Bulgaria - Second LeagueData current as of 23 July 2026

CSKA Sofia II vs Dunav 2010: match statistics

CSKA Sofia II crest
CSKA Sofia II
1 : 0half-time 0:0
Dunav 2010 crest
Dunav 2010
125%(2.95)
X25%(3.20)
250%(2.28)

Dunav 2010 is the undisputed league leader with an impressive record of 18 wins, 4 draws, and zero losses this season. The visiting team displays phenomenal away form with an 80% win rate and 60% clean sheets on the road. CSKA Sofia II, despite a decent league position and good home form (64% wins at home), falls short in class compared to the undefeated leaders. Dunav's goal difference (44:7) compared to CSKA's (39:23), along with the away goal differential (+14 vs the hosts' +18 at home), highlights the visitors' superiority. The recent form over the last five matches also favors Dunav (2.2 points per game vs CSKA's 1.6), making an away victory the most likely outcome of this encounter.

CSKA Sofia II vs Dunav 2010: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

CSKA Sofia II play Dunav 2010 in Second League (Bulgaria). The match date is 25 March 2026 at 14:30. Final score: 1:0.

Current form

CSKA Sofia II: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match. Dunav 2010: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

CSKA Sofia II scores 1.78 and concedes 1.00 goals per match. Dunav 2010 scores 1.66 and concedes 0.50. League average: 2.52 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: CSKA Sofia II 47%, Dunav 2010 31%. Over 2.5: CSKA Sofia II 50%, Dunav 2010 38%. League level: BTTS 46%, Over 2.5 46%.

xG, shots and style

CSKA Sofia II has higher xG: 1.65 vs 1.44. CSKA Sofia II: 12.5 shots per match, Dunav 2010: 11.0.

Match halves

CSKA Sofia II: half-time lead 44%, second-half goals 0.91. Dunav 2010: half-time lead 53%, second-half goals 0.88.

Goals by minute

CSKA Sofia II: 31-45+ (12 goals). Dunav 2010: 76-90+ (13 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Second League: 2.52 goals per match, BTTS 46%, Over 2.5 46%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 0-0-1. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 0%.

Match description

Dunav 2010 is the undisputed league leader with an impressive record of 18 wins, 4 draws, and zero losses this season. The visiting team displays phenomenal away form with an 80% win rate and 60% clean sheets on the road. CSKA Sofia II, despite a decent league position and good home form (64% wins at home), falls short in class compared to the undefeated leaders. Dunav's goal difference (44:7) compared to CSKA's (39:23), along with the away goal differential (+14 vs the hosts' +18 at home), highlights the visitors' superiority. The recent form over the last five matches also favors Dunav (2.2 points per game vs CSKA's 1.6), making an away victory the most likely outcome of this encounter.

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
1 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

50Possession (%)50
CSKA Sofia IIDunav 2010
5Shots8
CSKA Sofia IIDunav 2010
3Shots on target4
CSKA Sofia IIDunav 2010
0.97xG1.25
CSKA Sofia IIDunav 2010
2Corners2
CSKA Sofia IIDunav 2010
61Dangerous attacks65
CSKA Sofia IIDunav 2010
-1Fouls-1
CSKA Sofia IIDunav 2010
-1Cards-1
CSKA Sofia IIDunav 2010

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

CSKA Sofia IIDunav 2010
1.78Goals scored / match1.66
CSKA Sofia IIDunav 2010
1Goals conceded / match0.5
CSKA Sofia IIDunav 2010
52%Average possession50%
CSKA Sofia IIDunav 2010
6.94Shots on target / match6.13
CSKA Sofia IIDunav 2010

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

12.47Shots per match11.03
CSKA Sofia IIDunav 2010
6.94Shots on target6.13
CSKA Sofia IIDunav 2010
14.3%Shot conversion15%
CSKA Sofia IIDunav 2010
52%Possession50%
CSKA Sofia IIDunav 2010
1.65xG for1.44
CSKA Sofia IIDunav 2010
1.26xG against1.02
CSKA Sofia IIDunav 2010

Shooting quality

CSKA Sofia II: Efficient finishingDunav 2010: Efficient finishing
CSKA Sofia IIDunav 2010
Accuracy (shots on target)56%56%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.260.27

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

CSKA Sofia II is 43% better for: last-5 form.

2 pts / match - CSKA Sofia II · 1.4 pts / match - Dunav 2010

CSKA Sofia II
WDLWW
Season result split
50% W22% R28% P
Season (W-D-L)
16-7-9
1.72 pts / match · goal difference +25
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
10-3-3
Last 5 at home
3-0-2
WLWWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.61Opponent xG: 1.33BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 60%
Dunav 2010
LWDLW
Season result split
63% W28% R9% P
Season (W-D-L)
20-9-3
2.16 pts / match · goal difference +37
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
9-5-2
Last 5 away
1-3-1
DDLDW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.16Opponent xG: 1.00BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

CSKA Sofia II is 7% better for: goals scored per match.

1.78 goals / match - CSKA Sofia II · 1.66 goals / match - Dunav 2010

Dunav 2010 is 100% better for: goals conceded per match.

1 goals / match - CSKA Sofia II · 0.5 goals / match - Dunav 2010

CSKA Sofia II scoring profile: mixed

CSKA Sofia II scores in 78% of matches (25 of 32 matches), while Dunav 2010 keeps a clean sheet in 63% (20 of 32 matches).

Dunav 2010 scoring profile: strong

Dunav 2010 scores in 78% of matches (25 of 32 matches), while CSKA Sofia II keeps a clean sheet in 38% (12 of 32 matches).

57Goals scored (season)53
CSKA Sofia IIDunav 2010
32Goals conceded (season)16
CSKA Sofia IIDunav 2010
2.78Average goals in match2.16
CSKA Sofia IIDunav 2010
9Goals scored (last 5)8
CSKA Sofia IIDunav 2010
4Goals conceded (last 5)7
CSKA Sofia IIDunav 2010

How often they score at least...

78%1 goal78%
CSKA Sofia IIDunav 2010
44%2 goals63%
CSKA Sofia IIDunav 2010
22%3 goals19%
CSKA Sofia IIDunav 2010
16%4 goals6%
CSKA Sofia IIDunav 2010

How often they concede at least...

63%1 goal38%
CSKA Sofia IIDunav 2010
25%2 goals9%
CSKA Sofia IIDunav 2010
9%3 goals3%
CSKA Sofia IIDunav 2010
3%4 goals0%
CSKA Sofia IIDunav 2010

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

46%
League average

Goal patterns

28%BTTS at half-time6%
CSKA Sofia IIDunav 2010
0%BTTS in both halves0%
CSKA Sofia IIDunav 2010
31%Scored in both halves41%
CSKA Sofia IIDunav 2010

BTTS and goal count

34%Min. 3 goals and BTTS25%
CSKA Sofia IIDunav 2010
16%Min. 3 goals without BTTS13%
CSKA Sofia IIDunav 2010
40%BTTS - last 560%
CSKA Sofia IIDunav 2010

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

81%Min. 1 goal before half-time66%
CSKA Sofia IIDunav 2010
38%Min. 2 goals before half-time22%
CSKA Sofia IIDunav 2010
19%Min. 3 goals before half-time6%
CSKA Sofia IIDunav 2010

2nd half

69%Min. 1 goal after half-time75%
CSKA Sofia IIDunav 2010
41%Min. 2 goals after half-time31%
CSKA Sofia IIDunav 2010
16%Min. 3 goals after half-time13%
CSKA Sofia IIDunav 2010

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Dunav 2010 is 19% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.66 pts / match - CSKA Sofia II · 1.97 pts / match - Dunav 2010

CSKA Sofia II - half-time state
44% leading34% draw22% trailing
Dunav 2010 - half-time state
53% leading38% draw9% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.66Points per match (1st half)1.97
CSKA Sofia IIDunav 2010
0.88Goals scored (1st half)0.78
CSKA Sofia IIDunav 2010
0.59Goals conceded (1st half)0.16
CSKA Sofia IIDunav 2010
1.47Average goals (1st half)0.94
CSKA Sofia IIDunav 2010
53%Clean sheet before half-time84%
CSKA Sofia IIDunav 2010
38%No goal before half-time44%
CSKA Sofia IIDunav 2010

After half-time (2nd half)

1.47Points per match (2nd half)1.91
CSKA Sofia IIDunav 2010
0.91Goals scored (2nd half)0.88
CSKA Sofia IIDunav 2010
0.41Goals conceded (2nd half)0.34
CSKA Sofia IIDunav 2010
1.31Average goals (2nd half)1.22
CSKA Sofia IIDunav 2010
66%Clean sheet after half-time75%
CSKA Sofia IIDunav 2010
53%No goal after half-time38%
CSKA Sofia IIDunav 2010

CSKA Sofia II - second-half results

34% W44% R22% P
53
Half-time points
28
Half-time goals
+9
Goal difference (1st half)
47
Second-half points
+16
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.66
PPG before half-time
Lead holding114%

Leads at half-time in 44% of matches and wins 50%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.2

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Dunav 2010 - second-half results

53% W31% R16% P
63
Half-time points
25
Half-time goals
+20
Goal difference (1st half)
61
Second-half points
+17
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.97
PPG before half-time
Lead holding119%

Leads at half-time in 53% of matches and wins 63%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

CSKA Sofia II - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.001.80
Goals scored / match1.20.6
Goals conceded / match0.80.0
Average goals in match2.00.6
1 goal100%40%
2 goals40%20%
3 goals40%0%
Clean sheet40%100%
No goal20%60%
Goal difference+2+3
Half-time: 60% leading - 20% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 60% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 6
Dunav 2010 - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.401.40
Goals scored / match0.61.0
Goals conceded / match0.60.8
Average goals in match1.21.8
1 goal80%80%
2 goals20%80%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference0+1
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

CSKA Sofia II
ScoredConceded
7
4
0-15
9
9
16-30
12
6
31-45
7
3
46-60
10
7
61-75
12
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (12 goli). Concedes most in 16-30 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): +9 - wins late phases.

Dunav 2010
ScoredConceded
10
3
0-15
8
1
16-30
7
1
31-45
7
1
46-60
8
2
61-75
13
8
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (13 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.47
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.1 : 1.3
Estimated goal split
home : away
98%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
39%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-19%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
61%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
5%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 20 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

CSKA Sofia II

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.39
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.39
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-18.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.13
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.26
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
124%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
93%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.28
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.0
Late goals
21% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 12% come in the first quarter-hour.
21%

Dunav 2010

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.42
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.74
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-19.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.22
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.52
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
155%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
35%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.76
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
25% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 19% come in the first quarter-hour.
25%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Second League).

Teams vs league

CSKA Sofia IILigaDunav 2010
Average goals in match 2.782.52 2.16
Both teams scored 47%46% 31%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 50%46% 38%
Clean sheets 38%32% 63%
Goal before half-time 81%70% 66%
Goal after half-time 69%73% 75%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.52
Average goals per match
46%
Both teams scored
46%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
32%
Clean sheets
1.44
Home goals / match
1.07
Away goals / match
+35%
Home attack advantage
+26%
Home defence advantage
+14%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
70%
1 goal
35%
2 goals
12%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
73%
1 goal
38%
2 goals
14%
3 goals
3%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: CSKA Sofia II 0 - 0 - 1 Dunav 2010. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

Dunav 2010 Ruse
2 : 0
PFC CSKA Sofia II

FAQ

What was the result of CSKA Sofia II vs Dunav 2010?

The Second League match finished CSKA Sofia II 1:0 Dunav 2010. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before CSKA Sofia II vs Dunav 2010?

CSKA Sofia II score 1.78 goals per game on average and Dunav 2010 1.66. The Second League average is 2.52 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 46% of games. Both teams score in 47% of CSKA Sofia II's matches and 31% of Dunav 2010's.

What form are CSKA Sofia II and Dunav 2010 in?

Over the last 5 games CSKA Sofia II have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Dunav 2010 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for CSKA Sofia II vs Dunav 2010?

The statistical background for CSKA Sofia II vs Dunav 2010 — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.