Žilina II vs Futura Humenné: match statistics
Žilina II vs Futura Humenné: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Žilina II played against Futura Humenné in 2. Liga (Slovakia). The game was played on September 28, 2026. Venue: Štadión Pod Dubňom. Final score: 0:0.
Recent form
Žilina II has 3 wins, 0 draws and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.80 points per game. Futura Humenné has 1 win, 1 draw and 3 losses, with 0.80 points per game.
Scoring records
Žilina II scores 1.33 goals per game and allows 1.00. Futura Humenné scores 0.67 and allows 1.44. Games in this league average 2.82 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 44% of Žilina II's games and 44% of Futura Humenné's. The Over 2.5 rates are 44% and 44%, compared with league averages of 54% for BTTS and 58% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Žilina II has the higher season xG average, 1.36 to 0.98 per game. Žilina II takes 10.0 shots per game, while Futura Humenné takes 6.9.
First-half and second-half trends
Žilina II leads at halftime in 56% of its games and scores 0.44 goals per game after halftime. Futura Humenné leads at halftime in 44% and scores 0.11 after halftime.
When the teams score
Žilina II's most productive scoring window is minutes 16-30 (5 goals). For Futura Humenné, it is minutes 31-45+ (3 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
2. Liga games average 2.82 goals. Both teams score in 54% of games, and 58% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
There is not enough head-to-head history for a meaningful comparison.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Žilina II make excellent use of home advantage: they have won 80% of their home matches, scoring an average of 2.0 goals and recording 6.8 shots on target per game. Futura Humenné have lost all four of their away matches so far, scoring just 0.5 goals per game on the road while conceding 2.25. The difference in the quality of chances created is reflected in the hosts’ xG of 1.76, compared with just 0.77 for the visitors, who have failed to score in 50% of their away fixtures. Žilina II have also won 3 of their last 5 matches, whereas Futura have not recorded a victory during this period and have scored only 3 goals. The hosts are not flawless defensively, as their opponents generate an average xG of 1.55, but Futura’s poor finishing and losing away streak point towards a convincing Žilina II victory.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The case for both teams to score is strengthened by their current form: in their last 5 matches, both Žilina II and Futura Humenné recorded BTTS in 60% of games, compared with the league average of 53%. Žilina II scored 1.8 goals per match during this period, while Futura Humenné conceded an average of 1.2 goals, with the visitors also recording a 0% clean-sheet rate this season. The hosts are not particularly reliable defensively either, as their average xG conceded stands at 1.81, rising to 1.44 across their last five appearances. This gives the visitors a realistic chance of scoring despite averaging only 0.6 goals per match recently. Futura Humenné have a low season-long attacking output, averaging 0.5 goals and failing to score in 50% of their matches, which makes the BTTS - Yes edge only marginal. Nevertheless, the more likely scenario remains one in which the hosts’ recent attacking efficiency and the defensive frailties of both teams lead to at least one goal from each side.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Žilina II are in better offensive form: they have averaged 1.8 goals scored over their last 5 matches, with an xG of 1.52, while Futura Humenné have conceded 1.2 goals per game during this period. However, the visitors remain largely unproductive, scoring just 0.5 goals per game this season, with an average xG of 0.77. Although Futura have yet to keep a clean sheet and are conceding 2.25 goals per game this season, the hosts have scored only 0.8 goals per match throughout the competition. The 3.5 line is strongly supported by the results history: Žilina II have not seen Over 3.5 goals in any match, while this outcome has occurred in just 25% of Futura’s games. The projected total of 2.50 goals points to a clear preference for Under 3.5 goals, even with the hosts having a realistic chance of scoring twice.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Žilina II have a clear advantage in home results: they score an average of 0.8 goals and concede 0.8, while Futura Humenné have lost every away match and allowed opponents to score 2.25 goals per game. The hosts were leading at the break in 3 of their 5 home matches and did not trail in any of them, whereas the visitors were behind at half-time in 75% of their away fixtures and conceded an average of 1.0 goal before the interval. Žilina’s attacking potential is also reflected in their 1.15 xG and 9.4 shots per match, compared with Futura’s modest 0.77 xG and 3.75 shots. In their last five matches, the hosts won 60% of their games and scored an average of 1.8 goals, while the visitors failed to win, scored 0.6 goals and collected just 0.4 points per match. The most likely outcome is therefore Žilina II leading at half-time and maintaining their advantage until the final whistle, corresponding to the HT/FT pick 1/1.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Žilina II | Futura Humenné | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 48% | 40% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.14 | 0.14 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.28 | 0.24 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Žilina II is 125% better for: last-5 form.
1.8 pts / game - Žilina II · 0.8 pts / game - Futura Humenné
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Žilina II is 99% better for: goals scored per game.
1.33 goals / game - Žilina II · 0.67 goals / game - Futura Humenné
Žilina II is 44% better for: goals allowed per game.
1 goals / game - Žilina II · 1.44 goals / game - Futura Humenné
Žilina II scores in 67% of games (6 of 9 games), while Futura Humenné keeps a clean sheet in 22% (2 of 9 games).
Futura Humenné scores in 67% of games (6 of 9 games), while Žilina II keeps a clean sheet in 33% (3 of 9 games).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Žilina II
Over / Under - Futura Humenné
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Žilina II is 28% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
2 pts / game - Žilina II · 1.56 pts / game - Futura Humenné
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Žilina II - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 56% of games and wins 56%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Futura Humenné - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 44% of games and wins 22%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.
Allows 0.6 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 2.00 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.2 | 0.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 1.8 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 40% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +3 | 0 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 2.00 | 0.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.6 | 0.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.2 | 0.8 |
| Average goals per game | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 40% |
| No goal | 40% | 100% |
| Goal difference | +2 | -4 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (5 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (3 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Žilina II
Futura Humenné
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (2. Liga).
Teams vs league
| Žilina II | Liga | Futura Humenné | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 2.33 | 2.82 | ▼ 2.11 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 44% | 54% | ▼ 44% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 44% | 58% | ▼ 44% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 33% | 24% | ▼ 22% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 67% | 77% | • 78% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 67% | 81% | ▼ 67% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
FAQ
What was the result of Žilina II vs Futura Humenné?
The 2. Liga match finished Žilina II 0:0 Futura Humenné. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Žilina II vs Futura Humenné?
Žilina II score 1.33 goals per game on average and Futura Humenné 0.67. The 2. Liga average is 2.82 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 58% of games. Both teams score in 44% of Žilina II's matches and 44% of Futura Humenné's.
What form are Žilina II and Futura Humenné in?
Over the last 5 games Žilina II have a 3-0-2 record (1.80 points per game) and Futura Humenné 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Žilina II vs Futura Humenné?
The statistical background for Žilina II vs Futura Humenné — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


