Žalgiris vs Banga: match statistics
Žalgiris vs Banga: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Žalgiris played against Banga in A Lyga (Lithuania). The game was played on April 17, 2026. Final score: 1:1.
Recent form
Žalgiris has 1 win, 2 draws and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.00 points per game. Banga has 1 win, 1 draw and 3 losses, with 0.80 points per game.
Scoring records
Žalgiris scores 1.25 goals per game and allows 1.13. Banga scores 1.13 and allows 0.63. Games in this league average 2.22 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 38% of Žalgiris's games and 13% of Banga's. The Over 2.5 rates are 50% and 25%, compared with league averages of 37% for BTTS and 41% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Žalgiris has the higher season xG average, 1.84 to 1.37 per game. Žalgiris takes 16.5 shots per game, while Banga takes 12.6.
First-half and second-half trends
Žalgiris leads at halftime in 25% of its games and scores 0.50 goals per game after halftime. Banga leads at halftime in 25% and scores 0.50 after halftime.
When the teams score
Žalgiris's most productive scoring window is minutes 16-30 (3 goals). For Banga, it is minutes 16-30 (4 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
A Lyga games average 2.22 goals. Both teams score in 37% of games, and 41% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 4 previous meetings were available. The record was 2 home wins, 1 draw and 1 away win. Those games averaged 1.75 goals, with both teams scoring in 25% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
I back Žalgiris to win. The hosts generate significantly more chances and are more efficient: at home they average 14.2 shots and 5.2 on target with 60% possession, translating to 1.6 goals and xG 1.59 per match. Banga defend very well away — only 0.5 goals conceded on average and 50% clean sheets — but their attack is highly ineffective (0.5 goals per match, 75% of matches without a goal and a conversion rate of just 4%), despite an xG of 1.4. Žalgiris also posts a higher conversion (11% vs 4%) and more shots on target, but at home they concede 1.8 goals on average and suffer 60% losses in home fixtures, which lowers the confidence of the pick. Overall the hosts’ edge in creating and converting chances leads me to choose Žalgiris, although I expect a tightly contested game.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Seasonal statistics strongly point to No BTTS: Žalgiris has a season BTTS rate of 25%, Banga 0%, and in the last 5 matches both teams produced BTTS in only 20% of cases. The offensive gap is significant — Žalgiris averages 1.75 goals per game versus Banga's 0.5, with comparable xG (1.36 vs 1.40), but finishing efficiency is critical: the hosts convert 14% of their attempts versus just 4% for Banga. Additionally, Banga has a season clean sheet rate of 50% compared to Žalgiris’s 25%, and the league-wide clean sheet rate is as high as 80%, favoring matches without BTTS. Trends from the last 5 games confirm a drop in goals — both teams average 0.4 scored goals, with xG 1.76 for Žalgiris and 1.24 for Banga; in practice Žalgiris scored 2 and conceded 5, while Banga scored 2 and conceded 4 in their five most recent matches. On this basis I tip BTTS - No with a probability of 80% versus 20% for Yes.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The model forecasts expected goals: 1.30 for Žalgiris and 1.23 for Banga (total 2.53), calculated as the average of home attack xG (1.36) and away defense xG (1.23) and vice versa. With this mean, a Poisson distribution yields ~72% probability for Over 1.5, ~46% for Over 2.5 and only ~25% for Over 3.5, indicating a strong signal for Under 3.5 (about 75%). Žalgiris posts a seasonal average of 1.75 goals and a shot conversion rate of 14%, while Banga averages only 0.5 goals and a 4% conversion, so the majority of goal threat is concentrated on the home side rather than producing a very high-scoring game. Seasonal percentages confirm a limited frequency of high-scoring outcomes: hosts have 25% of matches with over 3.5 goals, visitors 0%, and the league average is 2.28 goals per game, which further supports Under 3.5 as the strongest signal.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Žalgiris has a clear advantage in attack and in first halves: the home side’s seasonal goals per game is 1.75 versus 0.5 for Banga, and first-half goals average 1.25 for Žalgiris and 0.0 for the visitors (GoalsHT 5–1). The hosts led at the break in 50% of matches (2 times) and have 100% clean sheets at half-time, while Banga has never led at the break (0%), which strongly favors the home team maintaining a lead after 45 minutes. Despite similar xG (1.36 for Žalgiris vs 1.40 for Banga), Žalgiris converts chances to goals far more efficiently (conversion rate 14% vs 4%), so the visitors’ xG advantage does not translate into goals. Additionally, Banga’s season share of matches with both teams scoring is 0% and they average only 0.5 goals per match, while the hosts register more on-target shots (4.75 vs 3.5), increasing the likelihood of Žalgiris holding the lead and winning the match. For these reasons the most likely HT/FT scenario is 1/1 and I have assigned it the highest probability; draws at half-time or turnarounds are assessed as significantly less likely.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Žalgiris | Banga | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 31% | 31% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.24 | 0.29 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Žalgiris is 25% better for: last-5 form.
1 pts / game - Žalgiris · 0.8 pts / game - Banga
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Žalgiris is 11% better for: goals scored per game.
1.25 goals / game - Žalgiris · 1.13 goals / game - Banga
Banga is 79% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.13 goals / game - Žalgiris · 0.63 goals / game - Banga
Žalgiris scores in 63% of games (5 of 8 meczów), while Banga keeps a clean sheet in 38% (3 of 8 meczów).
Banga scores in 38% of games (3 of 8 meczów), while Žalgiris keeps a clean sheet in 50% (4 of 8 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Žalgiris
Over / Under - Banga
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Žalgiris - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 25% of games and wins 38%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.1 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Banga - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 25% of games and wins 38%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.4 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.20 | 0.60 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 0.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 0.8 | 0.6 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 40% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 100% |
| Goal difference | 0 | -3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.40 | 0.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.2 | 0.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.0 | 0.8 |
| Average goals per game | 0.2 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 20% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 20% |
| No goal | 80% | 80% |
| Goal difference | +1 | -3 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (3 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (4 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Žalgiris
Banga
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (A Lyga).
Teams vs league
| Žalgiris | Liga | Banga | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 2.38 | 2.22 | ▼ 1.75 |
| Both teams scored | • 38% | 37% | ▼ 13% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 50% | 41% | ▼ 25% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 50% | 41% | ▼ 38% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 75% | 61% | ▼ 38% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 50% | 66% | ▲ 75% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Record from Žalgiris's perspective: 2 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss against Banga. Games average 1.75 goals, and both teams scored in 25% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Žalgiris vs Banga?
The A Lyga match finished Žalgiris 1:1 Banga. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Žalgiris and Banga?
In the last 4 head-to-head matches Žalgiris won 2, Banga won 1 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 1.75 goals, with both teams scoring in 25% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Žalgiris vs Banga?
Žalgiris score 1.25 goals per game on average and Banga 1.13. The A Lyga average is 2.22 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 41% of games. Both teams score in 38% of Žalgiris's matches and 13% of Banga's.
What form are Žalgiris and Banga in?
Over the last 5 games Žalgiris have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Banga 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Žalgiris vs Banga?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


