Zalaegerszegi TE vs Puskás: match statistics
Zalaegerszegi TE vs Puskás: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Zalaegerszegi TE played against Puskás in NB I (Hungary). The game was played on September 6, 2026. Venue: ZTE-Aréna. Final score: 1:0.
Recent form
Zalaegerszegi TE has 1 win, 0 draws and 4 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.60 points per game. Puskás has 3 wins, 0 draws and 2 losses, with 1.80 points per game.
Scoring records
Zalaegerszegi TE scores 0.83 goals per game and allows 2.50. Puskás scores 1.67 and allows 1.33. Games in this league average 3.26 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 17% of Zalaegerszegi TE's games and 50% of Puskás's. The Over 2.5 rates are 67% and 50%, compared with league averages of 63% for BTTS and 63% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Zalaegerszegi TE has the higher season xG average, 1.16 to 1.15 per game. Zalaegerszegi TE takes 9.0 shots per game, while Puskás takes 9.0.
First-half and second-half trends
Zalaegerszegi TE leads at halftime in 17% of its games and scores 0.33 goals per game after halftime. Puskás leads at halftime in 50% and scores 0.67 after halftime.
When the teams score
Zalaegerszegi TE's most productive scoring window is minutes 0-15 (1 goals). For Puskás, it is minutes 16-30 (3 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
NB I games average 3.26 goals. Both teams score in 63% of games, and 63% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 3 previous meetings were available. The record was 1 home win, 0 draws and 2 away wins. Those games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 33% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Puskás lead the league, having won 4 of their 6 matches, and have recorded 3 victories in their last five games, while Zalaegerszegi have lost 4 of their last 5. The hosts have already conceded 15 goals in 6 rounds, including 12 in their last five appearances, which significantly weakens their chances against a team averaging 2 goals away from home. Puskás have won all 3 of their away matches to date, conceding just 0.67 goals per game and keeping a clean sheet in 67% of those fixtures. Zalaegerszegi do boast a home xG average of 1.40 and 2.5 goals scored per match, but they have failed to score in 50% of their home appearances and have yet to keep a clean sheet. The visitors’ greater consistency, three-match away winning streak and significantly more stable defense point to a Puskás victory.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
A scenario in which at least one team fails to score is slightly more likely, primarily due to Puskás’s solid defense, which concedes an average of just 0.67 goals per match and has kept a clean sheet in 67% of its games. Zalaegerszegi scores an average of 1.33 goals at home, but its average xG is only 1.04, while in its last 5 matches the team has scored just once per game on average. The hosts recorded BTTS in only 20% of their last five appearances, whereas Puskás has failed to score in none of its matches this season and averages 2.00 goals per game. Zalaegerszegi’s weak defense, conceding an average of 2.00 goals this season and 2.40 in its last 5 matches, clearly increases the chances of the visitors scoring, but does not guarantee a response from the hosts. Although the league-wide BTTS average is a high 62%, Puskás’s defensive advantage over Zalaegerszegi’s limited attacking potential supports the BTTS - No pick.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Zalaegerszegi concede an average of 2.00 goals per home match, rising to 2.40 across their last five games, clearly favouring Puskás’s attacking prospects. The visitors score an average of 2.00 goals this season and 1.60 in their last five matches, while also holding an edge in shots on target: 4.67 compared with the hosts’ 4.00. The Over 1.5 line has landed in 100% of Zalaegerszegi’s matches and 67% of Puskás’s, while the league average stands at a high 3.15 goals. Caution around higher lines is warranted due to the visitors’ solid defense: they concede just 0.67 goals away from home and have kept a clean sheet in 67% of such matches. Nevertheless, the projected 2.77 goals provide the strongest edge on Over 1.5.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Puskás have a clear advantage in terms of results: they have won 100% of their league matches so far, while Zalaegerszeg have won 33% and lost 67%. The visitors were leading at the break in 67% of their matches, have not lost a single first half, and conceded an average of 0.0 goals before half-time, compared with 0.67 goals conceded by the hosts. In their last five appearances, Zalaegerszeg were trailing at half-time in as many as 80% of matches, scoring only 0.6 goals before the break, whereas Puskás have a positive first-half goal balance of 2:0 during this period. The visitors' superiority is also supported by their full-match scoring efficiency: they average 2.00 goals per game, while the hosts concede an average of 2.00. The scenario of Puskás leading at half-time and securing a full-time victory is therefore the strongest, although a draw at half-time followed by an away win remains a significant alternative.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Zalaegerszegi TE | Puskás | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 41% | 48% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.13 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.23 | 0.39 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Puskás is 200% better for: last-5 form.
0.6 pts / game - Zalaegerszegi TE · 1.8 pts / game - Puskás
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Puskás is 101% better for: goals scored per game.
0.83 goals / game - Zalaegerszegi TE · 1.67 goals / game - Puskás
Puskás is 88% better for: goals allowed per game.
2.5 goals / game - Zalaegerszegi TE · 1.33 goals / game - Puskás
Zalaegerszegi TE scores in 17% of games (1 of 6 games), while Puskás keeps a clean sheet in 33% (2 of 6 games).
Puskás scores in 83% of games (5 of 6 games), while Zalaegerszegi TE keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 6 games).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Zalaegerszegi TE
Over / Under - Puskás
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Puskás is 266% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.5 pts / game - Zalaegerszegi TE · 1.83 pts / game - Puskás
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Zalaegerszegi TE - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 17% of games and wins 17%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
Puskás - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 50% of games and wins 67%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.7 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.60 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.6 | 0.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.4 | 1.0 |
| Average goals per game | 2.0 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 0% | 60% |
| No goal | 80% | 80% |
| Goal difference | -4 | -3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.60 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 1.2 |
| Average goals per game | 1.2 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 20% |
| No goal | 60% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +2 | -2 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (1 goal). Concedes most in 0-15 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (3 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Zalaegerszegi TE
Puskás
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (NB I).
Teams vs league
| Zalaegerszegi TE | Liga | Puskás | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | • 3.33 | 3.26 | ▼ 3.00 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 17% | 63% | ▼ 50% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 67% | 63% | ▼ 50% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 0% | 21% | ▲ 33% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 100% | 71% | ▼ 67% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 67% | 79% | ▲ 83% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from Zalaegerszegi TE's perspective: 1 win, 0 draws and 2 losses against Puskás. Games average 2.00 goals, and both teams scored in 33% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Zalaegerszegi TE vs Puskás?
The NB I match finished Zalaegerszegi TE 1:0 Puskás. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Zalaegerszegi TE and Puskás?
In the last 3 head-to-head matches Zalaegerszegi TE won 1, Puskás won 2 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 33% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Zalaegerszegi TE vs Puskás?
Zalaegerszegi TE score 0.83 goals per game on average and Puskás 1.67. The NB I average is 3.26 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 63% of games. Both teams score in 17% of Zalaegerszegi TE's matches and 50% of Puskás's.
What form are Zalaegerszegi TE and Puskás in?
Over the last 5 games Zalaegerszegi TE have a 1-0-4 record (0.60 points per game) and Puskás 3-0-2 (1.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Zalaegerszegi TE vs Puskás?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Zalaegerszegi TE vs Puskás: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.


