 1.45 pts / match - Kyoto Sanga

Yokohama - half-time state
18% leading66% draw16% trailing
Kyoto Sanga - half-time state
37% leading34% draw29% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.21Points per match (1st half)1.45
YokohamaKyoto Sanga
0.32Goals scored (1st half)0.66
YokohamaKyoto Sanga
0.34Goals conceded (1st half)0.5
YokohamaKyoto Sanga
0.66Average goals (1st half)1.16
YokohamaKyoto Sanga
71%Clean sheet before half-time63%
YokohamaKyoto Sanga
71%No goal before half-time53%
YokohamaKyoto Sanga

After half-time (2nd half)

0.89Points per match (2nd half)1.71
YokohamaKyoto Sanga
0.39Goals scored (2nd half)0.97
YokohamaKyoto Sanga
0.84Goals conceded (2nd half)0.55
YokohamaKyoto Sanga
1.24Average goals (2nd half)1.53
YokohamaKyoto Sanga
42%Clean sheet after half-time50%
YokohamaKyoto Sanga
63%No goal after half-time32%
YokohamaKyoto Sanga

Yokohama - second-half results

18% W34% R47% P
46
Half-time points
12
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
34
Second-half points
-17
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.21
PPG before half-time
Lead holding133%

Leads at half-time in 18% of matches and wins 24%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.5

Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Kyoto Sanga - second-half results

45% W37% R18% P
55
Half-time points
25
Half-time goals
+6
Goal difference (1st half)
65
Second-half points
+16
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.45
PPG before half-time
Lead holding135%

Leads at half-time in 37% of matches and wins 50%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Yokohama - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.600.80
Goals scored / match0.60.6
Goals conceded / match0.41.2
Average goals in match1.01.8
1 goal60%80%
2 goals20%60%
3 goals20%40%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference+1-3
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3
Kyoto Sanga - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.801.40
Goals scored / match0.60.4
Goals conceded / match0.40.6
Average goals in match1.01.0
1 goal100%80%
2 goals0%20%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal40%60%
Goal difference+1-1
Half-time: 60% leading - 0% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Yokohama
ScoredConceded
3
3
0-15
6
4
16-30
3
6
31-45
6
9
46-60
2
10
61-75
7
13
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): -6 - late phases are a weakness.

Kyoto Sanga
ScoredConceded
7
3
0-15
6
11
16-30
12
5
31-45
8
2
46-60
12
9
61-75
17
10
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (17 goli). Concedes most in 16-30 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): +7 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.28
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
0.9 : 1.4
Estimated goal split
home : away
95%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
48%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+31%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
48%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
6%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 17 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Yokohama

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.27
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.20
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+4.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.37
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.17
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
54%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
109%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.12
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
26% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 11% come in the first quarter-hour.
26%

Kyoto Sanga

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.05
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.63
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-12.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.24
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.39
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
151%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
80%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.19
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
27% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 11% come in the first quarter-hour.
27%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (J1 League).

Teams vs league

YokohamaLigaKyoto Sanga
Average goals in match 1.892.40 2.68
Both teams scored 34%47% 61%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 32%45% 50%
Clean sheets 32%31% 26%
Goal before half-time 45%60% 71%
Goal after half-time 76%76% 87%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.40
Average goals per match
47%
Both teams scored
45%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
31%
Clean sheets
1.32
Home goals / match
1.08
Away goals / match
+22%
Home attack advantage
+18%
Home defence advantage
+14%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
60%
1 goal
29%
2 goals
9%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
76%
1 goal
40%
2 goals
16%
3 goals
5%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Yokohama 0 - 0 - 1 Kyoto Sanga. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

Kyoto Sanga FC
2 : 1
Yokohama FC

FAQ

What was the result of Yokohama vs Kyoto Sanga?

The J1 League match finished Yokohama 0:1 Kyoto Sanga. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Yokohama vs Kyoto Sanga?

Yokohama score 0.71 goals per game on average and Kyoto Sanga 1.63. The J1 League average is 2.40 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 45% of games. Both teams score in 34% of Yokohama's matches and 61% of Kyoto Sanga's.

What form are Yokohama and Kyoto Sanga in?

Over the last 5 games Yokohama have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and Kyoto Sanga 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Yokohama vs Kyoto Sanga?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Yokohama vs Kyoto Sanga: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.