Azerbaijan - Premyer LiqasıData current as of 23 July 2026

Zira vs Kapaz: match statistics

Zira crest
Zira
2 : 2half-time 1:1
Kapaz crest
Kapaz
170%(1.43)
X20%(4.00)
210%(6.60)

Zira is the decisive favorite for this meeting, occupying 4th place in the table with impressive form - 4 wins in the last 5 matches and a 10-8-4 record for the season. The hosts present solid play at home with 45% of home matches won, 55% clean sheets, and a positive goal difference of +7. Kapaz, on the other hand, sits in 11th position with a catastrophic away record - a mere 25% wins, 67% losses, and an alarming goal difference of -16 on the road. The visitors fail to score in 67% of away matches, conceding an average of 2.08 goals per match, which, given Zira's defensive solidity (0.73 goals conceded on average at home), points to a clear victory for the hosts. Zira's advantage in possession (61% vs 42%), shot efficiency, and xG indicators (1.49 vs 1.1) further confirms their dominance in this clash.

Zira vs Kapaz: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Zira play Kapaz in Premyer Liqası (Azerbaijan). The match date is 9 March 2026 at 15:30. Final score: 2:2.

Current form

Zira: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match. Kapaz: 2-0-3, 1.20 points/match.

Goal statistics

Zira scores 1.30 and concedes 1.09 goals per match. Kapaz scores 0.76 and concedes 1.85. League average: 2.58 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Zira 58%, Kapaz 30%. Over 2.5: Zira 42%, Kapaz 45%. League level: BTTS 46%, Over 2.5 48%.

xG, shots and style

Zira has higher xG: 1.38 vs 1.16. Zira: 10.6 shots per match, Kapaz: 9.6.

Match halves

Zira: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 0.73. Kapaz: half-time lead 12%, second-half goals 0.42.

Goals by minute

Zira: 76-90+ (15 goals). Kapaz: 31-45+ (7 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Premyer Liqası: 2.58 goals per match, BTTS 46%, Over 2.5 48%.

Head-to-head

2 H2H matches: 2-0-0. Average goals 3.50, BTTS 0%.

Match description

Zira is the decisive favorite for this meeting, occupying 4th place in the table with impressive form - 4 wins in the last 5 matches and a 10-8-4 record for the season. The hosts present solid play at home with 45% of home matches won, 55% clean sheets, and a positive goal difference of +7. Kapaz, on the other hand, sits in 11th position with a catastrophic away record - a mere 25% wins, 67% losses, and an alarming goal difference of -16 on the road. The visitors fail to score in 67% of away matches, conceding an average of 2.08 goals per match, which, given Zira's defensive solidity (0.73 goals conceded on average at home), points to a clear victory for the hosts. Zira's advantage in possession (61% vs 42%), shot efficiency, and xG indicators (1.49 vs 1.1) further confirms their dominance in this clash.

Half-by-half

1 : 1
1st half
1 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

61Possession (%)39
ZiraKapaz
13Shots10
ZiraKapaz
4Shots on target2
ZiraKapaz
1.49xG1.06
ZiraKapaz
7Corners3
ZiraKapaz
54Dangerous attacks40
ZiraKapaz
14Fouls10
ZiraKapaz
0Cards2
ZiraKapaz

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.3Goals scored / match0.76
ZiraKapaz
1.09Goals conceded / match1.85
ZiraKapaz
56%Average possession46%
ZiraKapaz
3.94Shots on target / match2.88
ZiraKapaz

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

10.58Shots per match9.58
ZiraKapaz
3.94Shots on target2.88
ZiraKapaz
12.3%Shot conversion7.9%
ZiraKapaz
56%Possession46%
ZiraKapaz
1.38xG for1.16
ZiraKapaz
1.12xG against1.8
ZiraKapaz

Shooting quality

Zira: BalancedKapaz: Balanced
ZiraKapaz
Accuracy (shots on target)37%30%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.330.26

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Zira is 33% better for: last-5 form.

1.6 pts / match - Zira · 1.2 pts / match - Kapaz

Zira
DWDWL
Season result split
39% W42% R18% P
Season (W-D-L)
13-14-6
1.61 pts / match · goal difference +7
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
7-8-2
Last 5 at home
2-2-1
LDDWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.64Opponent xG: 1.10BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%
Kapaz
LWWLL
Season result split
24% W9% R67% P
Season (W-D-L)
8-3-22
0.82 pts / match · goal difference -36
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-0-3
1.20 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
4-2-11
Last 5 away
1-1-3
DLLWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.10Opponent xG: 2.23BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 20%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Zira is 71% better for: goals scored per match.

1.3 goals / match - Zira · 0.76 goals / match - Kapaz

Zira is 70% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.09 goals / match - Zira · 1.85 goals / match - Kapaz

Zira scoring profile: very strong

Zira scores in 82% of matches (27 of 33 matches), while Kapaz keeps a clean sheet in 18% (6 of 33 matches).

Kapaz scoring profile: mixed

Kapaz scores in 45% of matches (15 of 33 matches), while Zira keeps a clean sheet in 36% (12 of 33 matches).

43Goals scored (season)25
ZiraKapaz
36Goals conceded (season)61
ZiraKapaz
2.39Average goals in match2.61
ZiraKapaz
6Goals scored (last 5)3
ZiraKapaz
5Goals conceded (last 5)6
ZiraKapaz

How often they score at least...

82%1 goal45%
ZiraKapaz
33%2 goals21%
ZiraKapaz
9%3 goals6%
ZiraKapaz
3%4 goals3%
ZiraKapaz

How often they concede at least...

64%1 goal82%
ZiraKapaz
33%2 goals58%
ZiraKapaz
12%3 goals30%
ZiraKapaz
0%4 goals9%
ZiraKapaz

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

18%BTTS at half-time15%
ZiraKapaz
6%BTTS in both halves3%
ZiraKapaz
15%Scored in both halves12%
ZiraKapaz

BTTS and goal count

36%Min. 3 goals and BTTS27%
ZiraKapaz
6%Min. 3 goals without BTTS18%
ZiraKapaz
60%BTTS - last 520%
ZiraKapaz

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

70%Min. 1 goal before half-time67%
ZiraKapaz
33%Min. 2 goals before half-time36%
ZiraKapaz
15%Min. 3 goals before half-time18%
ZiraKapaz

2nd half

70%Min. 1 goal after half-time76%
ZiraKapaz
36%Min. 2 goals after half-time42%
ZiraKapaz
12%Min. 3 goals after half-time12%
ZiraKapaz

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Zira is 83% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.39 pts / match - Zira · 0.76 pts / match - Kapaz

Zira - half-time state
33% leading39% draw27% trailing
Kapaz - half-time state
12% leading39% draw48% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.39Points per match (1st half)0.76
ZiraKapaz
0.58Goals scored (1st half)0.33
ZiraKapaz
0.61Goals conceded (1st half)0.91
ZiraKapaz
1.18Average goals (1st half)1.24
ZiraKapaz
55%Clean sheet before half-time42%
ZiraKapaz
58%No goal before half-time76%
ZiraKapaz

After half-time (2nd half)

1.52Points per match (2nd half)0.88
ZiraKapaz
0.73Goals scored (2nd half)0.42
ZiraKapaz
0.48Goals conceded (2nd half)0.94
ZiraKapaz
1.21Average goals (2nd half)1.36
ZiraKapaz
61%Clean sheet after half-time39%
ZiraKapaz
45%No goal after half-time67%
ZiraKapaz

Zira - second-half results

36% W42% R21% P
46
Half-time points
19
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
50
Second-half points
+8
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.39
PPG before half-time
Lead holding118%

Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 39%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Kapaz - second-half results

18% W33% R48% P
25
Half-time points
11
Half-time goals
-19
Goal difference (1st half)
29
Second-half points
-17
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.76
PPG before half-time
Lead holding200%

Leads at half-time in 12% of matches and wins 24%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Zira - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.602.60
Goals scored / match0.21.0
Goals conceded / match0.80.2
Average goals in match1.01.2
1 goal60%80%
2 goals40%20%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet40%80%
No goal80%20%
Goal difference-3+4
Half-time: 0% leading - 60% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 80% won - 20% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 1
Kapaz - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.801.20
Goals scored / match0.00.6
Goals conceded / match0.21.0
Average goals in match0.21.6
1 goal20%100%
2 goals0%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet80%20%
No goal100%60%
Goal difference-1-2
Half-time: 0% leading - 80% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 0% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Zira
ScoredConceded
3
3
0-15
4
11
16-30
12
6
31-45
1
5
46-60
8
8
61-75
15
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (15 goli). Concedes most in 16-30 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): +12 - wins late phases.

Kapaz
ScoredConceded
2
6
0-15
2
6
16-30
7
18
31-45
6
7
46-60
1
12
61-75
7
12
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (7 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (18). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.50
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.6 : 0.9
Estimated goal split
home : away
97%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
44%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+40%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
37%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
10%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 10 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Zira

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.26
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.05
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-5.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.08
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.03
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
99%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
86%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.01
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
35% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 7% come in the first quarter-hour.
35%

Kapaz

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.64
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.45
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+12.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.40
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.05
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
60%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
141%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.38
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
28% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 8% come in the first quarter-hour.
28%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Premyer Liqası).

Teams vs league

ZiraLigaKapaz
Average goals in match 2.392.58 2.61
Both teams scored 58%46% 30%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 42%48% 45%
Clean sheets 36%31% 18%
Goal before half-time 70%65% 67%
Goal after half-time 70%74% 76%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.58
Average goals per match
46%
Both teams scored
48%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
31%
Clean sheets
1.31
Home goals / match
1.27
Away goals / match
+3%
Home attack advantage
+3%
Home defence advantage
+0%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
65%
1 goal
30%
2 goals
12%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
74%
1 goal
48%
2 goals
20%
3 goals
5%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (2): Zira 2 - 0 - 0 Kapaz. Average goals 3.50, both teams scored in 0% matches.

FK Kapaz
0 : 2
Zira IK
Zira IK
5 : 0
FK Kapaz

FAQ

What was the result of Zira vs Kapaz?

The Premyer Liqası match finished Zira 2:2 Kapaz. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Zira and Kapaz?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches Zira won 2, Kapaz won 0 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 3.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Zira vs Kapaz?

Zira score 1.30 goals per game on average and Kapaz 0.76. The Premyer Liqası average is 2.58 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 48% of games. Both teams score in 58% of Zira's matches and 30% of Kapaz's.

What form are Zira and Kapaz in?

Over the last 5 games Zira have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and Kapaz 2-0-3 (1.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Zira vs Kapaz?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.