Egypt - Second DivisionData current as of 23 July 2026

Dayrout vs Tersana: match statistics

Dayrout crest
Dayrout
1 : 0half-time 1:0
Tersana crest
Tersana
135%(0.00)
X40%(0.00)
225%(0.00)

Statistical analysis points to an even contest with a draw being the likely scenario. Dayrout presents a solid attitude at home with 58% of matches ending in a draw and only 17% losses at their own stadium, with 58% of meetings ending with a clean sheet. Tersana also shows a tendency for draws in away matches (55%) but has weaker offensive efficiency (0.55 goals per match). The form of both teams in the last five matches is average, with a prevalence of draws and a low number of goals scored. Dayrout has the advantage in xG on their own pitch (1.44 vs 1.15 for Tersana away); however, the low chance conversion rate (6%) and the defensive attitude of both teams suggest a low-tempo match ending in a split of points.

Dayrout vs Tersana: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Dayrout play Tersana in Second Division (Egypt). The match date is 5 March 2026 at 20:30. Final score: 1:0.

Current form

Dayrout: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match. Tersana: 1-4-0, 1.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

Dayrout scores 0.65 and concedes 0.97 goals per match. Tersana scores 0.91 and concedes 0.94. League average: 1.95 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Dayrout 26%, Tersana 41%. Over 2.5: Dayrout 24%, Tersana 26%. League level: BTTS 41%, Over 2.5 32%.

xG, shots and style

Tersana has higher xG: 1.28 vs 1.18. Dayrout: 5.6 shots per match, Tersana: 8.4.

Match halves

Dayrout: half-time lead 9%, second-half goals 0.41. Tersana: half-time lead 18%, second-half goals 0.38.

Goals by minute

Dayrout: 76-90+ (8 goals). Tersana: 0-15 (8 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Second Division: 1.95 goals per match, BTTS 41%, Over 2.5 32%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 1-0-0. Average goals 1.00, BTTS 0%.

Match description

Statistical analysis points to an even contest with a draw being the likely scenario. Dayrout presents a solid attitude at home with 58% of matches ending in a draw and only 17% losses at their own stadium, with 58% of meetings ending with a clean sheet. Tersana also shows a tendency for draws in away matches (55%) but has weaker offensive efficiency (0.55 goals per match). The form of both teams in the last five matches is average, with a prevalence of draws and a low number of goals scored. Dayrout has the advantage in xG on their own pitch (1.44 vs 1.15 for Tersana away); however, the low chance conversion rate (6%) and the defensive attitude of both teams suggest a low-tempo match ending in a split of points.

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

41Possession (%)59
DayroutTersana
11Shots12
DayroutTersana
6Shots on target2
DayroutTersana
1.41xG1.37
DayroutTersana
3Corners10
DayroutTersana
40Dangerous attacks64
DayroutTersana
7Fouls12
DayroutTersana
0Cards0
DayroutTersana

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

0.65Goals scored / match0.91
DayroutTersana
0.97Goals conceded / match0.94
DayroutTersana
30%Average possession44%
DayroutTersana
1.76Shots on target / match3.35
DayroutTersana

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

5.59Shots per match8.38
DayroutTersana
1.76Shots on target3.35
DayroutTersana
11.6%Shot conversion10.9%
DayroutTersana
30%Possession44%
DayroutTersana
1.18xG for1.28
DayroutTersana
1.17xG against1.14
DayroutTersana

Shooting quality

Dayrout: BalancedTersana: Balanced
DayroutTersana
Accuracy (shots on target)31%40%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.210.15
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.370.27

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Dayrout is 14% better for: last-5 form.

1.6 pts / match - Dayrout · 1.4 pts / match - Tersana

Dayrout
DDWWL
Season result split
24% W41% R35% P
Season (W-D-L)
8-14-12
1.12 pts / match · goal difference -11
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
6-8-3
Last 5 at home
3-1-1
WWLDW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 0.91Opponent xG: 1.44BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%
Tersana
DWDDD
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
24% W47% R29% P
Season (W-D-L)
8-16-10
1.18 pts / match · goal difference -1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-4-0
1.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
2-9-6
Last 5 away
0-3-2
LLDDD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 0.97Opponent xG: 1.25BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Tersana is 40% better for: goals scored per match.

0.65 goals / match - Dayrout · 0.91 goals / match - Tersana

Dayrout scoring profile: mixed

Dayrout scores in 50% of matches (17 of 34 matches), while Tersana keeps a clean sheet in 35% (12 of 34 matches).

Tersana scoring profile: mixed

Tersana scores in 56% of matches (19 of 34 matches), while Dayrout keeps a clean sheet in 50% (17 of 34 matches).

22Goals scored (season)31
DayroutTersana
33Goals conceded (season)32
DayroutTersana
1.62Average goals in match1.85
DayroutTersana
7Goals scored (last 5)7
DayroutTersana
4Goals conceded (last 5)5
DayroutTersana

How often they score at least...

50%1 goal56%
DayroutTersana
12%2 goals21%
DayroutTersana
3%3 goals12%
DayroutTersana
0%4 goals3%
DayroutTersana

How often they concede at least...

50%1 goal65%
DayroutTersana
24%2 goals21%
DayroutTersana
12%3 goals6%
DayroutTersana
6%4 goals3%
DayroutTersana

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

6%BTTS at half-time24%
DayroutTersana
0%BTTS in both halves6%
DayroutTersana
6%Scored in both halves18%
DayroutTersana

BTTS and goal count

15%Min. 3 goals and BTTS24%
DayroutTersana
9%Min. 3 goals without BTTS3%
DayroutTersana
40%BTTS - last 580%
DayroutTersana

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

32%Min. 1 goal before half-time53%
DayroutTersana
12%Min. 2 goals before half-time32%
DayroutTersana
3%Min. 3 goals before half-time9%
DayroutTersana

2nd half

59%Min. 1 goal after half-time59%
DayroutTersana
21%Min. 2 goals after half-time21%
DayroutTersana
6%Min. 3 goals after half-time6%
DayroutTersana

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Tersana is 28% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.97 pts / match - Dayrout · 1.24 pts / match - Tersana

Dayrout - half-time state
9% leading71% draw21% trailing
Tersana - half-time state
18% leading71% draw12% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.97Points per match (1st half)1.24
DayroutTersana
0.15Goals scored (1st half)0.53
DayroutTersana
0.32Goals conceded (1st half)0.41
DayroutTersana
0.47Average goals (1st half)0.94
DayroutTersana
76%Clean sheet before half-time65%
DayroutTersana
85%No goal before half-time59%
DayroutTersana

After half-time (2nd half)

1.35Points per match (2nd half)1.06
DayroutTersana
0.41Goals scored (2nd half)0.38
DayroutTersana
0.5Goals conceded (2nd half)0.53
DayroutTersana
0.91Average goals (2nd half)0.91
DayroutTersana
71%Clean sheet after half-time56%
DayroutTersana
65%No goal after half-time68%
DayroutTersana

Dayrout - second-half results

29% W47% R24% P
33
Half-time points
5
Half-time goals
-6
Goal difference (1st half)
46
Second-half points
-3
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.97
PPG before half-time
Lead holding267%

Leads at half-time in 9% of matches and wins 24%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Tersana - second-half results

18% W53% R29% P
42
Half-time points
18
Half-time goals
+4
Goal difference (1st half)
36
Second-half points
-5
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.24
PPG before half-time
Lead holding133%

Leads at half-time in 18% of matches and wins 24%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Dayrout - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.202.20
Goals scored / match0.21.0
Goals conceded / match0.20.0
Average goals in match0.41.0
1 goal40%60%
2 goals0%40%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet80%100%
No goal80%40%
Goal difference0+5
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 40% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1
Tersana - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.400.80
Goals scored / match1.20.2
Goals conceded / match0.60.4
Average goals in match1.80.6
1 goal80%40%
2 goals80%20%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal20%80%
Goal difference+3-1
Half-time: 20% leading - 80% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 80% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 60% - Half-time goals total: 6

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Dayrout
ScoredConceded
4
6
0-15
1
8
16-30
3
2
31-45
2
5
46-60
4
5
61-75
8
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goli). Concedes most in 16-30 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

Tersana
ScoredConceded
8
2
0-15
3
6
16-30
7
6
31-45
3
3
46-60
2
4
61-75
8
11
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (8 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

1.73
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
0.8 : 0.9
Estimated goal split
home : away
89%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
34%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-42%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
28%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
22%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 5 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Dayrout

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.01
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.33
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+6.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.53
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.20
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
63%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
105%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.48
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
36% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 18% come in the first quarter-hour.
36%

Tersana

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.14
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.17
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-9.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.37
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.20
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
99%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
90%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.22
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.2
Late goals
26% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 26% come in the first quarter-hour.
26%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Second Division).

Teams vs league

DayroutLigaTersana
Average goals in match 1.621.95 1.85
Both teams scored 26%41% 41%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 24%32% 26%
Clean sheets 50%38% 35%
Goal before half-time 32%53% 53%
Goal after half-time 59%67% 59%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

1.95
Average goals per match
41%
Both teams scored
32%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
38%
Clean sheets
1.04
Home goals / match
0.92
Away goals / match
+13%
Home attack advantage
+12%
Home defence advantage
+4%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
53%
1 goal
19%
2 goals
5%
3 goals
0%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
67%
1 goal
30%
2 goals
9%
3 goals
3%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Dayrout 1 - 0 - 0 Tersana. Average goals 1.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

Tersana
0 : 1
Dayrout

FAQ

What was the result of Dayrout vs Tersana?

The Second Division match finished Dayrout 1:0 Tersana. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Dayrout vs Tersana?

Dayrout score 0.65 goals per game on average and Tersana 0.91. The Second Division average is 1.95 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 32% of games. Both teams score in 26% of Dayrout's matches and 41% of Tersana's.

What form are Dayrout and Tersana in?

Over the last 5 games Dayrout have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and Tersana 1-4-0 (1.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Dayrout vs Tersana?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.