Uganda - Uganda Premier LeagueData current as of 23 July 2026

KCCA vs Entebbe UPPC: match statistics

KCCA crest
KCCA
0 : 1half-time 0:1
Entebbe UPPC crest
Entebbe UPPC
155%(0.00)
X27%(0.00)
218%(0.00)

KCCA presents impressive home form with 86% wins at home and a +10 goal difference. The hosts dominate at their own stadium, scoring an average of 2.14 goals while conceding just 0.71 per match, confirming their offensive advantage (xG 1.93) and defensive solidity (43% clean sheets). Entebbe UPPC is in good general form, but their away stats indicate limited offensive effectiveness – just 1 shot on target per match and low xG (1.02) compared to a high xG Against (2.18), suggesting difficulties against stronger rivals. Although the visitors have 67% away wins, the difference in KCCA's home quality (57% possession, 6.57 shots on target) and table position (2nd vs 6th) speaks in favor of the hosts. I expect a KCCA victory, though Entebbe's solid defense might make the match closer than the hosts' home stats suggest.

KCCA vs Entebbe UPPC: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

KCCA play Entebbe UPPC in Uganda Premier League (Uganda). The match date is 30 January 2026 at 18:00. Final score: 0:1.

Current form

KCCA: 3-2-0, 2.20 points/match. Entebbe UPPC: 3-2-0, 2.20 points/match.

Goal statistics

KCCA scores 1.53 and concedes 0.73 goals per match. Entebbe UPPC scores 1.00 and concedes 0.67. League average: 2.09 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: KCCA 43%, Entebbe UPPC 23%. Over 2.5: KCCA 50%, Entebbe UPPC 17%. League level: BTTS 38%, Over 2.5 35%.

xG, shots and style

KCCA has higher xG: 1.68 vs 1.34. KCCA: 11.8 shots per match, Entebbe UPPC: 6.0.

Match halves

KCCA: half-time lead 47%, second-half goals 0.77. Entebbe UPPC: half-time lead 27%, second-half goals 0.27.

Goals by minute

KCCA: 76-90+ (12 goals). Entebbe UPPC: 0-15 (14 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Uganda Premier League: 2.09 goals per match, BTTS 38%, Over 2.5 35%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 1-0-0. Average goals 1.00, BTTS 0%.

Match description

KCCA presents impressive home form with 86% wins at home and a +10 goal difference. The hosts dominate at their own stadium, scoring an average of 2.14 goals while conceding just 0.71 per match, confirming their offensive advantage (xG 1.93) and defensive solidity (43% clean sheets). Entebbe UPPC is in good general form, but their away stats indicate limited offensive effectiveness – just 1 shot on target per match and low xG (1.02) compared to a high xG Against (2.18), suggesting difficulties against stronger rivals. Although the visitors have 67% away wins, the difference in KCCA's home quality (57% possession, 6.57 shots on target) and table position (2nd vs 6th) speaks in favor of the hosts. I expect a KCCA victory, though Entebbe's solid defense might make the match closer than the hosts' home stats suggest.

Half-by-half

0 : 1
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

64Possession (%)36
KCCAEntebbe UPPC
16Shots8
KCCAEntebbe UPPC
2Shots on target3
KCCAEntebbe UPPC
1.75xG1.08
KCCAEntebbe UPPC
6Corners4
KCCAEntebbe UPPC
83Dangerous attacks50
KCCAEntebbe UPPC
-1Fouls-1
KCCAEntebbe UPPC
-1Cards-1
KCCAEntebbe UPPC

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.53Goals scored / match1
KCCAEntebbe UPPC
0.73Goals conceded / match0.67
KCCAEntebbe UPPC
55%Average possession32%
KCCAEntebbe UPPC
4.43Shots on target / match1.37
KCCAEntebbe UPPC

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

11.77Shots per match6
KCCAEntebbe UPPC
4.43Shots on target1.37
KCCAEntebbe UPPC
13%Shot conversion16.7%
KCCAEntebbe UPPC
55%Possession32%
KCCAEntebbe UPPC
1.68xG for1.34
KCCAEntebbe UPPC
1.13xG against1.6
KCCAEntebbe UPPC

Shooting quality

KCCA: Efficient finishingEntebbe UPPC: Counter-attacking
KCCAEntebbe UPPC
Accuracy (shots on target)38%23%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.140.22
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.350.73

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

KCCA
DWWDW
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
63% W17% R20% P
Season (W-D-L)
19-5-6
2.07 pts / match · goal difference +24
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-2-0
2.20 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
12-2-1
Last 5 at home
4-1-0
WWDWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.0Goals conceded: 0.6xG: 1.73Opponent xG: 0.97BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
Entebbe UPPC
WWDDW
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
47% W30% R23% P
Season (W-D-L)
14-9-7
1.70 pts / match · goal difference +10
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-2-0
2.20 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
6-7-2
Last 5 away
1-3-1
DWLDD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 0.2xG: 1.20Opponent xG: 1.40BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 20%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

KCCA is 53% better for: goals scored per match.

1.53 goals / match - KCCA · 1 goals / match - Entebbe UPPC

Entebbe UPPC is 9% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.73 goals / match - KCCA · 0.67 goals / match - Entebbe UPPC

KCCA scoring profile: mixed

KCCA scores in 73% of matches (22 of 30 matches), while Entebbe UPPC keeps a clean sheet in 53% (16 of 30 matches).

Entebbe UPPC scoring profile: mixed

Entebbe UPPC scores in 60% of matches (18 of 30 matches), while KCCA keeps a clean sheet in 40% (12 of 30 matches).

46Goals scored (season)30
KCCAEntebbe UPPC
22Goals conceded (season)20
KCCAEntebbe UPPC
2.27Average goals in match1.67
KCCAEntebbe UPPC
10Goals scored (last 5)9
KCCAEntebbe UPPC
3Goals conceded (last 5)1
KCCAEntebbe UPPC

How often they score at least...

73%1 goal60%
KCCAEntebbe UPPC
50%2 goals27%
KCCAEntebbe UPPC
20%3 goals7%
KCCAEntebbe UPPC
10%4 goals7%
KCCAEntebbe UPPC

How often they concede at least...

60%1 goal47%
KCCAEntebbe UPPC
10%2 goals17%
KCCAEntebbe UPPC
3%3 goals3%
KCCAEntebbe UPPC
0%4 goals0%
KCCAEntebbe UPPC

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

38%
League average

Goal patterns

10%BTTS at half-time7%
KCCAEntebbe UPPC
0%BTTS in both halves0%
KCCAEntebbe UPPC
37%Scored in both halves10%
KCCAEntebbe UPPC

BTTS and goal count

37%Min. 3 goals and BTTS10%
KCCAEntebbe UPPC
13%Min. 3 goals without BTTS7%
KCCAEntebbe UPPC
60%BTTS - last 520%
KCCAEntebbe UPPC

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

73%Min. 1 goal before half-time40%
KCCAEntebbe UPPC
27%Min. 2 goals before half-time13%
KCCAEntebbe UPPC
7%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
KCCAEntebbe UPPC

2nd half

73%Min. 1 goal after half-time30%
KCCAEntebbe UPPC
37%Min. 2 goals after half-time10%
KCCAEntebbe UPPC
10%Min. 3 goals after half-time7%
KCCAEntebbe UPPC

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

KCCA is 18% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.73 pts / match - KCCA · 1.47 pts / match - Entebbe UPPC

KCCA - half-time state
47% leading33% draw20% trailing
Entebbe UPPC - half-time state
27% leading67% draw7% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.73Points per match (1st half)1.47
KCCAEntebbe UPPC
0.77Goals scored (1st half)0.37
KCCAEntebbe UPPC
0.3Goals conceded (1st half)0.17
KCCAEntebbe UPPC
1.07Average goals (1st half)0.53
KCCAEntebbe UPPC
70%Clean sheet before half-time87%
KCCAEntebbe UPPC
47%No goal before half-time67%
KCCAEntebbe UPPC

After half-time (2nd half)

1.63Points per match (2nd half)1.2
KCCAEntebbe UPPC
0.77Goals scored (2nd half)0.27
KCCAEntebbe UPPC
0.43Goals conceded (2nd half)0.2
KCCAEntebbe UPPC
1.2Average goals (2nd half)0.47
KCCAEntebbe UPPC
67%Clean sheet after half-time87%
KCCAEntebbe UPPC
43%No goal after half-time83%
KCCAEntebbe UPPC

KCCA - second-half results

43% W33% R23% P
52
Half-time points
23
Half-time goals
+14
Goal difference (1st half)
49
Second-half points
+10
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.73
PPG before half-time
Lead holding134%

Leads at half-time in 47% of matches and wins 63%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Entebbe UPPC - second-half results

17% W70% R13% P
44
Half-time points
11
Half-time goals
+6
Goal difference (1st half)
36
Second-half points
+2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.47
PPG before half-time
Lead holding174%

Leads at half-time in 27% of matches and wins 47%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

KCCA - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.002.00
Goals scored / match0.81.2
Goals conceded / match0.20.4
Average goals in match1.01.6
1 goal80%80%
2 goals20%60%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet80%60%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference+3+4
Half-time: 60% leading - 20% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 20% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 4
Entebbe UPPC - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.601.60
Goals scored / match1.00.8
Goals conceded / match0.00.2
Average goals in match1.01.0
1 goal80%60%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet100%80%
No goal20%60%
Goal difference+5+3
Half-time: 80% leading - 20% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 5

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

KCCA
ScoredConceded
5
1
0-15
8
2
16-30
10
6
31-45
6
6
46-60
5
6
61-75
12
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (12 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +11 - wins late phases.

Entebbe UPPC
ScoredConceded
14
11
0-15
1
1
16-30
7
2
31-45
3
1
46-60
2
1
61-75
3
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (14 goli). Concedes most in 0-15 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

1.97
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.1 : 0.9
Estimated goal split
home : away
94%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
33%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-49%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
44%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
11%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 9 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

KCCA

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.55
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.25
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-11.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.15
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.40
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
121%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
88%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.13
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
26% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 11% come in the first quarter-hour.
26%

Entebbe UPPC

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.26
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.59
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-11.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.34
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.93
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
120%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
53%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.50
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
10% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 47% come in the first quarter-hour.
10%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Uganda Premier League).

Teams vs league

KCCALigaEntebbe UPPC
Average goals in match 2.272.09 1.67
Both teams scored 43%38% 23%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 50%35% 17%
Clean sheets 40%39% 53%
Goal before half-time 73%59% 40%
Goal after half-time 73%62% 30%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.09
Average goals per match
38%
Both teams scored
35%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
39%
Clean sheets
1.26
Home goals / match
0.83
Away goals / match
+52%
Home attack advantage
+34%
Home defence advantage
+17%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
59%
1 goal
28%
2 goals
9%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
62%
1 goal
29%
2 goals
8%
3 goals
2%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: KCCA 1 - 0 - 0 Entebbe UPPC. Average goals 1.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of KCCA vs Entebbe UPPC?

The Uganda Premier League match finished KCCA 0:1 Entebbe UPPC. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before KCCA vs Entebbe UPPC?

KCCA score 1.53 goals per game on average and Entebbe UPPC 1.00. The Uganda Premier League average is 2.09 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 35% of games. Both teams score in 43% of KCCA's matches and 23% of Entebbe UPPC's.

What form are KCCA and Entebbe UPPC in?

Over the last 5 games KCCA have a 3-2-0 record (2.20 points per game) and Entebbe UPPC 3-2-0 (2.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for KCCA vs Entebbe UPPC?

The statistical background for KCCA vs Entebbe UPPC — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.