Zemun vs Radnički Niš: match statistics
Zemun vs Radnički Niš: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Zemun played against Radnički Niš in SuperLiga (Serbia). The game was played on August 2, 2026. Venue: Stadion u Gornjoj Varoši. Final score: 0:1.
Recent form
Zemun has 0 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 0.50 points per game. Radnički Niš has 0 wins, 0 draws and 2 losses, with 0.00 points per game.
Scoring records
Zemun scores 1.00 goals per game and allows 3.00. Radnički Niš scores 0.50 and allows 2.00. Games in this league average 2.80 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 50% of Zemun's games and 50% of Radnički Niš's. The Over 2.5 rates are 100% and 50%, compared with league averages of 40% for BTTS and 60% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Radnički Niš has the higher season xG average, 1.59 to 0.75 per game. Zemun takes 6.5 shots per game, while Radnički Niš takes 12.5.
First-half and second-half trends
Zemun leads at halftime in 0% of its games and scores 1.00 goals per game after halftime. Radnički Niš leads at halftime in 0% and scores 0.00 after halftime.
When the teams score
Zemun's most productive scoring window is minutes 46-60 (1 goals). For Radnički Niš, it is minutes 16-30 (1 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
SuperLiga games average 2.80 goals. Both teams score in 40% of games, and 60% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
There is not enough head-to-head history for a meaningful comparison.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
I predict an away win (2). Radnički Niš has won 3 of the last 5 matches and averages 1.8 points per game over that span, while Zemun has just 1 win and 0.8 points per game. Zemun has conceded 12 goals in their last five matches (2.4 per game) and concedes on average 2 goals per home game, whereas Radnički has conceded 6 in the last 5 (1.2 per game) and also averages 2 conceded on the road. In terms of chance quality, the home xG at their matches is 1.38 with xG against 2.80, while the visitors’ xG is 1.42 with xG against 1.35, indicating better control and lower defensive vulnerability for the away side. Additionally, Radnički averages 55% possession with 9 shots and 3 on target, versus the home side’s 32% possession and 13 shots, so greater ball control and stronger recent form point to an away victory.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The strongest signal for BTTS - Yes is that Radnički Niš have recorded 100% away matches with both teams scoring, and 100% of away matches with both BTTS and over 2.5, while in the last 5 meetings between the two sides BTTS occurred in 60% of cases. Zemun have conceded on average 2.4 goals in their last 5 matches (12 goals conceded in 5 games) and have an average xG against of 2.0 over that period, increasing the likelihood the opponent will score. The home side generate xG 1.75 and average 16 shots per match versus 9 for the visitors, with both teams averaging 3 shots on target, so both sides create goal-scoring opportunities. The counterargument is the league context: BTTS occurrence in the league is only 38% with 77% of matches ending in a clean sheet, which reduces overall confidence in the forecast. Considering the very strong away signal from Radnički (100%), positive xG figures for both teams and Zemun’s defensive frailty in the last five matches, I assess BTTS Yes at 65% vs 35% and recommend selecting Yes as the best bet.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Based on xG I expect Zemun to score around 1.55 goals (home attack xG 1.75 vs average xG conceded to visitors 1.35 → average 1.55), and Radnički Niš around 1.36 goals (away attack xG 1.42 vs average xG conceded to hosts 1.30 → average 1.36), giving a combined ~2.91 goals. Seasonal data show both teams had 100% of matches over 1.5 goals, which strongly supports Over 1.5 and justifies an estimated ~95% probability. For the 2.5 line data are mixed: seasonally Zemun has 0% of matches over 2.5, Radnički 100%, but in the last 5 matches Zemun has 100% Over 2.5, Radnički 60%, and the combined xG in the last 5 is 0.89+1.63=2.52 with 12 total goals (avg 2.4), so I assess Over 2.5 at about 70%. The 3.5 line appears less likely because the combined xG 2.91 is well below 3.5; despite the home advantage in shots (16 vs 9) and higher attacking xG, the conversion gap (home 0% vs away 11%) limits the chances of 4+ goals, so I rate Under 3.5 at ~75%. As a result the strongest signal is Over 1.5 (recommendation: over 1.5), with a secondary case for Over 2.5 based on combined xG 2.91 and recent form.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The key signal comes from half-time statistics: the home team averages 0.0 goals scored at half-time and 2.0 conceded (scoredAVGHT_home = 0.0, concededAVGHT_home = 2.0), while the away team averages 1.0 scored and 1.0 conceded by half-time (scoredAVGHT_away = 1.0, concededAVGHT_away = 1.0). Form confirms the advantage for the visitors — in the last 5 matches they won 60% of games versus 20% for the hosts (last5_winPercentage_overall_away = 60.0 vs last5_winPercentage_overall_home = 20.0), and the home side trailed at the break in 60% of cases (last5_trailingAtHTPercentage_overall_home = 60.0). Although the hosts generate higher xG and more shots (xG 1.75 vs 1.42 and 16 shots vs 9), their conversion rate is 0% compared to 11% for the away team (xg_for_avg_home = 1.75, xg_for_avg_away = 1.42; shotsAVG_home = 16, shotsAVG_away = 9; shot_conversion_rate_home = 0.0, shot_conversion_rate_away = 11.0), indicating finishing inefficiency. As a result the most likely scenario is the visitors leading at the break and winning at full-time: I assign 35% to 2/2 and 30% to X/2, i.e. 65% in total for an away win after 90 minutes. I assign a low probability to the home team winning both at half-time and full-time (e.g. 1/1 = 3%, 1/X = 2%), due to the season average of 0.0 goals for the hosts and 100% losses in the available data (seasonScoredAVG_home = 0.0, losePercentage_home = 100.0).
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Zemun | Radnički Niš | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 23% | 24% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.13 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.67 | 0.17 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Zemun is 100% better for: goals scored per game.
1 goals / game - Zemun · 0.5 goals / game - Radnički Niš
Radnički Niš is 50% better for: goals allowed per game.
3 goals / game - Zemun · 2 goals / game - Radnički Niš
Zemun scores in 50% of games (1 of 2 games), while Radnički Niš keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 2 games).
Radnički Niš scores in 50% of games (1 of 2 games), while Zemun keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 2 games).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Zemun
Over / Under - Radnički Niš
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Zemun - second-half results
Allows 1.0 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Radnički Niš - second-half results
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.00 | 1.50 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.0 | 1.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.0 | 2.0 |
| Average goals per game | 1.0 | 3.0 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 100% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 100% |
| Clean sheet | 0% | 0% |
| No goal | 100% | 50% |
| Goal difference | -2 | -2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.50 | 0.50 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.5 | 0.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.5 | 0.5 |
| Average goals per game | 2.0 | 0.5 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 50% |
| 2 goals | 100% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 0% | 50% |
| No goal | 50% | 100% |
| Goal difference | -2 | -1 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (1 goal). Concedes most in 76-90 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (1 goal). Concedes most in 16-30 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Zemun
Radnički Niš
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (SuperLiga).
Teams vs league
| Zemun | Liga | Radnički Niš | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 4.00 | 2.80 | ▼ 2.50 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 50% | 40% | ▲ 50% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 100% | 60% | ▼ 50% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 0% | 37% | ▼ 0% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 100% | 73% | ▲ 100% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 100% | 60% | ▼ 50% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
FAQ
What was the result of Zemun vs Radnički Niš?
The SuperLiga match finished Zemun 0:1 Radnički Niš. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Zemun vs Radnički Niš?
Zemun score 1.00 goals per game on average and Radnički Niš 0.50. The SuperLiga average is 2.80 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 60% of games. Both teams score in 50% of Zemun's matches and 50% of Radnički Niš's.
What form are Zemun and Radnički Niš in?
Over the last 5 games Zemun have a 0-1-1 record (0.50 points per game) and Radnički Niš 0-0-2 (0.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Zemun vs Radnički Niš?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Zemun vs Radnički Niš: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.


