Zamalek vs Abu Qair Semad: match statistics
Zamalek vs Abu Qair Semad: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Zamalek played against Abu Qair Semad in Egyptian Premier League (Egypt). The game was played on September 8, 2026. Final score: 2:0.
Recent form
Zamalek has 2 wins, 1 draw and 0 losses over its last five games, averaging 2.33 points per game. Abu Qair Semad has 1 win, 0 draws and 2 losses, with 1.00 points per game.
Scoring records
Zamalek scores 1.67 goals per game and allows 0.33. Abu Qair Semad scores 0.33 and allows 1.33. Games in this league average 2.03 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 33% of Zamalek's games and 0% of Abu Qair Semad's. The Over 2.5 rates are 67% and 0%, compared with league averages of 38% for BTTS and 32% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Zamalek has the higher season xG average, 1.29 to 0.75 per game. Zamalek takes 11.7 shots per game, while Abu Qair Semad takes 5.3.
First-half and second-half trends
Zamalek leads at halftime in 33% of its games and scores 1.33 goals per game after halftime. Abu Qair Semad leads at halftime in 0% and scores 0.33 after halftime.
When the teams score
Zamalek's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (2 goals). For Abu Qair Semad, it is minutes 46-60 (1 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Egyptian Premier League games average 2.03 goals. Both teams score in 38% of games, and 32% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
There is not enough head-to-head history for a meaningful comparison.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Zamalek are showing clearly superior form: they remain unbeaten in the league (2 wins and 1 draw), while their record in the last five matches stands at 4 wins and 1 draw. During this period, the hosts scored 7 goals and conceded just 1, whereas Abu Qair Semad have lost 2 of their last 5 matches and sit 13th, compared with Zamalek’s 3rd-place position. Away from home, the visitors are yet to score, have lost 100% of their matches, average just 2 shots and 0 shots on target per game, and post an average xG of only 0.32. Zamalek average 56% possession at home and create chances worth 1.29 xG, while their opponents allow 1.62 xG and concede an average of 2 goals away from home. The hosts’ lower attacking efficiency, having failed to score in 50% of their home matches, leaves some room for a draw; however, the quality gap and Abu Qair Semad’s defensive limitations clearly point towards a Zamalek victory.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The strongest signal points to BTTS - No, as the seasonal share of matches in which both teams scored is 0% for both Zamalek and Abu Qair Semad, compared with 33% across the league. The visitors have yet to score in the competition, average only 2.0 shots per match and have not recorded a single shot on target, while their average xG is just 0.32. Zamalek have kept a clean sheet in 50% of their matches this season and have conceded only 1 goal in their last five games, averaging 0.2 per match. The hosts are in better form, averaging 1.4 goals scored across their last five appearances, which supports a one-sided scoring outcome but does not significantly increase the chances of the visitors finding the net. Even with Abu Qair Semad improving offensively to an average of 1.0 goal over their last five matches, their 0% BTTS rate during this period still clearly supports a scenario in which at least one team fails to score.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The match profile clearly points to a low-scoring outcome: both Zamalek’s and Abu Qair Semad’s matches have finished with Under 2.5 goals in 100% of cases so far. In their last five appearances, the hosts averaged 1.4 goals scored and conceded just 0.2, while the visitors scored 1.0 goal, with matches involving both sides producing only 4 goals conceded across five games. Abu Qair Semad have failed to score in their matches so far in this matchup, averaging 2.0 shots and not a single shot on target, which limits the projection for the visitors to 0.57 goals. The league averages just 1.97 goals per match, and only 30% of games go Over 2.5, making Under 3.5 goals the most convincing option.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Zamalek are in clearly better form: over their last five matches, they have averaged 1.4 goals scored, conceded just 0.2, and won 80% of their games, while Abu Qair Semad have lost 40% of theirs. The hosts were leading at the break in 3 of their last 5 appearances and were not behind in any of them after 45 minutes, while the visitors averaged just 0.2 goals before half-time. Zamalek’s advantage is also evident in the quality of chances created: their average xG stands at 0.97 compared with just 0.32 for their opponents, who averaged fewer than one shot on target. Abu Qair Semad nevertheless remain capable of keeping the game open early on, having drawn at half-time in 60% of their recent matches; therefore, the half-time draw/full-time home win option is a strong alternative. The strongest scenario, however, remains Zamalek leading at the break and holding on to secure victory, supported by the hosts keeping a clean sheet in the first half in 100% of their last 5 matches.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Zamalek | Abu Qair Semad | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 31% | 31% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.14 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.46 | 0.20 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Zamalek is 133% better for: last-5 form.
2.33 pts / game - Zamalek · 1 pts / game - Abu Qair Semad
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Zamalek is 406% better for: goals scored per game.
1.67 goals / game - Zamalek · 0.33 goals / game - Abu Qair Semad
Zamalek is 303% better for: goals allowed per game.
0.33 goals / game - Zamalek · 1.33 goals / game - Abu Qair Semad
Zamalek scores in 67% of games (2 of 3 games), while Abu Qair Semad keeps a clean sheet in 33% (1 of 3 games).
Abu Qair Semad scores in 33% of games (1 of 3 games), while Zamalek keeps a clean sheet in 67% (2 of 3 games).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Zamalek
Over / Under - Abu Qair Semad
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Zamalek is 149% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.67 pts / game - Zamalek · 0.67 pts / game - Abu Qair Semad
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Zamalek - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 33% of games and wins 67%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Abu Qair Semad - second-half results
Allows 0.7 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.67 | 1.67 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.3 | 1.3 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.0 | 0.3 |
| Average goals per game | 0.3 | 1.7 |
| 1 goal | 33% | 67% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 67% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 33% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 67% |
| No goal | 67% | 33% |
| Goal difference | +1 | +3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.67 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.0 | 0.3 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.3 | 1.0 |
| Average goals per game | 0.3 | 1.3 |
| 1 goal | 33% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 33% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 67% | 33% |
| No goal | 100% | 67% |
| Goal difference | -1 | -2 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (2 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (1 goal). Concedes most in 31-45 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Zamalek
Abu Qair Semad
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Egyptian Premier League).
Teams vs league
| Zamalek | Liga | Abu Qair Semad | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | • 2.00 | 2.03 | ▼ 1.67 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 33% | 38% | ▼ 0% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 67% | 32% | ▼ 0% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 67% | 38% | ▼ 33% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 33% | 50% | ▼ 33% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 67% | 76% | ▲ 100% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
FAQ
What was the result of Zamalek vs Abu Qair Semad?
The Egyptian Premier League match finished Zamalek 2:0 Abu Qair Semad. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Zamalek vs Abu Qair Semad?
Zamalek score 1.67 goals per game on average and Abu Qair Semad 0.33. The Egyptian Premier League average is 2.03 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 32% of games. Both teams score in 33% of Zamalek's matches and 0% of Abu Qair Semad's.
What form are Zamalek and Abu Qair Semad in?
Over the last 5 games Zamalek have a 2-1-0 record (2.33 points per game) and Abu Qair Semad 1-0-2 (1.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Zamalek vs Abu Qair Semad?
The statistical background for Zamalek vs Abu Qair Semad — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.