Zalaegerszegi TE vs Debrecen: match statistics
Analysis of statistics indicates a very even encounter between Zalaegerszegi TE and Debrecen. The hosts present excellent form in the last five matches (4 wins, 2.4 points per match), whereas the visitors are going through a worse period (1.4 points per match, 2 victories in the last 5 meetings). Debrecen ranks higher in the table (3rd place) and has a better away record (45% wins); however, Zalaegerszegi is strong at home (36% wins, goal difference +4). A key factor is the hosts' possession advantage (54% vs 46%) and better shooting efficiency in domestic matches. Both teams have an identical goal difference at their respective venues (+4), suggesting a balance of power. Given the high form of the hosts and the solidity of the visitors on the road, the most likely scenario is a sharing of points.
Zalaegerszegi TE vs Debrecen: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Zalaegerszegi TE played against Debrecen in NB I (Hungary). The game was played on February 22, 2026. Final score: 1:1.
Recent form
Zalaegerszegi TE has 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 2.00 points per game. Debrecen has 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses, with 1.40 points per game.
Scoring records
Zalaegerszegi TE scores 1.55 goals per game and allows 1.27. Debrecen scores 1.50 and allows 1.23. Games in this league average 3.01 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 55% of Zalaegerszegi TE's games and 55% of Debrecen's. The Over 2.5 rates are 50% and 59%, compared with league averages of 60% for BTTS and 59% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Debrecen has the higher season xG average, 1.58 to 1.57 per game. Zalaegerszegi TE takes 13.4 shots per game, while Debrecen takes 13.2.
First-half and second-half trends
Zalaegerszegi TE leads at halftime in 18% of its games and scores 1.14 goals per game after halftime. Debrecen leads at halftime in 27% and scores 0.91 after halftime.
When the teams score
Zalaegerszegi TE's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (13 goals). For Debrecen, it is minutes 46-60 (10 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
NB I games average 3.01 goals. Both teams score in 60% of games, and 59% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 2 previous meetings were available. The record was 0 home wins, 1 draw and 1 away win. Those games averaged 4.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Analysis of statistics indicates a very even encounter between Zalaegerszegi TE and Debrecen. The hosts present excellent form in the last five matches (4 wins, 2.4 points per match), whereas the visitors are going through a worse period (1.4 points per match, 2 victories in the last 5 meetings). Debrecen ranks higher in the table (3rd place) and has a better away record (45% wins); however, Zalaegerszegi is strong at home (36% wins, goal difference +4). A key factor is the hosts' possession advantage (54% vs 46%) and better shooting efficiency in domestic matches. Both teams have an identical goal difference at their respective venues (+4), suggesting a balance of power. Given the high form of the hosts and the solidity of the visitors on the road, the most likely scenario is a sharing of points.
View the statistical overviewStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Zalaegerszegi TE | Debrecen | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 37% | 37% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.31 | 0.31 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Zalaegerszegi TE is 43% better for: last-5 form.
2 pts / game - Zalaegerszegi TE · 1.4 pts / game - Debrecen
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Zalaegerszegi TE scores in 86% of games (19 of 22 meczów), while Debrecen keeps a clean sheet in 27% (6 of 22 meczów).
Debrecen scores in 77% of games (17 of 22 meczów), while Zalaegerszegi TE keeps a clean sheet in 32% (7 of 22 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Zalaegerszegi TE
Over / Under - Debrecen
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Debrecen is 17% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.09 pts / game - Zalaegerszegi TE · 1.27 pts / game - Debrecen
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Zalaegerszegi TE - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 18% of games and wins 41%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
Debrecen - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 27% of games and wins 50%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.60 | 2.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.0 | 1.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 0.2 |
| Average goals per game | 0.4 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 80% |
| No goal | 100% | 20% |
| Goal difference | -2 | +5 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.00 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 1.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Average goals per game | 1.0 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 20% |
| Goal difference | -1 | +1 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (13 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +6 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (10 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Zalaegerszegi TE
Debrecen
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (NB I).
Teams vs league
| Zalaegerszegi TE | Liga | Debrecen | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 2.82 | 3.01 | ▼ 2.73 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 55% | 60% | ▼ 55% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 50% | 59% | • 59% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 32% | 21% | ▲ 27% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 55% | 69% | ▼ 59% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 100% | 88% | ▲ 91% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from Zalaegerszegi TE's perspective: 0 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss against Debrecen. Games average 4.50 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Zalaegerszegi TE vs Debrecen?
The NB I match finished Zalaegerszegi TE 1:1 Debrecen. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Zalaegerszegi TE and Debrecen?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches Zalaegerszegi TE won 0, Debrecen won 1 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 4.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Zalaegerszegi TE vs Debrecen?
Zalaegerszegi TE score 1.55 goals per game on average and Debrecen 1.50. The NB I average is 3.01 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 59% of games. Both teams score in 55% of Zalaegerszegi TE's matches and 55% of Debrecen's.
What form are Zalaegerszegi TE and Debrecen in?
Over the last 5 games Zalaegerszegi TE have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Debrecen 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Zalaegerszegi TE vs Debrecen?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Zalaegerszegi TE vs Debrecen: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.