Slovenia - 2. SNLData current as of 23 July 2026

Nafta vs Rudar: match statistics

Nafta crest
Nafta
1 : 1half-time 0:0
Rudar crest
Rudar
170%(0.00)
X20%(0.00)
210%(0.00)

Nafta is the clear favorite for this encounter, occupying 1st place in the table with an impressive record of 14 wins, 2 draws, and 0 losses. The hosts present excellent home form with an 88% win rate and a streak of 7 consecutive victories at their own stadium. Rudar, despite improved form in their last 5 matches, still possesses a weak away record (38% wins, 50% losses) and concedes an average of 1.63 goals per away match. Nafta scores an average of 2.75 goals per match at home while conceding just 0.88, resulting in a goal difference of +15 in home games. All statistical indicators, including higher xG (1.77 vs 1.4), better shot conversion rate (19% vs 17%), and dominant form, point to a certain victory for the hosts.

Nafta vs Rudar: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Nafta play Rudar in 2. SNL (Slovenia). The match date is 27 February 2026 at 15:00. Final score: 1:1.

Current form

Nafta: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match. Rudar: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

Nafta scores 2.17 and concedes 0.77 goals per match. Rudar scores 1.53 and concedes 1.30. League average: 2.82 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Nafta 60%, Rudar 53%. Over 2.5: Nafta 47%, Rudar 60%. League level: BTTS 50%, Over 2.5 54%.

xG, shots and style

Nafta has higher xG: 1.60 vs 1.51. Nafta: 12.3 shots per match, Rudar: 10.4.

Match halves

Nafta: half-time lead 57%, second-half goals 1.23. Rudar: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 0.73.

Goals by minute

Nafta: 76-90+ (14 goals). Rudar: 76-90+ (11 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

2. SNL: 2.82 goals per match, BTTS 50%, Over 2.5 54%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 1-0-0. Average goals 1.00, BTTS 0%.

Match description

Nafta is the clear favorite for this encounter, occupying 1st place in the table with an impressive record of 14 wins, 2 draws, and 0 losses. The hosts present excellent home form with an 88% win rate and a streak of 7 consecutive victories at their own stadium. Rudar, despite improved form in their last 5 matches, still possesses a weak away record (38% wins, 50% losses) and concedes an average of 1.63 goals per away match. Nafta scores an average of 2.75 goals per match at home while conceding just 0.88, resulting in a goal difference of +15 in home games. All statistical indicators, including higher xG (1.77 vs 1.4), better shot conversion rate (19% vs 17%), and dominant form, point to a certain victory for the hosts.

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
1 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

53Possession (%)47
NaftaRudar
14Shots12
NaftaRudar
6Shots on target7
NaftaRudar
1.81xG1.69
NaftaRudar
7Corners1
NaftaRudar
70Dangerous attacks60
NaftaRudar
-1Fouls-1
NaftaRudar
-1Cards-1
NaftaRudar

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

2.17Goals scored / match1.53
NaftaRudar
0.77Goals conceded / match1.3
NaftaRudar
52%Average possession50%
NaftaRudar
5Shots on target / match4.4
NaftaRudar

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

12.3Shots per match10.37
NaftaRudar
5Shots on target4.4
NaftaRudar
17.6%Shot conversion14.8%
NaftaRudar
52%Possession50%
NaftaRudar
1.6xG for1.51
NaftaRudar
1.23xG against1.5
NaftaRudar

Shooting quality

Nafta: Efficient finishingRudar: Efficient finishing
NaftaRudar
Accuracy (shots on target)41%42%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.15
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.430.35

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Nafta is 43% better for: last-5 form.

2 pts / match - Nafta · 1.4 pts / match - Rudar

Nafta
WWWLD
Season result split
77% W20% R3% P
Season (W-D-L)
23-6-1
2.50 pts / match · goal difference +42
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
12-3-0
Last 5 at home
4-1-0
WWWWD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.52Opponent xG: 1.16BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%
Rudar
WWLDL
Season result split
30% W33% R37% P
Season (W-D-L)
9-10-11
1.23 pts / match · goal difference +7
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
4-3-8
Last 5 away
1-1-3
LDWLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.68Opponent xG: 1.27BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 80%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Nafta is 42% better for: goals scored per match.

2.17 goals / match - Nafta · 1.53 goals / match - Rudar

Nafta is 69% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.77 goals / match - Nafta · 1.3 goals / match - Rudar

Nafta scoring profile: very strong

Nafta scores in 100% of matches (30 of 30 matches), while Rudar keeps a clean sheet in 30% (9 of 30 matches).

Rudar scoring profile: strong

Rudar scores in 70% of matches (21 of 30 matches), while Nafta keeps a clean sheet in 40% (12 of 30 matches).

65Goals scored (season)46
NaftaRudar
23Goals conceded (season)39
NaftaRudar
2.93Average goals in match2.83
NaftaRudar
7Goals scored (last 5)9
NaftaRudar
4Goals conceded (last 5)8
NaftaRudar

How often they score at least...

100%1 goal70%
NaftaRudar
70%2 goals47%
NaftaRudar
27%3 goals20%
NaftaRudar
17%4 goals10%
NaftaRudar

How often they concede at least...

60%1 goal70%
NaftaRudar
17%2 goals43%
NaftaRudar
0%3 goals13%
NaftaRudar
0%4 goals3%
NaftaRudar

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

17%BTTS at half-time20%
NaftaRudar
7%BTTS in both halves7%
NaftaRudar
43%Scored in both halves20%
NaftaRudar

BTTS and goal count

43%Min. 3 goals and BTTS43%
NaftaRudar
3%Min. 3 goals without BTTS17%
NaftaRudar
60%BTTS - last 560%
NaftaRudar

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

77%Min. 1 goal before half-time67%
NaftaRudar
37%Min. 2 goals before half-time43%
NaftaRudar
7%Min. 3 goals before half-time17%
NaftaRudar

2nd half

87%Min. 1 goal after half-time70%
NaftaRudar
47%Min. 2 goals after half-time53%
NaftaRudar
27%Min. 3 goals after half-time13%
NaftaRudar

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Nafta is 45% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

2.03 pts / match - Nafta · 1.4 pts / match - Rudar

Nafta - half-time state
57% leading33% draw10% trailing
Rudar - half-time state
33% leading40% draw27% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

2.03Points per match (1st half)1.4
NaftaRudar
0.93Goals scored (1st half)0.73
NaftaRudar
0.3Goals conceded (1st half)0.57
NaftaRudar
1.23Average goals (1st half)1.3
NaftaRudar
73%Clean sheet before half-time57%
NaftaRudar
33%No goal before half-time57%
NaftaRudar

After half-time (2nd half)

2.03Points per match (2nd half)1.17
NaftaRudar
1.23Goals scored (2nd half)0.73
NaftaRudar
0.47Goals conceded (2nd half)0.67
NaftaRudar
1.7Average goals (2nd half)1.4
NaftaRudar
57%Clean sheet after half-time50%
NaftaRudar
23%No goal after half-time57%
NaftaRudar

Nafta - second-half results

57% W33% R10% P
61
Half-time points
28
Half-time goals
+19
Goal difference (1st half)
61
Second-half points
+23
Goal difference (2nd half)
2.03
PPG before half-time
Lead holding135%

Leads at half-time in 57% of matches and wins 77%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Rudar - second-half results

23% W47% R30% P
42
Half-time points
22
Half-time goals
+5
Goal difference (1st half)
35
Second-half points
+2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.40
PPG before half-time
Lead holding91%

Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 30%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Nafta - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.601.80
Goals scored / match0.60.8
Goals conceded / match0.40.4
Average goals in match1.01.2
1 goal60%60%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet80%60%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference+1+2
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 60% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 3
Rudar - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.801.60
Goals scored / match0.41.4
Goals conceded / match1.00.6
Average goals in match1.42.0
1 goal100%100%
2 goals40%80%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet20%40%
No goal60%20%
Goal difference-3+4
Half-time: 20% leading - 20% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Nafta
ScoredConceded
10
2
0-15
7
3
16-30
11
4
31-45
10
3
46-60
13
7
61-75
14
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (14 goli). Concedes most in 61-75 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +10 - wins late phases.

Rudar
ScoredConceded
6
6
0-15
9
8
16-30
9
5
31-45
1
5
46-60
10
7
61-75
11
8
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (11 goli). Concedes most in 16-30 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.88
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.7 : 1.1
Estimated goal split
home : away
102%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
57%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-65%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
70%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Nafta

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.37
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+1.03
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-5.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.57
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.46
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
142%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
60%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.50
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
22% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 15% come in the first quarter-hour.
22%

Rudar

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.01
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.22
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-15.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.02
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.20
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
119%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
85%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.17
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
24% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 13% come in the first quarter-hour.
24%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (2. SNL).

Teams vs league

NaftaLigaRudar
Average goals in match 2.932.82 2.83
Both teams scored 60%50% 53%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 47%54% 60%
Clean sheets 40%28% 30%
Goal before half-time 77%74% 67%
Goal after half-time 87%81% 70%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.82
Average goals per match
50%
Both teams scored
54%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
28%
Clean sheets
1.53
Home goals / match
1.29
Away goals / match
+19%
Home attack advantage
+16%
Home defence advantage
+9%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
74%
1 goal
36%
2 goals
12%
3 goals
5%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
81%
1 goal
47%
2 goals
17%
3 goals
5%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Nafta 1 - 0 - 0 Rudar. Average goals 1.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

NK Rudar Velenje
0 : 1
NK Nafta 1903 Lendava

FAQ

What was the result of Nafta vs Rudar?

The 2. SNL match finished Nafta 1:1 Rudar. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Nafta vs Rudar?

Nafta score 2.17 goals per game on average and Rudar 1.53. The 2. SNL average is 2.82 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 54% of games. Both teams score in 60% of Nafta's matches and 53% of Rudar's.

What form are Nafta and Rudar in?

Over the last 5 games Nafta have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Rudar 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Nafta vs Rudar?

The statistical background for Nafta vs Rudar — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.