Etar vs Dunav 2010: match statistics
Etar vs Dunav 2010: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Etar play Dunav 2010 in Second League (Bulgaria). The match date is 13 April 2026 at 11:45. Final score: 0:0.
Current form
Etar: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match. Dunav 2010: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.
Goal statistics
Etar scores 1.22 and concedes 1.34 goals per match. Dunav 2010 scores 1.66 and concedes 0.50. League average: 2.52 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Etar 41%, Dunav 2010 31%. Over 2.5: Etar 44%, Dunav 2010 38%. League level: BTTS 46%, Over 2.5 46%.
xG, shots and style
Etar has higher xG: 1.61 vs 1.44. Etar: 12.1 shots per match, Dunav 2010: 11.0.
Match halves
Etar: half-time lead 22%, second-half goals 0.78. Dunav 2010: half-time lead 53%, second-half goals 0.88.
Goals by minute
Etar: 46-60 (11 goals). Dunav 2010: 76-90+ (13 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Second League: 2.52 goals per match, BTTS 46%, Over 2.5 46%.
Head-to-head
1 H2H matches: 0-0-1. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 0%.
Match description
Etar has been in better form over the last five matches: scoring 10 goals and averaging 2 points per game (3 wins, 1 draw, 1 loss), while Dunav has scored only 3 goals and averaged 1.2 points per game (1 win, 3 draws, 1 loss). Over the season Dunav leads the table with 18 wins, 45 goals scored and 9 conceded, whereas Etar has 8 wins, 30 goals scored and 36 conceded, indicating the visitors’ superiority over the longer term. Etar’s home metrics show an aggressive offensive profile: 1.83 goals per game, xG 1.85, 14.5 shots and 9.58 shots on target per match, while Dunav away records 1.58 goals, xG 1.44, 10.67 shots and 5.5 shots on target, suggesting the hosts create more chances. Defensively the edge is with Dunav: only 0.5 goals conceded away and 50% clean sheets versus Etar conceding 1.17 at home and 33% clean sheets; this may limit the effectiveness of Etar’s high chance volume. Considering Etar’s superior recent form and greater chance creation versus Dunav’s season-long defensive solidity, I predict a narrow home win (1).
Half-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Etar | Dunav 2010 | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 57% | 56% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.13 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.18 | 0.27 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Dunav 2010 is 36% better for: goals scored per match.
1.22 goals / match - Etar · 1.66 goals / match - Dunav 2010
Dunav 2010 is 168% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.34 goals / match - Etar · 0.5 goals / match - Dunav 2010
Etar scores in 59% of matches (19 of 32 matches), while Dunav 2010 keeps a clean sheet in 63% (20 of 32 matches).
Dunav 2010 scores in 78% of matches (25 of 32 matches), while Etar keeps a clean sheet in 31% (10 of 32 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under — Etar
Over / Under — Dunav 2010
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Dunav 2010 is 81% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.09 pts / match - Etar · 1.97 pts / match - Dunav 2010
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Etar - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 22% of matches and wins 34%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Dunav 2010 - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 53% of matches and wins 63%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.00 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 60% |
| No goal | 80% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -1 | +1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.40 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 1.2 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | 0 | +1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (11 goli). Concedes most in 46-60 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (13 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Etar
Dunav 2010
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Second League).
Teams vs league
| Etar | Liga | Dunav 2010 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | • 2.56 | 2.52 | ▼ 2.16 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 41% | 46% | ▼ 31% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 44% | 46% | ▼ 38% |
| Clean sheets | • 31% | 32% | ▲ 63% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 63% | 70% | ▼ 66% |
| Goal after half-time | • 72% | 73% | ▲ 75% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Etar 0 - 0 - 1 Dunav 2010. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Etar vs Dunav 2010?
The Second League match finished Etar 0:0 Dunav 2010. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Etar vs Dunav 2010?
Etar score 1.22 goals per game on average and Dunav 2010 1.66. The Second League average is 2.52 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 46% of games. Both teams score in 41% of Etar's matches and 31% of Dunav 2010's.
What form are Etar and Dunav 2010 in?
Over the last 5 games Etar have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Dunav 2010 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Etar vs Dunav 2010?
The statistical background for Etar vs Dunav 2010 — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.