Zamalek vs Pyramids FC: match statistics
Zamalek vs Pyramids FC: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Zamalek played against Pyramids FC in Egyptian Premier League (Egypt). The game was played on April 23, 2026. Final score: 1:0.
Recent form
Zamalek has 4 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 2.40 points per game. Pyramids FC has 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss, with 2.00 points per game.
Scoring records
Zamalek scores 1.71 goals per game and allows 0.67. Pyramids FC scores 1.62 and allows 0.76. Games in this league average 1.99 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 48% of Zamalek's games and 52% of Pyramids FC's. The Over 2.5 rates are 38% and 48%, compared with league averages of 46% for BTTS and 33% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Pyramids FC has the higher season xG average, 1.71 to 1.51 per game. Zamalek takes 13.8 shots per game, while Pyramids FC takes 15.4.
First-half and second-half trends
Zamalek leads at halftime in 62% of its games and scores 0.90 goals per game after halftime. Pyramids FC leads at halftime in 43% and scores 0.95 after halftime.
When the teams score
Zamalek's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (9 goals). For Pyramids FC, it is minutes 61-75 (9 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Egyptian Premier League games average 1.99 goals. Both teams score in 46% of games, and 33% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 1 home win, 0 draws and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 1.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
I back the home win (1). Zamalek have won 70% of their home matches, remain unbeaten at their stadium (0% defeats) and keep 70% clean sheets, conceding only 0.3 goals per game on average. In the last 5 fixtures the hosts scored 8 goals and recorded a 3-2-0 run (3 wins, 2 draws), averaging 2.2 points per match, while Pyramids netted 9 goals in five games with a 2-2-1 record and 1.6 points per match. Chance-creation metrics are comparable — Zamalek’s home xG is 1.68 versus Pyramids’ away xG of 1.64, and average shots on target are 5.4 vs 5.5, with Pyramids having superior shot conversion (13% vs Zamalek’s 10%). Zamalek’s main advantage is game control and defense: 62% possession compared to the visitors’ 56% and a positive home goal difference of +12 versus Pyramids’ +8 on the road, indicating the hosts should dictate tempo. That said, Pyramids remain dangerous (34 goals this season and 60% away win rate), so I also assign a 25% probability to a draw and 15% to an away win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
I pick 'yes' (BTTS - Yes) as the more likely scenario. Pyramids have a seasonal BTTS of 70% and average 1.8 goals per match with a shot conversion rate of 13%, strongly favoring their scoring capability. Zamalek, however, defends very well this season — conceding only 0.55 goals on average and keeping a clean sheet in 55% of games, with a seasonal BTTS of just 36%, which is the main argument against BTTS. In the last 5 matches both teams produced BTTS in 60% of cases, and the combined xG 1.78 (Zamalek) + 1.64 (Pyramids) = 3.42 suggests plenty of created chances; additionally Zamalek’s xG against in the last 5 matches is 1.23, indicating a growing risk of conceding. Considering Pyramids’ high seasonal BTTS (70%), the higher combined xG (3.42) and recent form (last 5 matches BTTS 60%), I favor the 'yes' scenario with a 65:35 split.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Statistics indicate a clear goal potential: Zamalek averages 1.45 goals at home, Pyramids 1.80 away, with xG of 1.78 for Zamalek versus 1.64 for Pyramids. After adjusting xG for opponent defenses the model yields expected 1.36 goals for Zamalek and 1.15 for Pyramids, totaling 2.51 goals per match. Season shares show 64% of Zamalek matches Over 1.5 and 80% for Pyramids, while Zamalek keeps a clean sheet in 55% of games and Pyramids have BTTS in 70% of cases. These figures and the combined xG imply roughly a 72% probability for Over 1.5, about 46% for Over 2.5 and about 24% for Over 3.5. Therefore the strongest and most reliable signal is a bet on Over 1.5.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The most likely scenario is a draw at half-time and a Zamalek win at full-time (X/1). A half-time draw is supported by the numbers: the home team had a draw at the break in 55% of matches and the visitors in 50%, so the high proportion of HT draws increases the probability of a draw at the break. Zamalek have superior defensive and offensive metrics (average xG 1.78 versus Pyramids’ 1.64 and a season average goals conceded 0.55 versus 1.00), which suggests that after an even first period they can tilt the match in their favor. In the last five matches the home side led at the break in 60% and averaged 1.2 goals by half-time, and they also scored 5 goals in minutes 76–90 versus 3 for the opponent, indicating a tendency to score decisive late goals. However, the visitors have a high probability of both teams scoring (70% BTTS) and a higher shot conversion rate (13% vs 9%), so X/X and X/2 scenarios are also possible, but the strongest signal from the data is X/1.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Zamalek | Pyramids FC | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 35% | 37% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.35 | 0.28 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Zamalek is 20% better for: last-5 form.
2.4 pts / game - Zamalek · 2 pts / game - Pyramids FC
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Zamalek is 6% better for: goals scored per game.
1.71 goals / game - Zamalek · 1.62 goals / game - Pyramids FC
Zamalek is 13% better for: goals allowed per game.
0.67 goals / game - Zamalek · 0.76 goals / game - Pyramids FC
Zamalek scores in 90% of games (19 of 21 meczów), while Pyramids FC keeps a clean sheet in 43% (9 of 21 meczów).
Pyramids FC scores in 90% of games (19 of 21 meczów), while Zamalek keeps a clean sheet in 48% (10 of 21 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Zamalek
Over / Under - Pyramids FC
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Zamalek is 21% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
2.19 pts / game - Zamalek · 1.81 pts / game - Pyramids FC
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Zamalek - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 62% of games and wins 67%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Pyramids FC - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 43% of games and wins 62%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 2.00 | 1.80 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 0.2 |
| Average goals per game | 1.2 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 80% |
| No goal | 40% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +2 | +3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.80 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 0.8 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +2 | +2 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (9 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +6 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (9 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Zamalek
Pyramids FC
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Egyptian Premier League).
Teams vs league
| Zamalek | Liga | Pyramids FC | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 2.38 | 1.99 | ▲ 2.38 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 48% | 46% | ▲ 52% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 38% | 33% | ▲ 48% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 48% | 35% | ▲ 43% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 71% | 57% | ▲ 62% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 76% | 69% | ▲ 90% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Record from Zamalek's perspective: 1 win, 0 draws and 0 losses against Pyramids FC. Games average 1.00 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Zamalek vs Pyramids FC?
The Egyptian Premier League match finished Zamalek 1:0 Pyramids FC. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Zamalek vs Pyramids FC?
Zamalek score 1.71 goals per game on average and Pyramids FC 1.62. The Egyptian Premier League average is 1.99 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 33% of games. Both teams score in 48% of Zamalek's matches and 52% of Pyramids FC's.
What form are Zamalek and Pyramids FC in?
Over the last 5 games Zamalek have a 4-0-1 record (2.40 points per game) and Pyramids FC 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Zamalek vs Pyramids FC?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


