Egypt - Egyptian Premier LeagueData current as of 16 July 2026

Zamalek vs ENPPI: match statistics

Zamalek crest
Zamalek
0 : 0half-time 0:0
ENPPI crest
ENPPI

Zamalek vs ENPPI: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Zamalek play ENPPI in Egyptian Premier League (Egypt). The match date is 27 April 2026 at 16:00. Final score: 0:0.

Current form

Zamalek: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match. ENPPI: 0-3-2, 0.60 points/match.

Goal statistics

Zamalek scores 1.50 and concedes 0.65 goals per match. ENPPI scores 1.04 and concedes 0.96. League average: 2.02 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Zamalek 38%, ENPPI 46%. Over 2.5: Zamalek 35%, ENPPI 35%. League level: BTTS 47%, Over 2.5 34%.

xG, shots and style

Zamalek has higher xG: 1.47 vs 1.14. Zamalek: 13.3 shots per match, ENPPI: 9.0.

Match halves

Zamalek: half-time lead 54%, second-half goals 0.81. ENPPI: half-time lead 27%, second-half goals 0.54.

Goals by minute

Zamalek: 76-90+ (10 goals). ENPPI: 76-90+ (7 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Egyptian Premier League: 2.02 goals per match, BTTS 47%, Over 2.5 34%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 0-0-1. Average goals 1.00, BTTS 0%.

Match description

Zamalek is the match favorite — they sit 1st in the table, have 15 wins this season and win 73% of home matches, suffering 0% home defeats. Offensively the hosts create more chances: at home they average 14.82 shots and 5.18 shots on target per match with xG 1.61, versus ENPPI’s away averages of 8.5 shots, 2.17 on target and xG 1.04 — roughly 6.3 more shots and over twice as many shots on target for Zamalek. Zamalek’s defense also dominates: on average 0.27 goals conceded per home match and 73% clean sheets, while ENPPI concedes 0.92 goals away and has only 33% clean sheets; in the last 5 matches Zamalek conceded 2 goals, ENPPI 7. ENPPI has a higher conversion rate (approx. 14% vs 10% for Zamalek), but they more often fail to score (33% of matches without a goal vs 9% for the hosts) and record as many as 58% draws away, which increases the chance of a points split. Considering the greater number of created chances, superior xG 1.61 vs 1.04 and defensive stability and form (Zamalek 4 wins and 1 draw in the last 5 matches with an average 2.6 points per match vs ENPPI 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss with an average 1.6 points per match), I tip the home win; estimated probabilities: 68% for Zamalek, 22% draw and 10% for ENPPI.

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

60Possession (%)40
ZamalekENPPI
21Shots8
ZamalekENPPI
8Shots on target3
ZamalekENPPI
2.3xG0.99
ZamalekENPPI
14Corners7
ZamalekENPPI
59Dangerous attacks37
ZamalekENPPI
12Fouls21
ZamalekENPPI
2Cards4
ZamalekENPPI

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.5Goals scored / match1.04
ZamalekENPPI
0.65Goals conceded / match0.96
ZamalekENPPI
53%Average possession50%
ZamalekENPPI
4.69Shots on target / match3.12
ZamalekENPPI

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

13.27Shots per match9
ZamalekENPPI
4.69Shots on target3.12
ZamalekENPPI
11.3%Shot conversion11.5%
ZamalekENPPI
53%Possession50%
ZamalekENPPI
1.47xG for1.14
ZamalekENPPI
1.1xG against1.31
ZamalekENPPI

Shooting quality

Zamalek: BalancedENPPI: Balanced
ZamalekENPPI
Accuracy (shots on target)35%35%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.320.33

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Zamalek is 233% better for: last-5 form.

2 pts / match - Zamalek · 0.6 pts / match - ENPPI

Zamalek
WDLWW
Season result split
65% W19% R15% P
Season (W-D-L)
17-5-4
2.15 pts / match · goal difference +22
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
9-4-1
Last 5 at home
3-1-1
WWDLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 0.6xG: 1.29Opponent xG: 1.15BTTS: 0%Over 2.5: 20%
ENPPI
DDDLL
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
31% W46% R23% P
Season (W-D-L)
8-12-6
1.38 pts / match · goal difference +2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-3-2
0.60 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
3-8-4
Last 5 away
1-2-2
WDDLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 1.14Opponent xG: 1.53BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Zamalek is 44% better for: goals scored per match.

1.5 goals / match - Zamalek · 1.04 goals / match - ENPPI

Zamalek is 48% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.65 goals / match - Zamalek · 0.96 goals / match - ENPPI

Zamalek scoring profile: strong

Zamalek scores in 85% of matches (22 of 26 matches), while ENPPI keeps a clean sheet in 42% (11 of 26 matches).

ENPPI scoring profile: mixed

ENPPI scores in 69% of matches (18 of 26 matches), while Zamalek keeps a clean sheet in 54% (14 of 26 matches).

39Goals scored (season)27
ZamalekENPPI
17Goals conceded (season)25
ZamalekENPPI
2.15Average goals in match2
ZamalekENPPI
3Goals scored (last 5)5
ZamalekENPPI
3Goals conceded (last 5)9
ZamalekENPPI

How often they score at least...

85%1 goal69%
ZamalekENPPI
38%2 goals27%
ZamalekENPPI
15%3 goals8%
ZamalekENPPI
8%4 goals0%
ZamalekENPPI

How often they concede at least...

46%1 goal58%
ZamalekENPPI
15%2 goals31%
ZamalekENPPI
4%3 goals8%
ZamalekENPPI
0%4 goals0%
ZamalekENPPI

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

12%BTTS at half-time19%
ZamalekENPPI
4%BTTS in both halves0%
ZamalekENPPI
27%Scored in both halves15%
ZamalekENPPI

BTTS and goal count

27%Min. 3 goals and BTTS27%
ZamalekENPPI
8%Min. 3 goals without BTTS8%
ZamalekENPPI
0%BTTS - last 560%
ZamalekENPPI

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

65%Min. 1 goal before half-time65%
ZamalekENPPI
19%Min. 2 goals before half-time23%
ZamalekENPPI
8%Min. 3 goals before half-time12%
ZamalekENPPI

2nd half

73%Min. 1 goal after half-time62%
ZamalekENPPI
38%Min. 2 goals after half-time27%
ZamalekENPPI
8%Min. 3 goals after half-time4%
ZamalekENPPI

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Zamalek is 63% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

2 pts / match - Zamalek · 1.23 pts / match - ENPPI

Zamalek - half-time state
54% leading38% draw8% trailing
ENPPI - half-time state
27% leading42% draw31% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

2Points per match (1st half)1.23
ZamalekENPPI
0.69Goals scored (1st half)0.5
ZamalekENPPI
0.23Goals conceded (1st half)0.58
ZamalekENPPI
0.92Average goals (1st half)1.08
ZamalekENPPI
81%Clean sheet before half-time58%
ZamalekENPPI
42%No goal before half-time58%
ZamalekENPPI

After half-time (2nd half)

1.73Points per match (2nd half)1.38
ZamalekENPPI
0.81Goals scored (2nd half)0.54
ZamalekENPPI
0.42Goals conceded (2nd half)0.38
ZamalekENPPI
1.23Average goals (2nd half)0.92
ZamalekENPPI
65%Clean sheet after half-time69%
ZamalekENPPI
46%No goal after half-time58%
ZamalekENPPI

Zamalek - second-half results

46% W35% R19% P
52
Half-time points
18
Half-time goals
+12
Goal difference (1st half)
45
Second-half points
+10
Goal difference (2nd half)
2.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding120%

Leads at half-time in 54% of matches and wins 65%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

ENPPI - second-half results

31% W46% R23% P
32
Half-time points
13
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
36
Second-half points
+4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.23
PPG before half-time
Lead holding115%

Leads at half-time in 27% of matches and wins 31%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.2

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Zamalek - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.201.60
Goals scored / match0.20.4
Goals conceded / match0.40.2
Average goals in match0.60.6
1 goal40%60%
2 goals20%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet80%80%
No goal80%60%
Goal difference-1+1
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1
ENPPI - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.801.00
Goals scored / match0.80.2
Goals conceded / match1.40.4
Average goals in match2.20.6
1 goal80%60%
2 goals60%0%
3 goals40%0%
Clean sheet20%60%
No goal60%80%
Goal difference-3-1
Half-time: 20% leading - 20% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Zamalek
ScoredConceded
6
1
0-15
5
3
16-30
7
2
31-45
6
2
46-60
5
6
61-75
10
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (10 goli). Concedes most in 61-75 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +7 - wins late phases.

ENPPI
ScoredConceded
4
2
0-15
3
7
16-30
6
6
31-45
4
3
46-60
3
2
61-75
7
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goli). Concedes most in 16-30 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.08
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.2 : 0.8
Estimated goal split
home : away
103%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
42%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-52%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
59%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
5%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 20 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Zamalek

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.37
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.48
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-9.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.03
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.45
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
144%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
66%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.15
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
26% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 15% come in the first quarter-hour.
26%

ENPPI

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.17
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.25
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-6.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.10
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.35
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
106%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
92%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.78
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.0
Late goals
26% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 15% come in the first quarter-hour.
26%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Egyptian Premier League).

Teams vs league

ZamalekLigaENPPI
Average goals in match 2.152.02 2.00
Both teams scored 38%47% 46%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 35%34% 35%
Clean sheets 54%35% 42%
Goal before half-time 65%58% 65%
Goal after half-time 73%70% 62%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.02
Average goals per match
47%
Both teams scored
34%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
35%
Clean sheets
1.04
Home goals / match
0.98
Away goals / match
+6%
Home attack advantage
+6%
Home defence advantage
+6%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
58%
1 goal
21%
2 goals
7%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
70%
1 goal
34%
2 goals
9%
3 goals
3%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Zamalek 0 - 0 - 1 ENPPI. Average goals 1.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of Zamalek vs ENPPI?

The Egyptian Premier League match finished Zamalek 0:0 ENPPI. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Zamalek vs ENPPI?

Zamalek score 1.50 goals per game on average and ENPPI 1.04. The Egyptian Premier League average is 2.02 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 34% of games. Both teams score in 38% of Zamalek's matches and 46% of ENPPI's.

What form are Zamalek and ENPPI in?

Over the last 5 games Zamalek have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and ENPPI 0-3-2 (0.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Zamalek vs ENPPI?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.