Yongin City vs Cheongju: match statistics
Yongin City vs Cheongju: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Yongin City play Cheongju in K League 2 (South Korea). The match date is 11 July 2026 at 12:30. Venue: Yongin Football Center. Final score: 1:1.
Current form
Yongin City: 1-4-0, 1.40 points/match. Cheongju: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match.
Goal statistics
Yongin City scores 1.25 and concedes 1.44 goals per match. Cheongju scores 1.19 and concedes 1.69. League average: 2.79 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Yongin City 69%, Cheongju 81%. Over 2.5: Yongin City 56%, Cheongju 56%. League level: BTTS 63%, Over 2.5 57%.
xG, shots and style
Cheongju has higher xG: 1.43 vs 1.18. Yongin City: 8.8 shots per match, Cheongju: 11.3.
Match halves
Yongin City: half-time lead 19%, second-half goals 0.75. Cheongju: half-time lead 25%, second-half goals 0.69.
Goals by minute
Yongin City: 76-90+ (9 goals). Cheongju: 76-90+ (6 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
K League 2: 2.79 goals per match, BTTS 63%, Over 2.5 57%.
Head-to-head
No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.
Match description
I predict a draw because both teams show a strong propensity to share points: Yongin have recorded 7 draws at home this season (50% of home matches) and only 13% wins, while Cheongju have as many as 86% draws away (10 draws). Offensive metrics are similar — Cheongju average 1.43 goals on the road, Yongin 1.38 at home, with xG 1.28 for the visitors and 1.13 for the hosts, and 9.71 vs 7.75 shots per match. Defensive trends differ: Cheongju have conceded 12 goals in the last 5 matches (2.4 per game), whereas Yongin conceded 5 (1.0 per game) and average 1.4 points in their last 5 matches compared to Cheongju’s 1.0. Finishing favors the hosts (conversion 18% vs 15% for the visitors), but the high draw rates and similar xG make a points split the most likely outcome.
Half-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Yongin City | Cheongju | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 39% | 36% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.13 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.36 | 0.29 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Yongin City is 40% better for: last-5 form.
1.4 pts / match - Yongin City · 1 pts / match - Cheongju
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Yongin City is 5% better for: goals scored per match.
1.25 goals / match - Yongin City · 1.19 goals / match - Cheongju
Yongin City is 17% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.44 goals / match - Yongin City · 1.69 goals / match - Cheongju
Yongin City scores in 75% of matches (12 of 16 matches), while Cheongju keeps a clean sheet in 19% (3 of 16 matches).
Cheongju scores in 81% of matches (13 of 16 matches), while Yongin City keeps a clean sheet in 19% (3 of 16 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under — Yongin City
Over / Under — Cheongju
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Cheongju is 5% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.13 pts / match - Yongin City · 1.19 pts / match - Cheongju
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Yongin City - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 19% of matches and wins 19%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.6 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Cheongju - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 25% of matches and wins 6%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.
Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.80 | 1.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.0 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 0.2 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 20% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 60% |
| No goal | 100% | 20% |
| Goal difference | -1 | +2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.40 | 0.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 1.6 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 2.6 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 60% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 20% |
| No goal | 40% | 20% |
| Goal difference | -1 | -3 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (9 goli). Concedes most in 46-60 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (6 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Yongin City
Cheongju
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (K League 2).
Teams vs league
| Yongin City | Liga | Cheongju | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.69 | 2.79 | • 2.88 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 69% | 63% | ▲ 81% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | • 56% | 57% | • 56% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 19% | 22% | ▼ 19% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 56% | 73% | ▲ 75% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 81% | 76% | • 75% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
FAQ
What was the result of Yongin City vs Cheongju?
The K League 2 match finished Yongin City 1:1 Cheongju. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Yongin City vs Cheongju?
Yongin City score 1.25 goals per game on average and Cheongju 1.19. The K League 2 average is 2.79 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 57% of games. Both teams score in 69% of Yongin City's matches and 81% of Cheongju's.
What form are Yongin City and Cheongju in?
Over the last 5 games Yongin City have a 1-4-0 record (1.40 points per game) and Cheongju 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Yongin City vs Cheongju?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Yongin City vs Cheongju: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.