Železničar Pančevo vs Radnik Surdulica: match statistics
Železničar Pančevo displays impressive home form with 60% wins at home and as many as 70% clean sheets, indicating a solid defense at their own stadium. The hosts concede an average of only 0.5 goals per match in home games, while Radnik Surdulica records poor away results with 60% losses and only 20% wins. The visitors concede an average of 1.7 goals per away match and have just 10% clean sheets, making them vulnerable to losses. Although Radnik's recent overall form is better (2.2 points per match), their series of five consecutive defeats and draws away from home confirms difficulties playing on the road. Considering the hosts' xG advantage in home matches (1.54 vs 1.32) and the visitors' pronounced weakness away from home, Železničar Pančevo has a clear edge to secure three points.
Železničar Pančevo vs Radnik Surdulica: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Železničar Pančevo played against Radnik Surdulica in SuperLiga (Serbia). The game was played on January 31, 2026. Final score: 1:0.
Recent form
Železničar Pančevo has 3 wins, 0 draws and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.80 points per game. Radnik Surdulica has 3 wins, 2 draws and 0 losses, with 2.20 points per game.
Scoring records
Železničar Pančevo scores 1.25 goals per game and allows 1.15. Radnik Surdulica scores 1.30 and allows 1.20. Games in this league average 2.73 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 50% of Železničar Pančevo's games and 45% of Radnik Surdulica's. The Over 2.5 rates are 40% and 35%, compared with league averages of 55% for BTTS and 48% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Radnik Surdulica has the higher season xG average, 1.55 to 1.49 per game. Železničar Pančevo takes 11.8 shots per game, while Radnik Surdulica takes 12.6.
First-half and second-half trends
Železničar Pančevo leads at halftime in 40% of its games and scores 0.55 goals per game after halftime. Radnik Surdulica leads at halftime in 40% and scores 0.40 after halftime.
When the teams score
Železničar Pančevo's most productive scoring window is minutes 31-45+ (7 goals). For Radnik Surdulica, it is minutes 31-45+ (8 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
SuperLiga games average 2.73 goals. Both teams score in 55% of games, and 48% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 1 home win, 0 draws and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Železničar Pančevo displays impressive home form with 60% wins at home and as many as 70% clean sheets, indicating a solid defense at their own stadium. The hosts concede an average of only 0.5 goals per match in home games, while Radnik Surdulica records poor away results with 60% losses and only 20% wins. The visitors concede an average of 1.7 goals per away match and have just 10% clean sheets, making them vulnerable to losses. Although Radnik's recent overall form is better (2.2 points per match), their series of five consecutive defeats and draws away from home confirms difficulties playing on the road. Considering the hosts' xG advantage in home matches (1.54 vs 1.32) and the visitors' pronounced weakness away from home, Železničar Pančevo has a clear edge to secure three points.
View the statistical overviewStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Železničar Pančevo | Radnik Surdulica | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 35% | 36% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.30 | 0.29 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Radnik Surdulica is 22% better for: last-5 form.
1.8 pts / game - Železničar Pančevo · 2.2 pts / game - Radnik Surdulica
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Železničar Pančevo scores in 80% of games (16 of 20 meczów), while Radnik Surdulica keeps a clean sheet in 35% (7 of 20 meczów).
Radnik Surdulica scores in 70% of games (14 of 20 meczów), while Železničar Pančevo keeps a clean sheet in 35% (7 of 20 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Železničar Pančevo
Over / Under - Radnik Surdulica
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Železničar Pančevo - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 40% of games and wins 45%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Radnik Surdulica - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 40% of games and wins 40%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.60 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Average goals per game | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +1 | +1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.60 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.8 | 0.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.2 | 0.2 |
| Average goals per game | 1.0 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 80% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +3 | +2 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (7 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (8 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Železničar Pančevo
Radnik Surdulica
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (SuperLiga).
Teams vs league
| Železničar Pančevo | Liga | Radnik Surdulica | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 2.40 | 2.73 | ▼ 2.50 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 50% | 55% | ▼ 45% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 40% | 48% | ▼ 35% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 35% | 26% | ▲ 35% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 65% | 72% | ▼ 65% |
| Goal after half-time | • 75% | 75% | ▼ 70% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Record from Železničar Pančevo's perspective: 1 win, 0 draws and 0 losses against Radnik Surdulica. Games average 3.00 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Železničar Pančevo vs Radnik Surdulica?
The SuperLiga match finished Železničar Pančevo 1:0 Radnik Surdulica. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Železničar Pančevo vs Radnik Surdulica?
Železničar Pančevo score 1.25 goals per game on average and Radnik Surdulica 1.30. The SuperLiga average is 2.73 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 48% of games. Both teams score in 50% of Železničar Pančevo's matches and 45% of Radnik Surdulica's.
What form are Železničar Pančevo and Radnik Surdulica in?
Over the last 5 games Železničar Pančevo have a 3-0-2 record (1.80 points per game) and Radnik Surdulica 3-2-0 (2.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Železničar Pančevo vs Radnik Surdulica?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Železničar Pančevo vs Radnik Surdulica: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.