Bulgaria - Second LeagueData current as of 23 July 2026

Dunav 2010 vs Hebar 1918: match statistics

Dunav 2010 crest
Dunav 2010
0 : 0half-time 0:0
Hebar 1918 crest
Hebar 1918

Dunav 2010 vs Hebar 1918: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Dunav 2010 play Hebar 1918 in Second League (Bulgaria). The match date is 4 April 2026 at 16:00. Final score: 0:0.

Current form

Dunav 2010: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match. Hebar 1918: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match.

Goal statistics

Dunav 2010 scores 1.66 and concedes 0.50 goals per match. Hebar 1918 scores 1.28 and concedes 1.63. League average: 2.52 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Dunav 2010 31%, Hebar 1918 56%. Over 2.5: Dunav 2010 38%, Hebar 1918 53%. League level: BTTS 46%, Over 2.5 46%.

xG, shots and style

Dunav 2010 has higher xG: 1.44 vs 1.35. Dunav 2010: 11.0 shots per match, Hebar 1918: 10.3.

Match halves

Dunav 2010: half-time lead 53%, second-half goals 0.88. Hebar 1918: half-time lead 16%, second-half goals 0.66.

Goals by minute

Dunav 2010: 76-90+ (13 goals). Hebar 1918: 31-45+ (10 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Second League: 2.52 goals per match, BTTS 46%, Over 2.5 46%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 1-0-0. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 0%.

Match description

Dunav 2010 is the clear favorite: they sit 1st with a record of 18 wins, 5 draws and 1 loss and a goal difference of 45-9 this season. At home the hosts score on average 2.17 goals and concede only 0.25, have clean sheets in 83% of matches and average xG for 1.67 versus xG against 0.74; in the last 5 matches they have scored 4 goals and earned 2 wins (average 1.6 points per match). Hebar 1918, despite winning 4 of the last 5 and scoring 8 goals in that period (average 2.4 points per match), sit 9th with a record of 9-4-10 and an overall goal difference of 31-38. Away, Hebar average 1.55 goals scored and 1.36 conceded with xG 1.16 and xG against 1.11, and in terms of shots they are clearly inferior to Dunav (8.82 vs 13.42 shots per match and 5.45 vs 7.75 on target). Considering Dunav’s extremely low number of goals conceded at home (0.25) and 83% clean sheets plus superior quantity and quality of chances (xG 1.67 vs 1.16), I assign 70% to the home side, 18% to a draw and 12% to a Hebar win, despite the visitors having slightly higher shot conversion (18% vs 16%).

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

53Possession (%)47
Dunav 2010Hebar 1918
10Shots4
Dunav 2010Hebar 1918
7Shots on target3
Dunav 2010Hebar 1918
1.36xG0.61
Dunav 2010Hebar 1918
2Corners2
Dunav 2010Hebar 1918
33Dangerous attacks20
Dunav 2010Hebar 1918
-1Fouls-1
Dunav 2010Hebar 1918
-1Cards-1
Dunav 2010Hebar 1918

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Dunav 2010Hebar 1918
1.66Goals scored / match1.28
Dunav 2010Hebar 1918
0.5Goals conceded / match1.63
Dunav 2010Hebar 1918
50%Average possession54%
Dunav 2010Hebar 1918
6.13Shots on target / match4.97
Dunav 2010Hebar 1918

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

11.03Shots per match10.31
Dunav 2010Hebar 1918
6.13Shots on target4.97
Dunav 2010Hebar 1918
15%Shot conversion12.4%
Dunav 2010Hebar 1918
50%Possession54%
Dunav 2010Hebar 1918
1.44xG for1.35
Dunav 2010Hebar 1918
1.02xG against1.25
Dunav 2010Hebar 1918

Shooting quality

Dunav 2010: Efficient finishingHebar 1918: Balanced
Dunav 2010Hebar 1918
Accuracy (shots on target)56%48%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.270.26

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Dunav 2010 is 75% better for: last-5 form.

1.4 pts / match - Dunav 2010 · 0.8 pts / match - Hebar 1918

Dunav 2010
LWDLW
Season result split
63% W28% R9% P
Season (W-D-L)
20-9-3
2.16 pts / match · goal difference +37
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
11-4-1
Last 5 at home
1-3-1
DDDWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.16Opponent xG: 1.00BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
Hebar 1918
LLWDL
Season result split
34% W22% R44% P
Season (W-D-L)
11-7-14
1.25 pts / match · goal difference -11
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
6-4-6
Last 5 away
1-2-2
DDLWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.53Opponent xG: 1.51BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Dunav 2010 is 30% better for: goals scored per match.

1.66 goals / match - Dunav 2010 · 1.28 goals / match - Hebar 1918

Dunav 2010 is 226% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.5 goals / match - Dunav 2010 · 1.63 goals / match - Hebar 1918

Dunav 2010 scoring profile: very strong

Dunav 2010 scores in 78% of matches (25 of 32 matches), while Hebar 1918 keeps a clean sheet in 22% (7 of 32 matches).

Hebar 1918 scoring profile: mixed

Hebar 1918 scores in 75% of matches (24 of 32 matches), while Dunav 2010 keeps a clean sheet in 63% (20 of 32 matches).

53Goals scored (season)41
Dunav 2010Hebar 1918
16Goals conceded (season)52
Dunav 2010Hebar 1918
2.16Average goals in match2.91
Dunav 2010Hebar 1918
8Goals scored (last 5)4
Dunav 2010Hebar 1918
7Goals conceded (last 5)7
Dunav 2010Hebar 1918

How often they score at least...

78%1 goal75%
Dunav 2010Hebar 1918
63%2 goals38%
Dunav 2010Hebar 1918
19%3 goals9%
Dunav 2010Hebar 1918
6%4 goals6%
Dunav 2010Hebar 1918

How often they concede at least...

38%1 goal78%
Dunav 2010Hebar 1918
9%2 goals56%
Dunav 2010Hebar 1918
3%3 goals28%
Dunav 2010Hebar 1918
0%4 goals0%
Dunav 2010Hebar 1918

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

46%
League average

Goal patterns

6%BTTS at half-time22%
Dunav 2010Hebar 1918
0%BTTS in both halves9%
Dunav 2010Hebar 1918
41%Scored in both halves13%
Dunav 2010Hebar 1918

BTTS and goal count

25%Min. 3 goals and BTTS44%
Dunav 2010Hebar 1918
13%Min. 3 goals without BTTS9%
Dunav 2010Hebar 1918
60%BTTS - last 560%
Dunav 2010Hebar 1918

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

66%Min. 1 goal before half-time75%
Dunav 2010Hebar 1918
22%Min. 2 goals before half-time44%
Dunav 2010Hebar 1918
6%Min. 3 goals before half-time19%
Dunav 2010Hebar 1918

2nd half

75%Min. 1 goal after half-time84%
Dunav 2010Hebar 1918
31%Min. 2 goals after half-time41%
Dunav 2010Hebar 1918
13%Min. 3 goals after half-time6%
Dunav 2010Hebar 1918

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Dunav 2010 is 135% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.97 pts / match - Dunav 2010 · 0.84 pts / match - Hebar 1918

Dunav 2010 - half-time state
53% leading38% draw9% trailing
Hebar 1918 - half-time state
16% leading38% draw47% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.97Points per match (1st half)0.84
Dunav 2010Hebar 1918
0.78Goals scored (1st half)0.59
Dunav 2010Hebar 1918
0.16Goals conceded (1st half)0.88
Dunav 2010Hebar 1918
0.94Average goals (1st half)1.47
Dunav 2010Hebar 1918
84%Clean sheet before half-time38%
Dunav 2010Hebar 1918
44%No goal before half-time66%
Dunav 2010Hebar 1918

After half-time (2nd half)

1.91Points per match (2nd half)1.41
Dunav 2010Hebar 1918
0.88Goals scored (2nd half)0.66
Dunav 2010Hebar 1918
0.34Goals conceded (2nd half)0.66
Dunav 2010Hebar 1918
1.22Average goals (2nd half)1.31
Dunav 2010Hebar 1918
75%Clean sheet after half-time47%
Dunav 2010Hebar 1918
38%No goal after half-time50%
Dunav 2010Hebar 1918

Dunav 2010 - second-half results

53% W31% R16% P
63
Half-time points
25
Half-time goals
+20
Goal difference (1st half)
61
Second-half points
+17
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.97
PPG before half-time
Lead holding119%

Leads at half-time in 53% of matches and wins 63%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Hebar 1918 - second-half results

38% W28% R34% P
27
Half-time points
19
Half-time goals
-9
Goal difference (1st half)
45
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.84
PPG before half-time
Lead holding213%

Leads at half-time in 16% of matches and wins 34%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.2

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Dunav 2010 - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.401.40
Goals scored / match0.61.0
Goals conceded / match0.60.8
Average goals in match1.21.8
1 goal80%80%
2 goals20%80%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference0+1
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3
Hebar 1918 - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.401.80
Goals scored / match0.20.6
Goals conceded / match1.00.4
Average goals in match1.21.0
1 goal60%100%
2 goals40%0%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal80%40%
Goal difference-4+1
Half-time: 0% leading - 40% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 0% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Dunav 2010
ScoredConceded
10
3
0-15
8
1
16-30
7
1
31-45
7
1
46-60
8
2
61-75
13
8
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (13 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.

Hebar 1918
ScoredConceded
5
11
0-15
5
8
16-30
10
12
31-45
4
5
46-60
9
6
61-75
8
10
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (10 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.54
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.6 : 0.9
Estimated goal split
home : away
101%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
44%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+18%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
59%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
6%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 17 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Dunav 2010

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.42
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.74
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-19.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.22
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.52
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
115%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
47%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.76
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
25% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 19% come in the first quarter-hour.
25%

Hebar 1918

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.10
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.45
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+3.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.07
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.38
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
120%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
113%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.45
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
20% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 12% come in the first quarter-hour.
20%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Second League).

Teams vs league

Dunav 2010LigaHebar 1918
Average goals in match 2.162.52 2.91
Both teams scored 31%46% 56%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 38%46% 53%
Clean sheets 63%32% 22%
Goal before half-time 66%70% 75%
Goal after half-time 75%73% 84%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.52
Average goals per match
46%
Both teams scored
46%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
32%
Clean sheets
1.44
Home goals / match
1.07
Away goals / match
+35%
Home attack advantage
+26%
Home defence advantage
+14%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
70%
1 goal
35%
2 goals
12%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
73%
1 goal
38%
2 goals
14%
3 goals
3%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Dunav 2010 1 - 0 - 0 Hebar 1918. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

FK Hebar 1918 Pazardzhik
0 : 3
Dunav 2010 Ruse

FAQ

What was the result of Dunav 2010 vs Hebar 1918?

The Second League match finished Dunav 2010 0:0 Hebar 1918. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Dunav 2010 vs Hebar 1918?

Dunav 2010 score 1.66 goals per game on average and Hebar 1918 1.28. The Second League average is 2.52 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 46% of games. Both teams score in 31% of Dunav 2010's matches and 56% of Hebar 1918's.

What form are Dunav 2010 and Hebar 1918 in?

Over the last 5 games Dunav 2010 have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Hebar 1918 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Dunav 2010 vs Hebar 1918?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.