Zob Ahan vs Fajr Sepasi: match statistics
Statistical analysis indicates balanced chances for both teams, with a slight advantage for a draw scenario. Zob Ahan shows very poor offensive form at home (just 0.44 goals per match, 67% of matches without a scored goal), but impresses defensively with 56% clean sheets and only 0.44 goals conceded on average per home match. Fajr Sepasi has better form in their last five matches (1.8 points per match compared to the hosts' 0.6) and a more effective attack away (1.11 goals on average), but at the same time concedes more goals (1.0 per match). A key factor is Zob Ahan's tendency for draws – as many as 67% of home matches end in a share of points, which, combined with Fajr Sepasi's 56% draws away, strongly suggests a goalless or low-scoring draw. The difference in xG (1.58 vs 0.76 in favor of the hosts in attack, but 1.29 vs 1.52 in defense) further confirms the balanced nature of this encounter.
Zob Ahan vs Fajr Sepasi: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Zob Ahan played against Fajr Sepasi in Persian Gulf Pro League (Iran). The game was played on February 2, 2026. Final score: 2:1.
Recent form
Zob Ahan has 0 wins, 3 draws and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.60 points per game. Fajr Sepasi has 3 wins, 0 draws and 2 losses, with 1.80 points per game.
Scoring records
Zob Ahan scores 0.50 goals per game and allows 0.83. Fajr Sepasi scores 1.11 and allows 1.17. Games in this league average 1.72 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 22% of Zob Ahan's games and 56% of Fajr Sepasi's. The Over 2.5 rates are 11% and 44%, compared with league averages of 37% for BTTS and 26% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Zob Ahan has the higher season xG average, 1.32 to 0.76 per game. Zob Ahan takes 4.7 shots per game, while Fajr Sepasi takes 0.8.
First-half and second-half trends
Zob Ahan leads at halftime in 22% of its games and scores 0.17 goals per game after halftime. Fajr Sepasi leads at halftime in 22% and scores 0.67 after halftime.
When the teams score
Zob Ahan's most productive scoring window is minutes 31-45+ (3 goals). For Fajr Sepasi, it is minutes 31-45+ (5 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Persian Gulf Pro League games average 1.72 goals. Both teams score in 37% of games, and 26% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 0 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 1.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Statistical analysis indicates balanced chances for both teams, with a slight advantage for a draw scenario. Zob Ahan shows very poor offensive form at home (just 0.44 goals per match, 67% of matches without a scored goal), but impresses defensively with 56% clean sheets and only 0.44 goals conceded on average per home match. Fajr Sepasi has better form in their last five matches (1.8 points per match compared to the hosts' 0.6) and a more effective attack away (1.11 goals on average), but at the same time concedes more goals (1.0 per match). A key factor is Zob Ahan's tendency for draws – as many as 67% of home matches end in a share of points, which, combined with Fajr Sepasi's 56% draws away, strongly suggests a goalless or low-scoring draw. The difference in xG (1.58 vs 0.76 in favor of the hosts in attack, but 1.29 vs 1.52 in defense) further confirms the balanced nature of this encounter.
View the statistical overviewStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Zob Ahan | Fajr Sepasi | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 31% | -27% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.28 | 0.92 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.35 | 0.00 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Fajr Sepasi is 200% better for: last-5 form.
0.6 pts / game - Zob Ahan · 1.8 pts / game - Fajr Sepasi
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Fajr Sepasi is 122% better for: goals scored per game.
0.5 goals / game - Zob Ahan · 1.11 goals / game - Fajr Sepasi
Zob Ahan is 41% better for: goals allowed per game.
0.83 goals / game - Zob Ahan · 1.17 goals / game - Fajr Sepasi
Zob Ahan scores in 28% of games (5 of 18 meczów), while Fajr Sepasi keeps a clean sheet in 28% (5 of 18 meczów).
Fajr Sepasi scores in 78% of games (14 of 18 meczów), while Zob Ahan keeps a clean sheet in 44% (8 of 18 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Zob Ahan
Over / Under - Fajr Sepasi
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Fajr Sepasi is 5% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.22 pts / game - Zob Ahan · 1.28 pts / game - Fajr Sepasi
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Zob Ahan - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 22% of games and wins 11%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.
Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Fajr Sepasi - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 22% of games and wins 33%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.5 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.80 | 0.60 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| 1 goal | 20% | 40% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 60% |
| No goal | 100% | 100% |
| Goal difference | -1 | -3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.40 | 1.80 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.8 | 1.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.2 | 1.0 |
| Average goals per game | 1.0 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +3 | 0 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (3 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (5 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Zob Ahan
Fajr Sepasi
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Persian Gulf Pro League).
Teams vs league
| Zob Ahan | Liga | Fajr Sepasi | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 1.33 | 1.72 | ▲ 2.28 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 22% | 37% | ▲ 56% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 11% | 26% | ▲ 44% |
| Clean sheets | • 44% | 43% | ▼ 28% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 44% | 51% | ▼ 44% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 50% | 60% | ▲ 94% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Head-to-head
Record from Zob Ahan's perspective: 0 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss against Fajr Sepasi. Games average 1.00 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Zob Ahan vs Fajr Sepasi?
The Persian Gulf Pro League match finished Zob Ahan 2:1 Fajr Sepasi. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Zob Ahan vs Fajr Sepasi?
Zob Ahan score 0.50 goals per game on average and Fajr Sepasi 1.11. The Persian Gulf Pro League average is 1.72 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 26% of games. Both teams score in 22% of Zob Ahan's matches and 56% of Fajr Sepasi's.
What form are Zob Ahan and Fajr Sepasi in?
Over the last 5 games Zob Ahan have a 0-3-2 record (0.60 points per game) and Fajr Sepasi 3-0-2 (1.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Zob Ahan vs Fajr Sepasi?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.