Žilina II vs Slávia TU Košice: match statistics
Žilina II vs Slávia TU Košice: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Žilina II played against Slávia TU Košice in 2. Liga (Slovakia). The game was played on May 15, 2026. Final score: 4:0.
Recent form
Žilina II has 0 wins, 2 draws and 3 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.40 points per game. Slávia TU Košice has 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses, with 1.40 points per game.
Scoring records
Žilina II scores 1.34 goals per game and allows 2.03. Slávia TU Košice scores 1.31 and allows 1.72. Games in this league average 2.94 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 66% of Žilina II's games and 66% of Slávia TU Košice's. The Over 2.5 rates are 55% and 59%, compared with league averages of 62% for BTTS and 54% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Žilina II has the higher season xG average, 1.59 to 1.42 per game. Žilina II takes 11.8 shots per game, while Slávia TU Košice takes 11.1.
First-half and second-half trends
Žilina II leads at halftime in 21% of its games and scores 0.83 goals per game after halftime. Slávia TU Košice leads at halftime in 28% and scores 0.69 after halftime.
When the teams score
Žilina II's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (12 goals). For Slávia TU Košice, it is minutes 76-90+ (11 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
2. Liga games average 2.94 goals. Both teams score in 62% of games, and 54% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 1 home win, 0 draws and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 4.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Žilina II have the edge in chance creation: home average xG is 2.02 versus 1.20 xG for away teams, and average shots are 15.79 vs 9.07 (6.21 vs 3.71 shots on target). That converts into a higher home goals average of 1.57 per match versus 1.14 for Slávia, although Slávia have better shot conversion (13% vs 10%). Žilina II’s issue is recent defensive form — in the last 5 matches the hosts conceded 14 goals (2.8 per match) and failed to win any (0-2-3, 0.4 pts per match), while Slávia over the same period are 2-1-2 and have conceded only 5 goals. Over the season, however, the hosts look better defensively and in possession: average xG against at home is 1.43 vs 1.92 for the away side, possession 55% vs 49% and more clean sheets (14% vs 7%), giving them a home-field advantage. Considering Žilina II’s greater number of chances and Slávia’s high away loss rate (71% losses away vs 43% for hosts), I tip a Žilina II win, with a moderate probability of a draw due to the hosts’ recent defensive problems.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
I pick BTTS - Yes because both teams show high seasonal BTTS rates: Žilina II 60% and Slávia TU Košice 71%, versus a league average of 62%. In the last 5 matches Žilina II had BTTS in 80% of games and Košice in 60%; Žilina II conceded 14 goals in those five matches (2.8 per game) while Košice scored 5 goals (1.0 per game). xG supports the game dynamics: Žilina II averages 1.63 xG per match with 1.30 xG conceded, and Košice has 1.20 xG per match with 1.92 xG conceded, indicating chances for both creating and conceding goals. Additionally, Košice have only 7% clean sheets versus 33% for Žilina II, and matches with over 2.5 goals occur 64% (Košice) and 53% (Žilina II), which increases the likelihood of goal exchange. Based on these figures (seasonal BTTS 60/71, recent form 80/60, xG and high number of goals conceded by the home side) I assess BTTS probability at 78% for Yes and 22% for No, therefore I recommend Yes.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
I project about 3.03 total goals in the match: 1.78 for Žilina II and 1.25 for Slávia TU Košice. A model based on xG (home xG 1.63 versus away xG against them 1.92, and away xG 1.20 versus home xG against them 1.30) yields these values and predicts a total slightly above the league average of 2.94. Both teams have a high share of matches over 1.5 goals — home 73% and away 93% — which strengthens the chance of Over 1.5; on that basis I estimate the probability of Over 1.5 at about 81%. Over 2.5 also has moderate support: season rates of 53% for the home side and 64% for the away side, and a Poisson model at a mean of 3.03 suggests roughly a 58% chance of at least 3 goals. Additionally, the home team has conceded 14 goals in the last 5 matches (2.8 per match) and both teams have high BTTS rates (60% and 71%), so I recommend backing Over 1.5 as the strongest signal.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Žilina II led at the break in 6 of 15 matches (40%) and won the matches outright in 40% of cases, while Slávia TU Košice wins only 14% of fixtures. The hosts have a higher xG of 1.63 versus 1.20 for the visitors and register more shots on target (5.33 vs 3.71); at half-time they score on average 0.73 goals and concede 0.40, whereas the visitors score 0.50 and concede 1.07. Additionally, Žilina II records 60% clean halves at the break compared to 29% for the away side, suggesting they frequently maintain a lead at the break and less often concede before half-time. Consequently, the most likely scenario is HT/FT 1/1 (approx. 28%), the second is Half-Time/Full-Time X/X (~24%), and a turnaround by the visitors remains unlikely (1/2 ~2%).
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Žilina II | Slávia TU Košice | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 42% | 41% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.13 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.27 | 0.29 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Slávia TU Košice is 250% better for: last-5 form.
0.4 pts / game - Žilina II · 1.4 pts / game - Slávia TU Košice
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Slávia TU Košice is 18% better for: goals allowed per game.
2.03 goals / game - Žilina II · 1.72 goals / game - Slávia TU Košice
Žilina II scores in 76% of games (22 of 29 meczów), while Slávia TU Košice keeps a clean sheet in 21% (6 of 29 meczów).
Slávia TU Košice scores in 83% of games (24 of 29 meczów), while Žilina II keeps a clean sheet in 14% (4 of 29 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Žilina II
Over / Under - Slávia TU Košice
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Slávia TU Košice is 32% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.97 pts / game - Žilina II · 1.28 pts / game - Slávia TU Košice
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Žilina II - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 21% of games and wins 28%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.1 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Slávia TU Košice - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 28% of games and wins 28%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.80 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.2 | 1.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.2 | 1.6 |
| Average goals per game | 1.4 | 2.8 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 20% |
| No goal | 80% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -5 | -2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.40 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.6 | 0.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 0.4 |
| Average goals per game | 1.2 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 40% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | 0 | 0 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (12 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (14). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (11 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Žilina II
Slávia TU Košice
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (2. Liga).
Teams vs league
| Žilina II | Liga | Slávia TU Košice | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 3.38 | 2.94 | • 3.03 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 66% | 62% | ▲ 66% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | • 55% | 54% | ▲ 59% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 14% | 22% | • 21% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 79% | 75% | • 76% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 76% | 79% | ▼ 76% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from Žilina II's perspective: 1 win, 0 draws and 0 losses against Slávia TU Košice. Games average 4.00 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Žilina II vs Slávia TU Košice?
The 2. Liga match finished Žilina II 4:0 Slávia TU Košice. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Žilina II vs Slávia TU Košice?
Žilina II score 1.34 goals per game on average and Slávia TU Košice 1.31. The 2. Liga average is 2.94 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 54% of games. Both teams score in 66% of Žilina II's matches and 66% of Slávia TU Košice's.
What form are Žilina II and Slávia TU Košice in?
Over the last 5 games Žilina II have a 0-2-3 record (0.40 points per game) and Slávia TU Košice 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Žilina II vs Slávia TU Košice?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


