Belgium - Pro LeagueData current as of September 12, 2026

Zulte-Waregem vs FCV Dender EH: match statistics

Zulte-Waregem crest
Zulte-Waregem
1 : 0half-time 0:0
FCV Dender EH crest
FCV Dender EH
150%(2.25)
X30%(3.40)
220%(3.20)

Zulte-Waregem holds a clear home advantage, as evidenced by their +1 goal difference in home matches and a 36% win rate at home. FCV Dender EH displays poor away form with only 18% of wins on the road and a negative goal difference of -7. The hosts score an average of 1.36 goals per home game, while the visitors concede an average of 1.55 goals in away matches, highlighting Dender's defensive vulnerability. Both teams are in poor recent form, but Zulte-Waregem boasts better xG stats (1.48 vs 1.3) and a higher shot conversion rate (10% vs 8%). Considering the home advantage and superior offensive metrics, Zulte-Waregem has a higher chance of winning, although both teams' poor form increases the likelihood of a draw.

Zulte-Waregem vs FCV Dender EH: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Zulte-Waregem played against FCV Dender EH in Pro League (Belgium). The game was played on February 7, 2026. Final score: 1:0.

Recent form

Zulte-Waregem has 1 win, 0 draws and 4 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.60 points per game. FCV Dender EH has 1 win, 2 draws and 2 losses, with 1.00 points per game.

Scoring records

Zulte-Waregem scores 1.35 goals per game and allows 1.52. FCV Dender EH scores 0.78 and allows 1.57. Games in this league average 2.53 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 65% of Zulte-Waregem's games and 57% of FCV Dender EH's. The Over 2.5 rates are 48% and 48%, compared with league averages of 53% for BTTS and 44% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Zulte-Waregem has the higher season xG average, 1.37 to 1.27 per game. Zulte-Waregem takes 11.7 shots per game, while FCV Dender EH takes 10.9.

First-half and second-half trends

Zulte-Waregem leads at halftime in 26% of its games and scores 0.65 goals per game after halftime. FCV Dender EH leads at halftime in 17% and scores 0.48 after halftime.

When the teams score

Zulte-Waregem's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (9 goals). For FCV Dender EH, it is minutes 76-90+ (5 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Pro League games average 2.53 goals. Both teams score in 53% of games, and 44% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 1 draw and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 4.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Zulte-Waregem holds a clear home advantage, as evidenced by their +1 goal difference in home matches and a 36% win rate at home. FCV Dender EH displays poor away form with only 18% of wins on the road and a negative goal difference of -7. The hosts score an average of 1.36 goals per home game, while the visitors concede an average of 1.55 goals in away matches, highlighting Dender's defensive vulnerability. Both teams are in poor recent form, but Zulte-Waregem boasts better xG stats (1.48 vs 1.3) and a higher shot conversion rate (10% vs 8%). Considering the home advantage and superior offensive metrics, Zulte-Waregem has a higher chance of winning, although both teams' poor form increases the likelihood of a draw.

View the statistical overview

Stats by half

0 : 0
First half
1 : 0
Second half

Game stats

50Possession (%)50
Zulte-WaregemFCV Dender EH
12Shots7
Zulte-WaregemFCV Dender EH
3Shots on target4
Zulte-WaregemFCV Dender EH
1.29xG0.99
Zulte-WaregemFCV Dender EH
6Corners1
Zulte-WaregemFCV Dender EH
45Dangerous attacks36
Zulte-WaregemFCV Dender EH
8Fouls8
Zulte-WaregemFCV Dender EH
1Cards4
Zulte-WaregemFCV Dender EH

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

Zulte-WaregemFCV Dender EH
1.35Goals scored / game0.78
Zulte-WaregemFCV Dender EH
1.52Goals allowed / game1.57
Zulte-WaregemFCV Dender EH
47%Average possession47%
Zulte-WaregemFCV Dender EH
4.17Shots on target / game3.83
Zulte-WaregemFCV Dender EH

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

11.7Shots per game10.87
Zulte-WaregemFCV Dender EH
4.17Shots on target3.83
Zulte-WaregemFCV Dender EH
11.5%Shot conversion7.2%
Zulte-WaregemFCV Dender EH
47%Possession47%
Zulte-WaregemFCV Dender EH
1.37xG for1.27
Zulte-WaregemFCV Dender EH
1.56xG against1.67
Zulte-WaregemFCV Dender EH

Shooting quality

Zulte-Waregem: BalancedFCV Dender EH: Balanced
Zulte-WaregemFCV Dender EH
Accuracy (shots on target)36%35%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.320.20

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

FCV Dender EH is 67% better for: last-5 form.

0.6 pts / game - Zulte-Waregem · 1 pts / game - FCV Dender EH

Zulte-Waregem
LLWLL
Season result split
26% W35% D39% L
Season (W-D-L)
6-8-9
1.13 pts / game · goal difference -4
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-0-4
0.60 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
4-3-4
Last 5 at home
1-2-2
LDDWL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 2.0xG: 1.61Opponent xG: 1.23BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
FCV Dender EH
LDWDL
Season result split
13% W35% D52% L
Season (W-D-L)
3-8-12
0.74 pts / game · goal difference -18
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
2-4-5
Last 5 away
2-2-1
LWWDD
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.60Opponent xG: 1.37BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 20%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Zulte-Waregem is 73% better for: goals scored per game.

1.35 goals / game - Zulte-Waregem · 0.78 goals / game - FCV Dender EH

Zulte-Waregem scoring profile: very strong

Zulte-Waregem scores in 74% of games (17 of 23 meczów), while FCV Dender EH keeps a clean sheet in 17% (4 of 23 meczów).

FCV Dender EH scoring profile: strong

FCV Dender EH scores in 61% of games (14 of 23 meczów), while Zulte-Waregem keeps a clean sheet in 17% (4 of 23 meczów).

31Goals scored (season)18
Zulte-WaregemFCV Dender EH
35Goals conceded (season)36
Zulte-WaregemFCV Dender EH
2.87Average goals per game2.35
Zulte-WaregemFCV Dender EH
6Goals scored (last 5)3
Zulte-WaregemFCV Dender EH
10Goals conceded (last 5)4
Zulte-WaregemFCV Dender EH

How often they score at least...

74%1 goal61%
Zulte-WaregemFCV Dender EH
43%2 goals17%
Zulte-WaregemFCV Dender EH
13%3 goals0%
Zulte-WaregemFCV Dender EH
4%4 goals0%
Zulte-WaregemFCV Dender EH

How often they concede at least...

83%1 goal83%
Zulte-WaregemFCV Dender EH
43%2 goals48%
Zulte-WaregemFCV Dender EH
17%3 goals17%
Zulte-WaregemFCV Dender EH
9%4 goals4%
Zulte-WaregemFCV Dender EH

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

53%
League average

Goal patterns

26%BTTS at half-time13%
Zulte-WaregemFCV Dender EH
9%BTTS in both halves0%
Zulte-WaregemFCV Dender EH
17%Scored in both halves13%
Zulte-WaregemFCV Dender EH

BTTS and goal count

48%Min. 3 goals and BTTS43%
Zulte-WaregemFCV Dender EH
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS4%
Zulte-WaregemFCV Dender EH
60%BTTS - last 540%
Zulte-WaregemFCV Dender EH

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

74%Min. 1 goal before half-time65%
Zulte-WaregemFCV Dender EH
39%Min. 2 goals before half-time22%
Zulte-WaregemFCV Dender EH
17%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
Zulte-WaregemFCV Dender EH

2nd half

78%Min. 1 goal after half-time78%
Zulte-WaregemFCV Dender EH
43%Min. 2 goals after half-time39%
Zulte-WaregemFCV Dender EH
22%Min. 3 goals after half-time26%
Zulte-WaregemFCV Dender EH

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Zulte-Waregem is 22% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.22 pts / game - Zulte-Waregem · 1 pts / game - FCV Dender EH

Zulte-Waregem - half-time state
26% leading43% draw30% trailing
FCV Dender EH - half-time state
17% leading48% draw35% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.22Points per game (1st half)1
Zulte-WaregemFCV Dender EH
0.7Goals scored (1st half)0.3
Zulte-WaregemFCV Dender EH
0.65Goals conceded (1st half)0.57
Zulte-WaregemFCV Dender EH
1.35Average goals (1st half)0.87
Zulte-WaregemFCV Dender EH
48%Clean sheet before half-time52%
Zulte-WaregemFCV Dender EH
52%No goal before half-time70%
Zulte-WaregemFCV Dender EH

After half-time (2nd half)

1Points per game (2nd half)0.91
Zulte-WaregemFCV Dender EH
0.65Goals scored (2nd half)0.48
Zulte-WaregemFCV Dender EH
0.87Goals conceded (2nd half)1
Zulte-WaregemFCV Dender EH
1.52Average goals (2nd half)1.48
Zulte-WaregemFCV Dender EH
35%Clean sheet after half-time39%
Zulte-WaregemFCV Dender EH
57%No goal after half-time57%
Zulte-WaregemFCV Dender EH

Zulte-Waregem - second-half results

22% W35% D43% L
28
Half-time points
16
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
23
Second-half points
-5
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.22
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at halftime in 26% of games and wins 26%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.2

Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

FCV Dender EH - second-half results

22% W26% D52% L
23
Half-time points
7
Half-time goals
-6
Goal difference (1st half)
21
Second-half points
-12
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding76%

Leads at halftime in 17% of games and wins 13%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.

Defense after halftime+0.4

Allows 0.4 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Zulte-Waregem - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.000.80
Goals scored / game0.60.6
Goals allowed / game0.81.2
Average goals per game1.41.8
1 goal80%80%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals20%40%
Clean sheet20%20%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference-1-3
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 3
FCV Dender EH - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game0.801.80
Goals scored / game0.20.4
Goals allowed / game0.80.0
Average goals per game1.00.4
1 goal80%40%
2 goals20%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet40%100%
No goal80%60%
Goal difference-3+2
Half-time: 20% leading - 20% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 60% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Zulte-Waregem
ScoredConceded
3
7
0-15
6
3
16-30
7
5
31-45
3
7
46-60
3
5
61-75
9
8
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (9 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

FCV Dender EH
ScoredConceded
4
7
0-15
1
3
16-30
2
3
31-45
4
6
46-60
2
9
61-75
5
8
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (5 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

2.61
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.5 : 1.1
Estimated goal split
home : away
103%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
61%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+53%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
45%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
10%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 10 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Zulte-Waregem

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.19
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.02
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-4.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.02
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.04
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
100%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
129%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.53
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.0
Late goals
29% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 10% come in the first quarter-hour.
29%

FCV Dender EH

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.40
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.39
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+3.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.49
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.10
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
66%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
116%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.26
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
28% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 22% come in the first quarter-hour.
28%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Pro League).

Teams vs league

Zulte-WaregemLigaFCV Dender EH
Average goals per game 2.872.53 2.35
Both teams scored 65%53% 57%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 48%44% 48%
Clean sheets 17%27% 17%
Goal before half-time 74%72% 65%
Goal after half-time 78%72% 78%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.53
Average goals per game
53%
Both teams scored
44%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
27%
Clean sheets
1.35
Home goals / game
1.18
Away goals / game
+14%
Home attack advantage
+13%
Home defensive advantage
+8%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
72%
1 goal
35%
2 goals
11%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
72%
1 goal
39%
2 goals
16%
3 goals
5%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. FCV Dender EHYellow cardLuc Marijnissen
  2. Zulte-WaregemYellow cardLukas Willen
  3. FCV Dender EHYellow cardBryan Goncalves
  4. FCV Dender EHYellow cardFabrice Sambu Mansoni
  5. Zulte-WaregemSubstitutionOn: Marley AkeOff: Joseph Amankwaah Opoku
  6. Zulte-WaregemSubstitutionOn: Stavros GavrielOff: Thomas Claes
  7. Zulte-WaregemGoalStavros GavrielAssist: Anosike Ementa
  8. FCV Dender EHSubstitutionOn: Desmond AcquahOff: Malcolm Viltard
  9. FCV Dender EHYellow cardDavid Toshevski

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Record from Zulte-Waregem's perspective: 0 wins, 1 draw and 0 losses against FCV Dender EH. Games average 4.00 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.

FC Verbroedering Dender Eendracht Hekelgem
2 : 2
SV Zulte-Waregem

FAQ

What was the result of Zulte-Waregem vs FCV Dender EH?

The Pro League match finished Zulte-Waregem 1:0 FCV Dender EH. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Zulte-Waregem vs FCV Dender EH?

Zulte-Waregem score 1.35 goals per game on average and FCV Dender EH 0.78. The Pro League average is 2.53 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 44% of games. Both teams score in 65% of Zulte-Waregem's matches and 57% of FCV Dender EH's.

What form are Zulte-Waregem and FCV Dender EH in?

Over the last 5 games Zulte-Waregem have a 1-0-4 record (0.60 points per game) and FCV Dender EH 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Zulte-Waregem vs FCV Dender EH?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.