Zob Ahan vs Tractor Sazi: match statistics
Zob Ahan vs Tractor Sazi: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Zob Ahan played against Tractor Sazi in Persian Gulf Pro League (Iran). The game was played on December 9, 2025. Final score: 0:0.
Recent form
Zob Ahan has 1 win, 3 draws and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 1.20 points per game. Tractor Sazi has 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss, with 1.60 points per game.
Scoring records
Zob Ahan scores 0.75 goals per game and allows 0.92. Tractor Sazi scores 1.45 and allows 0.64. Games in this league average 1.78 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 33% of Zob Ahan's games and 45% of Tractor Sazi's. The Over 2.5 rates are 17% and 45%, compared with league averages of 38% for BTTS and 24% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Tractor Sazi has the higher season xG average, 1.89 to 1.33 per game. Zob Ahan takes 5.4 shots per game, while Tractor Sazi takes 3.4.
First-half and second-half trends
Zob Ahan leads at halftime in 33% of its games and scores 0.25 goals per game after halftime. Tractor Sazi leads at halftime in 27% and scores 0.91 after halftime.
When the teams score
Zob Ahan's most productive scoring window is minutes 31-45+ (3 goals). For Tractor Sazi, it is minutes 76-90+ (4 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Persian Gulf Pro League games average 1.78 goals. Both teams score in 38% of games, and 24% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
There is not enough head-to-head history for a meaningful comparison.
Stats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Zob Ahan | Tractor Sazi | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 40% | 38% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.25 | 0.56 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.35 | 1.14 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Tractor Sazi is 33% better for: last-5 form.
1.2 pts / game - Zob Ahan · 1.6 pts / game - Tractor Sazi
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Tractor Sazi is 93% better for: goals scored per game.
0.75 goals / game - Zob Ahan · 1.45 goals / game - Tractor Sazi
Tractor Sazi is 44% better for: goals allowed per game.
0.92 goals / game - Zob Ahan · 0.64 goals / game - Tractor Sazi
Zob Ahan scores in 42% of games (5 of 12 meczów), while Tractor Sazi keeps a clean sheet in 45% (5 of 11 meczów).
Tractor Sazi scores in 55% of games (6 of 11 meczów), while Zob Ahan keeps a clean sheet in 33% (4 of 12 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Zob Ahan
Over / Under - Tractor Sazi
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Tractor Sazi is 9% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.42 pts / game - Zob Ahan · 1.55 pts / game - Tractor Sazi
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Zob Ahan - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 33% of games and wins 17%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.
Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Tractor Sazi - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 27% of games and wins 36%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.20 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.2 | 0.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 0.4 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 40% |
| No goal | 80% | 60% |
| Goal difference | 0 | -1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.40 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 1.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 0.6 | 2.2 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +1 | +5 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (3 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (4 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Zob Ahan
Tractor Sazi
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Persian Gulf Pro League).
Teams vs league
| Zob Ahan | Liga | Tractor Sazi | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 1.67 | 1.78 | ▲ 2.09 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 33% | 38% | ▲ 45% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 17% | 24% | ▲ 45% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 33% | 41% | ▲ 45% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 58% | 55% | ▼ 36% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 58% | 62% | ▲ 64% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
FAQ
What was the result of Zob Ahan vs Tractor Sazi?
The Persian Gulf Pro League match finished Zob Ahan 0:0 Tractor Sazi. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Zob Ahan vs Tractor Sazi?
Zob Ahan score 0.75 goals per game on average and Tractor Sazi 1.45. The Persian Gulf Pro League average is 1.78 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 24% of games. Both teams score in 33% of Zob Ahan's matches and 45% of Tractor Sazi's.
What form are Zob Ahan and Tractor Sazi in?
Over the last 5 games Zob Ahan have a 1-3-1 record (1.20 points per game) and Tractor Sazi 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Zob Ahan vs Tractor Sazi?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Zob Ahan vs Tractor Sazi: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.